rah
376.6K posts

rah
@hettinga
'Execrable'. ‘Crank’. 'Hyperactive genius saint from the future'. ‘Business visionary’. You’re welcome. Say it with an order.






The reality is there's mass amounts of cheating in our elections. Just because there's an engineered lack of data, does not mean there isn't data to the contrary. The new CBS/YouGov poll shows that 80% of Americans support Voter ID including 80% of black Americans & 77% of Hispanic Americans. Yet why is it that Congress seems so intractable to wanting to pass a such a popular policy?













JUST IN: President Trump sent B-2 Spirit stealth bombers to Kharg Island and destroyed every military target on it. Then he spared the oil terminals and released the footage on Truth Social. The message is not what he destroyed. It is what he chose not to. Kharg Island handles approximately 90% of Iran's crude oil exports. It is the single most valuable piece of infrastructure the Islamic Republic possesses. On 13 and 14 March, US strikes cratered the runway, destroyed coastal defence batteries, eliminated radar installations, and hit the IRGC garrison estimated at 250 to 500 personnel. Missile storage facilities and naval mine depots were obliterated. Trump posted: "totally obliterated every MILITARY target." The emphasis on "military" is the strategy. The oil terminals were left standing. The loading docks are intact. The pipeline connections from the mainland remain functional. Every piece of infrastructure that converts Iranian crude into revenue was deliberately preserved. Trump did not destroy Iran's ability to export oil. He destroyed Iran's ability to defend the island that exports the oil. Then he showed the world the footage to make sure Tehran understood: the terminals survive because I allow them to survive. This is coercive leverage, not destruction. If President Trump wanted to collapse Iran's economy overnight, he would crater the terminals. Kharg offline permanently would remove 1.5 to 2 million barrels per day from global supply, spike Brent past $150, and trigger a recession in every oil-importing economy including America's. He did not do that. He created a condition in which Iran knows the terminals can be destroyed in the next sortie, the world knows they were not destroyed in this one, and every future negotiation occurs under the shadow of a capability demonstrated but not fully deployed. The IRGC garrison on Kharg protected the mine-laying and coastal missile operations that threatened tankers transiting Hormuz. The garrison is gone. The coastal batteries are gone. The mines being loaded from Kharg facilities are no longer protected by air defences that prevented their interdiction. The island that was Iran's offensive naval platform in the Gulf is now a defenceless oil terminal that exports crude only because the country that destroyed its defences permits it. The impact on IRGC funding is immediate. Kharg revenue funds the 31 Mosaic Doctrine commands, the Shahed production lines, the Hezbollah transfers ($100 to $350 million annually), the Houthi Red Sea operations, and the Iraqi PMF strikes on US bases. The revenue stream is intact but the military infrastructure protecting it is rubble. The IRGC exports oil from an island it cannot defend, through a strait it cannot control, to a market that has repriced its survival. Axios and NBC report POTUS Trump has discussed ground forces or special operations contingencies for Kharg: seize the island for Hormuz enforcement or secure nuclear-related materials. No announcement. No deployment confirmed. The discussion itself is the pressure. Tehran must calculate whether the island that lost its garrison on Day 14 loses its sovereignty on Day 30. Trump did not destroy the oil. He destroyed the defence of the oil. He filmed it. He posted it. And every barrel that flows from Kharg tomorrow flows because an American president decided it should, not because an Iranian garrison can stop him from deciding otherwise. Full analysis in the below link open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…


Democratic Illinois Governor JB Pritzker speaks about a Democratic "Project 2029" in which members of the current Trump administration, along with federal agents, will be criminally and civilly prosecuted. "Whatever it is that we can do. It may be that you cannot criminally prosecute somebody, but you can go after them civilly." Follow: @AFpost




