@e_philalethes @MedBennett Probably paid to spread mis/dis-information to sow doubt.
See:
bloomsbury.com/au/merchants-o…
English
Dr Gabriel Rau 🌏💧
5.5K posts
Dr Gabriel Rau 🌏💧
@hydrogeoscience
Teacher & explorer (PhD) of #Hydrogeology @Uni_Newcastle (💧+🌏=🌱). Passionate e-bike commuter (🚴) in a sea of #WankTanks. Global citizen wanting peace.
Planet with water and life Katılım Nisan 2017
1.3K Takip Edilen827 Takipçiler
@hydrogeoscience @MedBennett Correct. It's funny how @MedBennett is simply too stupid and scientifically illiterate to understand something that simple, and yet writes with such confidence in his own egregious errors and flagrant falsehoods. Absolutely pathetic display of willful ignorance and stupidity.
English
More fun climate facts: CO₂ at high latitudes (poles) has a cooling effect on the earth’s surface. (Wijngaarden & Happer, 2020). Carbon dioxide isn’t melting ice anywhere in the Arctic or Antarctic.
wattsupwiththat.com/2021/09/21/the…
Hermann O.@Clarsonimus
Climate Fun Facts: There is a higher concentration of CO2 at the South Pole than elsewhere. This is because the water vapor there, Earth’s predominant "greenhouse" gas, has frozen. This leaves a higher percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere. So if CO2 and temperature are related in the way we are expected to believe, shouldn’t the rise in temperature be significantly higher at the South Pole than elsewhere? The opposite is true.
English
English
@hydrogeoscience @rozjonez @cherry_xeno @dense_evi I have no reason to disprove anything since you have t proven anything causal yet.
English
@kderosa @rozjonez @cherry_xeno @dense_evi You are not evaluating evidence against a consistent standard; you are defining the standard ex post to exclude the conclusion you dislike.
English
@kderosa @rozjonez @cherry_xeno @dense_evi You forgot that you want to disprove something while blaming me for your ignorance 🤣
English
@hydrogeoscience @rozjonez @cherry_xeno @dense_evi The yoke is not on me. I don’t have wacky theories I’m trying to prove. You do.
English
English
@rozjonez @hydrogeoscience @cherry_xeno @dense_evi That’s how observational slop works. You observe until you find a result that confirms your biases then you pretend you did science.
English
@rozjonez @kderosa @cherry_xeno @dense_evi All this pseudonym has is claims with zero evidence provided - a textbook case of ideology.
English
English
@hydrogeoscience @rozjonez @cherry_xeno @dense_evi That’s it run with that. lol I’m not trolling you. You’re trolling yourself. When you have something causal let us know. In the meantime have fun with your models. Keep tuning them until the answers confirm your biases
English
@kderosa @hydrogeoscience @cherry_xeno @dense_evi That's an article literally about infrared radiation and planetary temperature, which is textbook physics.
Published in a physics journal.
Let's face it; no science would be "hard" enough for you if you don't agree with the results, would it?
English
@kderosa @rozjonez @cherry_xeno @dense_evi If you have an alternative physical mechanism that reproduces the observed spectral signature, isotopic dilution, and ocean acidification without anthropogenic CO₂, publish it.
"Soft science" is just a slur for evidence you cannot refute.
All you have is deflection.
English
@hydrogeoscience @rozjonez @cherry_xeno @dense_evi lol. Physicists do physics. Chemists do chemistry. Your boys are doing neither physics or chemistry. They’re doing science serrations slop in the soft science of climate “science”
English
@cohler This paper is a compilation of previously refuted arguments wrapped in thermodynamic jargon. Its central conclusion is contradicted by basic mass balance, isotopic fingerprinting, and direct atmospheric observations.
English
@MedBennett @e_philalethes The “penetration depth” argument confuses the medium with the mechanism.
CO₂ warms the atmosphere, not by penetrating ice. A warmer atmosphere slows heat loss from the ocean’s surface, causing the ocean to warm. Warmer air and water then melt ice from above and below.
English
@e_philalethes CO₂ has no capacity to melt ice or heat ocean water anywhere on earth. Its penetration depth is measured in micrometers.
Med Bennett@MedBennett
@jobkeepblog Why was the Arctic ice free 14,000 years ago, when CO₂ was supposedly flatlining at 200 ppm? x.com/kenneth7271299…
English
@MedBennett That claim comes from a non-peer-reviewed, rejected preprint with fatal errors.
Observations show the opposite: The Arctic is warming 2–3× faster than the global average, Arctic sea ice is declining, and Greenland/West Antarctica are losing mass directly from warming.
English
99% of electricity supply interuptions on Australia's NEM in FY2025 were due to faults on the distribution (95%) & transmission (4%) network.
Distributed local renewable generation paired with islanding capable storage is a great way to be resiliant to the vast majority outages.
English
@kderosa @rozjonez @cherry_xeno @dense_evi At this stage of the conversation I must assume that you're trolling me - because the amount of ignorance is too staggering to be true.
English
@kderosa @rozjonez @cherry_xeno @dense_evi Excuse me? Climate science combines physicists, chemists and other "hard" science into a multi-disciplinary branch.
Example: physicstoday.aip.org/features/infra…
You've lost it completely ...
English
@kderosa @rozjonez @cherry_xeno @dense_evi Apply that standard to epidemiology, geology, or cosmology and they all become "opinion." Climate science uses the same methods: mechanism, prediction, consilience. You're not policing rigor - you're policing the word *cause* to avoid the evidence.
English
@kderosa @rozjonez @cherry_xeno @dense_evi You talking to me, or the authors of >80,000 peer-reviewed studies?
doi.org/10.1088/1748-9…
"Tough Love Jesus" stands above all scientists in scientific rigour - despite having demonstrated lack of logic and ignorance 🤣
English
English
Science deniers are like neutrinos. They pass straight through mountains of evidence without interacting with any of it.
"The cumulative scientific evidence is unequivocal that human activities, principally through emissions of greenhouse gases, have caused global warming"- IPCC AR6 2021
"Indicators of Global Climate Change 2025: annual update of key indicators of the state of the climate system and human influence"
essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd… ipcc.ch/report/sixth-a…
ipcc.ch/report/sixth-a…
English
Dear Climate change deniers .
Today UK broke it's May temperature record by 2C.
The UK has temperature records going back 350 years and in all that time we have never come close to this May temp.
Without climate change this temp in UK would be impossible
English
@kderosa @rozjonez @cherry_xeno @dense_evi Climate: Water vapor (satellites); sensitivity converges at ~3°C-LGM, Pliocene, Pinatubo, and modern energy budgets-independent of CMIP. Predicted fingerprints (stratospheric cooling, Arctic amplification, nights>days) confirmed before observation.
English
@kderosa @rozjonez @cherry_xeno @dense_evi False analogy. Epicycles had no physics. Ptolemy patched geometry with geometry. Climate models patch physics with physics constrained by independent observation.
English
Botulinum toxin is fatal at 0.0000000001% body weight
Iodine is 0.00002% of body weight. Without it, you suffer severe disease
Ozone makes up 0.000003% of the atmosphere, blocking lethal UV radiation. Without it, we would live underground, or die
Fake climate scientist👇
Anika@anika_climate
🚨CLIMATE SCIENTIST ANSWERS PUBLIC QUESTIONS! Q: “Isn’t Carbon Dioxide a dangerous greenhouse gas?”, A: “This is another common misconception, it only comprises 0.04% of Earth’s atmosphere…”
English