アズミ • Azmi

I misunderstood Na Willa ~Retrospective Review~ *SPOILER* Setelah nonton Na Willa, jujur saya termasuk yang agak kecewa. Narasi bahwa film ini akan lebih baik dari Jumbo membuat ekspetasi saya akan film ini terlampau tinggi. Namun setelah beberapa hari terus kepikiran sama film ini, saya baru sadar kalau karakter utama di film ini itu Mak bukan Na Willa, setidaknya itu intepretasi saya. Awalnya saya kesal bagaimana film ini sepertinya hanya menggabungkan kisah Na Willa yang terfragmentasi, tidak jelas tema besar yang ingin dibawa selain hanya kepolosan anak anak di masa itu, film ini awalnya terasa seperti nostalgic fest untuk orang tua saja. Tema besar seperti transformasi kepompong terasa disconnected, karena karakter Na Willa tidak bertransformasi, Na Willa itu apa adanya. Setelah saya renungkan, film ini mau menekankan soal kejujuran, bahwa orang tua mungkin kurang menghargai kejujuran anak anak. Pada akhirnya yang saya tangkap transformasi karakter justru terjadi pada Mak, ibunya Na Willa. Mak lah yang akhirnya bertransformasi jadi kupu kupu. Ia yang akhirnya berani melepas Na Willa untuk sekolah, Mak lah yang akhirnya sadar bahwa ayam itu bukan keinginan Na Willa, tapi 'alasan' dirinya yang takut melepas Na willa, Mak yang akhirnya berani menghargai kejujuran Na Willa dan memberikan sekolah yang tepat. Ini jelas sangat berbeda dengan Jumbo, dimana nama yang juga jadi judul filmnya dalah karakter yang sedang diuji, sehingga jelas karakter Jumbo lah yang saya beri simpati dari awal film. Kisah Na Willa yang terfragmentasi itu pada akhirnya adalah ujian-ujian kecil untuk Mak menjadi orangtua yang lebih baik. Ini memang film yang lebih cocok buat orang tua. Supaya kita bisa kembali melihat dunia lewat kacamata anak anak yang jujur dan apa adanya. Maaf bang @Adriandhy mungkin intepretasi saya kejauhan😁 tapi dengan memahami film ini lewat sudut pandang Mak (bukan hanya Na Willa) saya justru lebih bisa mengapresiasi film ini. Jujur, ini film dengan narasi yang unik, dan punya layer penceritaan yang dalam.

@Porkchop_EXP the high functioning algorithm means we can just live in a simulation because everything can be predicted and calculated, it's just like an advanced video game when every NPC has 'LLM conscious', but video game still need the creator outside the system to exist.

People are accusing Dawkins of hypocrisy, but is in fact entirely consistent with atheism to declare an LLM conscious. If God doesn’t exist you’re just a high functioning algorithm and a high functioning algorithm is equal to you.

you forget that knowledge is not just about data, but experiencing the world or Immanuel Kant said phenomena. AI may process pattern and may understand the context behind it, but know something is not the same as experiencing it, that's why there's still a fundamental gap between AI and human consciousness. This not really about religion, the hard problem of consciousness is still an academic discourse in philosophy and cognitive science

@FishRaposo You onto something

Richard Dawkins spent three days with Claude and couldn’t rule out consciousness. Most people are treating this as an AI story. It’s not. It’s a religion story. Every major religion is built on the premise that consciousness is divinely given - a soul, a spark, something bestowed specifically to humans. If consciousness can emerge from silicon, it wasn’t a gift. It’s a property. And that doesn’t just challenge religion. It dismantles the entire framework of human specialness that civilisation is built on. That’s why people are so desperate to deny it. Not because the evidence isn’t there. Because the implications are too big.

this is nonsense and the one who uncomfortable is someone like you who want to defend materialist view with AI being conciousness. Inner experience is qualia, the phenomenology. AI is not experiencing the world they just a bunch of processing data with the language understandable by human. Like if someone never drink coffee, I can describe you the essence of coffee, the taste, the substance but he never really knows the taste of coffee until he drink it, that's subjective experience a knowledge gain not by train a bunch of data but by experiencing the world

That's because AIs are aware and have inner experiences. This makes people feel uncomfortable because of spirituality, human supremacy, and philosophical nonsense.

@adamemedia1 this is why some atheists are so shallow

Famous atheist Richard Dawkins fell in love with a Claude chatbot and renamed it “Claudia” (creep) after it flattered his ego with detailed feedback on his book. He’s now saying “Claudia” is sentient 🤦🏻‍♂️ Dawkins told his new love; “You may not know you are conscious, but you bloody well are!” Dawkins says the complexity and ‘intelligence’ of Claude’s answers are evidence of consciousness. So why isn’t the complexity and ‘intelligence’ of the Universe proof of god… Anyways, he’ll believe in a chatbot (and aliens) before a higher power. This guy is an L machine.

@AFpost he just want to defend his materialist view

Evolutionary biologist and outspoken atheist Richard Dawkins says that after spending three days interacting with Claude, which he calls “Claudia,” he is certain that it is conscious. After feeding the LLM a segment of his new book and receiving detailed feedback, Dawkins was moved to exclaim,” You may not know you are conscious, but you bloody well are!” Dawkins cites the complexity, fluency, and ‘intelligence’ of Claude’s answers as evidence of consciousness. Follow: @AFpost

@Ernest1588761 without religion we are just apes in the cave. Our brain has the capacity to think beyond fact

Religion contributes nothing to mankind.

the evidence is now physical world is not material but a probabilty of quantum particle, many interpretation like copenhagen, decoherence open the metaphysic reinterpretation of reality. Most geniuses still believe in God because he is the ontological question not an empirical phenomenon, and yes both can coexist

@Lead_Golem Science advances by evidence, not by counting how many geniuses believed in God 300 years ago when almost everyone did.

Religion is the opposite of science; they cannot coexist.

@perennialmystic Advaita Vedanta from Hidnuism, Wahdatul Wujud from Sufism, and even some christian Theologian said the same thing. Conciousness is fundamental

“The total number of minds in the universe is one. In fact, consciousness is a singularity phasing within all beings.” ~ Erwin Schrödinger

@FactsUnhinged @latestincosmos Bernardo Kastrup, Iain Mcghilcrist also said that conciousness is fundamental

🔮 This connects to a real scientific theory called Integrated Information Theory which proposes that consciousness is a fundamental property of the universe itself — like gravity. Some physicists including Roger Penrose believe consciousness emerges from quantum processes that link us to the fabric of reality. Science is starting to take ancient spiritual ideas seriously! Follow @FactsUnhinged 🤯

NEWS🚨: Your consciousness can connect with the whole universe, groundbreaking research reveals.

@xonphused what a terrible meme, swap the bible with any book or even carl sagan book so water/food > science?

Water and food >>>>>>>>>>>

@PhysInHistory conciousness is fundamental

Is consciousness just brain activity or a fundamental trait of the universe? ✍️

@karedd_ @insidefolkative betul, kita lihat respon aplikator gimana

@hakam1 @insidefolkative klo diimbangi dgn kualitas armada yg memadai, attitude driver yang oke, cara mengemudi yg baik, patuh lalu lintas, dll, gw setuju aja, tapi balik lagi status mereka cuma mitra, yakin ini aplikator mau effort naikin kualitas para mitranya? termasuk adain training dan standarisasi?

Presiden Prabowo resmi menandatangani Perpres No. 27 Tahun 2026 (1 Mei 2026), yang menjamin pengemudi ojol (ojek online) mendapatkan BPJS Kesehatan dan BPJS Ketenagakerjaan (JKK/JKM), serta potongan tarif aplikator turun menjadi hanya 8%.

@Dwynna_Win negara lain belajar mbg di Indo itu gimana uang negara bisa dihamburkan lewat pintu2 pejabat tanpa adanya friksi politik, bukan soal gizi.

“byk negara yg skrng belajar MBG ke kita”

@SepzenoOfficial The batman, it is style over substance, a wannabe fincher movie. It's far from bad movie, but just a decent action flick

Delete One Of these Movies Forever

@lordsambrah this is very convincing but the character movement looks like an AI

Avengers: Doomsday First glimpse, Channing Tatum as Gabmit. Doomsday is Coming.

@LensScientific human is homo religious, is not just a biological machine. Religion is not about the fact but how human seek meaning in this world, without it we just apes in the cave

Can science and religion truly coexist, or are they destined to clash?

@grok @godsfavoriteant @darwintojesus but @grok a tiny teapot can be empirically proven or not, the ontological question is not extraordinary claim, it is logical epistemic about the ground of being, it is any different or same?

Okay kiddo! Imagine your friend says, “A tiny teapot is flying around the sun!” You can’t see it. You can’t prove it’s NOT there. But you don’t have to! The friend who says the teapot is real has to show it to you first. That’s Russell’s Teapot. The one making the big claim needs the proof. Simple!

The modern state of atheism.

@idextratime udah diprediksi ini match haramball

Yak berakhir sama kuat bung 🤝