Gorilla Da Spoon

@mattfreeman05_ USC is fragile-minded and knows they’re going to be the bottom of the B1G

USC continues taking shots after winning recruiting battles. The Trojans are firing shots at Notre Dame with a remake of Notre Dame's 'Think Big' video and a voiceover from Chad Bowden saying "Think Bigger." USC also takes digs at ND, Oregon and UCLA with license plate messages.

@disclosetv Oh, here comes a false flag…

JUST IN - Trump on Lebanon: "I am going to prohibit him [Netanyahu] from bombing Lebanon." When asked how, Trump said he'll tell Netanyahu "he cannot do it." — ABC

A gun-grabbing Democrat that you supported just murdered his wife and now you want to infringe on my rights?!

its kinda funny normies dont know that Joey Swole was a notorious grifter and sleazy drug salesman before he accidentally fell into the grift of spreading gym positivity

Monitoring the Situation

@aryngomx It was sooooo good but made me super sad though. RIP Skyking.

Yoooo this documentary was badass. Go watch it.

Former NFL Linebacker Will Compton was PREACHING in this segment with @NDFootball about Creating Evidence. A must watch regardless of title, age, or industry: 👮‍♂️ You start with BELIEF, you stand on EVIDENCE. Facts don't care about feelings. When you get there, nobody cares HOW you got there, they care about how you can HELP. 👨‍⚖️ One Rep ➡️ One Day ➡️ One Week ➡️ One Game ➡️ One Year. At the end of the year, you're graded and judged by the evidence of your WORK. Evidence doesn't just arrive, it's acquired and accumulated everyday. It’s never one moment, it’s the accumulation of all of them. 🏷️ Let Proof Override Labels. Creating Evidence isn't about running from the truth, it's about creating so much proof that past labels become irrelevant. 🧵 Everything matters. Every rep has meaning. Even when you can't see it. Too tired, too emotional, too worn out to see or hear it, but it still means something. So you must TIE meaning to it. The smallest action either adds to your case or subtracts from it, tie purpose to all of it. 🖋️ Facts are permanent, but they do not define who you are, or who you have to be in the future. The truth is the starting point, not the ceiling. Face it, use it, and build forward, the obstacle is the way.

@DogDickDaniel @BowTiedYukon Great minds

@gorilladaspoon @BowTiedYukon Beat me to it

Eating 36 eggs a day is not the same experience as tren

Them: when did your distrust of the government begin Me:

People don’t realize how dangerous this food movement is. There are billions of people eating untested food prepared by men and women who’ve never set foot in a licensed and accredited culinary school. This is not going to end well.

We stayed in a little compound with Iraqi Police for awhile. I liked one of the dudes quite a bit so we talked a lot. One of our guys had served a Mormon mission in England before the war so he knew a little about islam. One day he told me to ask my friend the IP if it's true that in the end we would have to either convert or fight to the death. After a bunch of blabber about jizyah and other nonsense he finally admitted that it is true. If islam runs the world the answer is eventually Christianity must be stamped out and it's adherents butchered or subjugated. This is running in the background of all muslim immigration. Jihad of the womb, taqiyya, then eventually ruling in the open. It's against the religion to migrate to a non-muslim country unless this is the intent btw. Conquest is built in at the lowest levels of the faith.

You couldn’t repel millions of Muslims into your homeland. Now you’re going to crusade against us? We have more planes than there are Frenchmen left in Paris. Pipe down, frog.

"An Open Letter to the Nobility" Martin Luther, 1520

@BjjJoshD @AntiDoc I’m glad I’m not the only one. I still take 10g/day but can’t tell a difference between taking it/not taking it.

@AntiDoc I have run it at 5, 10 and 20g a day and have never felt anything physical. I never really paid attention cognitively but it’s been a zero return for me. Maybe I will run it again at 20 and look for cognitive benefits

I don’t care what any of you say. Creatine is ridiculously cognitively impactful. The pumps and fullness are even more pronounced. Given the evidence, anecdotes, and price, it’s braindead to save your 13 cents per day because you “don’t feel it.” Objectively ridiculous hill to die on.

@mikeynedy2 @RaidersLead @leviidombroo Let’s think for a minute: what could be the reason he was unsuccessful at Bama in 23’ and FSU in 24’, but successful at Oregon in 25’?

@RaidersLead @leviidombroo He was the #1 Juco WR in 83 recruited by Bama. Then he went to Fla ST then Oregon. Had a grade of 83 which is that of a #101 to #200 recruit. Didn't do much in college to say the least. Seems like a 7th rounder or UDFA.

The #Raiders met with #Oregon WR Malik Benson at ASG and via zoom, per @leviidombroo Benson is a 4th-6th round projected pick with elite speed and would be a much needed deep threat for the #Raiders

@joeyrscotland @RaidersLead @patrick_mclaren @leviidombroo Why aren’t you a fan of Benson?

@RaidersLead @patrick_mclaren @leviidombroo Not a fan of Benson. My top two WRs for the team to focus on would be Round 3 target of Antonio Williams or Skyler Bell. It’s possible one is available in the 4th at 102 but if the team is set at getting one early, Williams would be my choice at 67.

Here is a summary play-by-play of Harris' Dispensationalist errors and shady low-blow arguments against historic Christianity, explained within the latest I2I article: 1. Harris argued that believing that the Abrahamic Covenant is applied to believers in Jesus only is a recent, politically motivated development. I explain in the article that this was the position of the early church, and prove that Harris is projecting; although he refused to name Darby, it's actually his position that is, as a matter of proven, verifiable fact, a little more than 200 years old. 2. Harris used the Church Fathers' Historic Premillennial view that Jews would one day be restored to the Covenant post-conversion to Jesus in the eschaton, to support the idea that Jews remain in Covenant with God even today and retain Covenant blessings and promises prior to conversion in Jesus. The article shows you quote after quote that the Church Fathers emphatically state that they rejected the notion that Jews remain in the Covenant or have access to its blessings or promises without Jesus. Harris cited the dead guys - including Spurgeon - to support his position, conflating Spurgeon's belief that Jews will be restored to the Covenant AFTER converting to Christianity with Harris' belief that Jews remain in Covenant BEFORE their conversion and DESPITE their unbelief. I provide you in the article with quotations showing that Spurgeon explicitly named both Darby and Dispensationalism and had a loathing contempt for Harris' position. He also does this with Calvin, Matthew Henry, Dabney, et al. Not a single one affirms the belief that is the actual subject of the controversy. I explain in the article the dirty trick that this really is, which is finding agreement on an issue that isn't the actual controversy, to stack corpses in your corner who actually testify against you. Harris argued the Abrahamic covenant is unconditional because of the Covenant imagery of Genesis 15, arguing God remains obligated to ethnic Israel despite their rejection of Jesus. Three paragraphs later, Harris quotes Leviticus 26 to explain why the restoration has not yet happened: Israel has not yet met the conditions for restoration to the Covenant. The irony that he refuted his own argument was lost on him. Harris deployed the Hebrew word "olam" to argue the land promise is perpetually binding on God toward ethnic Israel. I pointed out that Genesis 17:13 uses the identical word to describe circumcision as an everlasting covenant. Harris does not believe physical circumcision is perpetually binding on believers. He never explains why the same word establishes perpetual obligation in one case and not the other. This is the really insane one: Harris used first-century Jewish messianic expectations as evidence for his position. His claim is that because the Jews were expecting a political messiah and a literal kingdom, his view must be right because it conforms with theirs. I point out the sheer insanity of arguing for fidelity to a view that led people to miss their own Messiah, and how the New Testament is one giant refutation of that Jewish misconception. This, in particular, shows the Dispensationalist mind-rot is of an advanced stage and possibly terminal. I also gave scriptural evidence that Jesus repeatedly corrected their Zionist expectations. Harris built his entire case on Romans 9 through 11 as proof of ethnic Israel's ongoing covenant despite their lack of faith in Christ. I noted that Harris never once addresses Romans 9:6, the thesis statement of the entire passage: "For they are not all Israel who are descended from Israel," and went deeper into his cherry-picking of the Text while running from the verses that refute his position. This was the second-lowest and second-most vulgar tactic in the article: Harris included a section on the Islamic interpretation of the Abrahamic covenant, and then the Hebrew Israelites, poisoning the well to suggest that those who disagree with Darby's novel view should be lumped in with Muslims and crazy black people. I explained in the article the lack of integrity in this tactic, which alleges the historic position of the church is somehow Islamic or associated with the Black Hebrew Israelites. This was **absolutely** below him, and it was disgusting and cheap. I also used it as an opportunity to explain Judaism's pre-20th-century love-affair with Islam, its kid-gloves for the Mohammadians, Hallakah's spitting-image of Sharia Law, and the fact that Rabbinic teaching allows Jews to pray in Mosques but not churches, and classifies Islam as more similar to Judaism - and less heretical - than Christianity. Harris accused his opponents of letting politics drive their theology while describing Israel's military victories as "miraculous," endorsing strategic military alliances, and framing his entire piece as a response to criticism of military and diplomatic support for a foreign government. I pointed out that the Israeli government has spent hundreds of millions each year promoting Dispensational theology to Americans, has the most sophisticated religious interference campaign in history, and that Dispensationalism's most vocal defenders literally cannot locate the Abrahamic Covenant in Scripture. There is politicization, but it's not on our side. Harris cited Edward Bickersteth as a restorationist forefather supporting his position. I noted that Bickersteth explicitly stated Jews have no valid claim to the Holy Land given their unbelief, and provided quotations stating that Christians may assist Jews get settled in Palestine but not for that reason, so long as it must "not do injustice to others" and must be "peaceful assistance." Harris left that part out, while arguing for American military help (that every honest person knows is being used in ways Bickersteth would have found appalling). Harris cited Charles Ryrie and J. Vernon McGee, two of the most committed dispensationalists of the twentieth century, as supporting witnesses for his theological framework. Harris rightly acknowledged that both men explicitly stated the modern state of Israel does not qualify as the fulfilled prophecy because Israel has not repented and returned to God. I pointed out this creates a problem Harris never addresses. If the most doctrinally committed Dispensational theologians in history looked at the modern state of Israel and said it is not prophetic fulfillment, and Harris agrees with them, then Harris has no argument against people who are skeptical of the modern state's covenant significance. He spent four thousand words constructing a theological framework designed to make that skepticism look dangerous, and went on to accuse them of becoming modern-day Hamans (more on that in a second). Harris dismissed questions about the genetic continuity of modern Jewish populations as conspiratorial. I pointed out that the genetic question is theologically irrelevant because Paul settled the genetic inheritance debate in Galatians 3:16 and 3:29 (although, let's be honest, in 2026 America, you can't just dismiss an argument by waving your hands and calling it "conspiratorial" anymore). Abraham's promise runs through Christ to those who are in Christ, not through a chromosome. Harris's framework depends on the theologically decisive role of genetic ethnic continuity. Paul already told us it is not. Harris charged unnamed online voices with questioning Christ's Jewish identity, made without a single name, quote, or citation (no doubt, because naming them would allow the reader to research that debate for themselves). I explained that the actual argument serious people are making is that folks are using "Jesus was a Jew" (for example, Israeli influencers who deny his Messiahship) for explicitly political purposes to manipulate evangelicals to insist we support Israel, and in doing so, want the hearer to presume that Jesus was a Rabbinic Jew (a charge that cannot go unanswered). The debate has not suggested that Jesus isn't the Son of David, a descendant of Abraham, and an ancient Israelite, which every orthodox Christian confesses without reservation. But it's not about what term we use. It's about intentionally misrepresenting your opponents' views - especially when they have an obvious point about your side politicizing theology by using Jesus' biology to demand more bombs for Israel. Harris then made the lowest blow possible, repeating the talking points of Josh Hammer in his propaganda piece at the David Horowitz Freedom Institute, likening Israel critics to Haman, who attempted a genocide of the Jewish people. I understand a Jew like Hammer doing it. But it was absolutely beyond the pale for a Christian to do. While arguing that our side politicizes the faith, he literally brings out HAMAN to suggest this is the end-product of holding to historic Christian doctrine. I suppose Hitler was unavailable. This type of thing is not honest, is not fair, and is a hyperbolic and shameful. Harris ended with a claim he's compiled a folder over the years of Christians who deconstructed because "Christianity was too Jewish," which is an interesting thing to compile over the years when one is as disinterested in eschatology as he claims. I pointed out that not once in all of the New Testament did the Apostle to the Gentiles ever warn his readers not to distance themselves from the "Jewishness" of the faith. Not once. But Paul did repeatedly warn his readers of precisely the opposite. The bewitching Judaizing spirit was Paul's biggest bugbear. And while someone might have at some point apostacized over the "Jewishness of Jesus" incessant talking points (seriously, maybe stop doing it), poke your head out on X and see multitudes of Christians being baptized in the Judaizing heresy. If you want to see what that does to a man, look no further than Jon Harris. Please look forward to several upcoming podcast interviews on this article, because I'm not done firing yet.