Nate

15 posts

Nate

Nate

@iStock_Ops

Katılım Aralık 2024
229 Takip Edilen17 Takipçiler
Nate
Nate@iStock_Ops·
@SenatorHeinrich Didn’t you guys pass a bill to add 20 cents more in state taxes? Don’t we have our own oil fields in New Mexico?
English
1
0
0
66
Martin Heinrich
Martin Heinrich@SenatorHeinrich·
Albuquerque. Thanks, Trump.
Martin Heinrich tweet media
English
123
18
140
10.7K
Nate retweetledi
GhettoGronk
GhettoGronk@ghetto_gronk·
Kids in Africa pulling up to school in their new Maxx Crosby Ravens jerseys
English
76
1.4K
32.5K
1.3M
Nate
Nate@iStock_Ops·
@SenAdamSchiff That’s for our troops! What the hell? Would you rather they starve? This is the dumbest shit I’ve ever seen… how much do they spend to feed congress?
English
0
0
0
11
Adam Schiff
Adam Schiff@SenAdamSchiff·
While Americans struggle with the high costs of living, Donald Trump’s Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth spent millions on lobster tails?….. Talk about a waste of taxpayer dollars.
English
6.5K
786
2K
430.5K
Nate retweetledi
BetMGM 🦁
BetMGM 🦁@BetMGM·
Raiders are BACK ☠️
BetMGM 🦁 tweet media
English
250
179
5K
546.8K
Nate retweetledi
The Wall Street Journal
Exclusive: Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. are backing Powerus, a drone company vying to meet Pentagon demand and fill a hole left by the administration’s ban on new Chinese drones in the U.S. on.wsj.com/4rjkEe0
English
378
907
1.9K
1.4M
Nate retweetledi
Ian Rapoport
Ian Rapoport@RapSheet·
🚨 🚨 🚨 The #Raiders are trading star edge Maxx Crosby to the #Ravens for pick No. 14 and additional compensation, per me and @TomPelissero. A blockbuster. A new home for Crosby and a true rebuild for Las Vegas.
Ian Rapoport tweet media
English
761
2K
17.5K
6M
Gene Trevino
Gene Trevino@GenoVeno73·
This has got to be THE funniest, yet dumbest, comment I've ever read. Let's give a few examples of this so called "well oiled killing machine" you seem to think we have under Trump. - Trump fired multiple high-ranking military officers shortly after inauguration - Trump directed the Defense Department to cut 20% of its four-star general officers and additional reductions across ranks - Trump replaced senior military leaders with loyalists, rather than experience (I do believe you MAGA clowns call that DEI hires, right?) - Trump deployed National Guard and Marines to Democratic-led cities (in clear violation of the Posse Comitatus Act) - Trump bombed Iran without Congressional approval nor consultation - Trump weakened our international alliances to such extent that some countries have refused or restricted U.S. access to military bases on their soil And you call that a "well oiled killing machine." 😂 I guarantee you, Kamala Harris wouldn't have been such a disaster.
English
8
4
193
3.5K
Gene Trevino
Gene Trevino@GenoVeno73·
MAGA: "We don't want Harris for president. We don't want war." ALSO MAGA: "Trump is bombing Iran to protect the American people. Yay, for war." And THAT is why MAGA are the dumbest motherfuckers on this planet.
English
152
1K
6.9K
66.7K
Nate
Nate@iStock_Ops·
@johnpavlovitz Yeah she sure scared them by saying “Don’t!” And wouldn’t need ICE because she told immigrants to “don’t come” including the bad ones… oh yeah and the extra IRS agents would’ve made sure we paid our taxes so we can feed the poor, like we do now… hmmm
English
0
0
0
9
John Pavlovitz
John Pavlovitz@johnpavlovitz·
Kamala isn’t in the Epstein Files. She wouldn’t have weaponized ICE against America. She wouldn’t have attacked Iran without Congressional consent just to try and legally and politically save herself. Oh yeah, and poor children would have food assistance, we wouldn’t have been illegally tariffed for a year, and we wouldn’t have an Attorney General protecting pedophiles. Great work, Trumpers!
Wake Forest, NC 🇺🇸 English
523
1.4K
4.2K
44.8K
Nate retweetledi
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 JUST IN: This clip of Democrat Rep. Nancy Pelosi is resurfacing where she INSISTS presidents do NOT need Congressional approval for strikes "[Obama] did not need authorization, and still does not need it on Libya?" PELOSI: "Yes." Simple as that! 😂
English
788
21.9K
49.6K
1.3M
Nate retweetledi
AJ Inapi (Allan)
AJ Inapi (Allan)@aj_inapi·
When you hear “America First,” most people interpret it through their own life. Taxes. Groceries. Fuel. Housing. Bills. That’s not wrong. That’s reality at the citizen level. But the mistake is assuming that’s the same lens a President operates through. A President doesn’t just manage a household economy. He manages a global power position. Those are not the same game. From your perspective, “America First” means relief. From the President’s perspective, it means survival of dominance. Because if America loses leverage globally… your cost of living doesn’t go down - it explodes. The world runs on power, not goodwill. Trade routes. Energy supply. Currency dominance. Military deterrence. These are the levers that decide whether your dollar holds value… or collapses. Since Jimmy Carter, successive administrations slowly shifted from strength to management. From projection of power → to negotiation from weakness. That shift didn’t happen overnight. It was incremental. Strategic complacency. Under Carter, you saw the Iran hostage crisis - a moment that signaled vulnerability. Adversaries took note: America could be challenged… publicly. Then came decades of mixed signals. • Short-term wins • Long-term strategic drift • Wars without decisive outcomes • Deals that bought time, not dominance Enemies don’t respect hesitation. They exploit it. The result? China expands economically. Russia reasserts militarily. Iran builds influence through proxies. None of that happens in a vacuum. It happens when the world senses hesitation at the top. This is where people misunderstand leaders like Donald Trump. You might judge policy based on prices. He’s judging based on leverage. • Who fears consequences • Who tests limits • Who backs down That’s the scoreboard at that level. Now let’s be clear about something: No sane person wants war. War destroys economies. War destroys families. War destroys nations. Anyone cheering for war has never paid its cost. But history is brutally honest. When aggressors win… populations don’t just lose comfort - they lose freedom. Speech. Property. Opportunity. Sometimes their lives. Freedom has never been free. That’s the uncomfortable truth people try to ignore: Strength deters war. Weakness invites it. And when deterrence fails, the price isn’t theoretical - it’s paid by entire populations. There has always been a cost for freedom. And there always will be.
English
93
538
1.2K
29K
Nate retweetledi
John Spencer
John Spencer@SpencerGuard·
Iran started a war against the United States in 1979 and has never stopped. - 444 days of American hostages. - 241 Marines murdered in Beirut. - 603 U.S. troops killed in Iraq by Iranian-backed militias. Their proxies, agents, and Iranian IEDs attacking our soldiers (including me and my soldiers) daily. - Over 170 attacks on U.S. forces in Iraq and Syria just last year. - Assassination plots on our President on American soil. - Ballistic missiles fired at U.S. bases. For 47 years, the regime has targeted Americans. All while expanding its nuclear program and building longer-range missiles designed to threaten the U.S., our allies, and global stability. Failed diplomacy was tried for decades. Diplomacy was tried now. The President’s Article II duty is clear: protect the American people. IMO, he and we (the United States) @WhiteHouse @POTUS @michaelgwaltz @SecRubio @RapidResponse47 @SecWar are doing exactly that.
English
851
2.1K
7.2K
745.8K
Nate retweetledi
Vulture trades 🦅
Vulture trades 🦅@vulturetrades·
Tomorrow morning: $250,000 in calls on ONE stock. I am only sending this stock to someone who LIKE/RETWEET this post. I only trade what I personally buy. This is six-figure conviction. 99% will miss the next Nvidia-like move. My followers won’t. Big Tech has invested $100B+ into AI. The data center race has begun. What stock do you think it is?
English
88
264
608
31.2K
Vulture trades 🦅
Vulture trades 🦅@vulturetrades·
I have a $20 short squeeze setup that has the potential to turn into $1,100 in under 24 hours. This is the same setup I saw once in 2025 — and it’s showing up again now in 2026. My CBC indicator is fully backing it. Signals are aligned. 2000-5000%+ trade. Like + reply “$20” and I’ll DM it to you (Must be following to DM)
Vulture trades 🦅 tweet media
English
269
7
293
19.6K