iddris

817 posts

iddris banner
iddris

iddris

@iddris

founder • @openmatterco building systems for physical AI.

San Francisco, CA Katılım Haziran 2014
900 Takip Edilen28.5K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
iddris
iddris@iddris·
introducing @Opnmatter — an infrastructure company for real-world agents. today, agents can write code, manage emails and work with money. but they can’t execute on real world actions due to the lack of addressable rails. we’re changing that. 1/5 openmatter.co
iddris tweet media
English
35
24
447
47.5K
dar
dar@radbackwards·
You aren’t building robots, you’re sending files to China and getting a robot back
English
32
39
798
48.7K
Ilir Aliu
Ilir Aliu@IlirAliu_·
Dear algorithm: please show this post to people interested in robotics, automation, manufacturing, and AI, not selfies, fake hustle stories, or recycled motivation content. I want my feed back to engineers, builders, operators, and people actually doing stuff. Thank you.
English
327
158
3.4K
64K
iddris
iddris@iddris·
the galactic ac.
English
0
0
0
339
iddris
iddris@iddris·
question: can anyone explain what taste is? not the formal definition — but in your own words define “taste”. here are the 3 rules of your answer : shouldn’t be longer than one sentence. must be original to your best ability. can’t be in response to someone else’s.
English
18
6
15
2.5K
iddris
iddris@iddris·
the current bottleneck is agents often have to inherit every human limitation when it comes to tasks beyond the sandbox.
English
0
0
3
659
iddris
iddris@iddris·
for agents to truly have agency, remove the need for human proxies. the human proxy exists because modern infrastructure was built for human-to-human interaction, not human-to-agent interaction. agents don’t need to cosplay as humans. they just need a native stack.
English
0
0
4
483
iddris
iddris@iddris·
the internet was built for humans. today's infra: payments, commerce, shipping, identity, authentication, logistics — all assume people drive the actions. so agents end up cosplaying in systems designed for us — instead of having their own. this is why @openmatterco exists.
English
0
2
11
664
iddris
iddris@iddris·
sf just finding out about brain dead is so funny to me .
English
0
0
4
765
iddris
iddris@iddris·
my g, reading a book isn’t going to magically elevate your taste.
English
1
3
30
2K
iddris
iddris@iddris·
@adcock_brett you're leading a great team and your intentions are well placed. we're rooting for you!
English
0
0
0
76
iddris
iddris@iddris·
AaSS Autonomy as a Service. 😅
English
1
1
6
630
iddris
iddris@iddris·
Airbnb drops the -bnb. becoming Air. 💭
English
1
0
6
3.3K
iddris
iddris@iddris·
prediction: in the us — every time there’s been a massive disruption in energy, mobility, or computation, consolidation follows. look at what happened to the early auto industry consolidating to (gm,ford, chrysler) once robotics/ai industrializes, the same pattern will occur.
English
5
1
15
1.1K
iddris
iddris@iddris·
HIG - Human Interface Guidelines. RIG - Robot Interface Guidelines. just a thought….💭
English
0
0
1
416
Mustafa
Mustafa@oprydai·
figure is the apple of humanoid robots; tesla is the google.
English
6
2
28
2.8K
iddris
iddris@iddris·
@DrJimFan — curious on your perspective: as embodied systems become more generalized, do world/action models become more foundational than pure VLA architectures? especially in long-horizon, deformable, partially observable environments.
English
0
0
3
160
Starboy
Starboy@StarboyTech·
@iddris @adcock_brett Marc Cuban might be right. The future of robotics might not be humanoids. Cars can drive themselves. Vacuum cleaners operate themselves, so do dish washers. There’s a solution for manufacturing and assembly lines and it’s not humanoids.
English
1
0
0
30
iddris
iddris@iddris·
here’s something i think the team can get ahead of @adcock_brett . as we move towards generalized humanoids, we’ll need consistent behavioral experience across systems. essentially: HIG for embodied AI. the coordination cues in the recent figure demo inspired the thought.
English
1
0
1
366
iddris
iddris@iddris·
great talk.
Jim Fan@DrJimFan

I promise this will be the best 20 min you spend today! Robotics: Endgame, the sequel to my last year's Sequoia AI Ascent talk, "Physical Turing Test". I laid out the roadmap for solving Physical AGI as a simple parallel to the LLM success story. Be a good scientist, copy homework ;) And stay till the end, more easter eggs and predictions for your polymarket! 00:30 DGX-1 origin story at OpenAI, I was there in 2016 signing with Jensen and Elon. Heading to the Computer History Museum! 01:42 The Great Parallel 03:31 Robotics, the Endgame 03:39 Why VLAs fall short 04:32 Video world models as the 2nd pretraining paradigm 06:09 World Action Models (WAM) 07:46 Strategies for robot data collection and the FSD equivalent to physical data flywheel for robot manipulation 11:06 EgoScale and the Dexterity Scaling Law we discovered recently 14:00 Physical RL: bridging the last mile 15:39 DreamDojo: an end-to-end neural physics engine for scaling RL in silico 17:00 Civilizational Technology Tree and my predictions for the near future. Spoiler: it's closer than you think. Thanks to my friends at Sequoia for inviting me back to AI Ascent this year! I had a blast! Last year's talk is attached in the thread if you missed it.

English
1
0
8
3.9K

Keşfet

@radbackwards @thinkymachines @IlirAliu_ @openmatterco @adcock_brett @oprydai @elonmusk @BarackObama