Goda Go

another day, another reason to love @claudeai and @AnthropicAI. Who else found $1000 in Claude Code credits? Christmas came early this year 🥹

@johnrushx Check out Aider :) it definatelly should be on your list. 🤌

21. That's it. I waste so much time trying out these tools because I'm running 11 SaaS and 20 directories, and I need to be mutant-level efficient. Nobody on earth uses more AI leverage than I do at the moment (IMHO) x.com/johnrushx/stat…

Absolutely nobody predicted this: AI Code is the new NoCode. Honestly, I like talking to AI more than to human developers when building small apps. It understands me better, even with half-baked specs. I've literally tested all AI builders I could find 😑 1/20 🧵 :

@360nhatot After recent comments made by ex-Google CEO regarding AI use in war... Kind of not surprised, but slightly terrified to see Chinese clones of Boston Dynamics Spot robots on the actual battlefield (for the first time) in Ukraine....

🚨🇺🇦 Lực lượng vũ trang Ukraine sử dụng chó robot 'BAD One' làm trinh sát ở tiền tuyến. Những robot này rất khó bị phát hiện và pin của chúng có thể hoạt động trong 2 giờ, trong thời gian đó nó đã hoàn thành nhiệm vụ trinh sát.

@CharaspowerAI This is so misleading... You used other designer files, photoshop, illustrator, midjourney and so on... It has nothing to do with got4o beside code.

🔥#ChatGPT4o is insane, you can create small interactive HTML5 games in just a few minutes with no coding knowledge. 🔥 Follow these thread, and I'll show you the entire workflow I set up.

@Altimor To your point, something missing here is the capitalism. If it costs that much to make, what do you think is the number one objective for the big tech? Lower the costs. Labor accounts for around 70% of big tech costs. Thus natural logic is, how can we build tools to lower costs.

Been receiving lots of questions about this from folks who expect AI engineers to result in a wave of mass unemployment. I think the crux of the question is whether there can be such a thing as "too much code" in the world. As farming productivity skyrocketed in the last few hundred years, we really didn't need all that food, and so the % of the American workforce working in agriculture went from 70% in 1840 to 2% today. But other goods showed a very different trend, and their consumption increased as productivity increased and prices decreased (the famous Jevons paradox). en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_pa… This was the case of aluminum and solar panels — Jevons paradox tends to be the rule in commodities, and trends shown by food the exception: We consume more than 10x more aluminum today than we did in 1950. The trend for solar panels is even more spectacular — we consume more than 1,000x as many modules today(!!!) as we did in 2002. And the trend is accelerating! My contention is that code will follow the same path, and I think every single big tech company in existence today is one more point supporting this thesis. Consider the Uber app — Uber spends about $3B per year on R&D right now, per their public filings. You could say the Uber app is an object that's cost roughly $10-20B to produce. For reference, the Golden Gate Bridge cost $600M (yes, adjusted for inflation). The Uber app is 20-40 Golden Gate Bridges. We don't realize it because these things are so immaterial, and they seem so small stuck behind the glass of our phones — but software has been very, very expensive. I bet that if you were to do the same math for Google, Microsoft Windows, or iOS, you'd land on something closer to $100B. Each of these companies has voted with their wallet — they need a lot more software, and are willing to pay *a lot* of money to get it. That makes sense when you consider what software is — it's just rules and logic. There is no hard coded number anywhere specifying the maximum amount of logic that a civilization can use — my contention is that the more, the better. Now the question left is — sure, we'll need an infinite amount of software. But won't AI write it all? And here, I appeal to good old comparative advantage. If you have an asset producing billions of dollars an hour (AI engineers will), it will rationally make sense to pay someone 6 figures who can improve this system by 1e5 / 1e9 = 0.0001%. I have a hard time thinking human engineers won't be able to cross that hurdle — they'll just operate on a different layer of abstraction, just like we don't code in machine code anymore, but in high-level languages. And even those still require technical skills — Interestingly, this still applies even in the extreme scenario of "no code," aiming to let even your grandmother build applications. But I think we've all learnt by now that even the no-codest of the no-code products require someone with a programming mindset to build great products.

@mreflow Same here! I make a video showing how gpt4o does not work, and everyone is defending OpenAI that it is slow release. It's not. We have gpt4o, it does not do what they say on their website. Period.

YouTube comments baffle me. I make videos talking about the cool stuff I’m impressed by from OpenAI and ALL the comments are about how OpenAI and Sam are the devil. I make a video pointing out concerns around OpenAI and ALL the comments are from people who think Sam is a god and can do no wrong. 🤷‍♂️

@peranchor @mreflow @bilawalsidhu @hlntnr Yes, I loved @mreflow break down of scandals. Let's see if false advertising to paid users and not delivering will be one of those. In any case, gpt4o not functioning how they say it can is at minimum miscommunication.

@mreflow @bilawalsidhu @hlntnr I just spent some time on YouTube, and watched "Open AI is SERIOUSLY Concerning Me..." by @mreflow – and I certainly agree with your conclusions. I also watched "Debunking OpenAI Fake GPT 4o Demos. This is Not..." by @godago_o , which adds to my concerns. Ethics, anyone?

Wow! This is crazy to me. The OpenAI board learned about the launch of ChatGPT over Twitter. They didn't even know it was coming. Great episode @bilawalsidhu and @hlntnr!

@runstop @X @OpenAI @Google Glad to hear I am not alone. 🙊 sad truth is, that everyone has access to Gpt4o and expects some sort of other release where it works better. If this was any other company people would be furious.

@godago_o @X @OpenAI @Google Thank you for bringing this truth to light. I was baffled about the disparity between my experience using GPT-4o from what had been advertised by AI influencers who showed off the “amazing demos” from the OpenAI website.🧐 When my results varied, I thought it was just me.

I am a lurker on @X , so I will just leave this here. 17 GPT-4o #fake use cases that Don't Work. AND no one seems to care when @OpenAI ships a non-functioning model while it is cool to 💩 on @Google 🍿 youtu.be/0lPs-vZzwGs

The first human with @neuralink controlling computer with his minds 🫠 we knew it’s coming, but wow just wow

"I think AI has already made the greatest contribution to the world as you don't need to learn C++ anymore to be successful. You can be a prompt engineer... When my wife is talking to me, she is prompting", says #NVIDIA chief Jensen Huang Via @moneycontrolcom #GTC24

I will just leave this one here for anyone wondering how #Sora was trained and why it is so good on simulating 3d environments. TL;DR ever heard of Unreal Engine? youtu.be/phUwy4CenCs

Dev-in, Devs-out and I just started #CS50 :D #Devin @cognition_labs

Imagine losing your job to an AI named fucking Devin

@Charles_SEO Thank you so much for your kind words!

#12 - Goda Go (@godago_o) Very high quality videos, with easy to understand and follow explanations on a range of topics in AI - As well as interviews with industry leaders and experts. Channel Link 👇 @godago/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@godago/

AI is the future of my industry and likely will be the future of ALL our lives! So here are 14 of the best AI channels in the world to get you prepared... A 🧵

What's your choice?

AI Generated Film? #shorts youtu.be/o7ka9BTWpiY?si…