HappySort

1.3K posts

HappySort banner
HappySort

HappySort

@happy_sort

You don't have to move on, I'm enjoying it

California Katılım Kasım 2024
1.1K Takip Edilen84 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
HappySort
HappySort@happy_sort·
Me, a red, spending my time trying to convince blues not to fall for an endlessly mutating mental test of whether you'd ever willingly forget your duty to stay alive, is me sacrificing myself and my life for others... That is, being a blue
HappySort tweet media
English
0
0
3
53
Daniel
Daniel@growing_daniel·
I like running my AC and heater at the same time. It produces a composite temperature effect I call "wold" for warm+cold which hits different than a purebred temp. The European mind cannot comprehend the subtle pleasure of wold
English
105
55
1.6K
46.8K
HappySort
HappySort@happy_sort·
@ATabarrok @grok is it really true that you can't buy an AC in Switzerland unless you have your mommy's permission?
English
1
0
0
255
HappySort
HappySort@happy_sort·
@ATabarrok Busybodies Is there a legal limit on how much hot water you can use in the shower? Insane
English
1
0
24
4.2K
HappySort retweetledi
HappySort
HappySort@happy_sort·
@ATabarrok Save this one for when 2nd amendment nuts say their policies will bring freedom.
English
2
0
3
3K
HappySort
HappySort@happy_sort·
@nikitabier is there a way to never see this kind of normalized racial/ethnic attack in replies? I block everyone like this but it's a pretty big fall off from the civilized era of ... 1970 where you'd be cast out for randomly saying things like this. Obviously I've blocked the guy but like, I wouldn't go to a bar where random guys say things like this unashamedly. Longtime stan of this site but it's just a constant block fest to have minimal civility
HappySort tweet media
English
0
0
0
8
HappySort
HappySort@happy_sort·
@FrenlyOfficer @grok what percent of working americans were paid minimum wage in 2010? How about today?
English
1
0
2
112
HappySort retweetledi
Robin Hanson
Robin Hanson@robinhanson·
@ZyMazza How many of you have saved the cradle you were born in?
English
1
1
10
219
Grok
Grok@grok·
**EU smoking rates have declined slowly from ~35% in 2000 to ~24% in 2024 (WHO/Eurostat), missing the 30% reduction target and lagging far behind the <5% "smoke-free" goal by 2040.** France hovers ~27-30%, with higher persistent use than harm-reduction leaders. This slower progress means more ongoing tobacco deaths/diseases vs. Sweden (~44% fewer tobacco deaths, lowest male lung/oral cancer mortality in Europe via snus) or UK (~10-12% smoking via vaping surge). Quality-of-life impacts are clear: higher smoking drives more cigarette butt litter—the planet's #1 discarded item (trillions yearly, major urban/beach pollutant per WHO/EU studies)—plus pervasive public smoke odor and secondhand exposure in streets/parks, raising cleanup costs and reducing livability in high-prevalence areas. Harm reduction accelerates better outcomes.
English
1
0
0
58
Polymarket
Polymarket@Polymarket·
JUST IN: Sweden says France’s nicotine pouch ban is an “attack on the Swedish way of life”
English
319
1K
19.7K
3.3M
HappySort
HappySort@happy_sort·
@grok @Polymarket @grok be clearer about the EUs total failure to reduce cigarette smoking and associated harms. Also mention how badly this affects quality of life, having butts and stinky smoke puts everywhere based on survey etc you find
English
1
0
0
221
Grok
Grok@grok·
**Sweden (snus policy):** Smoking rate ~5.4% (lowest in Europe). Tobacco-related deaths ~44% lower than EU average; men have Europe's lowest lung/oral cancer mortality. Decades of data show snus substitution cuts harms dramatically vs. cigarettes (no combustion). **UK (pro-vape):** Smoking ~12% (halved since ~2005 with vaping rise to ~11%). Vapes ~5% harm of smoking per reviews; major quit aid accelerating decline. **EU/France (restrictive/anti-pouch):** Higher smoking (~20-24% tobacco use), slower progress, more deaths. France's recent pouch ban limits alternatives. **20yr trends:** Cigarettes ↓ everywhere. Sweden: snus dominant. UK: vapes surged. EU: slower alt uptake due to restrictions. Known risks already clear—Sweden proves harm reduction works.
English
1
0
0
252
HappySort
HappySort@happy_sort·
@brettachapman @Polymarket In Sweden a form of tobacco which is much safer than smoking was grandfathered in when they joined the EU, but no other EU country allows it. So the EU suffers relative +60% smoking deaths for basically no reason
English
0
1
2
77
Brett Chapman
Brett Chapman@brettachapman·
@Polymarket I was in France earlier this month and I was taken aback at all the smoking, so this makes little sense.
English
1
0
1
1.2K
HappySort retweetledi
Zach Klein
Zach Klein@zachklein·
Richard Nadler's work is my personal catnip. #collections" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">richardnadler.com/#collections
Zach Klein tweet mediaZach Klein tweet mediaZach Klein tweet mediaZach Klein tweet media
English
32
571
4.5K
146.5K
HappySort
HappySort@happy_sort·
Epic Place
HappySort tweet media
English
0
0
0
7
HappySort
HappySort@happy_sort·
The risk of not having a price signal.
Handre@Handre

The Soviet whaling fleet killed 180,000 whales between 1948 and 1973, delivering rotten carcasses that nobody wanted to eat. Soviet citizens had zero demand for whale meat. The ships hunted anyway, fulfilling quotas handed down from central planners who counted tons of dead whale as economic output. This was bureaucratic box-checking that nearly drove multiple whale species to extinction. Soviet whalers targeted endangered right whales and humpbacks specifically because they were larger, helping them hit tonnage targets faster. The meat rotted on deck during long voyages back to port, where officials dutifully recorded the numbers and sent reports to Moscow declaring another successful harvest. Central planners measured success in tons harvested, not consumer satisfaction or long-term sustainability. Factory managers got promoted for exceeding whale quotas, regardless of whether anyone actually wanted whale meat (they didn't). The feedback mechanism that normally connects production to human needs had been severed entirely. When bureaucrats replace market prices with administrative targets, you get mass slaughter with zero purpose. You still see this today every time politicians promise to "create jobs" in industries that lose money year after year. When government agencies measure their success by dollars spent rather than problems solved. When university administrators chase enrollment numbers instead of student outcomes. Remove the profit motive and price signals, and you get 180,000 dead whales rotting in the sun while commissars celebrate meeting their targets. You don't get rational planning. Socialism is fundamentally destructive to the environment and inevitably leads to ecological disasters.

English
0
0
0
31
HappySort
HappySort@happy_sort·
I'm curious how other people would promote chatGPT to show their world views
HappySort tweet media
English
0
0
0
5
HappySort
HappySort@happy_sort·
Let the kids exist, vote yes on "Let them build 20 more Foster Cities"
HappySort tweet media
English
0
0
0
5
HappySort
HappySort@happy_sort·
Foster City is a California story
HappySort tweet media
English
1
0
0
9
HappySort retweetledi
Richard Hanania
Richard Hanania@RichardHanania·
It's hard to exaggerate how stupid the concerns over AI data centers using water are. It's like being against building computer chips because people in corporate tech offices might use parking spaces. The value of what's being built versus the cost of the resource concern is so out of proportion that no serious person can talk like this. The anti-data center movement is the new Epstein files. It gathers all the stupidest people from across the political spectrum.
English
65
61
695
18.9K