heliotropic

Idc if this is controversial imma just speak from the heart. If Clav’s life is over, so is mine. With this being said if Clavicular gets a serious sentence I will be taking my life live on X out of solidarity ❤️‍🩹

@Blondes_tweets cringe millenial the blonde version

Foid W

@KingGrubby that josiah guy has textbook cuck face if ive ever seen it

Lol the online right is full of queers and cucks.

@Curse0fMedusa @mattforney

@heliotropikk @mattforney So? Were you trying to prove you can read? 🤣 Good boy.

If you're in India, Africa, or Uzbekistan, you can't reply to this. Eat shit, nïglët. (We need a version of this feature that excludes by country and not just region. E.g. I should be able to allow Thailand and block Malaysia instead of both being grouped as "Southeast Asia.")

@Curse0fMedusa @mattforney

@heliotropikk @mattforney “account based in united states”

@manoaharanz @mattforney "accout based in Malaysia"

@mattforney "We yts are high IQ" yeah sit your ass down Epstein child

@Curse0fMedusa @mattforney "accout based in west asia"

@mattforney Eat d*ck, d*ckhead. Oh wait, you already do that.

@RodgmanPsych @gregkellyusa "boomer take" says the boomer desperate to be accepted by younger generations lmao

@gregkellyusa What a boomer take. Good one, Greg.

What the hell is up with all of these TATTOOS everywhere? “Back in the Day” only Sailors got them when they were DRUNK in the Philippines. Then it became a “Thing” with STRIPPERS in the 90s. Now I see Dentists, Teachers, Nurses, Interns all TATTED UP. My Theory: It’s an Easy, quick way to feel Distinctive and Special, WITHOUT actually doing the WORK to be Distinctive and Special. Too much “Ink” and Selfies, Not enough GRIT. #tatsaresilly

@BuckeyeBackup @gregkellyusa your bald lol

@gregkellyusa This is the worst, old white man take in the country right now. If you don’t like tattoos, don’t get them. Otherwise shut the fuck up and stop pushing your bullshit on others.

@TerminalAscent @gregkellyusa you're not living up to the description in your bio, my guy

@gregkellyusa Geeze what a bitchy little snowflake you are. Point out on the doll where someone else’s tats hurt your wittle fweeings 🙄

@JohnBow31350342 @thom_bradshaw @gregkellyusa you sound like a f3g

@thom_bradshaw @gregkellyusa And we’re cooler than the ones who don’t have any tattoos hahahaha

@AndrewBanner83 you will gamble everything and be happy.

I could do without seeing another ad for Fanduel ever again.

@chaotichermes arent you a manlet lmao

If your aura isn’t so intensely radiant that old ladies aren’t coming up to you with a smile to reach for things on the upper shelves and stopping you to talk about the Holy Spirit in grocery stores you have work to do my friend.

@chrisbrunet You heard him boys. Put down the 35 dollar smash burger, truffle fries with house made sriracha aioli (for only 6.99 upcharge), the microbrew triple IPA, and stop this war to Of Monsters and Men - Little talks

It’s up to Millennial men to stop the war in Iran. Gen X has proven to be useless. Boomers are worse than useless. Zoomers are depending on us.

@chrisbrunet and youre gonna do...what exactly?

@UziCryptoo nobody ever "wanted" to work. They had to. Nobody finds its worth the effort anymore is what they mean

The phrase "nobody wants to work anymore" is hilarious... Like, no dude, people don't want to: - Commute 2 hours daily - Miss their kids growing up - Trade their entire life for rent - Get laid off with zero warnings - Work 50 hours for 40 hours pay Fix the system. not the workers.

@books_andy groyperhood awaits you

Trump was elected on three promises: drain the swamp, no new wars, and close the border/deport the illegals. He utterly betrayed 2 out of 3 and he's only half assing the last one.

@books_andy @mattforney You exist in just as much of an echo chamber as the people you criticize, beglov

@mattforney Idk man maybe I'm the minority here but I believe the things I believe because I think they're true. Not because of how they're "coded" or who is or isn't on my side.

It's already happened. A great deal of people who were openly anti-Semitic ten years ago have moved back towards neutrality/peaceful coexistence with Zionists because anti-Zionism/anti-Semitism is now brown-coded and left-coded. I'm one of them. I was notorious enough during the alt-right era to get defamed in an ADL profile. One of my old videos on the subject was cited in a Netflix special about "online hate" several years back which caused a bunch of people in the lit scene (several of whom I considered friends) to turn their backs on me. Genuinely surprised I never ended up on Canary Mission. What changed? After 10/7, the anti-Semitic/anti-Zionist discourse was revealed to be a fig leaf for Marxism and anti-white hatred. The same people chanting "FREE PALESTINE" vote for Democrats, support DEI and mass immigration, and want to kill me for being white. The Israel/Palestine conflict is just an extension of their desire for a Rwanda-esque genocide, because they see Jews as white and Israel as a mini-America. Spare me your genetics charts "proving" that Jews aren't white. The left believes they're white and they've imposed this view as a reality that you must deal with. Does that mean Israel is ARE GREATEST ALLY or there aren't problems with our relationship? Absolutely not. But when one side is aligned with you on some issues and the other wants you DEAD, it's obvious who your true enemies are. In the wake of Charlie Kirk's assassination, it wasn't people with Israeli flags calling for me to be next. It was Palestine supporters. This is a very basic friend/enemy distinction that large numbers of the right have failed. Moreover, I'm tired of the easily debunked conspiracy theories about Jews. Crap like "Greater Israel." Ooooh, some minor Likud functionary talked about "Greater Israel." Clearly the war in Iran is about lebensraum for the Zionazis! Or fabricated quotes from the Talmud. Buddy, you've never read the Talmud. I've never read it. I'm not GONNA read it. If I wanted to experience a bunch of Jews arguing about minutia, I'd go to the Spring Valley Mall. At least there I can get lunch. Back in 2017, some guy on Facebook was demanding I unfriend Jews I was IRL friends with because "you're endangering your comrades." Yeah sure I'm gonna cut off actual friends who've always had my back to mollify some weirdo who'd stab me in the back. Anti-Semitism is an affectation for brownoids and irony leftists who were afraid to say "retard" until the right made it edgy and cool. It's Sneako and Nick Fueñtes: gross, low-IQ brownoids that normal people find repulsive. And it always results in turning people into libtards. Fueñtes is now telling people to vote Democrat. The scattered remnants of the 2016 alt right were defending those losers in Minnesota who got shot by ICE because ICE are "ZOGbots." Vote for Zohran Mamdani so some homeless schizo can shove you in front of a train, all because we need to own the Jews. This level of mental illness needs a DSM entry. I'm neither an anti-Semite or a philo-Semite. Israel is just another country to me, one that can (and does) help further American goals. It is not the axis on which the world turns and the Jews are not the Borg. You don't have to choose between Ben Shapiro and Nick Fueñtes. You can choose your own side. Mind-blowing concept to groypers, who basically have a George W. Bush view on the JQ: "if you're not with us, you're with the Zionists." I'm with America.

@ff3k1984 @mattforney @BanishedPosts is it a lot of words for 7k tho?

@mattforney @BanishedPosts That's a lot of words for 7k, enjoy your shekels parasite

The Iran war is a complete paradigm shift in how first-world countries wage war. It's closer to the Gulf War than the Iraq War. We've seen previews of it in the Nagorno-Karabakh wars and the Gaza war, but the Iran war shows a next-generation military (America and Israel) wiping the floor with a last-generation military (Iran). The big problem America has had since World War II is dealing with insurgencies. Insurgency did not exist as a tactic, by and large, prior to World War II because nations had no reason to care about human life in the countries they were fighting. The Romans responded to Vietcong- or Taliban-like uprisings by putting entire villages to the sword. When the Helvetii tried to invade what is now France, marshaling every fighting-age man they had, Julius Caesar called up a force that was four times the size of theirs, defeated them easily, razed their territory, and sold the women and children into slavery. During the imperial era, Britain, France, and the other colonial powers dealt with uppity colonials via mass extermination. At one point, the British invaded Tibet out of boredom and humiliated them after a couple of battles. That tactic ceased to be viable in the era of mass media. Counterinsurgency warfare is literally about winning hearts and minds, meaning the most effective tactic---mass extermination of enemy civilians---is off the table since video of your soldiers bayoneting women and children will end up on the nightly news. We failed in Vietnam because we were unable to deal with the Vietcong without "destroying the village to save it." Same in Iraq. The only winning move in wars like this is not to play; this is why the Iraq "regime change" and "nation-building" initiatives were always doomed. Every My Lai massacre or Abu Ghraib sex abuse scandal is a weapon that undermines us. Additionally, public opinion is intolerant of casualties. Fun fact: the number of American servicemen dying or being injured has steadily decreased with every war we've fought since World War II. Over 400,000 servicemen died in World War II. A little less than 60,000 died in Vietnam. Less than 4,500 died in Iraq and less than 2,500 died in Afghanistan. But you'd be an inhuman monster to try and rationalize that to the loved one of a dead or maimed soldier. It would certainly destroy you in an election. What first-world nations needed was a way to microtarget enemy combatants and infrastructure with minimal damage to civilians, as well as minimize casualties on their own side. We did not have that 20 years ago. With AI, drones, and next-generation surveillance technology, the problem of insurgency has been solved without having to resort to Genghis Khan methods. We can now precision strike enemy leaders in their homes, in their places of work, and we can blow up their missile launchers and ammo caches with minimal risk to ourselves. This is exactly what's going on now. The Air Force, Navy, and IDF have been focusing fire on Iranian leaders and military targets. They've been explicitly avoiding attacking civilians (the school that was destroyed was from a misfiring Iranian missile, not the IDF). And we've explicitly avoiding putting servicemen in harm's way by focusing on long-distance air and sea power and strategically evacuating bases that Iran attacks so they don't have a pile of dead Americans they can use for propaganda purposes. We're almost a week into the war and only six Americans have died. 50 servicemen died in the first week of the Iraq invasion. Everything is set up to not only knock out the Iranian leadership, but get the Iranian citizenry and dissidents in the military on side. Some of this is due not to technology but smarter leadership. The idea that you need "boots on the ground" is a retarded neocon notion that flies in the face of reality. The Mongols---the most successful land warriors in history---used horse-mounted archers to destroy enemy armies from a distance. The idea that you need to march into the enemy's territory, where they have all the advantage, to fight them one-on-one is stupid. We have a superior Navy and Air Force. Trump is using them. The other key factors are intelligence and diplomacy. In the latter, Trump's approach is more like George H.W. Bush's than Dubya's. The Trump administration spent years improving relations with Arab states as well as other regional players like Armenia and Azerbaijan precisely to get them on side for something like this. As for intelligence, Dubya's crew of tards knew almost nothing about the situation in Iraq before invading. We know everything about Iran, from where their key military facilities are to the bathrooms where the mullahs jerk off. They can't run and they can't hide. Amusingly, Israel is probably the ideal partner for this kind of warfare because they specialize in it. The IDF is famously averse to casualties because of Israel's limited manpower reserves. They literally design tanks to minimize harm to the occupants. They have impressive intelligence (I used to diss Mossad and I think they're still overrated in many respects, but man did they put the Iranians over a barrel). You don't have to like Israel to acknowledge any of this. The Iranians may have spent years preparing for an American attack, but they spent those years preparing to fight the last generation's war. They're like France in 1939, wasting their resources on the Maginot Line while the Wehrmacht just sent tanks to circle around it and bombers to fly over it. This is why the pro-Iran contingent on here is now whining that they're being censored. They know they're losing and have to resort to literal fake news, AI videos, and years-old photos in a propaganda war to convince Americans that we're losing. Sorry Suleiman, it's not the responsibility of an American social media platform to help America's enemies! Go home! I do believe that the Iran war could go sideways. But every indication so far is that it won't. Trump is the guy who got elected in part because he said the Iraq War was "a big fat mistake." He and his cabinet are cognizant of why that war failed and how to fight a war properly, using America's strengths. The brownoids, ziggers, and third worldists can cope and seethe, but America is back, baby.

@frozenaesthetic it would crumble under your weight