Alex Lags Ever Xanadu

Journalists and columnists are inevitably gonna use AI to write. That’s impossible to police. But we should, at least, make it deeply taboo to admit it publicly

Skyline be like: “Everything’s computer”

Here are my probabilities and the average of the 23 responses I tracked across social media channels. Note my mean is about 2.3% (using a slightly finer and more approximate distribution within the cells).

it's strange to see the world of the past fade before my eyes from 2012 through 2024, I wrote code in long sessions of sitting in vim -- sometimes typing, mostly thinking, flipping between different terminals, making changes, looking at errors, googling, reading stackoverflow... I took pride in carrying in my head these towering abstractions. I knew every nook and cranny of my business logic, like a neighborhood you live in. I felt extra fast when tab-completing a single long variable name. Nice. I placed every parenthesis, every semicolon, myself. Hundreds of thousands of them. And like a great wave washing over your sandcastle on the beach, it is now all gone. Engineering will never again be as it once was. What's especially significant about it to me is that there's barely a record of the way it was: I've spent thousands of hours writing software, and I don't think there's a single video recording of me doing it. I remember how it was: the long breaks of meditative silence, the frustration of hunting a particularly tricky bug, the relief and joy in solving it, the expressions of taste and cleverness that come with any manual craft. But it's hard to communicate how it was to someone who has never experienced it. As with all histories, the narrative is lacking in depth: you really had to be there.

BREAKING: New York bill would ban AI from answering questions related to medicine, law, dentistry, nursing, psychology, social work, engineering, & more.

I was getting Claude to help me study and it said this? Why would it say that.

this is the whole thing by the way

Anthropic rejects the Pentagon’s AI demands and everyone forgets they’re lobbying against open-source AI and spying on their clients

Here is re-post of an internal post: We have been working with the DoW to make some additions in our agreement to make our principles very clear. 1. We are going to amend our deal to add this language, in addition to everything else: "• Consistent with applicable laws, including the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, National Security Act of 1947, FISA Act of 1978, the AI system shall not be intentionally used for domestic surveillance of U.S. persons and nationals. • For the avoidance of doubt, the Department understands this limitation to prohibit deliberate tracking, surveillance, or monitoring of U.S. persons or nationals, including through the procurement or use of commercially acquired personal or identifiable information." It’s critical to protect the civil liberties of Americans, and there was so much focus on this, that we wanted to make this point especially clear, including around commercially acquired information. Just like everything we do with iterative deployment, we will continue to learn and refine as we go. I think this is an important change; our team and the DoW team did a great job working on it. 2. The Department also affirmed that our services will not be used by Department of War intelligence agencies (for example, the NSA). Any services to those agencies would require a follow-on modification to our contract. 3. For extreme clarity: we want to work through democratic processes. It should be the government making the key decisions about society. We want to have a voice, and a seat at the table where we can share our expertise, and to fight for principles of liberty. But we are clear on how the system works (because a lot of people have asked, if I received what I believed was an unconstitutional order, of course I would rather go to jail than follow it). But 4. There are many things the technology just isn’t ready for, and many areas we don’t yet understand the tradeoffs required for safety. We will work through these, slowly, with the DoW, with technical safeguards and other methods. 5. One thing I think I did wrong: we shouldn't have rushed to get this out on Friday. The issues are super complex, and demand clear communication. We were genuinely trying to de-escalate things and avoid a much worse outcome, but I think it just looked opportunistic and sloppy. Good learning experience for me as we face higher-stakes decisions in the future. In my conversations over the weekend, I reiterated that Anthropic should not be designated as a SCR, and that we hope the DoW offers them the same terms we’ve agreed to. We will host an All Hands tomorrow morning to answer more questions.