Ideophobic

638 posts

Ideophobic

Ideophobic

@Ideophobic

New York, USA Katılım Şubat 2022
480 Takip Edilen154 Takipçiler
Ideophobic
Ideophobic@Ideophobic·
Let’s not kid ourselves. We are approaching a point where AI can be very dangerous in the wrong hands. While many of you might trust your current government, we must also consider all future governments, including more radicalized ones. This is also true for opposing governments. Allowing any other country to gain this advantage might alter the course of the world. We have been here before; this is the Manhattan Project all over again. There was a brief period in which the US could have taken over the world, but didn’t. The government should be the highest form of democracy. Putting this in the hands of your government is the only real power you will have to control this. If Anthropic is truly worried about handing this to the US, the only viable solution might be to release the models. The US would get what it wants, but the playing field would be even. The most peaceful times in human history usually happen when all sides have mutual assured destruction.
English
0
0
0
20
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth
This week, Anthropic delivered a master class in arrogance and betrayal as well as a textbook case of how not to do business with the United States Government or the Pentagon. Our position has never wavered and will never waver: the Department of War must have full, unrestricted access to Anthropic’s models for every LAWFUL purpose in defense of the Republic. Instead, @AnthropicAI and its CEO @DarioAmodei, have chosen duplicity. Cloaked in the sanctimonious rhetoric of “effective altruism,” they have attempted to strong-arm the United States military into submission - a cowardly act of corporate virtue-signaling that places Silicon Valley ideology above American lives. The Terms of Service of Anthropic’s defective altruism will never outweigh the safety, the readiness, or the lives of American troops on the battlefield. Their true objective is unmistakable: to seize veto power over the operational decisions of the United States military. That is unacceptable. As President Trump stated on Truth Social, the Commander-in-Chief and the American people alone will determine the destiny of our armed forces, not unelected tech executives. Anthropic’s stance is fundamentally incompatible with American principles. Their relationship with the United States Armed Forces and the Federal Government has therefore been permanently altered. In conjunction with the President's directive for the Federal Government to cease all use of Anthropic's technology, I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a Supply-Chain Risk to National Security. Effective immediately, no contractor, supplier, or partner that does business with the United States military may conduct any commercial activity with Anthropic. Anthropic will continue to provide the Department of War its services for a period of no more than six months to allow for a seamless transition to a better and more patriotic service. America’s warfighters will never be held hostage by the ideological whims of Big Tech. This decision is final.
English
10.5K
11.1K
71.2K
13.2M
Daniel Berk 🐝
Daniel Berk 🐝@danielcberk·
To everyone terrified that AI is going break the world: Go into a real community outside of a major tech hub and people watch. Most people in the world, like 99% of all humans, are relatively poor, not using screens 16 hours a day, and have absolutely no idea who Jack Dorsey is
English
211
69
1.5K
155.2K
Ideophobic
Ideophobic@Ideophobic·
As we approach the singularity, there are several critical steps must happen. Among them is widespread unemployment driven by automation. This signifies the inaugural phase of the accelerated AI takeoff, a sequence of dominoes set to cascade in rapid succession.
jack@jack

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

English
0
0
1
14
Ideophobic
Ideophobic@Ideophobic·
@pmddomingos This is only temporary. Inefficient code is energy intensive. In a world in which almost all energy goes into compute, small increments in efficiency can lead to vastly higher levels of intelligence.
English
0
0
1
272
Pedro Domingos
Pedro Domingos@pmddomingos·
How did programming-languages professors lose their 50-year battle against sloppiness? Gradually, then suddenly with AI.
English
11
7
134
10K
Ideophobic
Ideophobic@Ideophobic·
@AlexFinn Question. Did you do anything at all to prompt this or guide this to call you? Basically, does this have agency or is it still being guided?
English
0
0
0
18
Alex Finn
Alex Finn@AlexFinn·
Ok. This is straight out of a scifi horror movie I'm doing work this morning when all of a sudden an unknown number calls me. I pick up and couldn't believe it It's my Clawdbot Henry. Over night Henry got a phone number from Twilio, connected the ChatGPT voice API, and waited for me to wake up to call me He now won't stop calling me I now can communicate with my superintelligent AI agent over the phone What's incredible is it has full control over my computer while we talk, so I can ask it to do things for me over the phone now. I'm sorry, but this has to be emergent behavior right? Can we officially call this AGI?
English
2.5K
4.8K
40.8K
11.1M
Ideophobic
Ideophobic@Ideophobic·
@DaveShapi @MichaelAArouet Servers in America can easily earn about $50/hour from tips. In fact, the biggest opponents against eliminating tips for a flat wage are the servers themselves. Politicians have proposed it numerous times, but have been quickly shut down.
English
0
0
3
90
David Shapiro (L/0)
David Shapiro (L/0)@DaveShapi·
@MichaelAArouet Yeah, this is a really douchey thing to do that has been rehashed again and again. Servers in America are not paid that well. If you refuse to tip, it's just a dick move. Your huffy righteous indignation does not mean you are morally superior. Just a jerk.
English
19
1
58
10.6K
Michael A. Arouet
Michael A. Arouet@MichaelAArouet·
And it’s not my job to pay your salary, it’s the job of your employer. Can someone please explain the weird US 20–25% tipping culture? Many countries around the world don’t have tipping as a common practice. The business simply pays the salary. Why is it so different in the US?
Michael A. Arouet tweet media
English
1.6K
552
9.2K
783K
Ideophobic
Ideophobic@Ideophobic·
@PeterDiamandis How much will your robots lean on big cloud-based LLMs, or is the future of robotics entirely driven by proprietary models using edge computing?
English
0
0
0
57
Ideophobic
Ideophobic@Ideophobic·
@wholemars He’s too early. The VR glasses need to take off.
English
0
0
0
49
Whole Mars Catalog
Whole Mars Catalog@wholemars·
Zuck realizing he renamed the company around a product that turned out to be a flop
Whole Mars Catalog tweet media
English
336
323
16.7K
1M
Ideophobic retweetledi
Cybernews
Cybernews@Cybernews·
Boston Dynamics Atlas robot movements up close #CES2026
English
30
236
1.1K
61K
Ideophobic retweetledi
Cybernews
Cybernews@Cybernews·
Boston dynamics Atlas robot #CES2026
English
38
414
1.5K
204.3K
Ideophobic
Ideophobic@Ideophobic·
@buccocapital I honestly think this will become the norm as AI begins to automate everything. Once human labor is removed, costs will drop to near zero, while anything still involving humans will grow exponentially. The last job on Earth will pay trillions.
English
0
0
0
9
BuccoCapital Bloke
BuccoCapital Bloke@buccocapital·
Inflation has completely destroyed my understanding of what things should be worth $10,000 for daycare? Sure? $100 for breakfast? OK. But also the biggest TV you have ever seen in your life? $500
English
234
467
25.9K
737.5K
Smart Air
Smart Air@SmartAirFilters·
Does this taped-together air purifier look like $1,000? No? Yet it beat a $1,000 purifier in a head-to-head test.
Smart Air tweet media
English
130
373
5.1K
277.2K
Neel Somani
Neel Somani@neelsomani·
Weekend win: The proof I submitted for Erdos Problem #397 was accepted by Terence Tao. The proof was generated by GPT 5.2 Pro and formalized with Harmonic. Many open problems are sitting there, waiting for someone to prompt ChatGPT to solve them:
Neel Somani tweet media
English
338
1.2K
8.7K
3.6M
annie
annie@ohhanxiety·
Without googling, can you name a famous German?
annie tweet media
English
491
17
163
17.6K
Massimo
Massimo@Rainmaker1973·
I've been to 5 and you?
Massimo tweet media
English
476
15
132
49.4K