Degenvestor

11.9K posts

Degenvestor banner
Degenvestor

Degenvestor

@grandfromage

Smooth operator 🇮🇪 YouTube 👇

in the trenches Katılım Ekim 2021
2.3K Takip Edilen3.5K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Degenvestor
Degenvestor@grandfromage·
Just hit five figs! Onwards 👊❤️
Degenvestor tweet media
English
8
0
53
5.3K
Degenvestor
Degenvestor@grandfromage·
@graveskies It’s not top down control if the majority of the network agrees No one will trust in Bitcoin security if we allow hackers to steal it , Bitcoin will go to zero Who’s going to buy an asset that has a huge portion of the supply free to be stolen?
English
1
0
0
13
Thunder
Thunder@graveskies·
No it's not. Permissionless is about destroying top down control over money. That's it. You can't stop people from doing bad things. That is a power that has always, without fail, corrupted every system. The best way is to fight with the freemarket. If my choices are theft or the ability to freeze people's funds, which is also theft, I choose the former.
English
1
0
1
8
path.eth 🛡️
path.eth 🛡️@Cryptopathic·
BIP-361 is inevitable. The vaunted censorship-resistance of Bitcoin will be sold out in the blink of an eye to protect the liquidity of institutional funds. It is a big, simple button that immediately solves the problem AND has the added bonus of removing supply. There is a lot of anger from the community today that it could even be considered, which makes me think there will be another hardfork where these guys become the new Bcashers holding onto trampled values. What do you think friends?
English
74
25
418
88.8K
Degenvestor retweetledi
Degenvestor retweetledi
CTO Larsson
CTO Larsson@ctoLarsson·
BIP-361 to freeze quantum vulnerable wallets: Yes. The alternative is price dipping to near 0. That would be bad for Bitcoin’s reputation. If not freezing: - Say you know that half a million BTC will be market dumped tomorrow. - What will you do today? You will sell today, to re-buy tomorrow at a fraction of the price. - So will everyone else. - Will anyone buy today? No. - So there is little or no floor. - Price will wick down to “impossible” levels. - Then repeat it again a few days later, for a total of 2 million btc. - Oh price will hit near zero. The argument to not freeze, is to completely f over Wall Street, Saylor, treasuries, and everyone else and start again from basically zero.
English
182
12
170
21.4K
Degenvestor
Degenvestor@grandfromage·
@Mandrik you're not 'recovering' the coins you're stealing them from some dead person's house who hasn't got a modern lock
English
0
0
0
43
Mandrik
Mandrik@Mandrik·
If you recover gold coins from the bottom of the ocean, then you deserve them. If you figure out how to steal Satoshi's coins, then you deserve them. #NoFreeze
English
110
103
1.3K
45K
Degenvestor
Degenvestor@grandfromage·
@sashahodler Security is the point. Leaving a huge portion of the network open to theft is completely retarded
English
0
1
4
33
Sasha Hodder
Sasha Hodder@sashahodler·
BIP-361 proposes freezing Satoshi's Bitcoin to prevent future quantum theft. There is no good reason to freeze bitcoin, ever. Immutability is the point.
English
64
13
247
6.9K
Degenvestor retweetledi
Bit Paine ⚡️
Bit Paine ⚡️@BitPaine·
The cleanest way to “freeze” quantum-insecure coins is just to sunset *all P2PK UTXOs at a defined block height.* Give Satoshi and anyone else, say, 3-5 years to move them. If they haven’t moved to quantum resilient addresses by then, they are assumed to have been lost or forfeited by their owners. Nothing wrong with sunsetting old network components that present vulnerabilities. This gets rid of the “confiscation” language. It’s a technical bug fix/security upgrade.
English
191
16
369
50K
Degenvestor
Degenvestor@grandfromage·
@0xcoinn No one would buy any bitcoin until every single coin not in a quantum wallet was hacked By the time that happens people would have given up on it and would have been replaced by something else
English
1
0
3
247
ً
ً@0xcoinn·
if we have to let the dormant btc get hacked by quantum then so be it. freezing wallets is unacceptable if btc crashes so be it. on a long enough time horizon, it distributes itself. all that supply is not even 50%+ what do you guys think?
English
87
21
411
18.1K
Degenvestor
Degenvestor@grandfromage·
@Cryptopathic agree imagine thinking letting north korea hack and sell all of satoshi's coins is the better option
English
0
0
3
360
steve easy
steve easy@vanillanormoid·
@SalsaTekila So many long term holders would unknowingly have their addresses frozen in this scenario.
English
1
0
2
313
SalsaTekila
SalsaTekila@SalsaTekila·
Unpopular opinion: This is going to happen and most holders silently want this to happen. Assuming it’s done with a fair grace period, it seems right. People talking about the ‘original ethos’ are talking out of their sidelined arses or virtue signaling.
Bitcoin Archive@BitcoinArchive

Cypherpunk Jameson Lopp and other Bitcoin developers propose BIP-361 to freeze quantum vulnerable wallets. This could lock dormant BTC like Satoshi Nakamoto’s 1.1M coins, now worth $74B, before quantum computers can steal them.

English
130
7
294
64.9K