Sebastián Herrera

Principales problemas de la NASA: -Tener un aterrizador lunar listo -Cadencia del SLS -Un inodoro

@SouARamonaS2 Aquela cena me deu vontade de comprar.

e pensar que teve gente que cancelou a pré venda do 007 por conta dessa cena de 15 segundos 💔

@13ericralph31 @deltaIV9250 Yeah, the same thing happened with F9 in 2016. It took them just over a year to repair SLC-40, but they were flying again in 4 months thanks to Vandenberg and LC-39A

This certainly validates SpaceX's odd decision to build multiple Starship launch sites (Pad 1 rework, 39A, LC-37) in parallel well before Starship is remotely operational. A similar event at Pad 2 might only delay testing by a few months thanks to 39A being nearly complete.

@ScottLikedSLS Yeah, watching the videos again, it was in the engines of stage one

@hbravoseb no.

best thing is there payload was not on the vehicle at the time, so those LEO sats could probably be reasigned to Ariane 6 or Atlas

@SpaceDavenport @pronounced_kyle Blue Origin doesn't have another platform like SpaceX did in 2016. Unfortunately, New Glenn won't fly again until mid-2027 at the earliest

The Amos-6 Falcon 9 pad explosion was 10 years ago. SpaceX returned to flight within four months. I think it’ll be far longer than that before we see New Glenn take to the skies.

@NoVive_Socialis Chinga, estamos hablando de tornillo

¿Opiniones?

@Javisness Pequeño Cesar 🗿

El apodo “Liru Sisa” o “Liru Cisa” se volvió tan popular en México que incluso Little Caesars tomó la decisión de registrarlo oficialmente ante el IMPI

@ChecoxB @ivanshiz La Fia y sus reestructuraciones

@ivanshiz Es la misma mamada

Como que first win for México si Checo Pérrz ganó en gp2

El próximo vuelo debería de llamarse "Orbital Flight Test" (si es que deciden ir a órbita con lo sucedido, claro)

@Zelda_Talk @Starship_20 I don't think they'll do anything to the pad other than paint the QDs again

@Starship_20 Yeah makes sense I guess this thing just tanked it and it’s already good to go and we won’t have to see scafungus ever again!!!

Is there a reason they have done nothing with the launch tower and launch mount yet? I feel like they were out there right away at pad 1?

@hbravoseb @mcrs987 Called Starship “v3” for a reason mate

We Lost the booster and an Rvac but the ship made it all the way to the ocean omfg what a flight 🥹

@mcrs987 Third time flight 3 is repeated 😅

YTPH en español

@ScottLikedSLS Now fix the SQ arm

dw guys i pushed all the weather out the way, You'll Thank Me Later.

@visual_iam @SpaceX @Starlink I assume the 3 boosters are connected

SICS StarEagle -- SpaceX Interplanetary Commercial Starship @spacex #megastarship @Starlink

¿Te cuento una cosita respecto a otro UAP? Tira del hilo

Starship launch pads and cadence implications: Starting with confirmed: Texas: OLP-1 & 2 Florida: LC-39A SLC-37A&B Louisiana: Pecan Island (at least 1) All but certain: At least one, probably several California pads. Did I miss any? With only counting 1 california pad that is 7 pads we know of coming online. With a very unambitious launch cadence of once every 2 weeks, that is enough for 182 Starship flights per year. Once a week pad cadence gets you a launch every single day. With Falcon 9's SLC-40 2025 cadence you get 756 launches per year, or twice a day.

@smmmmss2 @Astrofriki Un mes por Starship contando al personal que utilizaron en ese tiempo. Para cuándo tengan una cadencia considerable el equipo de revision también debería de haber crecido

@hbravoseb @Astrofriki Les tomo 31 días sacar todo el escudo térmico de la S30, poner la capa de ablativo debajo, y colocarlo entero devuelta. Creo que es seguro decir que un mes de reacondicionamiento es un máximo.

Millenial descubre el shuttle 🤣