Emigrant 🇵🇱❤️🇬🇧 👑🔰
10.8K posts

Emigrant 🇵🇱❤️🇬🇧 👑🔰
@gruczykowski
Act. Don't just talk! #Legia #MUFC #WTA Świątek Kasatkina #ATP Medvedev Sinner





$PATH FACTS ABOUT CEO INSIDER SELLING I see a raft of pissing and moaning about @danieldines selling shares Let’s educate ourselves shall we Daniel has a tiny base salary of $6,017 (the legal minimum) Yes you read that right His $1M in listed compensation is not money that is paid to him It is money that is spent by the company on his personal security and transportation This is a “paper” number required by the SEC The board chooses how much to spend to protect their CEO as if something were to happen to them, it goes without saying that would be a material risk to the company The only real “wages” he receives is by selling shares of his $600M+ stake in UiPath This is why you see the regular selling in batches of 45,000 shares every few days He does not receive new stock through SBC and has not done so since 2021 He has a vested interest in the company (and the stock) doing well Let’s not forget that he owns the vast majority of class Bs which means he controls the entire company regardless of how many class As he owns He could sell all of his common stock and still have full control over the company IS THIS A STRANGE SETUP? It is uncommon, but it is typical of a “founder blueprint” Do you know who else has a similar arrangement? Mark Zuckerberg: $META founder - $1 salary since 2013 - $0 in new shares via SBC - Similar security package setup - Wages from sales of ownership stakes Larry Page/Sergey Brin: $GOOGL founders - $1 salary each for over a decade - Wages from sales of ownership stakes CONCLUSION Do some actual research before jumping to conclusions Daniel still owns 37.7M class As and 77M class Bs He still has a massive stake in the company and his values are shareholder aligned It genuinely bothers him (and his employees) when the share price is getting hammered I have seen him talk about this directly It affects morale at the company in a big way So have some consideration before you start spouting off on here and throwing accusations around without the facts Rant over Not financial advice

$PATH CEO has now sold $6m in just one week & the stock is down -20%

$PATH FACTS ABOUT CEO INSIDER SELLING I see a raft of pissing and moaning about @danieldines selling shares Let’s educate ourselves shall we Daniel has a tiny base salary of $6,017 (the legal minimum) Yes you read that right His $1M in listed compensation is not money that is paid to him It is money that is spent by the company on his personal security and transportation This is a “paper” number required by the SEC The board chooses how much to spend to protect their CEO as if something were to happen to them, it goes without saying that would be a material risk to the company The only real “wages” he receives is by selling shares of his $600M+ stake in UiPath This is why you see the regular selling in batches of 45,000 shares every few days He does not receive new stock through SBC and has not done so since 2021 He has a vested interest in the company (and the stock) doing well Let’s not forget that he owns the vast majority of class Bs which means he controls the entire company regardless of how many class As he owns He could sell all of his common stock and still have full control over the company IS THIS A STRANGE SETUP? It is uncommon, but it is typical of a “founder blueprint” Do you know who else has a similar arrangement? Mark Zuckerberg: $META founder - $1 salary since 2013 - $0 in new shares via SBC - Similar security package setup - Wages from sales of ownership stakes Larry Page/Sergey Brin: $GOOGL founders - $1 salary each for over a decade - Wages from sales of ownership stakes CONCLUSION Do some actual research before jumping to conclusions Daniel still owns 37.7M class As and 77M class Bs He still has a massive stake in the company and his values are shareholder aligned It genuinely bothers him (and his employees) when the share price is getting hammered I have seen him talk about this directly It affects morale at the company in a big way So have some consideration before you start spouting off on here and throwing accusations around without the facts Rant over Not financial advice







W związku z nowymi publikacjami red. Szymona Jadczaka stałem się obiektem fali hejtu oraz insynuacji przypisujących mi działania, których nigdy nie podejmowałem. Czuję się w obowiązku krótko i jasno to wyjaśnić. Szanuję pracę dziennikarską i dorobek red. Jadczaka. Jednak w tym przypadku sposób formułowania pytań z zawartą tezą, a także wykorzystanie tylko części udzielonych odpowiedzi uważam za niewłaściwy i prowadzący do zniekształcenia faktów. A są one proste: poza Jackiem Liberskim, z którym widywałem się wyłącznie prywatnie w ramach współpracy z Klubem Swobodnej Myśli i nigdy nie rozmawiałem na tematy służbowe, w tym te związane z CPK, nie znam osób wskazywanych w materiale red. Jadczaka, a co za tym idzie, nigdy nie kontaktowałem się z nimi, ani nie przekazywałem im jakichkolwiek informacji. Po objęciu funkcji pełnomocnika rządu ds. CPK zakończyłem współpracę z Fundacją Myśli Demokratycznej i Klubem Swobodnej Myśli, co zostało zresztą odnotowane w materiale red. Jadczaka. Materiał red. Jadczaka został wykorzystany przez moich przeciwników politycznych do ataków personalnych. Nawet jeśli nie było to intencją autora, skutkiem jest szkalowanie mnie i niesprawiedliwe oskarżanie o działania, z którymi nie mam żadnego związku. Nie godzę się na przypisywanie mi czynów, których nie popełniłem, ani na podsycanie hejtu kosztem prawdy. Hejtu, z którym walczy również red. Jadczak.
















