pavan
811 posts



SPINE CHILLING STORY OF ENTIRE INCIDENT OF Rape/Murder of IRS Officer's Daughter💔 Such Criminals should be publically executed after torturing. There is no place for these criminals on earth❗️


Indian and American soldiers during Exercise Yudh Abhyas 2025.




UPSC declares final results of the Civil Services Examination 2025.








Najam Sethi has little credibility left, having long blurred the line between political commentary and power brokering within Pakistan’s ruling ecosystem. It was telling that he was among the first to brand the Pahalgam massacre of 24 Hindus a false flag. He is now overreading S. Jaishankar shaking hands with Pakistan National Assembly Speaker Sardar Ayaz Sadiq on the sidelines of Khaleda Zia’s funeral in Dhaka. A basic diplomatic courtesy at a funeral is being spun as rapprochement. Sethi doesn’t stop at this amateur speculation, but goes a step ahead, claiming India is fooling the world, pretending to want peace while planning a military attack on Pakistan. Facts remain unchanged. The Indus Waters Treaty remains in abeyance. India has made no concession on terrorism. Sethi’s religious bigotry is further laid bare when he invokes Lord Shiva as a metaphor for deception, dragging a Hindu deity into his crude political smear. This is the real face of Pakistan’s so-called liberal elite. The same man cries about visas. India owes none to a habitual liar and bigot. What makes Najam Sethi’s performance more than just shrill is the pattern. After Pakistan’s Jaffar Express security failure, Sethi rushed in to blame India, without evidence, almost as a reflex. He then went on to warn of intensified jihadist activity in Jammu and Kashmir. Days later, Pahalgam happened. Even after the US designated TRF and the attack was globally recognised as a Lashkar operation, Sethi stuck to the false-flag line. He is now again pre-emptively predicting another false flag, insisting India will stage an attack to justify military action against Pakistan. This is not intuition, and it is certainly not analysis. It is narrative management for something worse about to come. When someone repeatedly predicts terror and then explains it away in advance, the question is not why he is wrong, but why he is so sure.

















