Guillermo Agudelo

2.9K posts

Guillermo Agudelo banner
Guillermo Agudelo

Guillermo Agudelo

@guilleagudelo

Cristiano ✝️. Programador web 💻

Valledupar, Colombia Katılım Haziran 2011
424 Takip Edilen108 Takipçiler
maximiliano ramirez
maximiliano ramirez@Gatocasachelo·
@AlejandraM40013 Me encanta que no lo pongan, los fandom con su fanatismo no son objetivos para eliminar, son capaces de dejar el más mueble con tal de perjudicar a quien si es contenido. Miren a Manuela, Juancho etc y ahí están
Español
1
0
6
172
Dave Teaches (JoT)
Dave Teaches (JoT)@DaveTradesOpts·
I’ll be giving away my total revenue from Creator Payouts on this platform. Retweet and comment below what you’d use it for to qualify. I didn’t not know I was getting revenue from @X but someone will be blessed with it now.
Dave Teaches (JoT) tweet media
English
86
59
98
18.6K
𝐙𝐀𝐑𝐔
𝐙𝐀𝐑𝐔@zaruww·
A complete 30 page guide covering the four most powerful ICT ENTRY MODELS. Perfect for traders who want clear, structured entry frameworks. If you want the full PDF, like & comment “ENTRY” I’ll DM it to you. (Only if you’re following)
𝐙𝐀𝐑𝐔 tweet media
English
1.5K
166
2K
169.2K
💰•PHD I N FOREX💎
💰•PHD I N FOREX💎@reayah_saa·
The book that taught me how to trade like a 🐐 Comment with “Hi” if you want it .
💰•PHD I N FOREX💎 tweet media
English
1.1K
164
2.1K
150.7K
Lizzie Marbach
Lizzie Marbach@LizzieMarbach·
No. That would be idolatry. Pray to God! He is merciful and hears you. ❤️
English
501
160
2.2K
76.7K
Guillermo Agudelo retweetledi
WWUTT?
WWUTT?@WWUTTcom·
Gold.
WWUTT? tweet media
English
159
303
3K
109.2K
Guillermo Agudelo retweetledi
Matt L
Matt L@MeetMattL·
The Law of Large Numbers > Everything Else To be profitable, you need to allow your edge to play out. That means not changing a SINGLE thing after a loss. Especially multiple losses. Unlike most traders, I don't think you have to learn something from every loss. Losses are the cost of doing business.
English
1
2
8
183
Guillermo Agudelo retweetledi
Matt L
Matt L@MeetMattL·
9) You don’t need to be a great trader to make money. You do need to have great discipline, though.
English
3
31
425
22.4K
Trader Mike
Trader Mike@tradermike1234·
No trading for me tomorrow gotta visit doctor Super dizzy lately almost to the point of fainting, frequent heart palpitations, not sure what's up..
English
86
3
190
23.8K
Guillermo Agudelo retweetledi
Austin Silver
Austin Silver@austinsilverfx·
I used to think consistency meant green days. Now I know it means doing the same thing, the same way, every day — win or lose. That’s what actually compounds.
English
8
21
175
5.6K
5 Solas
5 Solas@5Solas2·
Charlie Kirk: • Explicitly stated in multiple recent videos that he is not Catholic. • Publicly critiqued specific Catholic doctrines with which he disagrees. • Clearly preached a biblical gospel — justification by faith alone (sola fide) and substitutionary atonement. • Listed several distinctively Roman Catholic teachings as reasons why he could never become Catholic. —He preached a biblical gospel. —He was not a Roman Catholic. —He was not converting to Roman Catholicism. Can Roman Catholics (especially Candace Owens) please stop doing what they do best and start telling the truth?
English
102
72
832
28K
Guillermo Agudelo
Guillermo Agudelo@guilleagudelo·
@ericm1836 @LostMyHats Escathology matters but it's not essential and it's hard. If someone is teaching falsehood about a secondary matter, our love for our brethren must triumph. I'm just asking for humility, love and grace towards our brethren in Christ. Jesus died for those "heretics" and love them.
English
0
0
0
21
JD™
JD™@LostMyHats·
No, the Puritans were not Zionists. They were the most Replacementy Replacement Theologians that ever Repacemented. If the Puritans had found a Christian believing like Greg Locke or John MacArthur, they’d have put them in a zoo and charged admission to poke him with a stick, just because of how weird it’d be. No one prior to the 19th Century held to Dual Covenant Dispensationalism, or even heard of it. And history is on our side.
JD™@LostMyHats

That’s absurd. Dispensational Zionism did not exist until 1821. During the Puritan era, the vast majority of JEWS were not even Zionists (like, almost none), let alone Puritans. The Puritans were Covenantalists and viewed themselves as Zion, and America as the New Jerusalem. Remember the American history books? John Winthrop’s “A Model of Christi Charity” famously declared that their colony would be “a city upon a hill,” echoing Christ’s words in Matthew 5, not a literal mountain in Judea. The Puritans interpreted their own history through Scripture, but never confused themselves with the biological seed of Abraham. They saw the Church (especially in the New World) as the continuation of Israel. Thomas Goodwin wrote that “the covenant made with Abraham was the covenant of grace, which takes in all believers, both of Jews and Gentiles.” John Owen insisted that “the promises made to Abraham are fulfilled in the Gospel, and not to any carnal seed.” Richard Sibbes declared that the Church is “the true Israel of God.” None of them expected an earthly restoration of Jewish political power. They interpreted prophetic promises as fulfilled in the spread of the gospel and the dominion of Christ’s kingdom, not in a reborn Levantine state. Salem Massachusetts was named after Jeru-Salem. Canaan, Connecticut; Bethel, Maine; Shiloh, New Hampshire; Zion Hill, Connecticut; Mount Zion, Pennsylvania; Hebron, Massachusetts; and Goshen, Connecticut. SOUND FAMILIAR? The Cambridge Platform ruling charter of 1648 referred to themselves as “the Israel of God.” The Puritans believed that in a display of God’s power that many Jews would be saved in the Last Days, showing his power by saving the most cursed, stubborn people on Earth. Not because they were in Covenant with God, but to bring them in Covenant through Christ. Please stop saying dumb stuff.

English
25
24
281
8.6K
CynthiaSpell
CynthiaSpell@cynthialspell·
@farmingandJesus Have you listened to Dr. MacArthur’s series on the Catholic Church? I’ve been listening the past few days and the deception is heart breaking.
English
2
0
1
114
🌷 LIZZIE🌷
🌷 LIZZIE🌷@farmingandJesus·
Jesus didn’t die so that we could come to mary or anyone else other than God. He tore the veil that we may come boldly to the throne of grace…. To the father, through the son. I believe those who go to the creation for the things only God can do are not going through the narrow gate.
English
19
32
318
6.3K
Eric Metaxas
Eric Metaxas@ericmetaxas·
You can't argue with the Scriptures. God chose the Jews. Read it.
Insurrection Barbie@DefiyantlyFree

Tucker might want to spend less time with the Quran and more time with the Bible. So for the 100th time, here is biblical proof, historical proof both Catholic and Protestant that he is lying. On purpose. To push an agenda. One that is at odds with the Bible. To say the Jews are not God’s chosen people is not just wrong. It is a denial of what the Bible clearly teaches, and it shows a failure to understand the foundations of Christianity itself. In the Old Testament, God declares Israel’s chosenness beyond dispute. Deuteronomy 7:6 says, “The Lord your God has chosen you out of all the peoples on the face of the earth to be his people, his treasured possession.” In Genesis 17:7, God tells Abraham, “I will establish my covenant as an everlasting covenant between me and you and your descendants after you.” Everlasting means permanent. Jeremiah 31:36 makes the point in even stronger terms: “Only if the sun, moon, and stars vanish will Israel ever cease to be a nation before me.” If the stars are still shining tonight, then Israel’s covenant still stands. The New Testament affirms this truth just as clearly. Paul raises the question in Romans 11:1, “Did God reject his people?” His answer is immediate: “By no means! God did not reject his people, whom he foreknew.” Later in Romans 11:28–29 he writes, “As far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs, for God’s gifts and his call are irrevocable.” Irrevocable means exactly what it says. No commentator, pundit, or modern voice has the authority to reverse what God Himself has declared. Jesus said in John 4:22, “Salvation is from the Jews.” That is not a side note. It is central to understanding who He is and how God’s plan unfolds. Christianity does not replace Israel. It is joined to Israel. Paul explains this in Romans 11:17–18 when he warns Gentile believers not to boast against Israel: “You, though a wild olive shoot, have been grafted in among the others… do not consider yourself superior to those other branches.” The Church shares in the promises given to Israel, but those promises remain rooted in the people to whom God first gave them. Church history confirms what Scripture teaches. The early Fathers acknowledged Israel’s election. The Catholic Catechism teaches that “to the Jews belong the covenants, the law, the worship, the promises, and from them is the Christ” (CCC 839–840). Vatican II’s Nostra Aetate solemnly declared that God’s covenant with the Jewish people has never been revoked. Protestant voices like John Calvin, commenting on Romans 11, also affirmed that God did not cut off His covenant with Abraham’s descendants. So when Tucker Carlson claims the Jews are not God’s chosen people, he is not correcting elites or offering a bold insight. He is simply revealing that he does not understand basic Christianity. The Bible is plain, the teaching of the apostles is plain, and the witness of the Church through history is plain. God’s covenant with Israel is everlasting, His gifts and His call are irrevocable, and Christians are grafted into that truth. As Paul put it in Romans 11:29: “God’s gifts and His call are irrevocable.” Anyone who denies that is not defending the faith. They are contradicting it at its root. And when Tucker dares to speak as if he knows whom God has chosen, his arrogance knows no bounds.

English
2.6K
346
2.3K
301.1K
Guillermo Agudelo
Guillermo Agudelo@guilleagudelo·
@5Solas2 This is a useless discussion. If CK wanted to become Roman Catholic, that would not make Roman Catholicism true nor less abhorrent to God. If he was interested, I would think that maybe God took CK home before he made an horrible mistake
English
0
0
0
18
Guillermo Agudelo retweetledi
Atif Hussain
Atif Hussain@AtifHussainOG·
FULL trading model 1) Open the charts 2) Where is the HTF liquidity? 3) Wait for a liquidity sweep on the LTF 4) Wait for a FVG/OB to form in the direction of the HTF liquidity 5) Enter on that FVG 6) Target a 2 or 3 RR 7) Control your emotions and manage your risk Done
English
16
55
447
15.7K