Laser-eyed Pleb

Yes, over the past year+, MatthewStadlen has tweeted about Reform/Nigel Farage dozens of times (frequent spikes around elections, polls, and donations—e.g. multiple per week in April-May 2026 alone, plus consistent commentary in 2025). The posts are not objective reporting. They’re strongly opinionated and appeal to emotion via sarcasm, mockery (“laughing stock”, ironic “pity”, “grift”, “hopelessly out of their depth”), and repeated emphasis on unpopularity/fitness for office to criticize.

Here is another stupid take by a silly little socialist. They are two separate businesses. I don't take a wage from the coffee shop despite owning and operating it at the senior level. There is no money left to pay me. I do it out of love. The costs of the podcast are paid out of the profits of the podcast, which is a good little business. But the interesting point here is that he thinks all the profit being generated by the workers should go to them. But the silly little socialists can't fathom the following: 1. I took the risk to open the coffee shop - the £120k refurb, the 10 year lease, the business plan and the risk. My reward for the risk if the profits if it works, which I can share with the staff if I choose. 2. But even if we take the silly little socialist mildly seriously (we shouldn't, he's a dumb dumb), if the business fails and is losing money, should we blame the workers and should it be deducted from their salary? This is why these silly little revolutionaries should not be taken seriously. Firstly they don't understand economics, second they are fundamentally stupid, third their model is based on envy, fourth they have no answer to the coordination problem. I could go on, probably not worth it as you can't reason with silly little socialists.

We are working to restore mobility that was lost due to disease or spinal cord injury by allowing participants to control robotic arms with their thoughts. See how this is possible.