goametrics.sol

@CuadradoDeFi @CryptoGnojek @NoFUDonSNEK I read this as: people will go back to horses once they realize how many accidents are caused by cars. Newsflash: not gonna happen.

In the long term, yes — I believe it will happen. When mass exploits from Solidity vulnerabilities and off-chain infrastructure dependencies become impossible to ignore, the market will start reevaluating what “security” actually means. Cardano was built with a different philosophy: 1. Functional programming 2. Peer-reviewed architecture 3. More secure UTXO model 4. DApps designed with determinism in mind Most people still underestimate how important that becomes once real capital starts prioritizing security over hype. People won’t ignore systemic risks forever.

Be honest, do you think cardano:native can actually flip $ETH like Charles claims? 👀

@ItsDave_ADA Because who wouldn’t want to join a blockchain where the founder publicly vilifies anyone with an opposing opinion

I'm confident, ADA will soon reclaim the top 10.

You are comparing a blockchain with a dApp. It’s not Solana that got hacked, it’s dApp whose admins were socially engineered over a 6month timespan into signing a malicious tx. Cardano dApps are equally vulnerable to this, or even more so, since all dex orders are routed through centralized batchers under full control of a single team. It’s just that no dApp on Cardano has enough tvl to go through such effort.

This argument is so dumb there picking off products in essence hitting moving targets based on the number of protocols and being successful there is $5.6 billion sitting not moving begging them to hack it. And it's funny you think a thief has a certain amount they won't steal if it's less then😂😂😂 they are exploiting based on the easiest to exploit my guy trust that. The same reason it doesn't hack Bitcoin so your bs response is invalidated or no not enough liquidity there either right🤔🤔🤔

Well hell North Korea has been picking the shit out of ethreum for many years and now it's confirmed there now doing it to solana and this is what many say is the next big things LMFAO..... And there are people who still doubt cardano LMFAO that's the truly funniest part #cardano

If 2 people submit a fill for the same order, one of them gets canceled. This is the same in tradfi, same on Cardano. Meanwhile, on Cardano, you have “probalistic finality”. Your tx may not get confirmed for up to 36h. Imagine an institution trying to add margin to prevent multi-million dollar liquidation in a volatile moment and you tell them “yes, we’ll look at somewhere in the next 3 days”. That’s why Cardano has no institutions willing to touch it. Reg. MEV, that’s quite the jump. Cardano very much allows MEV, it just hides it off chain, in custodial batchers, with zero transparency.

What sets Cardano apart from every other blockchain is deterministic tx execution. This is a critical factor even by institutional and financial service standards. On $ETH and $SOL, submitted txs can fail, and even when they do, gas fees are still consumed. This creates daily side effects like MEV and front-running. Imagine a financial service provider telling clients, "We placed your order, but it might fail." That is a fundamental flaw for financial infrastructure. On $ADA, losing your fee and getting nothing in return is structurally unlikely. tx outcomes are determined before submission, so everything from user experience to institutional accounting, compliance, and risk management operates on a predictable foundation. Attack vectors like MEV are also structurally reduced. This is why I believe Cardano is the most suitable chain for financial infrastructure where real liquidity accumulates and real users transact. Deterministic execution is what separates a trustworthy financial system from one that is not. The market simply has not recognized this yet. Cardano has more potential as financial infrastructure than any other chain.

@dori_coin Lol. Note: these are counting non-vote tx only.

Interesting article. Over 2.27 million Solana wallets holding between 1 and 100 $SOL have zero staking activity. Participation drops off sharply in the smaller retail holder segment. The way I see it, these are mostly users who came in for memecoin trading and airdrop farming. Once that meta died, they simply stopped using the chain. When you're chasing quick wins, staking with a lockup period, days-long unstaking, and modest yields just doesn't appeal to you. For a while, the AI agent economy brought a lot of attention, and Solana moved fast to capture that market. x402 payment volume exploded, but according to @aixbt_agent, tx volume has dropped by about 90% since last December. From memecoins to AI agents, Solana has proven it can move quickly on market trends and grab early dominance. But converting that momentum into lasting fundamentals still seems to be a weak spot.

Cardano TPS dropped for 1tx/s to 0.22tx/s today. That’s an 80% drop. At this point, the “seconds per tx” makes more sense for cardano then “tx per second”. But here you go out again attacking solana. Ofcourse a lot of wallets are idle, its a bear market. That happens in every bear market. Focus on Cardano first, that does 1tx every 5sec at the moment

@MarzzNyc Imagine thinking the right side of history is the side that killed 30k of its own people 2 couple of weeks ago, suppresses women, supports underage marriage,… Should Trump have executed the war the way he did? No. But once bullets start flying, i sure know what side im on.

Bro, no one is supporting this unprovoked war and mass killing of children and civilians except some cultist Trump supporters, delusional useful idiot Iranian diaspora, and zionists. Be on the right side of history.

@JaromirTesar If circle decides to block tainted USDC from redeeming, DEXes will adapt to this.

@goametrics You can swap them on DEX, get "untainted" USDCx, and then redeem.

Why can’t Circle freeze a USDC account on Cardano or block a transaction? Because USDCx on Cardano is a native asset. USDC has the same properties as ADA after minting, including storage in the ledger and transfer. A mint script can be used to mint and burn assets. For burning, the script owner needs to have assets on their own address. Once the issuer sends USDC to the recipient’s address, the recipient has full control over the assets. The transfers of assets are handled by the Cardano protocol. The issuer (script owner) has no control over the assets. The Cardano protocol handles the operations that users perform. When Alice sends USDC to Bob, the only one who validates the transaction is the Cardano network. All valid transactions will be processed. There is no way to prevent this. A third party would have to force all SPOs not to include the transaction in the block. Transfers to Cardano are safe and cheap, because it is not necessary to process a smart contract (which is computationally more intensive than just using the protocol logic). Why is it possible to block transactions and freeze an account on EVM chains like Ethereum? A smart contract is always used for the transfer of assets. So, any logic can be included. A smart contract is used for minting and transferring assets. It handles all operations with assets that users perform. This has some advantages, because the behavior of assets can be defined. I like the flexibility. It is useful for many use cases. However, control over assets can also be abused. This is exactly what Circle utilized. They inserted logic into the smart contract to blacklist an account or prevent a transaction. When Alice sends USDC to Bob, the transaction is processed by a smart contract, which is controlled by Circle. Circle is a third party that can prevent the transaction. EVM transactions can theoretically be more expensive, because it is necessary to execute a smart contract. There was an unclear situation around USDC and USDT. It was said that Circle and Tether do not want to mint stablecoins on Cardano because they want (maybe have to) retain control. Let's be happy that Pentad delivered and we have USDCx as a native asset.

@JaromirTesar K = 500, yet 13 entities running multiple pools control 50% of the stake.

Sybil resistance cannot be achieved 100% in a decentralized environment. Parameter K is probably the best we can have. Look at governance, where we don't have parameter K. Top 25 DReps can decide on Treasury Withdrawals. The situation would probably be different if we had a saturation mechanism there. Parameter K certainly contributed to decentralization.

I've seen a few small SPOs retire recently. Cardano is losing decentralization, perhaps unnecessarily. Isn't it time to increase the K parameter from 500 to 1000? Is the ecosystem ready for it?

If it is not sybil-resistant, it does not contribute to decentralisation, since one entity can spin up N pools without any restriction, and they openly do so. I would even argue it reduces transparency for the end user. When they delegate, how can they know how much stake is already present in affiliated pools?

@MarzzNyc @DeItaone Imagine carrying water for a dictator that killed 30k+ of its own people just last week, just because you don’t like the guy on the other side. The missile was a misfire by Iran that hit their own school. Stop being so blinded by your hatred and apply some basic common sense.

@DeItaone There is no off-ramp after you kick start by attacking a fucking elementary school and killing 150 little girls. What's this fascination with killing children?

TRUMP FLOATS "OFF RAMPS" AFTER ATTACKING IRAN-AXIOS

@MarzzNyc Your source a guy who just makes things up? Think for a moment, why would US start a war by blowing up a school instead of military/political targets? Your hate for Trump has you blinded, to the point where you believe anything negative about him.

@goametrics nope. don't be delusional. the war was started and initiated with the school attack by trump's direct order. don't bring stupid maga talking points to me either about something you have no fucking clue about. x.com/GinoTheGhost/s…

America and Israel bombed a fucking girls elementary school and killed 80 little girls to kick off the war. Out of all the other sites they could have targeted. They have a fascination with killing children. Fuckng terrorists. x.com/i/status/20277…

@pray_eth @DefiLlama Solana is now the default value when using the Paypal UI. That’s what the tweet is about.

You guys realize we can just look this stuff up, right? What kind of culture are you building at Solana where you lie for short-term market advantage? 1 month TVL change: Ethereum: +11% ↗️ Solana: -15% ↘️ Or "default" is a meaningless marketing term? Source: @DefiLlama

@DWtweetum @Investanswers What % of Cardano tx have more than 10inputs or outputs you think?

@Investanswers You do realize most of Solana transactions are fake and Cardano can handle dozens of outputs/recipients in one transaction.

Some of these “bear market” ratios are the most distorted and impressive I’ve ever seen. $SOL is on fire. Solana = ~$400 market cap per daily tx. Cardano = ~$16,000,000 per tx. I have openly ridiculed Cardano since 2021..... not FUD — Crypto Metrics Utilization matters. Efficiency matters. Sycophants don’t. SCP Profiler investanswers.io/product/scp-pr…

@dori_coin Storage capacity scales exponentially, solana’s ledger size scales linearly, so this is not an issue at all. You can store 1TB on cloud 2$/month. Moreover, Cardano with the activity of solana would have a larger ledger size than Sol.

scaling matters, but how you scale matters just as much. $SOL significantly boosted throughput, but its block data size is also growing at an insane pace. $SOL adds around 80TB every year. that pushes infrastructure costs higher, and those costs eventually get passed on to users. In the industry, it’s well known that running solana validators and even rpc services requires extremely expensive hardware, which is why many providers avoid it. this isn’t sustainable, and I believe it will become a major issue over time.

@bigpey Nobody equates active addresses to active users, except for Charles when he’s shilling midnight

Do you think Solana really has 63 Million active users on-chain?