Greg Piechota

1K posts

Greg Piechota banner
Greg Piechota

Greg Piechota

@gregpiechota

Katılım Şubat 2010
328 Takip Edilen178 Takipçiler
Greg Piechota
Greg Piechota@gregpiechota·
@unusual_whales @grok what percent of these foreclosures are in Miami, FL? Also, what percentage of the total foreclosures are tied to developers?
English
1
0
0
572
unusual_whales
unusual_whales@unusual_whales·
Florida had the most foreclosures in the US in 2025, per NYP
English
187
501
3.9K
954.4K
Samruddhi Mokal
Samruddhi Mokal@samruddhi_mokal·
This AI system researches prospects like a psychopath and writes to them like a best friend. This combo is absolutely insane for outreach that actually books calls. No SDRs. No manual research. No sales reps spending 3 hours per prospect. Just AI tools working together like a professional sales team. Here's how it works: → AI scrapes LinkedIn profiles + recent posts automatically → Perplexity researches their company across the entire internet → Claude analyzes pain points and writes hyper-personalized 3-email sequences → System references specific achievements like you personally studied them → Emails send in proper time zones with perfect deliverability rotation → Sequences stop automatically when prospects reply Perfect for anyone tired of 2% reply rates and "hope this finds you well" templates. The power is in the combo: LinkedIn scraping = behavioral data most sales reps ignore Perplexity = company intelligence that makes prospects think you know them Claude = emails that feel like a best friend wrote them, not a robot While others are manually researching 10 prospects per day, you're personalizing 100 per hour. Test different angles. Book more calls. Scale immediately. Like, RT + reply with "SYSTEM" and I'll DM the complete workflow (Must be following so I can DM) Skip this and keep manually copying LinkedIn bios into ChatGPT.
English
768
458
1.2K
94.8K
Landan Dory
Landan Dory@HunkyDoryTX·
Compare the Crexi and Loopnet pricing structures. Crexi is a single monthly fee for unlimited listings and full lead visibility. The user-interface is also from this century and easy to use. Loopnet forces you to buy "packages" of a specific number of listings for a specific period of time. Last time I checked it was packages of 5 listings per package per quarter. If you only have 4 listings? too bad - pay for 5. If you have 6 listings? Either pony up for another package (and have 4 unused listing slots) or demote one of your listings to a free listing. Loopnet is literally forcing you into wasting money to use the sub-par platform.
English
17
2
60
8.2K
Matt | the mojo mindset
Matt | the mojo mindset@themojomindset·
Much necessary @Airbnb improvement to our side landscaping, the growth of weeds is real esp in this New Orleans heat
Matt | the mojo mindset tweet mediaMatt | the mojo mindset tweet mediaMatt | the mojo mindset tweet media
English
1
1
3
140
Greg Piechota
Greg Piechota@gregpiechota·
@mcuban @howardlutnick @mcuban unfortunately this always seems to be the case, politics and policy aside. When does the poor really benefit? I don’t think this would have a marginal impact. Maybe when there are less hands in the pot (fraud and abuse) more money can flow to the bottom?
English
0
0
1
23
Mark Cuban
Mark Cuban@mcuban·
So after watching this I finally got the logic of how Trump sees Tariffs. As @howardlutnick says, it’s a consumption tax. The tariff is paid for by companies (what they don’t pass on), and consumers/companies (what they do pass on) to buyers. Trump believes they can collect enough to replace income taxes paid by those making above the standard deduction and who earn money on tips, overtime or get soc security. Like any consumption tax there are winners and losers The biggest losers are the poorest people who make under the standard deduction. (15k, single 30k joint ). They already pay no income taxes. So the tariff cost on food , clothes etc is a difficult tax for them.
The All-In Podcast@theallinpod

🇺🇸 all-in takes dc part 2! @chamath and @friedberg sit down with @CommerceGov secretary @howardlutnick for another long-form interview 🔥 -- insights from running trump's transition team -- creating @DOGE with @elonmusk -- fixing gdp -- tariff strategy -- how to sell 1m+ trump cards -- government software strategies ++ much, much more (0:00) chamath and friedberg welcome commerce secretary howard lutnick! (1:10) howard describes his 30+ year relationship with president trump and his road from business to politics (14:44) running trump's transition team, doge origin story, what it's like working for trump (38:01) balancing the budget and fixing gdp (52:21) tariff history and strategy, global trade (1:10:34) trump cards, building better government software, ai thoughts (1:22:49) sovereign wealth fund strategy (1:37:16) how his family reacted to his new role

English
597
584
4.7K
1.4M
Greg Piechota
Greg Piechota@gregpiechota·
@makoblako @kealoha73 @chamath Does the mineral deal involve having US interest and personal in Ukraine ? Seems to me that deal offers some sort of security. Either way, he needs the US. He’s got to give in at the end of the day
English
2
0
3
120
Chamath Palihapitiya
Chamath Palihapitiya@chamath·
Watch this video. It has some important details about what led to yesterdays incredible video from the WH: 1) US sent Bessent weeks ago to Kyiv get a deal signed. Z said no, I’ll sign in Munich. 2) US sends JD and Rubio to Munich. Z stalls and says I’ll sign in Washington. 3) Z shows up at the WH, feels emboldened and chaos ensues. If nothing else, this makes the grounds for an audit of all the aid sent to Ukraine a very likely outcome. To be fair, Z must be under tremendous pressure. It’s a very unenviable position he’s in and it’s a very weighty responsibility to both defend your people and fight an invading army. But, frankly, knowing this, between him and his key staff, they need better planning and restraint than what was displayed. What we saw was brewing for weeks then ignited in front of a US President who was elected, in part, because of his ZERO tolerance to be a part of any war of any kind. Z made his bed yesterday. He is clearly under severe pressure, but that was a major blunder.
@amuse@amuse

UKRAINE: Secretary Bessent confirms this was the third time Zelensky has agreed to the terms of the mineral deal only to back out. This time it was staged for the media.

English
861
3.2K
16.9K
1.7M
Greg Piechota
Greg Piechota@gregpiechota·
@LinusEkenstam This has been the same talking point for years, since taking private at $420…what other US car company would you invest in, or is superior over Tesla. If you had to of course…
English
0
0
0
117
Linus ✦ Ekenstam
Linus ✦ Ekenstam@LinusEkenstam·
I’ll make a simple case for why Tesla will struggle significantly in the coming years. The CEO has alienated many loyalists, and even more are defecting. Just check any used car site and graph recent data, used Teslas are everywhere. Six months ago, they were rare. If the CEO continues down this path, he could tank the stock to levels where it arguably belongs (which might be good for long-term buyers). But he’s not truly loyal to Tesla anymore, it was always a stepping stone for him. His new obsessions are X and xAI. As ruthless as he is, he could simply walk away from Tesla. Revenue has been flat for years, new vehicle development is sluggish, and broken promises are piling up. Sure, FSD is godlike if you ask the hardcore fans, but where’s the full rollout? I own a 2024 Model Y, and since October, the Vision system has been nearly useless, dirty cameras, poor visibility in dark weather, bright lights throwing it off. On 9 out of 10 drives, anything relying on Vision doesn’t work. Meanwhile, competition from China and other EV makers is fierce. Tesla once led the race but got distracted, and now, it doesn’t. Chinese manufacturers are building factories and cars at a faster pace, producing high-end vehicles that rival Tesla’s. In response, the U.S. is slapping 100% tariffs on Chinese EVs to block them from the market. But in Europe, we welcome trade. That’s why our roads are already filling up with Chinese EVs. Tesla had a decade-long head start, but competitors are catching up fast now that the EV market is truly established. In Sweden, 68% of all new cars sold are EVs. In Norway, that number is 98.9%. And this is just the beginning. The rest of Europe is on the same trajectory. Charging infrastructure is expanding at a rapid pace. I’ve crossed Europe four times in the past six months, and every trip, more stations were online. Nearly every highway stop now has 250-500 kW chargers, plus lower-power options. This means I’m no longer tied to Tesla’s Superchargers, which are often tucked away in obscure parking lots with no amenities. Superchargers were once a strategic advantage. Now? They’re mostly a hassle. (A few are good, but they’re the exception.) If a CEO actively devalues and undermines his company’s product, he’s no longer working in the best interest of shareholders. Robotaxi, Robovan, Semi… and let’s not forget the Roadster, where are they? Years away, at best. And without strong leadership, it shows. Tesla’s best shot is to remove the CEO and replace him with someone from within, someone who genuinely cares about electric vehicles. Maybe Franz. Unfortunately, most of Tesla’s longtime leaders have already left. Zach is gone. Drew is gone. JB is gone. They all cashed out. My take? Tesla is in for a tough ride, even with Optimus. The brand’s most loyal supporters are slipping away. Tesla will be left trying to win over gas car enthusiasts who were never interested in the first place.
Linus ✦ Ekenstam tweet media
English
72
34
378
68.6K
Dr. Gichuho Mungai, Ed.D., MBA, M.Sc., PGD, B.ED.
In legacy systems, it was common to use odd data input to accommodate uncommon situations. If I died at a 100, but I had dependents enjoying survivors benefits, then my information may still be retained in the system and deceased field cannot be set to TRUE, otherwise the system wouldn’t work. Further, the age would automatically increase at each birthday.
English
39
10
74
33.4K
Greg Piechota
Greg Piechota@gregpiechota·
Idea: We have thousands and thousands of satellites with real time data over us at any given time. Why are we not using this data? Any flare up from a fire in a threatening area should immediately be detected and automatically deploy emergency services or even drones to eliminat
English
0
2
3
60
Robert Evans
Robert Evans@RobertOnFire3·
I have been thinking about the fire damage in the Palisades and Malibu, that many have been quoting - often in the hundreds of billions losses, etc, based on value... Well, most of these "losses", which are based on value, are really not losses after all, because their locations has not been damaged. Consider the following: Most of the houses are not that big; In fact, many are small, constructed during the 1960s or before. They are NOT large mansions, so physical replacement cost is small. The reality is that almost of value of those properties is in location, NOT structure; It is the land, view and proximity to ocean, and those are not damaged at all. Also, the huge thicket of regulations that prevents, or retards, any new construction is not damaged. - it still takes many years, or decades, to get approval, if approval is ever granted. Only the structures are damaged and, in California with its moderate weather, all you need for a basic structure, for the most part, is slab on ground, 4 walls, roof and utilities. Replacing a basic structure costs very little. There are also interior improvements, and those costs can vary widely, depending on tastes of owner. So, what is it that justifies those huge values quoted as losses? It is the thicket of government regulations, permitting, from federal to local, that has prevented timely new construction. Getting government approval to build can take decades, if granted at all. For example, the cost of building a 2,000 square foot house at $100 per square foot is $200,000. Yet the current value of such a house in the Palisades would be more like $2,000,000, and most of that difference is due to government restrictions that have artificially created scarcity of buildable lots. The only thing preventing a rapid comeback for the area is government regulations on zoning and permitting, coastal commission, and similar obstacles. If permits are granted immediately, the area could be rebuilt in 6 months, including streets and utilities. Better yet, if all those government agencies were abolished, prices of those ocean area properties could drop by 50%, and everyone would be better off.
English
1
0
2
274
Tommy Vietor
Tommy Vietor@TVietor08·
NYT on how Elon Musk is trying to buy the election for Trump: - Spending $140-180MM on Trump super PAC - Twitter coordinating with the Trump camp to throttle links to leaked campaign documents - Musk rallying other billionaires to support Trump - Musk temporarily moving to PA
English
1.5K
5.4K
18.6K
4.1M
Greg Piechota
Greg Piechota@gregpiechota·
@MarioNawfal Are we just killing timing the worst talking points and just filling the time
English
0
0
0
17
Maddy
Maddy@MaddySukoru·
Because the goal is to build infrastructure not just provide internet access. At any point Elon can drive the price of starlink up but with infrastructure most providers are forced to lease out their networks to competitors and other providers to prevent monopolies and lock in. Might be helpful to research these things before making these types of claims.
English
10
2
170
7.5K
The All-In Podcast
The All-In Podcast@theallinpod·
EARLY DROP! buckle up besties... we've got *two hours* with @mcuban for you! -- kamala vs trump -- why he sold a majority of his @dallasmavs position -- cost plus drugs -- relationship w/ @elonmusk -- @openai's new fundraise -- national debt -- crypto regulation -- middle east/ukraine conflicts (0:00) the besties intro mark cuban: voting record, working with ross perot's campaign in 1992 (5:43) the history of cuban's love/hate relationship with trump (19:08) trump's performance as president: what he got right and wrong (40:46) party nominations: kamala vs. trump (49:18) biden's performance as president: what he got right and wrong (55:45) should kamala share blame for biden's failures? (1:07:01) international conflict, national debt, crypto regulation (1:21:33) general sense of kamala harris, why she's been avoiding adversarial interviews, why sacks supports trump (1:31:47) selling a majority of his mavericks stake, changing business landscape of the nba, what he's working on at cost plus drugs (1:44:50) thoughts on ai, what's next for him (1:51:37) relationship with elon, re-evaluating the twitter deal, openai's new fundraise
English
1.2K
184
2.1K
1.6M