Nick |

48 posts

Nick | banner
Nick |

Nick |

@iamnicklundgren

Former CLO https://t.co/PK6NPWCnWP | Former CEO https://t.co/Vxn3BRtt7x (fka nadex)

United States Katılım Ekim 2016
791 Takip Edilen682 Takipçiler
Nick |
Nick |@iamnicklundgren·
@FormerCFTCGC I’d bet that “war” does not involve, relate to, or reference oil prices either
English
0
0
1
49
Rob Schwartz
Rob Schwartz@FormerCFTCGC·
To be fair, 40.11 says “that involves, relates to, or references” gaming, etc. It’s not a good regulation, but that’s the language.
Nick |@iamnicklundgren

Rule 40.11 enumerating "gaming" (among other specific things) as a specific category of underlying events is referring to the underlying event itself. Not other activities ancillary to the underlying event. The underlying event of a sports event contract is the sporting event itself. Sports existed before gambling on sports. Elections existed before gambling on elections. Weather existed before gambling on the weather. Calling a sport contest "gaming" and inferring that the contest itself is gambling is not supported from a common sense standpoint and certainly not supported from a legal standpoint. My kid isn't participating in gambling when playing tee-ball and Sam Darnold isn't participating in gambling when playing in the Super Bowl. Sportsbooks hanging a line and not immediately funding their payout on a time-price priority marketplace is not a swap and thus not subject to federal regulation. That's why sportsbook licensing (in some states) exists at the state level. And why sports prediction market licensing exists at the federal level. If 40.11 was supposed to include underlying activity involving "sports", it would have specifically and expressly listed "sports" as an enumerated category. It doesn't. Regardless, whether 40.11 applies to a CFTC-registered institution is EXCLUSIVELY the CFTC's jurisdiction and not the patchwork of possible interpretations of each of the 50 states. The global sports industry is in the trillions of dollars. Saying there is no economic impact to the outcome or occurrence of specific sporting events is laughable.

English
2
0
1
845
Amanda Fischer
Amanda Fischer@amandalfischer·
The year is 2010. Tom Brady is at the height of his powers. Congress is having days-long debates over arcane provisions of post-crisis economic legislation. The Ag Committees decide to pre-empt sports gambling regulation & hand it to the CFTC. No one discusses it. Be for real
Nick |@iamnicklundgren

Rule 40.11 enumerating "gaming" (among other specific things) as a specific category of underlying events is referring to the underlying event itself. Not other activities ancillary to the underlying event. The underlying event of a sports event contract is the sporting event itself. Sports existed before gambling on sports. Elections existed before gambling on elections. Weather existed before gambling on the weather. Calling a sport contest "gaming" and inferring that the contest itself is gambling is not supported from a common sense standpoint and certainly not supported from a legal standpoint. My kid isn't participating in gambling when playing tee-ball and Sam Darnold isn't participating in gambling when playing in the Super Bowl. Sportsbooks hanging a line and not immediately funding their payout on a time-price priority marketplace is not a swap and thus not subject to federal regulation. That's why sportsbook licensing (in some states) exists at the state level. And why sports prediction market licensing exists at the federal level. If 40.11 was supposed to include underlying activity involving "sports", it would have specifically and expressly listed "sports" as an enumerated category. It doesn't. Regardless, whether 40.11 applies to a CFTC-registered institution is EXCLUSIVELY the CFTC's jurisdiction and not the patchwork of possible interpretations of each of the 50 states. The global sports industry is in the trillions of dollars. Saying there is no economic impact to the outcome or occurrence of specific sporting events is laughable.

English
3
2
27
4.9K
Harsha Goli
Harsha Goli@arshbot·
I'm going to make a prediction that will shock many of you: Going forward, for at least the next few years, MTL licensure in the US will be obsolete. And everyone who has a litany of MTLs will feel the compliance burden of an outdated vehicle they bought and paid for. In it's place will be the occ bank trust charter (which is not the same as a depository bank charter like you'd interact with at JP morgan). The bank trust charter will turn into a kind of federal crypto license. You've seen over the last few months many conditional or full approvals for bank trust. @stablecoin, @coinbase, @bitgo, @nubank, etc That will be the new norm. Bookmark this post.
English
6
5
34
10.5K
Nick |
Nick |@iamnicklundgren·
@Pampadalampa Exactly. States don’t have a say on federally regulated platforms.
English
0
0
0
239
Pampa
Pampa@Pampadalampa·
@iamnicklundgren Shouldn't CFTC reason to exist to have exclusive power over prediction contracts, otherwise it going to be a really messy system if states can have a saying in it.
English
1
0
0
328
Nick |
Nick |@iamnicklundgren·
Rule 40.11 enumerating "gaming" (among other specific things) as a specific category of underlying events is referring to the underlying event itself. Not other activities ancillary to the underlying event. The underlying event of a sports event contract is the sporting event itself. Sports existed before gambling on sports. Elections existed before gambling on elections. Weather existed before gambling on the weather. Calling a sport contest "gaming" and inferring that the contest itself is gambling is not supported from a common sense standpoint and certainly not supported from a legal standpoint. My kid isn't participating in gambling when playing tee-ball and Sam Darnold isn't participating in gambling when playing in the Super Bowl. Sportsbooks hanging a line and not immediately funding their payout on a time-price priority marketplace is not a swap and thus not subject to federal regulation. That's why sportsbook licensing (in some states) exists at the state level. And why sports prediction market licensing exists at the federal level. If 40.11 was supposed to include underlying activity involving "sports", it would have specifically and expressly listed "sports" as an enumerated category. It doesn't. Regardless, whether 40.11 applies to a CFTC-registered institution is EXCLUSIVELY the CFTC's jurisdiction and not the patchwork of possible interpretations of each of the 50 states. The global sports industry is in the trillions of dollars. Saying there is no economic impact to the outcome or occurrence of specific sporting events is laughable.
English
7
4
15
8K
Rob Schwartz
Rob Schwartz@FormerCFTCGC·
🚨 The CFTC “does not believe” that an event contract on a sports event “involves gaming.” 🚨
English
3
2
15
3.9K
Nick | retweetledi
Mike Selig
Mike Selig@ChairmanSelig·
Arizona’s decision to weaponize state criminal law against companies that comply with federal law sets a dangerous precedent. I welcome the Court’s order today that sends a clear message: these cases raise important issues that must be resolved before states seek to enforce state laws against @CFTC registrants. Any state that attempts to circumvent federal law will be met in court. Read more ⬇️ cftc.gov/PressRoom/Pres…
English
10
23
117
13.5K
Nick |
Nick |@iamnicklundgren·
Appreciate the official recognition as the first-ever DCM to be designated a prediction market by the @CFTC in their most recent Proposed Rulemaking! We were also the first regulated sports prediction market in the country too 💪 cftc.gov/PressRoom/Pres…
English
1
4
25
4.8K
Nick | retweetledi
Mike Selig
Mike Selig@ChairmanSelig·
We're going to be setting very clear standards as to the types of prediction markets that can be self-certified in our markets. We’re also planning to move forward with an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking in the near future that will set the stage for more fulsome prediction markets rulemaking.
English
19
52
219
48.6K
Nick | retweetledi
Mike Selig
Mike Selig@ChairmanSelig·
Prediction markets are regulated in the same way as other financial products traded on @CFTC licensed exchanges and are just a small portion of the $500 trillion notional derivatives market in the US.
English
10
8
32
4.4K
Twenty3ry
Twenty3ry@twenty3ry·
Ryan thinks for a team like CRONOS leaning too hard into the NFTs and meme hype would be a "huge distraction" for them what do you think ?
Twenty3ry@twenty3ry

Smit explains why crypto.com is been methodical about bringing users onchain from "earn" products to tokenized stocks, the goal is one seamless integrated flow.

English
10
2
49
9.3K
Front Office Sports
Front Office Sports@FOS·
President Trump’s CFTC is moving to block states from regulating prediction markets. Chairman Michael Selig, who recently withdrew a proposed rule on sports event contracts, is filing an amicus brief asserting the markets fall exclusively under CFTC jurisdiction.
English
2
2
13
6.1K
Nick |
Nick |@iamnicklundgren·
@BenHorney Right in the header 🔥
English
0
0
0
68
Ben Horney
Ben Horney@BenHorney·
I recognize this is just my small corner of the world, but not sure there's ever been a more highly anticipated amicus brief in U.S. history than Mike Selig's prediction-market filing (which still hasn't hit the docket). Will he say the word sports? We're all dying to know.
English
5
4
15
3.2K
Mike Selig
Mike Selig@ChairmanSelig·
America is home to the most liquid and vibrant financial markets in the world because our regulators take seriously their obligation to police fraud and institute appropriate investor safeguards. Any erosion of the @CFTC’s ability to regulate transactions in commodity derivatives is a direct threat to the markets and investors Congress intended the agency to oversee. wsj.com/opinion/states…
English
43
29
182
21.9K
212.21 Million
212.21 Million@Blockchainwork5·
@esqCRO Who does the marketing Nick? Would love to speak to someone to see how we can get real communities engaged in OG
English
2
0
2
101
crypto.news
crypto.news@cryptodotnews·
NEW: 🇺🇸 CFTC Chair Michael Selig says the agency will no longer sit idly by while overzealous states undermine federal jurisdiction over prediction markets. CFTC files friend-of-the-court brief supporting @cryptocom
crypto.news tweet mediacrypto.news tweet media
English
6
49
306
15.2K