Kibs

Short back and reveal the sides

I see that Neville has merged with Goldbridge to form the ultimate twat 🫠

Aye you're right, it's rubbish

Awesome performance of Purple Rain by @springsteen and #Estreetband last night in Minneapolis at @TargetCenterMN . Absolutely stellar guitar work by Nils and Tom Morello. Stunning. Video by SeanEsq on YouTube #springsteen

Geordie smoke alarm

And yet - he still hasn’t received any recognition for his work!

@Ankaman616 *continues 🤦🏻‍♂️

@Ankaman616 Week by week Carl, the Bilbao surrender considers to look even more criminal on Amorim’s CV

Tottenham Hotspur. It is well.

@TeleFootball @alantyers ‘How long will we have to tolerate the Man Utd mob dominating the sports news agenda’ You’re the ones writing about it!

@iamscassidy You’ll get it all next week lad 👍🏻

Should've gone here tonight

@NathSalt1 @Ankaman616 "See where they play, how they play, if they play. That's football heritage."

Jesse Lingard’s career path 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Manchester United 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Leicester City (loan) 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Birmingham City (loan) 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Brighton (loan) 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Derby County (loan) 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 West Ham (loan) 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Nottingham Forest 🇰🇷 FC Seoul 🇧🇷 Corinthians Fun

From Casemzero to Casemhero!

@sarm0161 🙄

You weren’t captain. You weren’t even in the squad. And it didn’t.

I'm going to rebut this entire 'article' & see if Simon has the courage to respond & factually address it. It paints City as victims of bias, but ignores Football Leaks evidence of disguised funding, inflated sponsorships, & obstruction. "Same old shite without balance"? Pot, kettle? You're peddling City innocence fantasies, ignoring leaks publicly available for years. "You cannot really talk about [City winning] without the charges in the room." Damn right - because leaked emails show disguised Abu Dhabi funding via Etihad shortfalls, inflating revenue to enable that success. Not sensationalism, it's integrity. "Basically nobody knows any of the details." Bullshit. Publicly available docs - emails, invoices, contracts -contradict City's UEFA/PL submissions. £47m suspicious IP sales, £5m "win bonus" for lost FA Cup final, overvalued Aabar/Etisalat sponsors. "[We're all] in the same boat of not knowing any of the evidence for or against." Wrong. City settled with UEFA in 2014 (€60m fine, squad/wage/transfer limits) for artificial inflation via IP/related-party deals. Why accept if innocent? And agree never to repeat if legit? "People have just jumped to their own conclusion devoid of facts." Facts: CAS didn't clear City, €10m fine for obstruction, said disguised equity "could not be excluded." City's expert denied docs to disprove it. "No evidence" = withheld evidence. Why refuse if clean? "It helps those people to feel better thinking that all the trophies might be tainted." Tainted by evidence, you mean? The secret Mancini deal (£1.75m/yr from Al Jazira, same day as City contract, kept confidential). The Yaya Toure payments. How are they NOT tainted? "It could be the Premier League who this turns out worse for... if those are not proven." Proven foundation: High Court judge said it was: "surprising and of legitimate public concern". UK-UAE talks sealed to avoid damaging relations - why, if not state-backed? "More people want City punished.. unfair on City that this feeling has impacted on the majority of coverage." Coverage reflects unanswered questions: why discuss "correct channels" to hide funding? Why weaken APT rules? Why not show us the "irrefutable evidence"? "How can 115 be such an exciting topic.. but.. agreeable... ignored." Ignored? Your "balance" ignores leaks. Hearing length? From City's delays: challenged investigation, refused docs, forced arbitration. CAS: obstruction prevented justice, not innocence. "City were 'already condemned' without having had the chance to defend themselves." They've defended - with litigation/obstruction. Fined for non-cooperation by UEFA/CAS/PL. High Court criticism. Open the books if innocent. Why delay all this time if they're not guilty? "Opinions have only hardened through years of speculation and selective information." 54 charges for inaccurate financials. Image rights sold for £24.5m to comply - the buyer? Linked to City's legal officer. That's not speculation & it's not selective information. Your "good news ignored" sob story? It doesn't erase evidence. You claim bias while reeking of your own, this is accountability. If City loses public battle, blame leaks, fines, unanswered questions not what the "majority want." Prove innocence or own the hate. Facts > the spin of a lackey.

@RyanR2021 @pooball

@sarm0161 @JBanned__ What’s Rosenior up to at 10pm in it?

@JBanned__ Magnificent. Have a word with that stupid haired fuck at 2 mins past the hour.

buon appetito

@anthonyfdshaw Allegedly been an impasse in negotiations over one key financial point, leading to silence from both sides 🧐😜…

With Simply Red being undoubtedly more popular in their day than the Stone Roses, i'm going to hold out for their MUFC collaboration. I'm sure it's on the way as it's WAY overdue.

@sarm0161 @JBanned__ It’s a very impressive long revenge game by a woman scorned perhaps

@JBanned__ She hates you.