Illia Romanenko 🇺🇦

3.9K posts

Illia Romanenko 🇺🇦 banner
Illia Romanenko 🇺🇦

Illia Romanenko 🇺🇦

@illiaromanenko

CEO/CTO at @solidsoftwarehq, @worklog_ai

Katılım Nisan 2009
718 Takip Edilen942 Takipçiler
Justin Vu
Justin Vu@justin_vu113·
@precious_tagy The greatest feature of riverpod or signals is the dependency graph, that plain notifier or bloc miss With that, data could be auto reloaded whenever its dependencies changed, e.g user profile reload when auth is changed
English
0
0
0
22
Precious | The App Guy 💙
Precious | The App Guy 💙@precious_tagy·
Both a them have a lot of boilerplate Dislike riverpod because of it being tied to the widget or ref I don’t use bloc because I don’t understand why I need to go through that huddles to manage state I’m looking to migrate to signal or something more minimal tho
Abdulkabir Adekanye@_KanyeDev

Bloc is solid. Riverpod is clean. But at scale? Riverpod wins. Less boilerplate, better reactivity, easier testing. Used both in prod. The verdict is clear. Which are you shipping with?

English
3
0
7
591
Jonata Santos
Jonata Santos@_jonatasantos·
we’re building a set of metrics based on cyclomatic complexity + architecture leaks/violations so we'll be able to more easily evaluate if the agent's code is following our standards goal is to go up one level of abstraction, instead of code review you'll be looking at a visual structure that represents and evaluate your codebase
Jonata Santos tweet media
English
1
0
5
327
Illia Romanenko 🇺🇦
Illia Romanenko 🇺🇦@illiaromanenko·
First day of I/O: things that I want to investigate further: Spark AI, New updates in Stitch and GitHub integration, WebMCP, Antigravity, and new 3.5 Flash. Also, the conversation AI demo was pretty nice:
Illia Romanenko 🇺🇦 tweet media
English
0
0
1
93
Illia Romanenko 🇺🇦
Illia Romanenko 🇺🇦@illiaromanenko·
Really excited for tomorrow's Google IO: each year it's getting better with more and more advanced and futuristic technology like AI, Robotics, Cloud, and Flutter, of course.
Illia Romanenko 🇺🇦 tweet media
English
0
0
1
136
Jason Cohen
Jason Cohen@asmartbear·
If you hire someone excellent and then micromanage them to death, you’re a bad manager. If you hire someone who isn’t capable, so you have to micromanage to get good work done, you’re a bad manager. In every case, it's bad management, and it's your fault. Instead… longform.asmartbear.com/delegation/?ut…
English
9
7
72
5.4K
Kobie sync/acc
Kobie sync/acc@k081e·
@illiaromanenko @powersync_ Oh cool, we might be able to help with comparison in that case. Will see if I can take a look at SQL Data Connect docs a bit later.
English
1
0
1
26
Illia Romanenko 🇺🇦
Illia Romanenko 🇺🇦@illiaromanenko·
Thoughts on Firebase SQL Connect: - Really nice that it supports caching out of the box (but keep in mind it's not a full offline mode like in Firestore, cache in memory for web, others persistent) - Dart Cloud Functions admin SDK doesn't support Firebase SQL Connect yet
English
2
0
2
72
Firebase
Firebase@Firebase·
🎯 You can now use the same language and tooling across your whole stack when building applications with Flutter, Dart, and Firebase. Native Dart support for Cloud Functions is currently an experimental feature behind a flag in the Firebase CLI. Learn more about the experiemential release → goo.gle/4tnjnDY
Firebase tweet media
English
5
15
151
15.7K
Illia Romanenko 🇺🇦
Illia Romanenko 🇺🇦@illiaromanenko·
@k081e @powersync_ I was mostly comparing SQL Data Connect offline/caching capabilities and pricing with Supabase + PowerSync approach. Trying to figure out what would be the best approach for the future projects.
English
1
0
0
32
Kobie sync/acc
Kobie sync/acc@k081e·
@illiaromanenko @powersync_ Ah nice find, thanks. (doesn't look like PowerSync can help here at all, we already support Google Cloud SQL but this looks like something that will need to be solved in SQL Connect itself)
English
1
0
1
26
Illia Romanenko 🇺🇦
Illia Romanenko 🇺🇦@illiaromanenko·
- You still pay per operation (like in Firestore), but it's better than per document, but still not as good as Supabase - Generating queries and mutations is nice (including clients)
English
0
0
2
21
Illia Romanenko 🇺🇦
Illia Romanenko 🇺🇦@illiaromanenko·
@garrytan I would rather pay a bit more for @DropboxSign to avoid hassle with maintenance. Oh, and Docuseal Cloud version costs more per seat - which is interesting...
English
0
0
0
43
Garry Tan
Garry Tan@garrytan·
2026 and onwards is truly the age of open source
Nav Toor@heynavtoor

DocuSign Personal: $10 to $15 per month. DocuSign Standard: $25 to $45 per user per month. DocuSign Business Pro: $40 to $65 per user per month. A 10-person team on Business Pro pays $4,800 to $7,800 a year. To put signatures on PDFs. A team of 50 pays $24,000 to $39,000 a year. And there is a 100-envelopes-per-year cap on most plans. Send more contracts and you pay extra. Need SMS delivery? $0.40 per send. Need ID verification? $2.50 per attempt. Need premium support? $5,000 to $50,000 per year add-on. You are rationing digital signatures in 2026. DocuSign is a $10 billion company built entirely on this pricing model. Now meet DocuSeal. A free and open source alternative to DocuSign. Created in 2023 by a Ruby developer named Alex who was simply trying to sign one document and realised every solution online was overpriced or required a subscription. Three weeks later he had a working alternative. He pushed it to GitHub under the AGPL-3.0 license. Today it has 11,800+ stars and over 1,000 forks. Bootstrapped. No VCs. No paywalls. Here is what DocuSeal does: - Upload any PDF and turn it into a fillable, signable form - Drag and drop signature fields, dates, checkboxes, file uploads, and 13 field types - Send to multiple signers with custom signing order - Automated email reminders - Mobile signing on any device - PDF signature verification built in - Audit trail for every document - Bulk send and templates - Full API access - Self-host with one Docker command Here is what DocuSeal costs: Zero. Forever. Unlimited documents. Unlimited signers. Unlimited storage. DocuSign limits envelopes. DocuSeal doesn't. DocuSign charges per SMS. DocuSeal doesn't. DocuSign charges for ID checks. DocuSeal doesn't. DocuSign sees your contracts on their servers. DocuSeal doesn't. Here is the wildest part: The median DocuSign contract per Vendr is $17,250 per year. One Reddit thread has people saying "they want me to pay $4.80 per e-signature." Self-host DocuSeal on a $5 cloud server and a 50-person team can sign as many contracts as they want without paying a single dollar. Your contracts never leave your server. Your client lists. Your NDAs. Your employment agreements. None of it touches a third-party company. For individuals who only sign a few contracts a year, you save $180. For small teams of 10, you save up to $7,800 a year. For a 50-person company, you save up to $39,000 a year. Your documents. Your signatures. Your server. 100% Open Source. (Link in the comments)

English
90
123
1.7K
552.9K
Luke
Luke@luke_pighetti·
my feed has to be cooked because i had no idea this was even a thing. six months ago it would have blown up my feed! firebase.google.com/docs/functions…
Rody Davis@rodydavis

@luke_pighetti Oh gotcha, so it is for a GCP project attached for Firebase. If it is dart you could try the new Dart Firebase functions we just launched. That should be a lot easier too

English
3
0
7
1.8K
Kate Lovett
Kate Lovett@k8lovett·
Can I just hot reload and be in Vegas? On our way to #CloudNext ✈️
Kate Lovett tweet media
English
3
2
58
2K
Illia Romanenko 🇺🇦
Illia Romanenko 🇺🇦@illiaromanenko·
We had multiple cases when we build Tablet app and then asked if that possible to build and run the same/similar app on the web? We say ok 1-2 weeks people get mind blown. Web is one of the greatest advantages of Flutter.
Remi Rousselet@remi_rousselet

As a Flutter lover, Flutter Web _is_ bad. It's cool that it is possible. But I'm not sure I'd use it legitimately for a professional project. Flutter is great for lots of stuff. Just not web.

English
0
0
2
74
Volodymyr Buberenko🇺🇦
Just another proof that all these charts of some repo popularity used to claim about ‘how good this project is’ is just a trash metric and nobody should take it seriously or make any decisions based on numbers of stars. awesomeagents.ai/news/github-fa…
English
1
0
1
42
Emma Twersky
Emma Twersky@twerske·
Come meet the Flutter and Dart team at Google I/O! We want to meet you, hear your feedback, help solve your problems, and build the best framework and language possible. Here's all @FlutterDev sessions at Google I/O 2026:
English
4
15
94
4.7K