patricia gorges

@sage1411 Nope 👎. They do not 🙄

They never seem to learn….

@nicksortor @dbongino @FBIDirectorKash @DAGToddBlanche Great job! 👏

🚨 BREAKING: FBI has just RAIDED and ARRESTED the man who I caught on video threatening the lives of an ICE agent and his family outside ICE Newark Nicholas Scelfo is facing FEDERAL FELONIES THIS IS HOW IT’S DONE! 🔥 THANK YOU to @FBIDirectorKash and @DAGToddBlanche for PERSONALLY working with me on this. You PROMISED you’d find him, and you delivered. WELL DONE! 👏 ACTING AG BLANCHE: “FAFO.”

@StefAlterNerd @NancySidley you’re gonna get through this!

@StefAlterNerd I hate ugly hearts .. really. Evil is evil.

Lets Talk About Nancy Sidley...... x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

@MeghansMole Flying saucers 🛸!!

Not even a week after getting married, Meghan had Prince Harry wrapped around her finger like he is now her bitch

@XOQueenEsther I hate nobody, it’s hard not to hate her.

Meghan Markle can copy Diana’s clothes. She can copy the poses, the expressions, the carefully staged photos, and she can have endless articles written trying to sell the idea of “Diana 2.0.” What she can never copy is why people loved Diana in the first place. Diana’s connection with people wasn’t created by PR teams, media leaks, paid narratives, or carefully curated branding. It came from a genuine ability to connect with ordinary people in a way that felt natural and authentic. People saw compassion, warmth, vulnerability, and empathy. They felt that she genuinely cared about the people she met. You cannot manufacture that. You cannot buy it. You cannot force the public to believe it through headlines. The curtsy comparison is a perfect example. Diana carried herself with grace and respect because she understood the institution she had married into and knew that one day her son would inherit it. Whatever disagreements she had with the monarchy, she never seemed to lose sight of the fact that William’s future was tied to it. Meghan chose to turn a curtsy into a joke for a global audience. Diana understood the significance of the role. Meghan appeared more interested in mocking it. The more Meghan tries to recreate Diana’s image, the more obvious it becomes that she is imitating the surface while missing the substance. Wearing similar outfits doesn’t create the same legacy. Recreating photographs doesn’t create the same impact. Invoking Diana’s name doesn’t create the same emotional connection. Diana became Diana because people chose to admire her. Not because the media told them to. Not because a PR team convinced them to. No amount of media campaigning can make people see Meghan as Diana 2.0 if the public doesn’t genuinely feel it for themselves.

@the_royal_rogue Asking for a friend… who or what planet allows matches to be mailed? Let’s set a truck on fire? What? The bloody hell? Those trucks aren’t insulated? Am I wrong 😑? WTH? I’d never mail matches?! Ah hell no!

So As Ever just announced their new product drop. Matches. Meghan, who left the Royal Family to build a media empire, who signed deals with Netflix and Spotify, who called herself a female founder and entrepreneur, is selling you... matches. But not artisan matches. Not some revolutionary fire-starting technology. A decorative box of matches. To go with the candles she's been selling you. The candles that cost $190 for the set of four. She posted a photo of a candle next to a box of matches and captioned it "a small spark, arriving tomorrow." Which, fair enough, small spark is also a pretty accurate description of what this brand has become. The Sausage Squad, to their credit, was divided. Half of them were enthusiastic. The other half asked if this was parody. One X user did the math and pointed out you're looking at $260 to get the candles plus the bonus matches, which is a bonkers way to acquire matches in 2026. But what did you expect? she's reportedly been trademarking As Ever for hospitality services. Hotels. Restaurants. You buy the jam, the honey, the tea, the wine, the candle, the matches to light it, and suddenly you realize you've been furnishing a hotel room (a rather cheap one) one $64 product drop at a time. *Remind housekeeping to sprinkle dead flowers over the beds. Rachel is not confused. Rachel is playing a very long, very expensive game of lifestyle chess, only against herself. Because whether anyone except the Sausage Squad will check into that hotel, is another conversation entirely.

@DuchessofGeeks Am I living in a different reality? It’s California in June 🤔.. wth? NOT A GOOD LOOK 👀!

Why I always carry around overflowing baskets of flowers with perfectly clean bright oranges when a camera is on me 😂 But seriously if she has a flower garden that is producing enough to pull off that many flowers why isn’t she showing it off? Why no pics of the oranges on the trees?

@XOQueenEsther Everything he was… isn’t if she’s got her claws on it.

Nothing will deter Meghan Markle from putting herself at the centre of attention, even when it means making a complete spectacle of herself. Whatever that was, it wasn’t charming, relatable, or funny. It was painfully embarrassing to watch. The level of desperation it takes to put yourself in that position just for a few moments of attention is honestly baffling. At some point, most people would feel a flicker of self awareness. Meghan seems completely immune to it. Every time this clip resurfaces, I’m reminded that no amount of public ridicule is enough to keep her away from a spotlight.

@KennedyNation Exactly 👍🏻

When American POWs tried to sneak her notes with their personal information to tell their families they were still alive, she gave them to the North Vietnamese. Some of them were beaten to death. You are both commies and you can both fuck off.

@ARamblingRoyal Dressed awfully warm for sunny California in June 🤔.

I am more enthralled by Meghan’s oranges she picked- perfect in color and shape and climbing ladders to pick them in boots …she is amazing -what a woman 😂

@XOQueenEsther @NightRider__ This woman is desperate for attention. The further the star falls the more dangerous she becomes.

Meghan Markle might genuinely be one of the most exhausting public figures alive because absolutely nothing about her matches her own narrative. Everything is “trauma” and “freedom” until it’s time to sell something. Then suddenly it’s royal wedding nostalgia, duchess branding, fake British lifestyle aesthetics and Montecito Downton Abbey cosplay again. If the monarchy was so unbearable, why is she still financially, socially and publicly feeding off it years later? She spent 18 months there. EIGHTEEN. And somehow it has become her entire identity for the next decade. Privacy? Netflix cameras. Hated royal life? Uses the title nonstop. Wanted freedom? Still obsessed with royal status and image. American feminist? Selling a Pinterest fantasy version of aristocratic England to Californians. Scones for Memorial Day. Recipes in kilograms for Americans. Wedding inspired candles. Duchess titles everywhere. Montecito cosplay with a side of Buckingham Palace branding. It’s embarrassing. She wanted out so badly, yet still cannot function without selling the very institution she claims damaged her. At this point it genuinely feels like she wakes up every morning and asks herself how to become even more unlikeable than the day before.

@according2_taz He’s such a pig! Hypocrite.

Harry, who stood alongside his wife to collect a ‘humanitarian award’, still has said nothing about the human rights atrocities being committed against the indigenous people in the Congo & Zambia! Renewed calls for Harry to step down from African charity! dailymail.com/news/article-1…

@nancytsidley I’m so sorry Nancy. Matters of the heart is tough stuff ♥️🥹♥️. Hate this for you.

Thank you for your grace and understanding.

@DailyMail They chose to leave. Rational people call it quitting, job change. They live in The United States 🇺🇸. Their former home isn’t a shrine or museum. Remodeling happens every day in many homes. Time marches on.

Harry and Meghan's Soho House-inspired makeover of Frogmore Cottage: All final traces of couple are 'to be wiped from' the former home they kitted out with a £5,000 copper bath, £500 artwork and Diana's portrait trib.al/R5mQetO

@TrixMcGee @DailyMail You’re kidding right?

@DailyMail why remove excellent taste? this is such a metaphor for the royal family's appalling treatment of this couple -- remove all traces of taste, hard work, decency

@the_royal_rogue The only “non-profit” anyone has ever heard of that isn’t transparent with their records. was publicly available then wasn’t. Something seems almost criminal… 🤔.

There is a number sitting in the final report on the 2025 Invictus Games, it has to do with costs, and that number is $118,000. PER COMPETITOR. 500-something wounded veterans would mean $63,000,000 in total spend, and if you do the arithmetic (which I'm sure no one was supposed to do) you arrive at a per-veteran cost roughly equal to the median home price in 26 American states. Which is a lot of money, unless the competitors are being awarded actual pieces of real estate. ...which they are not. They are getting medals. The United States Warrior Games, which exists to do the same thing for veterans of the same wars, runs on $2,000,000, for a full year. The German equivalent runs on $200,000, which means the Germans are basically running their entire operation on what the Vancouver guys spend on high-end cheese platters. So, either Vancouver is uniquely expensive (fine, sure, maybe a cup of coffee there costs... 5,000 dollars?) or something else is happening here, and the thing happening here is a total scam that works because we have collectively agreed "charity for wounded veterans" is a phrase you cannot question without looking like a complete piece of trash. This is the trick that worked so well with things like USAID, by the way. Every charity-industrial apparatus, everywhere, runs on it. It’s a brilliant psychological hack. You attach a noble cause to a budget -> the budget becomes the noble cause. Ask why a wheelchair-curling tournament needed a $60,000,000 production line, and you are no longer asking about a tournament. You are asking about the veterans. And the veterans, as a rhetorical category, are not available for cross-examination, you monster! Veterans end up becoming a very, very lucrative human shield for a giant pile of cash. Meanwhile, a royal commentator is on the record asking whether the 'founder' is using the whole machinery as a personal tax write-off. There is no evidence he is, but... there is also no evidence he isn't. But "show us the ledger" is, somehow, the rudest question anyone is allowed to ask out loud. Oddly enough, the defense isn't "here are the books, look at them all you want." Nope, their defense is just pointing a finger at you and screaming that you're a bad person for wanting to see them. Or maybe systemic racism. Or unconscious bias. Or something else.

@XOQueenEsther Harkles got Markled 😂

Funny how Beyoncé seemed to vanish from the Harry and Meghan orbit right after that painfully cringey “Beyoncé just texted me” Netflix scene. Meghan reading out that Beyoncé text like a teenager announcing prom news will never not be embarrassing, especially with the way she started interpreting it like she’d rehearsed the speech beforehand while while Harry reacting like he’s witnessing a historic world event 🤭 And ever since then? Silence. No friendship moments. No public support. No Beyoncé appearances. Nothing. Honestly feels like Beyoncé wanted no part in becoming another Meghan curated moment after that 🤣

@angiejojo3 @OKMagazine Clicks. @OK_Magazine it’s over. Stick a fork in it. Bullshit.

@OKMagazine Feud? Oh, NO. Meghan is just doing her thing 5k miles away. Not even trying to think about Crusty Feet Kate.

King Charles Urging Meghan Markle and Kate Middleton to Squash Their Feud Ahead of Duchess' U.K. Visit: Source ebx.sh/sN1zvf

@OKMagazine Markle, it over. Stick a fork in it @OK_Magazine it’s over.