Hurbeigh

Justice Caguioa’s concurring opinion on Bato’s case is superbly written. This case will define the Court. For too long, power has found ways to outrun justice. It has hidden in office, in influence, in violence, and now, in the language of due process. That ends here. The Court cannot become a refuge for impunity. It has always been, and must always remain, where justice refuses to yield.

“The Court should strongly guard against being used as a politically convenient doormat, for the wiping clean of those who are charged with blood on their hands.” — J. Caguioa concurring opinion

END OF AN ERA 💙💙 All five members of the fabled ‘Fab 5’ of the Ateneo Lady Eagles have reached the twilight of their respective volleyball careers.

INISPLUK NAMAN HAHAHHA SANA TRUE!!! 🤔🥹

A new meme was born! Ces Oreña-Drilon 🔥🔥🔥

hindi nagsisinungaling ang screenshot

Objectively speaking, Alyssa’s decision can still be considered morally valid under multiple ethical frameworks: • Deontology / Duty Ethics • Consequentialism / Utilitarianism • Virtue Ethics So reducing it to “tumuloy maglaro = enabler” ignores ethical complexity entirely.

OH: Eya, Des, Isa, Mean, Jewel (Sisi) MB: Maddie, Lors, Jen, Jai OPP: Kat, Dindin, Barbie, Achik S: Deanna, Alina, Jem (Tia) L: Thang, Dawn (Rechina) Pag di MB talaga kinuha nyo sa draft 🙄