🛠️ Evolve to Toolmakers or higher to unlock access to exclusive airdrops. More evolution = more rewards! @DNATOKEN_#DNA#Toolmakers#Airdrop
Invitation Code: 625291
🌎 Toolmakers Meme Token is the next evolution in the @DNATOKEN_ world. Built by humans, for humans. Launching soon! #DNA#Toolmakers#CommunityDriven
Invitation Code: 625291
@AsianEAC Great move from Ador. Now, those toxic Team Bunnies will be running off and hide as deep as they can. They can only spread hate but can never be responsible for their actions. They're just a bunch of cowards.
BELIFT LAB sues TEAM BUNNIES, fandom of New Jeans. $1M questions...
apparently BUNNIES has confirmed the operator is 17 years old.
Which raises the obvious question:
Is this going to juvenile court?
Short answer: for the kid, maybe.
Long answer: BELIFT didn’t come to play kindergarten law.
BELIFT didn’t just file against the 17-year-old. They filed against the parents too. And parents do not get the “I’m just a minor on X” discount.
Juvenile protection measures can handle the minor.
Civil damages? Those live very comfortably in adult court, especially when:
- plagiarism accusations are being blasted online,
companies and artists are named,
- money is raised,
- and the operation is described as “active in law, media, finance, culture, and the arts.”
At that point, this stops being “stan behavior” and starts looking like a supervised activity that wasn’t supervised or supervised by a vile adult who forgot to adult.
Also worth noting:
Courts already said it’s hard to see ILLIT copying NewJeans.
To summarize:
- Yes, the operator is 17.
- No, that doesn’t magically erase consequences.
BELIFT absolutely can—and did—aim higher up the family tree.
- “Good intentions” don’t cover business losses.
And being a minor doesn’t mean your parents are.
Thoughts and prayers to everyone who learned in real time that Twitter, or the internet for that matter, is not a legal sandbox.