Jordan stone
632 posts
🚀Want remote work paying up to $150/hr? Join the Handshake AI Program — get paid to train AI using your expertise (Software Engineering, STEM, humanities & more). Flexible part-time hours, work from anywhere, no AI experience needed! joinhandshake.com/move-program/r… #RemoteWork #AIJobs
🚀Want remote work paying up to $150/hr? Join the Handshake AI Program — get paid to train AI using your expertise (Software Engineering, STEM, humanities & more). Flexible part-time hours, work from anywhere, no AI experience needed! joinhandshake.com/move-program/r… #RemoteWork #AIJobs
🚀Want remote work paying up to $150/hr? Join the Handshake AI Program — get paid to train AI using your expertise (Software Engineering, STEM, humanities & more). Flexible part-time hours, work from anywhere, no AI experience needed! joinhandshake.com/move-program/r… #RemoteWork #AIJobs
🚀Want remote work paying up to $150/hr? Join the Handshake AI Program — get paid to train AI using your expertise (Software Engineering, STEM, humanities & more). Flexible part-time hours, work from anywhere, no AI experience needed! joinhandshake.com/move-program/r… #RemoteWork #AIJobs
Another win! This is a massive one vs. DTCC. One step closer to triangulate the data. Thanks for sharing @kimkep4796 For the record, I need ZERO access to the trading data information for my case (including the Nasdaq 6 month data - I was informed some are really scared I would use, but wait… is there something of value they are uniquely aware of?? -> for the dum dums 🗿🗿) The fact that NASDAQ went and hired Meta’s Nevada Counsel, Ballard Spahr, would be hilarious if it wasn’t true. (For the record the Managing Partner at the Las Vegas office R Kim, was excellent for four years) Mistake or not the laws in Nevada are clear and the options available to the trustee are very significant, for example: 1.Expedited motion to disqualify under Nevada RPC 1.9/1.10 (and 1.7 if concurrent), citing Nevada’s substantial-relationship framework. 2.In the same package, request relief that strikes/denies the motion to quash (or at least bars the conflicted firm from further participation), and sets an accelerated schedule for conflict-free counsel to appear. 3.If Nasdaq (or any subpoena target) resists after an order, escalate to compel + contempt/sanctions using §105(a)/inherent authority and, where appropriate, Rule 9011 / §1927. 4. Discovery of all privileged information between Nasdaq and Ballard Spahr (more nuanced) Example: In re Burnett (Arkansas bankruptcy court) The court found an attorney violated the Code, Bankruptcy Rules, and local rules, and ordered: •Disgorgement of fees, and •Suspension from practicing in the bankruptcy courts of that district, pending review by the state disciplinary authority.[uscourts] Takeaway: When a bankruptcy judge decides counsel abused the system, consequences can include both financial sanctions and a practice ban in that court.
So no, the AI isn’t secretly a genius market cop. It’s a mirror with autocomplete. If you feed it dumb or devious questions, you get perfectly dumb or devious answers, just formatted nicely. The upside: you can also use it to expose that. Ask better questions: •“Filings‑only first. No adjectives” •“Now mark each phrase as: fact, inference, or social‑media narrative” •“Now compare for example MMAT to Tesla and other deeptech microcaps using the same rules” •“Now admit what you just had to walk back” Do that, and the mystique evaporates fast. You see exactly how much of the story was vibes vs documents. The lesson isn’t “never use AI” The lesson is: Think first and don’t be lazy if you wish to prompt like a litigator, not a devout hater/fan with financial (or other hidden) motives. Strip out the 70% noise and you’ll be shocked how different the “truth” looks. Up Next: I will post the exact prompts used and exact answers, related to MMAT and MMTLP. These examples and style of questioning can be extended to all stocks and issuers.
MMAT Bankruptcy Scheduling Order Filed 2/23/2026 Following the Motion to Quash Hearing
Oh, so some OTHER energy co just HAPPENS to have the same cusip as $TRCH (the mother ships that spawned $MMTLP and $MMAT) and its not the least bit suspicious? Looks like this is how the MMTLP shorts will try to extricate themselves and likely why SEC has been stalling
🚨NEXT BRIDGE HYDROCARBONS ANNOUNCES RECEIVING ADDITIONAL SEC COMMENTS REGARDING S-1 REGISTRATION STATEMENT. Next Bridge initially filed the S-1 in January 2023. MMTLP MMAT TRCH @nbhydrocarbons
From the Epstein Files
Here it is-
The playbook to destroying small public companies
“From: Bruce Galloway
To: "jeffrey E."
