Guy D.

4.9K posts

Guy D. banner
Guy D.

Guy D.

@guydroog

Trader & Technical Analyst. None of this is financial advice.

Katılım Eylül 2009
90 Takip Edilen1.5K Takipçiler
Guy D.
Guy D.@guydroog·
@FranVezz Imagine selling this after it closed below the 10D. Couldn't be me.
English
0
0
0
81
Francesco
Francesco@FranVezz·
$MU (long) Closing in on a double here. No predictions, no guesses, no telling the stock what it should do. Just good old fashioned trend following. Maybe $MU topped today, maybe it tops in 6 months. I don't know, but better still, I don't even care. Trading gets pretty cool when you care less about the $, and obsess about the process. whop.com/smart-stocks-d…
Francesco tweet media
English
2
2
39
2.8K
Jeff Sun, CFTe
Jeff Sun, CFTe@jfsrev·
This market will make you appreciate high ADR% securities.
Jeff Sun, CFTe tweet media
Jeff Sun, CFTe@jfsrev

Understanding the Infeasibility of '1% Risk to Equity' and Benefits of High ADR% Securities Your question is excellent, and I’d like to clarify why aiming for a 1% risk-to-equity ratio is often unrealistic due to position sizing constraints. I’ll also compare lower ADR% products, like $XRT at 1.41% ADR, with higher ADR% products, like $RETL at 4.06% ADR (a 3x leverage of $XRT, sharing the same price structure on intraday timeframes). In the example below, I simulate an entry price and stop-loss price based on $XRT and $RETL high and low range and automate the calculation of position size % required for a “1% risk” approach relative to account equity (excluding existing unrealized gains/losses of other positions). Using a 1% risk model, you would need to allocate almost your entire account (without margin) to $XRT and about 30% of your account to $RETL with its higher ADR%. The 1% risk approach may work for traders constraining themselves to securities with ADRs above 5%, as structuring trades based on high/low intraday ranges often only requires 10-25% of equity, enabling a minimum of four concurrent positions on swings. However, with names like $TSLA, $MSFT, or $NVDA, even synthetic leveraged of those names like $TSLL, $MSTU, or $NVDU wouldn’t allow for comfortable positioning. This is no secret if you have the right metrics on your spreadsheet. @stamatoudism have also highlighted about inflexibility of even 0.5% risk in his first interview with @traderlion I suggest starting with a 0.15% risk per trade, increasing only when you begin to see the benefit of having a ADR% cut off in your screening and share structure of higher ADR% securities. Personally, I max out at around 0.33%, especially when most active names now are in the 2b-25b market cap range, with floats below 50 million shares and ADRs above 4.5%. This are the trademark of momentum names, and it make alot of sense why are able to move in such rapid fashion on those share structure. I just wish to add that High ADR% securities offer the benefit of greater intraday range expansion without substantial capital lock-up compared to lower ADR% names. I avoid trading products like $XRT or $TSLA directly, preferring leveraged ETFs when they provide sufficient liquidity for the same reason. It gives you alot of capital excess when a 5-star/A-rated setup in the latter stage of your position building.

English
29
17
353
41.6K
Guy D.
Guy D.@guydroog·
@shiri_shh What do you mean you can't validate the 95% claim? Listen to the sound your dog makes, look at what the app translate it into and just compare it to the Oxford Barking Dictionary to confirm? How do people not get that?
English
0
0
1
115
Guy D.
Guy D.@guydroog·
@NickSchmidt Ofcourse you're bullish Tesla. You literally sound like Elon Musk. There is no chance you are not him.
English
0
2
2
34
Nick Schmidt
Nick Schmidt@NickSchmidt·
This is why I think $TSLA is close to making a big move
English
37
20
380
52.3K
Guy D.
Guy D.@guydroog·
My life in one image part 37
Guy D. tweet media
English
0
0
3
86
Guy D.
Guy D.@guydroog·
I find it odd people take credit for highlighting or even mentioning strong stocks that continue to be strong in their newsletter or analysis. There is a world of difference between actionable setups or highlighting strength.
English
0
0
1
60
Guy D.
Guy D.@guydroog·
$CXDO Super thin (acting like that would matter to me), but I like the setup here.
Guy D. tweet media
English
0
0
1
137
Guy D.
Guy D.@guydroog·
@NickSchmidt That has never happened to me except for five times every single week.
English
1
0
1
159
Nick Schmidt
Nick Schmidt@NickSchmidt·
Having a thesis on a stock and it playing out perfectly without you is one of the worst feelings. Last year for me that was $GEV it was a special setup I was laser focused on. I took like 5 losses executed terrible. I was right but I made no money. Think I actually may have been right and lost money 🤣 I learned from it though. Made sure to focus when the same setup appears. If it wasn't for screwing up $GEV I would not have had nailed $MU which has been my best trade so far of the year. The pattern for me has always been something that really sucked or was painful has eventually turned into experience that made me more money in the future.
Nick Schmidt tweet media
Nick Schmidt@NickSchmidt

Being right about a stock and making money are two completely different skills. Watched $GEV's base develop for months. Picture perfect setup. It's playing out exactly how I imagined and I don't own a single share.

English
16
2
182
28.1K
Guy D.
Guy D.@guydroog·
$CRCL Trades exactly like anything else related to crypto but could be forming a neat little handle here. It'll still stop you out a thousand times before it's done though but that's the best part of trading isn't it? A thousand tiny stop outs before missing the move.
Guy D. tweet media
English
1
0
3
239
Guy D.
Guy D.@guydroog·
@MarkRitchie_II As a dad, this was actually the highlight of the whole piece: “But who else was I going to call when my confidence was already waning right off the hop?” Your dad has won in life.
English
0
0
1
246
Mark Ritchie II
Mark Ritchie II@MarkRitchie_II·
How & why I ended up picking the fighter in the blue trunks...(longer read warning) I may have shared elements of this prior but when I started on my own (Jan 2010), I was nearly 100% a quant. I had some ideas and figured all I needed was discipline and risk management and I’d be a millionaire in no time. I borrowed 50K from my dad in sort of a handshake deal, and he said, “Trade it like it’s 100K, and if you do well I’ll add.” Fast forward a few weeks and nearly all my first trades had been losers, to the tune of about $500–1,200 a piece. I was down a few grand and DYING on the inside. My dad was on the other side of the world in Southeast Asia working with orphans, and I didn’t want to tell him that my new trading adventure, which he had backed, was off to a bumpy start. But who else was I going to call when my confidence was already waning right off the hop? The conversation via skype call (this was 2010) went nearly verbatim like this: “Mac, what’s the problem?” he asked. “Uh, well, nearly all the trades have been losers and I’m losing a bit of confidence,” I said. “Were these within what you expected in terms of percentage drawdown?” he asked. “Yeah,” I said. “Then get back to work and take the next trade. If you can’t stomach the volatility, then cut your size in half.” End of conversation. Fast forward about 2+ years and, through a lot of hard work, I’d managed to run that initial stake up quite a bit and was managing somewhere in the neighborhood of 700K when I had my first six‑figure drawdown. I was up on the year but again dying on the inside and feeling like I’d had my guts ripped out. My pops was stateside when I invited him into the office for a similar chat. “Dad, I’m in the biggest drawdown I’ve ever had and it’s kinda eating me up.” “Why is that?” he asked. We then reviewed the gains and the relative drawdown, and I said, “I think this is normal given the run I’ve had, but it just feels awful. I want to be able to lose 10x this someday and NOT have it feel this bad.” “Now you’re thinking like a pro,” he said. “If you’re going to continue to grow, this is what you signed up for—and you’re thinking about it exactly right.” End of conversation. As luck or divine sovereignty (I always take the latter) would have it, I became friends with @PeterLBrandt shortly thereafter at one of his Trader bootcamps. I heeded his advice to always express risk and trades in terms of basis points and not dollars and never looked back. It felt like a weight was lifted off me. I don’t know how many of our cognitive biases are truly holding us back—and I’m not a psychologist—but for me, telling someone I lost 100 bp does not have the negative emotional pull that telling someone I lost 100K does. Yes, they are two ways of saying the same thing, but for me, one helps me stay grounded while the other leads down a road of emotional volatility that I don’t want to be on. Within a few years (end of 2018), I had the worst drawdown I’ve ever had in a single month and lost nearly 2 million dollars. I only share the dollar amount for illustration. To be clear…it sucked. However, it didn’t have nearly the gut‑wrenching hold that some of the prior periods had, because I was only seeing the BPs from my end and could get back to work knowing that the loss was acceptable (albeit really sucky) relative to how much I was trading and where I was for the year and overall. I wasn’t thinking about losing a house or a boat or all the things we like to attach to the capital we are trading. I think the moral of this story—at least for me (some of this is cathartic)—is that BP vs $ are two ways of saying the same thing, but one gives me much more psychological stability and an edge in my emotional capital and in this business, that can be a really big separator in the long run. Hope this helped someone. MR2
Mark Ritchie II tweet media
English
23
19
197
9.9K
Guy D.
Guy D.@guydroog·
@jfsrev Hi Jeff, Could you elaborate on your execution on this one? Will you in fact take trades when they close above a level later into the session and not exclusively after the first 30m?
English
0
0
2
200
Mark Ritchie II
Mark Ritchie II@MarkRitchie_II·
Best evidence we aren't topping here... In my career (I'm officially an adult as I started full time in 07' & 2010 on my own) I've never seen a market top in ANY meaningful way with sentiment that looks like this. Normally this would suggest we have a way to go but more to the point sentiment to me is more about mood/environment (which can get WAY out of whack) than a timing signal. It tells me that most are doubting this rally still here and that macro stuff still has a lot of managers sitting on their hands.
Mark Ritchie II tweet mediaMark Ritchie II tweet media
English
33
41
451
99.6K