@kderosa @dense_evi @rozjonez @cherry_xeno I'll let you have the last word, better make it profound 🤣
"Tough Love Jesus" says:
English
Dr Gabriel Rau 🌏💧
5.5K posts
Dr Gabriel Rau 🌏💧
@hydrogeoscience
Teacher & explorer (PhD) of #Hydrogeology @Uni_Newcastle (💧+🌏=🌱). Passionate e-bike commuter (🚴) in a sea of #WankTanks. Global citizen wanting peace.
Planet with water and life Katılım Nisan 2017
1.3K Takip Edilen826 Takipçiler
@kderosa @rozjonez @cherry_xeno @dense_evi You are not evaluating evidence against a consistent standard; you are defining the standard ex post to exclude the conclusion you dislike.
English
@kderosa @dense_evi @rozjonez @cherry_xeno Next time you use MRI or GPS a little voice will remind you: "this cannot work as it's based on observational slop" 🤡
English
@kderosa @dense_evi @rozjonez @cherry_xeno Lol. Guy who worships made up bits on a computer over real value.
English
English
English
English
@kderosa @rozjonez @cherry_xeno @dense_evi Ah yes, let's again invert reality to match your money centric ideology. There's no energy poverty as long as the sun keeps shining. The transition is unstoppable and cheaper anyway.
English
@hydrogeoscience @rozjonez @cherry_xeno @dense_evi Lolz. You’re the one advocating the radical step-change: trillions in costs, net-zero mandates, energy poverty. Burden of proof for net harm plus causation is on you. I’m not claiming danger from 420 ppm CO₂; you are. Paleo proxies plus tuned models don’t meet it.
English
@kderosa @rozjonez @cherry_xeno @dense_evi You effectively argue for a reversed burden of proof which defies all common principles.
English
@kderosa @rozjonez @cherry_xeno @dense_evi Generally speaking: If you advocate for a human induced step change in environmental conditions, the burden of proof for it to be safe is on you.
English
@e_philalethes @MedBennett Probably paid to spread mis/dis-information to sow doubt.
See:
bloomsbury.com/au/merchants-o…
English
@hydrogeoscience @MedBennett Correct. It's funny how @MedBennett is simply too stupid and scientifically illiterate to understand something that simple, and yet writes with such confidence in his own egregious errors and flagrant falsehoods. Absolutely pathetic display of willful ignorance and stupidity.
English
More fun climate facts: CO₂ at high latitudes (poles) has a cooling effect on the earth’s surface. (Wijngaarden & Happer, 2020). Carbon dioxide isn’t melting ice anywhere in the Arctic or Antarctic.
wattsupwiththat.com/2021/09/21/the…
Hermann O.@Clarsonimus
Climate Fun Facts: There is a higher concentration of CO2 at the South Pole than elsewhere. This is because the water vapor there, Earth’s predominant "greenhouse" gas, has frozen. This leaves a higher percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere. So if CO2 and temperature are related in the way we are expected to believe, shouldn’t the rise in temperature be significantly higher at the South Pole than elsewhere? The opposite is true.
English
@kderosa @rozjonez @cherry_xeno @dense_evi You forgot that you want to disprove something while blaming me for your ignorance 🤣
English
@hydrogeoscience @rozjonez @cherry_xeno @dense_evi The yoke is not on me. I don’t have wacky theories I’m trying to prove. You do.
English
English
@rozjonez @hydrogeoscience @cherry_xeno @dense_evi That’s how observational slop works. You observe until you find a result that confirms your biases then you pretend you did science.
English
@rozjonez @kderosa @cherry_xeno @dense_evi All this pseudonym has is claims with zero evidence provided - a textbook case of ideology.
English
English
@hydrogeoscience @rozjonez @cherry_xeno @dense_evi That’s it run with that. lol I’m not trolling you. You’re trolling yourself. When you have something causal let us know. In the meantime have fun with your models. Keep tuning them until the answers confirm your biases
English
@kderosa @rozjonez @cherry_xeno @dense_evi If you have an alternative physical mechanism that reproduces the observed spectral signature, isotopic dilution, and ocean acidification without anthropogenic CO₂, publish it.
"Soft science" is just a slur for evidence you cannot refute.
All you have is deflection.
English
@hydrogeoscience @rozjonez @cherry_xeno @dense_evi lol. Physicists do physics. Chemists do chemistry. Your boys are doing neither physics or chemistry. They’re doing science serrations slop in the soft science of climate “science”
English
@cohler This paper is a compilation of previously refuted arguments wrapped in thermodynamic jargon. Its central conclusion is contradicted by basic mass balance, isotopic fingerprinting, and direct atmospheric observations.
English
@MedBennett @e_philalethes The “penetration depth” argument confuses the medium with the mechanism.
CO₂ warms the atmosphere, not by penetrating ice. A warmer atmosphere slows heat loss from the ocean’s surface, causing the ocean to warm. Warmer air and water then melt ice from above and below.
English
@e_philalethes CO₂ has no capacity to melt ice or heat ocean water anywhere on earth. Its penetration depth is measured in micrometers.
Med Bennett@MedBennett
@jobkeepblog Why was the Arctic ice free 14,000 years ago, when CO₂ was supposedly flatlining at 200 ppm? x.com/kenneth7271299…
English
@MedBennett That claim comes from a non-peer-reviewed, rejected preprint with fatal errors.
Observations show the opposite: The Arctic is warming 2–3× faster than the global average, Arctic sea ice is declining, and Greenland/West Antarctica are losing mass directly from warming.
English
99% of electricity supply interuptions on Australia's NEM in FY2025 were due to faults on the distribution (95%) & transmission (4%) network.
Distributed local renewable generation paired with islanding capable storage is a great way to be resiliant to the vast majority outages.
English