Me Myself

@ReffiComics It’s like the BMW driver on the roads. The good ones are not the rule, but the exception.

man why did this skin have to get the "KOS/Tryhard/Betrayer" stigma I just wanna look like my character 😭

@IanSextonjekg @farmingandJesus So according to you he just made it up? But you’re going to say there’s no dispute about Mary’s age?

@grandchahee13 @farmingandJesus I think Luke is supposed to have written that and he wasn’t even born when he said this happened. 🤷‍♂️

Last post on this p*rvert. Stop Giving him attention. He loves it , he was clearly the nerd in high school using the word of God to lead like a weirdo. This is no diff than lib families with tr&ns parents. Block him

@IanSextonjekg @farmingandJesus What twelve year old speaks like this?

@farmingandJesus If she wasn’t 12, she was close. That’s not in dispute. The point is I don’t think it’s moral for someone in authority to ask someone so young to carry their baby.

@robbkow @RBryan2 @MikeWingerii Name one disciple with multiple wives. I’ll wait.

@RBryan2 @MikeWingerii "twist and distort scriptures"...that were written by men with multiple wives 🙃

So God has a broken picker I guess, but @MikeWingerii knows better who is fit to lead His people lmao! That verse doesn't mean monogamy-only fool. "Study to show thyself approved." The word was mias meaning (one, a or first). A "bishop" couldn't be divorced! And yet look how many divorced pastors y'all have leading churches!

@3AngelsWatchman @ChrisBlohn “The law of emnity against us” meaning the law that separated Jews and gentiles. Or rather northern kingdom and southern kingdom. Because Christ united the children of Judah to the children of Israel to become one again. That’s why it is written “a light came to the gentiles.”

Law of Moses was abolished I suggest studying the sanctuary and the SHADOWS that pointed to JESUS THAT HE THE AntiTYPE FULFILLED AND ABOLISHED STUDY HEBREWS 4, AND CHAPTERS 7- 10 2000 years later and stiff necked as always ignoring the word of God Ephesians 2:15 having abolished in His flesh the enmity, that is, the law of commandments contained in ordinances, so as to create in Himself one new man from the two, thus making peace,

@robbkow @RBryan2 @MikeWingerii You’re an Israelite prophet now? Calm yourself man, when you start calling people fools to defend your private interpretations shows many people you’re on a slippery slope.

@robbkow @MikeWingerii Until then we can’t just skip to it. Just like Israel, gentiles and the prophets could not skip to the renewed covenant.

@grandchahee13 @MikeWingerii I agree, but we are on the path to get there

😂😂 @MikeWingerii “An overseer must be blameless, the husband of one wife...” 1 Timothy 3:2 'This is one of the most misinterpreted verses in the Bible and the verse that cost me over twenty years that could have been spent building a family. Many churches twist this into a blanket ban on polygyny for all men, but that is not what Paul said or meant. Paul was laying down qualifications for church elders, not setting marriage laws for every believer. He was saying a leader’s house should be in order and his life marked by faithfulness and above-reproach character. It is about proven leadership and integrity, not about limiting all men to a single wife. In fact, think about it. If Paul had to mention this standard for elders, it implies that having multiple wives was a known possibility in the church. Polygyny among ordinary believers was not unusual back then, and Paul never calls it a sin. If having more than one wife were inherently sinful, he would have simply declared, “No man should have more than one wife,” period. He did not. Why? Because it was not. The Greek phrase in 1 Timothy 3:2 is mias gunaikos andra, literally, “a man of one woman.” But here is the key: the word mias, usually translated “one,” does not always mean the number one. It can also mean “a,” “first,” or “primary.” You can verify this easily by looking at Strong’s Concordance. Those are the definitions of the word Paul used. Now ask yourself, which meaning fits better with the entirety of Scripture? Read that verse again with fresh eyes: “a man of a wife,” meaning a married man, or “a man of his first wife,” meaning not divorced, faithful, and proven in his household. Paul was not outlawing plural marriage. He was describing the kind of man qualified to lead, faithful, consistent, and well tested at home. Would not a man managing a household with three wives and ten children, yet keeping his family solid, be more qualified to lead than a man with one ex-wife and a trail of emotional wreckage? The point is about stability and fidelity, not a headcount of wives. And clearly, God does not hate polygynous men in leadership. He chose plenty of them Himself, Abraham, Jacob, Moses, David, Solomon. All were leaders of God’s people and all had multiple wives. Do you really think Paul swooped in and overruled all that heritage with one vague phrase that modern translators interpret as a strict monogamy rule? Please. That kind of conclusion comes from repeating traditions, not actually reading the text." Man of Options: Escaping The Monogamy-Only Lie Pres-sale copies: bit.ly/manofoptionsbo…

@robbkow @MikeWingerii Jesus has laid the structure we are supposed to follow today.

@robbkow @MikeWingerii We are not at Isaiah 4 yet Rob. We are in the time of struggle and captivity still.

@richtidwell We have seen the end of polygyny multiple times. Koreshians, Mormonism, Quiverfull movement and the various cults and fringe sects it leads to. You are just at the beginning of a path already well travelled. youtube.com/shorts/oqFuskw…

Polygyny is Biblically lawful.

@ThatARCGuy Yes

Should there be beards in the next update?

@You_n_God @YahwehGraced And He was already gone

@YahwehGraced Oh… so ignore where it says early on the first day of the week the women came to Jesus’ tomb.

Yeshua rose on Saturday afternoon, towards the dusk. Not on Sunday! 3 days and 3 night From Passover Wednesday afternoon towards the dusk Do not be deceived into thinking the Sabbath was changed to Sunday

@richtidwell The Lord rebuke you and your false teachings.

Finally, some Biblical arguments. 1. Each marriage is its own unique marriage—one man, multiple ribs. “If a man has two wives…” (Deut 21:15) validates the women as being “wives” not “wife and adulteress.” 2. God forbade having too many wives, and too many horses, and too much gold. The problem is greed not polygyny (Deut 17:16-17). God Himself gave David multiple wives (2 Sam 12:7-8). 3. No, polygyny was not his sin, Solomon violated Deuteronomy 7:3-4. Nehemiah 13:26 validates this—“foreign women made even him to sin.” 4. Jesus indicated He can multiply wives just as His Father (Luke 18:29-30, John 5:19), and is Himself illustrated as being plurally married (Matt 25:1, 2 Cor 11:2) like the Father (Jer 31:32, 3:6-10) 5. “The husbands! love your own wives, as also the Christ did love the assembly, and did give himself for it” - Ephesians 5:25 YLT 6. Elder’s are commanded to be the “husband of first wife” (1 Tim 3:2) and not be divorced (Matt 5:32, 19:9). Mias rendered “first” in Rev 9:12. 7. The Church is the family of Believers made up of many virgin brides known as churches (2 Cor 11:2). Jesus speaks to His seven churches in Revelation 1-3, which coincides with the messianic imagery of Isaiah 4:1-2. Thank you for being someone who actually presented Biblical arguments!

@richtidwell So you keep the sabbath day holy right?

@NefflynBe As a good husband I put my wife away. She left the marriage when she cheated. And now I have no responsibility for her any longer.

@sola_chad That’s how my great grandmother did the laundry.

Not only is infant baptism unbiblical, but this guy just traumatized this child for life 👀🫣

@JamesDueck And what do you mean you can’t read? It’s not like reading was some foreign and exclusive thing.

@JamesDueck Why did the Bereans study to see if what Paul was saying was true?

Imagine you’re an early Christian in AD 200. There’s no Bible canon, and you can’t read anyway. You love Jesus and want to do what’s right. Do you: 1. Follow the teachings of the Apostles’ successors? or 2. Follow a particular non-apostolic successor with different teachings?

@ElonClipsX Hmmm… so if I can’t afford an Optimus I can just do a crime and get one.

Elon Musk: With Optimus, we might be able to stop putting people in prison. “If somebody's committed a crime, we might be able to provide a more humane form of containment of future crime. You now get a free Optimus, and it's just going to follow you around and stop you from doing crime. Other than that, you get to do anything; it's just going to stop you from committing crime. That's really it. You don't have to put people in prisons and stuff. It's pretty wild to think of all the possibilities, but I think it's clearly the future.” Tesla Shareholder Meeting, November 6, 2025