Josep Pascual Badia

Construint avui les aplicacions de demà🛠🖥 Passa per twitch per veure que estic trastejant📺📡 twitch.tv/hatsyio Trello per planificar próxims projectes⚙️💡 trello.com/joseppascualba… Tens idees que t'agradaria desenvolupar o curiositat per noves tecnologies? Parlem-ne📝🌍🌟

@KeitaroTR Pulsa mi enlace exclusivo y ¡ganemos juntos Protogemas y recompensas del sorteo! Código de invitación: GCFH63JCHN, hoyo.link/2AK6DH46l?m_co…

Gente, aún hay tiempo para poder conseguir todas las Protogemas del evento web Dejen en los comentarios vuestros códigos para apoyarnos!

Cuando programo con IA a menudo me veo indicándole al agente en qué capa de abstracción colocar cada cosa. Le pido una funcionalidad en un buscador, y me escribe un módulo fabuloso de cientos de líneas, que funciona perfectamente. Yo lo veo, horrorizado, y le digo: —Payo, ¡así no! Consulta la documentación de la base de datos y mira si puedes delegarle esa complejidad. Entonces me responde: —Tienes razón, ¡buen cambio de rumbo! Y borra el módulo de cientos de líneas que escribió en el paso anterior. Ahora, más que nunca, programar es entender qué va en cada capa de abstracción. Delegar todo lo posible en el DOM, en el JavaScript moderno, en la base de datos, en el protocolo… Y luchar contra la complejidad artificial que trata de introducir la IA. El mérito nuca fue conseguir que funcione. El mérito es que la complejidad del proyecto crezca linealmente cuando la funcionalidad que proporciona crece exponencialmente.

@GenshinUniverse Pulsa mi enlace exclusivo y ¡ganemos juntos Protogemas y recompensas del sorteo! Código de invitación: GCFH63JCHN, hoyo.link/2AK6DH46l?m_co…

Don't miss out on the rewards! Share your link if you still need it and let's help each other :) #GenshinImpact

"Is that code AI generated? If it’s AI generated I don’t want it"

The CEO of Take-Two, the company behind GTA, just said something the entire AI industry doesn't want to hear. And he said it without being anti-AI. Strauss Zelnick's argument is precise. AI is built on datasets. Datasets are backward-looking. Creativity is forward-looking. A model trained on everything that already exists cannot, by definition, produce something genuinely unexpected. And all hits, by their very nature, are unexpected. Asset creation and hit creation are not the same thing. AI is getting very good at the first one. The second one is what actually makes money, builds franchises, and changes culture. Nobody has shown AI can do that yet. The derivative property problem is real. You can clone GTA with existing technology. You could do it before AI. It would take 3 years and look identical. It still wouldn't sell. Because it isn't GTA. It's a clone of GTA. And consumers, despite what the industry occasionally pretends, can feel the difference between something genuinely new and something assembled from the residue of things that already worked. Thousands of mobile games ship every year. 0 to 5 hits get made. The same studios make them every time. The technology to make more games has been commoditized for years. It didn't democratize hit creation. It just flooded the market with more forgettable product. The Silicon Valley thesis that AI unlocks game creation for everyone is true in the same way that cheap cameras unlocked filmmaking for everyone. They did. And the same 5 studios still make the movies everyone watches. What Zelnick is saying, without quite saying it, is that the thing AI cannot replicate is taste. The instinct for what hasn't been done yet. The cultural antenna that detects the gap in the market before the data can see it. Data tells you what people wanted. Hits tell people what they want next. Those are different jobs.

Local ultra hyper tourist attempts to prove a point using modded AI cop cars and moving goalposts. Again, apologize immediately for being dumb. You never played Most Wanted 2005.

I was wrong about AI replacing developers. For a year I told clients the leverage was in the tool. Better Cursor setup, better Copilot rules, more output per engineer. Two years of building production AI teams later, that take aged badly. The original story was simple. AI is an output multiplier. Adopt the tools, ship more code, win. Every vendor sold it. Every conference talk repeated it. I repeated it on sales calls. DX surveyed 121,000 developers across 450+ companies between November 2025 and February 2026. 92.6% use an AI coding assistant. AI-authored code is now 26.9% of all production code, up from 22% the prior quarter. Productivity gains still haven't moved past 10%. Digital Applied's Q1 2026 survey of 2,847 developers found something even sharper. Reviewing AI-generated code now takes 11.4 hours per week. Writing new code takes 9.8. The cost of AI is showing up where most teams aren't measuring it. In the human attention required to keep AI-generated code from breaking in production. At Limestone, 98% of our code is not handwritten. Auth, payments, and a few domain edge cases are the exception. But every line of that 98% gets reviewed, restructured, or rejected by a senior engineer who decided what should exist before the agent ever generated it. AI replaced typing. It didn't replace thinking. The engineers who thrive aren't the fastest coders. They're the ones who can read a 200-line AI-generated diff and spot the three edge cases the model missed. They're the ones who architect before they prompt. They're the ones who can tell you why a piece of code shouldn't exist before they explain how to write it. If your AI strategy assumes the agent does the thinking, you're not building an AI-augmented team. You're building a risk surface that compounds with every commit.

That’s called remote code execution sir. Last I checked it was a vulnerability, not a feature

it’s a bit ridiculous to say “the time you spend scrolling could be spent building a business/writing a novel/reading the classics”. sometimes that’s true but usually scrolling happens as a result of cognitive fatigue, and the idea that you can just “swap in” another intellectually demanding task means you’re treating your body/mind as a machine a better approach would be “the time you spend scrolling could be spent taking a stroll/napping/staring out the window/having a meandering conversation with a friend”. that’s both more palatable and probably what we’re actually craving when we reach for our phone: a brief break from the demands of life, and a time to let our mind relax

I strongly believe there are entire companies right now under heavy AI psychosis and its impossible to have rational conversations about it with them. I can't name any specific people because they include personal friends I deeply respect, but I worry about how this plays out. I lived through the great MTBF vs MTTR (mean-time-between-failure vs. mean-time-to-recovery) reckoning of infrastructure during the transition to cloud and cloud automation. All those arguments are rearing their ugly heads again but now its... the whole software development industry (maybe the whole world, really). It's frightening, because the psychosis folks operate under an almost absolute "MTTR is all you need" mentality: "its fine to ship bugs because the agents will fix them so quickly and at a scale humans can't do!" We learned in infrastructure that MTTR is great but you can't yeet resilient systems entirely. The main issue is I don't even know how to bring this up to people I know personally, because bringing this topic up leads to immediately dismissals like "no no, it has full test coverage" or "bug reports are going down" or something, which just don't paint the whole picture. We already learned this lesson once in infrastructure: you can automate yourself into a very resilient catastrophe machine. Systems can appear healthy by local metrics while globally becoming incomprehensible. Bug reports can go down while latent risk explodes. Test coverage can rise while semantic understanding falls. Changes happens so fast that nobody notices the underlying architecture decaying. I worry.

Las personas de izquierdas que difundieron el infundio de que Jon estaba en Twitter para defender los intereses del BBVA, ¿rectificarán o se disculparán ahora que Jon ha tenido que suspender su cuenta? ¿Les importa mínimamente el daño personal y laboral que pueden haberle provocado a una persona solo por discrepar de sus ideas (más bien, por ser incapaces de refutarlas)? No, no les importa lo más mínimo porque toda su ideología es una mentira: dicen defender la libertad de expresión y ahora se recrean en haber conseguido censurarla; dicen luchar por los derechos de los trabajadores y han lanzado unas campaña en redes sociales para linchar a un trabajador e intentar que lo despidan. Ni libertad de expresión ni derechos de los trabajadores. Lo único que les obsesiona es conquistar y retener el poder político y, para lograrlo, no tienen el más mínimo reparo en mentir, difamar y triturar a quien se interponga en su camino. No vais a hallar en sus cuentas ni la menor señal de arrepentimiento sincero por lo que han hecho.

计算机这个行业，的确是当代所有工科里最开放、最真实、最先进的一个 很多人以为程序员的待遇好只是因为风口，其实背后有个更底层的原因——这个行业的文化本身就拒绝藏着掖着。 去看看传统工科。机械、电气、化工、材料……越老的师傅越吃香，每个人都把自己手里那点"核心技术"当成金疙瘩，捂得死死的，传徒弟还要留一手。 知识在这些行业里是高度私有化的，是用来换地位、换饭碗、换话语权的。 计算机不一样。 打开 GitHub，全世界最聪明的一批人，把自己最核心的东西免费扔出来，让所有人去用、去改、去骂、去 fork。 能跑就是能跑，跑不出来再多解释都是废话。性能好就是牛逼，性能差就是菜狗。 没有职称、没有辈分、没有"老师傅说了算"。 很多传统工科的论文，方法是一回事，实验数据是另一回事，复现是第三回事。 学术圈心照不宣，能用的成果其实少得可怜。 计算机领域虽然也有水文，但因为大量论文开源代码、开源模型、开源数据，整体可信度甩开传统工科一大截。 一个行业越开放，越敢把底裤露出来给人看，它的进步速度就越快，人才的天花板也就越高。 计算机过去三十年的爆发，根子就在这里。

Viendo JJK3 y medio capitulo de maki es un tributo a kill bill.

Con el tema de @Jongonzlz me pregunto una cosa: ¿para qué tenemos en España varios cientos de doctorandos en economía y ciencias políticas cobrando dinero público, si el curro que deberían hacer lo hace en su tiempo libre un pollo que trabaja redactando el informe anual del BBVA?

Lo siento, pero cada vez que oigo hablar del hantavirus no puedo evitar imaginármelo tal que así:

En cualquier banco o gran institución financiera como BBVA, si te identificas en redes como empleado, cualquier cosa que publiques puede interpretarse como una postura oficial de la institución y eso solo te puede traer muchos problemas. Creo que lo de Jon (como la mía y muchos otros que estamos todo el día en X con los datos), es una causa personal que no preocupa enormemente por el futuro de este país y precisamente porque nos dedicamos profeisonalmente a ello tenemos las herramientas y el conocimiento para tener más consciencia que nadie. Pero este periodista prefiere insinuar que lo oculta porque BBVA le obliga a manipular datos en favor de sus intereses financieros. Eso sí me parece bastante más cercano a la mala fe y a la falta de ética 😂 Los datos son los datos, y si piensas que la información que vierte Jon en esta red es mala o manipulada, como periodistas argumenta con el fondo y no intentes matar al mensajero! Ojalá muchos más profesionales que conozco en instituciones pudieran participar de la conversación en redes y no lo hacen por miedo a este tipo de periodistas

Un desarrollador danés, flipando con Autofirma, deja un educado comentario en el repositorio de desarrollo. Es imposible explicarlo mejor: «En el sector privado, lanzar software en este estado supondría un fracaso comercial inmediato. El hecho de que esta aplicación sea obligatoria para los ciudadanos españoles no exime al equipo de desarrollo de cumplir con los estándares modernos de seguridad y distribución. Exige estándares más altos, no más bajos». ¡Necesitamos más software de código abierto en la Administración pública!

I’m speechless dude that was yet another 10/10 World Quest . Zeitlind is such a relatable and well written character. I love how even though she’s clearly suffering from suicidal ideation the story doesn’t resolve with her recovering, or people trying to convince her not to feel depressed and it works, but instead it ends with her getting what she wants in a way while still growing to love life through the course of the adventure Media often glorifies kindness as a fix to everything but that’s not how it works a lot of the time. She has to find the answer herself, but even finding the answer can’t suddenly heal depression and that made this quest feel so real. She’s sees the value in life, but can’t value herself, so by “killing herself” and erasing her memories she gives herself a second chance instead of ending it entirely. It’s really bittersweet That “To be continued” at the end of the quest really hit different 😭