Scarf

@Viola_Nation x.com/ACFFiorentinaE…

@Viola_Nation I promised to 100% tweet this back to you at the end of the season. Given that you have already started...here it is. x.com/Viola_Nation/s…

That's it for me. Tito signing off to celebrate the end of this miserable season, aside from a couple of friendlies this next fortnight. I hated every second of it, but I love you all.

@GraveyardDogs81 @DyerbolicalDB @WrestleAllDay1 I'm not sure he can mimic the accent, but yeah he's in Street Fighter playing Dhalsim.

@DyerbolicalDB @WrestleAllDay1 Plenty of people would cry about it but Vidyut would make a heck of a bond.

So auditions for James Bond have started. Let me end it. New James Bond. Next Bond Girl. Print money.

@DelVindicta @_manuvers @RichardHanania The allegation is not about speaking like a Disney villain. It's about discrimination and sexual harassment.

@iScarf @_manuvers @RichardHanania Not just one but numerous ones from law subreddits saying the same thing. You claim he’s only making these allegations against her, nope he claims the entire team spoke to him like Disney cartoon villains. The 1 million offer was only twice what they were already paying him..

Wall Street Journal profiles Chirayu Rana. -As a soccer player in college, he "could sometimes be aggressive during practice, getting into disagreements with other seniors on the team for excessive tackling or jostling with teammates for control of the ball" -At one job, "he yelled at co-workers after they tried to offer constructive criticism about his performance," and was let go for his demeanor on the job. -Rana used to hang out with a group of co-workers, including Hajdini. They would joke by calling him and other South Asians, "brown boys." Rana liked one such message. -Rana lied to JP Morgan about his dad dying so he could get time off. It turned out his dad is still alive. Now Rana's lawyer says that he was referring to a "dad-like figure." -Hajdini and other co-workers sent flowers when they thought his dad died -Hajdini sent Rana SoundCloud links and memes via text -Rana asked JP Morgan to settle the case for $22 million. They offered $1 million, and then he sued. So basically, this guy has been an aggressive hothead his entire life, and now wants us to believe he was "sexually abused" by his co-worker and he was unable to do anything about it, despite no one at his company believing that this happened. He probably targeted Hajdini because she made the foolish mistake of being nice to him. Perhaps she rejected him. No mention of the story about how he workshopped his story about harassment by referring to a case at Morgan Stanley, another former employer, in which case the alleged assailant was a man. What a scumbag. I look forward to him losing the case, and having to live the rest of his life as a laughingstock.

@DelVindicta @_manuvers @RichardHanania “In my 30-plus-year career as an employment litigator I have never had an employer defendant make such a substantial offer if they truly believed the allegations to ‘have no merit.’” Kaiser, Sauborn & Mair

@iScarf @_manuvers @RichardHanania They wanted protect an employee from having their reputation destroyed which is what’s happening now. He first demanded 22 million then wanted 11 million after they offered 1 million.

@DelVindicta @_manuvers @RichardHanania Were you there?

If you can’t see these are the rants of an incel, I can’t help you. Yes super convenient everyone in this lawsuit including all his coworkers talks like villain from a cartoon show, interesting how he’s accusing a female colleague more successful than he is of sucking dick in his fan fiction lawsuit.

@DelVindicta @_manuvers @RichardHanania Were you there?

@iScarf @_manuvers @RichardHanania Like this guy is obviously an incel, he just had to drop something about her saying she sucked dick to get her job. If you can’t see that, god help you.

@DelVindicta @_manuvers @RichardHanania So, you're basing your opinion on one reddit thread? Perhaps you might be interested in various documentations made including asking to be transferred away, the witnesses referred to and the $1 million he was offered. That's quite a lot of evidence.

Exactly, the other accusations make his case even less believable. I read the entire lawsuit, it reads like he cooked the whole thing up with ai, everyone talks like Disney cartoon villain. It’s not just Jesse Webber I’m basing my opinion on: reddit.com/r/FinancialCar… reddit.com/r/law/comments…

@DelVindicta @_manuvers @RichardHanania None of any of that makes any sense. Firstly, Jesse Webber isn't, secondly there is nothing mundane about this case and thirdly, there are no other accusations to others. I would advise you accordingly regarding what the media are being paid to say.

@iScarf @_manuvers @RichardHanania I read the complaint, there is a reason every lawyer is saying it’s nonsense. Lawyers will twist anything even most mundane things to make their case stronger. The fact that he’s accusing other people of talking like this just shows how even more nonsense it is.

@DelVindicta @_manuvers @RichardHanania Not as strong as the complaint, which you have not read. capclaw.com/wp-content/upl…

@_manuvers @RichardHanania lol the delusion is strong.

@DoingTime76 @misfitpatriot_ @thevivafrei A sensible person would suggest you read the claim before suggesting lack of evidence. It is actually, one of the best documented claims I have ever seen capclaw.com/wp-content/upl…

@misfitpatriot_ @thevivafrei You’re being disingenuous as it’s customary to demand evidence to support an accusation of any kind. By your logic there was evidence Chirayu Rana was sexually harassed because he signed affidavits. A sensible person would say there’s no evidence corroborating his claims.

You made the claim that Massie “trie[d] to pay hush money to an ex-girlfriend to stop her from revealing his bizarre conduct”. I asked you for the evidence, and you broadly referred to the 20 minute video. Even assuming that video qualifies as a sworn statement under penalty of perjury, there was literally nothing in that video that could ever qualify as evidence to substantiate your defamatory statement @willchamberlain In fact, the only statement she made was regarding an offer to settle her wrongful dismissal claim against Sparkz. Did you even watch the video? If you did watch the video, how did you not understand what she said? At least that explains why you did not provide any evidence to substantiate your defamatory statement. Because none exists, even within the bounds of that idiotic 20 minute video.

@kashish_cfc @AliceTalksFooty The media also support it with the AthleticoMadrid match for the second leg. Seems to have paid off.

@AliceTalksFooty VAR is Arsenal’s player of the season. It’s disgusting how Arsenal have done this shit in every game of the season. They get away with everything - crowding the keeper, punching players in the box, holding and grappling players.

@gjf197 @markgoldbridge He's also great for Sweden, which supports your comment.

@markgoldbridge Lindelof is decent now he’s been coached

If United want Van De Ven it just shows how clueless our recruitment truly is. Watched him a lot the last 2 seasons and he's a big reason Spurs are where they are. Clumsy, injury prone and without pace he's no better than Lindelof

@Viola_Nation nightmare.

75' Double change: it's Fazzini and Fabbian for Solomon and Mandragora.

@Viola_Nation That's how he got into the team. Typo from the Director of Football.

@iScarf Solo-man is very funny.

Good on Gary Taphouse for pretending like Fiorentina could muster a response and make this interesting. Soldiering on despite the fact that this game's been done and dusted for about 167.5 hours.

@Choccy07Joe @SkySportsGolf I have complained about Faldo practically every year. Golf is one of those sports - at some time - you have to shut up and let us watch it

I can imagine Nick Faldo at Masters dinner....not another soul gets a word in... Take a break ffs, @SkySportsGolf

@ej_moura @AA_Gabriel1111 Whoever they are, I hope to God they know to use the question mark first.

@AA_Gabriel1111 So who are they then? Do you know who they are!?

They know exactly who you are That’s why they targeted you from the beginning with demons because they can’t jump on you because of your light

@AslanEgia @magawavecap @_whitneywebb @mtracey @TheDuranReal @BrianJBerletic You already answered the question. You said 'no' - because you don't know him 'PERSONALLY'. Funny how you didn't need a "theory" to answer the question in that way.

@iScarf @magawavecap @_whitneywebb @mtracey @TheDuranReal @BrianJBerletic Explicitly state what exactly it is that you're theorizing, and what exactly it is that you're asking me. Then I'll answer those questions, but if you continue with your BS and abuse towards me then I'm out 👋

Just want to follow up and let people that Glenn Greenwald apparently does not want to debate me, after smearing me on false claims on the back of Michael Tracey's attacks on my Jeffrey Epstein-related research. I have reported only on the Intercept and its handling of the Snowden leaks and its mismanagement of past whistleblowers (as did many others!) and the only mention of Greenwald, despite his false claims, is a reference to his alleged role in the closure of the Snowden archives per his co-founder Laura Poitras and former Intercept writer Barrett Brown. I have never written anything about Greenwald beyond that, or written about his reporting on the Snowden files. I tried multiple times to arrange a debate through his preferred moderator for said debate from last year into this year and no dice.

@AslanEgia @magawavecap @_whitneywebb @mtracey @TheDuranReal @BrianJBerletic There is no clarity issue - demonstrated by the fact that you decided to tackle the question by changing its obvious intent from the universal 'you' to 'you' personally. You then used the answer to deflect to your second answer to a question that was not asked.

@iScarf @magawavecap @_whitneywebb @mtracey @TheDuranReal @BrianJBerletic The only thing I can think of is that there's some implied meaning that's clear to you in your own head, but which you STILL haven't spelled out so that it's clear to me or anyone else here, despite me repeatedly asking you to do so.