Martin Johansson

@Adel_A_Sadat Flytta hem, islamistgubbe

VEM GRANSKAR MAGNUS RANSTORP? Magnus Ranstorp har gjort sig ett namn på att kartlägga andras nätverk, finansiering, beroenden och påstådda dolda agendor. Muslimers organisationer ska vändas ut och in. Varje kontakt ska redovisas. Varje krona ska följas. Varje styrelseuppdrag ska misstänkliggöras. Men granskningen riktas sällan mot Ranstorp själv. Och de som väljer att kritisera honom svartmålas istället. Det talas istället om "svartmålning". Ranstorp är vice ordförande i Nordic Safe Cities, en organisation som tar emot betydande årliga avgifter från nordiska kommuner och erbjuder rådgivning, seminarier och kunskapsinsatser om bland annat extremism och radikalisering. Göteborgs Stad betalar omkring 115 000 kronor om året. Samtidigt framträder Ranstorp i medierna som expert på exakt de hotbilder som får kommuner att köpa denna typ av stöd. Han är alltså inte enbart en utomstående forskare som neutralt betraktar ett samhällsproblem. Han sitter i ledningen för en organisation vars verksamhet gynnas av att kommuner upplever ett fortsatt och växande behov av rådgivning, utbildning och expertinsatser inom samma område. Ju allvarligare hotbilden framställs, desto större blir efterfrågan. Demand and supply. Detta bevisar inte att Ranstorps slutsatser är fel. Men det krossar föreställningen om att han kan presenteras som en helt frikopplad och oberoende expert utan att hans egna organisatoriska intressen redovisas. Han hjälper till att beskriva problemet offentligt och sitter samtidigt i ledningen för en aktör som erbjuder kommunerna stöd kring problemet. Hur är det inte en uppenbar intressekonflikt som medierna borde granska? Är styrelseuppdraget arvoderat? Vilka ekonomiska och professionella fördelar följer med uppdraget? Hur mycket offentliga pengar tar organisationen emot? Hur används pengarna? Varför redovisas inte kopplingen varje gång Ranstorp framträder som expert? Och framför allt: varför har journalister, som annars kan ägna månader åt att kartlägga muslimska föreningars styrelser, kontakter och bidrag, inte ställt samma frågor till honom? Ranstorp har i åratal krävt transparens av andra. Då ska han inte få gömma sina egna kopplingar bakom titeln forskare. Den som granskar muslimers nätverk måste själv tåla att få sitt eget nätverk granskat. Den som följer andras pengar måste själv lägga sina egna institutionella intressen på bordet. Och den som bygger sin offentliga auktoritet på att misstänkliggöra andra ska inte behandlas som oantastlig när ljuset slutligen riktas mot honom själv. Granska granskaren innan granskaren får i uppdrag att granska andra.

@mattvanswol The cause is a recent Spanish court ruling that migrants entering Ceuta by sea cannot be returned to Morocco without due process.

Un criminal marroquí que acaba de entrar ilegalmente en Ceuta, admite que lo expulsaron de Holanda para no cumplir una pena de 5 años y le quitaron el pasaporte español. Además, dice que tiene hepatitis C. Vienen criminales y enfermos.

It's war. It's also a world war, and the bad guys know it and act like it while the free world is still in denial.

Did this propaganda sway you? I won’t fault you if it did. But now, it’s time to confront the truth.

BREAKING: Moroccan media reports that over 30,000 Moroccans are currently invading Ceuta On the eve of Throne Day, Moroccan King Mohammed VI pardoned 1,788 prisoners. In May, he pardoned 1,376 prisoners, including terrorists. They are now entering Spain with no controls 🇪🇸🇲🇦

🇪🇸🇲🇦 In these minutes, a huge column of illegal migrants is heading toward the Spain-Morocco border We publish the fastest updates and more videos from the border in our Telegram channel ➡️ t.me/Visegrad_24

Amnesty founder's granddaughter: “I am very sad to say it, but I would not donate a single penny to Amnesty at this stage. I really am horrified by what they have done in Ireland and in the UK. How can you trust what they say now? The damage they have done to their reputation is enormous.” “Amnesty has moved so far away from their original mission. They want to go against the laws of the UK — a western democracy. They are now acting like the types of authoritarian regimes that they have always sought to expose,” said Iseult White. “How can you have any faith about any statements they put out about human rights, around the world, when they are completely misrepresenting the situation in the UK and Ireland?” This is “shocking behaviour from an organisation that was set up to support prisoners of conscience.”

Yeah Pallywood BS from 2024

Carl-Henric Grenholm a priest in the Church of Sweden and professor of ethics at Uppsala University between 1992 and 2013 wrote the following in 1971: “The Palestinians want to erase Israel as a state; they want to completely destroy Israel. This is entirely correct, and it is an objective we should support.” From the Swedish Social Democratic magazine Broderskap – Faith and Politics (No. 10, 1971, p. 15). Jew hatred was always its core.

Reading Martha Gellhorn's 1961 article in the Atlantic titled "The Arabs of Palestine." 1961 predates practically every grievance cited today—no occupation, no settlements, no 1967 borders, none of the vocabulary that frames modern arguments. Yet the rejection of the Jews and Israel is already total and eliminationist... which means today's stated causes can't be the root; they're just the latest justifications for something far older.

"Amnesty has moved so far away from their original mission... They are now acting like the types of authoritarian regimes that they have always sought to expose.” -- @iseult, granddaughter of Amnesty founder. thetimes.com/uk/scotland/ar…

A major pre-war myth is that Gaza couldn't import goods or food without Israeli approval. But UN's own data shows 110 trucks/day entered Gaza via Egypt in 2023 without Israeli control. Gaza only needed ~70/day for food but Hamas mostly imported construction supplies for tunnels.

🎥 Ex-Muslim woman EXPOSES Zohran Mamdani. A must watch. (“unveiltogether” on TikTok)

It should worry you a lot that an IRGC-linked criminal gang in Sweden successfully hired a Norwegian assassin to carry out a hit in Britain. He was stopped last minute. But the fact that the islamic regime in Iran somehow allied with a 19 year old native Scandinavian, is absolutely shocking. We live in very dangerous times.

The newly reopened al-Malaki Restaurant, Salah al-Din Street at the entrance to Nuseirat, Central Gaza Strip. Instagram timestamp: 22 hours ago (28 July '26) #TheGazaYouDontSee Link + restaurant details in 1st response

The foundation of ALL AI training is that Big Tech knew they'd never get permission for all the data they needed - let alone afford it. So they stole it all instead. They knowingly broke the law and banked on it being cheaper to normalize their crime through settled lawsuits.

REALLY WTF AI companies are purchasing large quantities of used and rare books. Scanning their contents to train models. Then turning the originals to pulp. The sum of human thought, digitized and shredded. Every book that gets scanned disappears from the physical world permanently. The knowledge survives only as training data inside a system no one can hold, browse, or resell. What used to sit on a shelf for centuries now exists as weights in a model that might get deprecated next quarter.

Het verhaal rond Abdul B wordt steeds bizarder... De man die Abdul B moest deradicaliseren in opdracht van de Duitse staat is voorzitter van een NGO die Islampropaganda publiceerde en jonge meisjes met hoofddoeken liet poseren met wapens.... nius.de/politik/millio…

The behavioral patterns of Muslim populations in non-Muslim countries change predictably based on their percentage of the total population: 0–2% When Muslims constitute less than 2% of the population, they typically maintain a low profile. This is the stage of da’wah, Islamic proselytization, and reputation-building. Islam is presented to the host society as peaceful, rational, and ethical. The focus is on integration, tolerance, and charitable outreach. Criticism of Islam is dismissed as ignorance or Islamophobia, while the community builds its infrastructure, mosques, community centers, and Islamic schools. At this stage, Muslim communities leverage the language of Western liberalism to gain a foothold: religious freedom, civil rights, and anti-discrimination laws. Political involvement is minimal, and confrontational rhetoric is avoided. Public engagement centers around interfaith dialogues, cultural exchange events, and educational outreach, designed to normalize Islam as a peaceful, constructive force in the multicultural fabric. This phase is also marked by a strong narrative of victimhood. Muslims are portrayed as an embattled minority needing protection from xenophobic majorities. Laws protecting hate speech and religious freedom are invoked to shield Islamic doctrines from public scrutiny. In the early 1990s, Muslim populations in countries like Ireland, New Zealand, and Norway remained below this threshold. The communities focused on mosque-building and cultural integration. Violent incidents were rare, and the rhetoric was geared toward coexistence. 2–5% As the population crosses the 2% threshold, a noticeable change occurs. Advocacy groups emerge with more aggressive postures. Demands are no longer requests but framed as civil rights: halal food in schools and hospitals, Islamic prayer rooms in public buildings, gender-segregated swim times, and recognition of Islamic holidays. These demands are wrapped in the language of equality, but the subtext is unmistakable: Islam is not merely seeking parity; it is beginning to shape the host society. At this stage, sharia-compliant accommodations are requested, not just in private religious life but in public institutions. Workplaces are asked to allow prayer breaks. Public schools are pressured to remove curriculum deemed Islamophobic. Terms like “Islamophobia” become strategic weapons to intimidate critics and silence public debate. Ontario, in the early 2000s, witnessed a push to introduce sharia arbitration in civil and family disputes. Though it was ultimately defeated due to public backlash, the initiative revealed the ideological thrust: the attempt to institutionalize Islamic jurisprudence within the Western legal system. Similar efforts have appeared in Australia and the U.S. 5–10% Between 5–10%, Muslim communities transition from integration to parallelism. No-go zones begin to form, urban enclaves where state law is either ignored or actively resisted. Police avoid intervention, and informal sharia enforcement takes hold. Honor killings, female genital mutilation, polygamy, and forced marriages begin to appear, not as isolated events, but as features of a separate legal order within the host nation. This stage also sees increasing legal jihad, efforts to redefine blasphemy laws, criminalize criticism of Islam, and pressure media, academia, and politicians into compliance. Islam’s totalizing nature refuses compartmentalization. Everything must bend to its divine law, including speech, gender relations, and governance. More than 80 sharia courts operate unofficially in the UK, issuing rulings on everything from divorce to inheritance, often disadvantaging women and violating national law. Efforts to investigate or criticize these courts are met with accusations of racism and Islamophobia. Banlieues surrounding Paris, such as Seine-Saint-Denis, have become synonymous with lawlessness and Islamic radicalism. Police do not patrol without backup. Civil authorities are unable, or unwilling, to enforce French secularism. Samuel Paty’s beheading in 2020 after showing a cartoon of Muhammad was not an aberration; it was the fruit of a system where sharia sensitivity overpowered state sovereignty. In Sweden, Muslim immigration has contributed to the creation of over 60 “vulnerable areas” where government control is minimal. Rape statistics have climbed, often linked to men from Muslim-majority countries. The Swedish state’s response has ranged from denial to appeasement. In Belgium, the Brussels district of Molenbeek became a safe haven for jihadists, including those who coordinated the 2015 Paris attacks. Radical imams preach freely, and efforts to clamp down on extremism have been paralyzed by political correctness. 10% and Beyond At this point, the Muslim community ceases to be a subculture and becomes a rival culture. Integration is abandoned for Islamization. Political parties with explicit Islamic agendas rise. Muslim representatives in parliaments begin defending jihadist regimes and condemning Western foreign policy not from a critical citizen’s perspective, but from the standpoint of civilizational opposition. In this phase, open threats replace veiled demands. Cartoons of Muhammad are no longer protested, they are punished. Attempts to defend secularism are denounced as hate. Criticizing Islam becomes a criminal or even suicidal act. Entire sectors of society, media, academia, politics, are paralyzed by fear. The Muslim community, now entrenched and numerically significant, weaponizes democracy against itself. It uses freedoms of speech, religion, and assembly to dismantle those very freedoms. The goal is not coexistence. The goal is submission, the literal meaning of the word “Islam.” Why Doesn’t This Happen with Other Immigrant Groups? Why do these patterns not emerge with Chinese, Indian, Korean, Filipino, Ethiopian, or Jewish immigrants? Why don’t Sikhs or Hindus or Confucianists demand parallel legal systems, segregated public spaces, or censorship of perceived blasphemy? Because none of those systems contain a theological mandate for global supremacy. Islam does. Islam is not just a private set of beliefs, it is a geopolitical doctrine, a legal code, a social order, and a totalizing ideology. The behavior of Muslim populations is not a deviation, it is a logical extension of Islam’s core teachings when it gains numerical strength. Based on Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat.