ilyza1002

2.1K posts

ilyza1002

ilyza1002

@ilyza1002

I love Tennis, books and my dogs.

Germany Katılım Mayıs 2021
184 Takip Edilen728 Takipçiler
ilyza1002
ilyza1002@ilyza1002·
Alexander Zverev: "I am very sorry to have to make this decision. After all, the ABN AMRO Open gave me an opportunity as a young player, which is why I always enjoy returning. However, given my history with my ankle, I have to prioritise my recovery and cannot take any risks. I wish everyone in Rotterdam a wonderful week." Tournament director Richard Krajicek: "Given his history, we would of course have loved to see Alexander back on court, but we understand the decision he has made. Everyone remembers the images and the impact his previous ankle injury had."
ABN AMRO Open@abnamroopen

Alexander Zverev Withdraws from Rotterdam. The 28-year-old German withdrew today. Due to recurring ankle problems, his physio advised him to recover thoroughly before playing matches again. Wishing him a smooth recovery. Read more: abnamro-open.nl/nieuws/headlin… #AlexanderZverev #Zverev #ABNAMROOpen

English
5
5
98
27.3K
ilyza1002
ilyza1002@ilyza1002·
@gavindavies80 @pavyg He mentioned Murray and Wawrinka in the interview. x.com/ilyza1002/stat…
ilyza1002@ilyza1002

Toni Nadal said in an interview during the Australian Open that he thinks Zverev is the only one who can challenge Alcaraz and Sinner, if he changes certain things. Nada: "So, Alcaraz can go wherever he wants. First, he has special physical conditions, he has very good technical skills and, on top of that, he is lucky: he has lower-level rivals. And I'm not saying this because I'm Rafael Nadal's uncle — not at all. I try to be impartial. But it's clear, you said it before: before, Rafael or Djokovic played against Del Potro, and if Del Potro had a great day, he could beat you. Before, Rafael and Federer faced Wawrinka or Murray, and you knew you were going to suffer and that the match was going to be complicated." Today they win 80% of the time? Nadal: "Yes. The only one I think could challenge them a little is Zverev, as long as he's willing to change some habits in both his game and his character. If he's willing to fight... because Zverev has great ball control and a very good serve. I said this to Zverev when he came to train. I said,"‘Look, you have that serve, how many breaks are they going to get on you in a match? Two? Then play much more aggressively." Because you're not like Rafael, who had to fight for every point. You know that in a long match the'll get two breaks on you, so take a lot more risks." After the final of the Australian Open, Toni Nadal gave another interview and said the following: Nadal: "For me, he (Alcaraz) has a big advantage in that I don't see any rival, or almost any rival, who can bother him or unsettle him much... No, Sinner obviously can." And Zverev on Thursday when we saw him close in and force the fifth set? Nadal: "Zverev, yes, I said it, I don't know if you remember... I said, ‘Well, if Zverev plays well...’ But Zverev has a mental problem. He has an obsession with winning. Zverev had the match, he had the chance to win the second set, and when he served to win, he got broken. And his best shot is his serve. He comes back to win the match in the fifth, when he serves to close out the match and again... fails at that moment. So he's a dangerous rival and, for me, he's clearly better than Djokovic is today, but he lacks... the... if he, if Zverev had won that match today, he probably would have won the final too. It would change him because it gives you extra confidence and takes away the pressure he has to win a Grand Slam. Today, I don't see a Fonseca or a Mensik who can compete with Carlos in a year or two. I don't know if one will appear soon, but at the moment I don't know of any young players aged 18, 19 or 17 who are already showing signs of being a number one. Of course, in the end, Carlos is competing against Sinner, who is very good; Zverev, let's see how today's result affects him; and then the others, who seemed like they should be there, have disappeared: Rublev, Tsitsipas, Medvedev."

English
1
0
1
324
GAVIN D
GAVIN D@gavindavies80·
@pavyg Don’t forget Murray 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🎾
English
1
0
1
111
Pavvy G
Pavvy G@pavyg·
Toni Nadal saying Alcaraz and Sinner are playing in an easier era. Said he doesn't want to sound bias but Nadal faced likes of Djokovic, Federer or Del Potro. Today, Alcaraz and Sinner have an 80% chance of winning. Only Zverev can maybe challenge them.
English
73
43
496
56.8K
ilyza1002
ilyza1002@ilyza1002·
@Jimbo1604 @pavyg He did. And Wawrinka as well. x.com/ilyza1002/stat…
ilyza1002@ilyza1002

Toni Nadal said in an interview during the Australian Open that he thinks Zverev is the only one who can challenge Alcaraz and Sinner, if he changes certain things. Nada: "So, Alcaraz can go wherever he wants. First, he has special physical conditions, he has very good technical skills and, on top of that, he is lucky: he has lower-level rivals. And I'm not saying this because I'm Rafael Nadal's uncle — not at all. I try to be impartial. But it's clear, you said it before: before, Rafael or Djokovic played against Del Potro, and if Del Potro had a great day, he could beat you. Before, Rafael and Federer faced Wawrinka or Murray, and you knew you were going to suffer and that the match was going to be complicated." Today they win 80% of the time? Nadal: "Yes. The only one I think could challenge them a little is Zverev, as long as he's willing to change some habits in both his game and his character. If he's willing to fight... because Zverev has great ball control and a very good serve. I said this to Zverev when he came to train. I said,"‘Look, you have that serve, how many breaks are they going to get on you in a match? Two? Then play much more aggressively." Because you're not like Rafael, who had to fight for every point. You know that in a long match the'll get two breaks on you, so take a lot more risks." After the final of the Australian Open, Toni Nadal gave another interview and said the following: Nadal: "For me, he (Alcaraz) has a big advantage in that I don't see any rival, or almost any rival, who can bother him or unsettle him much... No, Sinner obviously can." And Zverev on Thursday when we saw him close in and force the fifth set? Nadal: "Zverev, yes, I said it, I don't know if you remember... I said, ‘Well, if Zverev plays well...’ But Zverev has a mental problem. He has an obsession with winning. Zverev had the match, he had the chance to win the second set, and when he served to win, he got broken. And his best shot is his serve. He comes back to win the match in the fifth, when he serves to close out the match and again... fails at that moment. So he's a dangerous rival and, for me, he's clearly better than Djokovic is today, but he lacks... the... if he, if Zverev had won that match today, he probably would have won the final too. It would change him because it gives you extra confidence and takes away the pressure he has to win a Grand Slam. Today, I don't see a Fonseca or a Mensik who can compete with Carlos in a year or two. I don't know if one will appear soon, but at the moment I don't know of any young players aged 18, 19 or 17 who are already showing signs of being a number one. Of course, in the end, Carlos is competing against Sinner, who is very good; Zverev, let's see how today's result affects him; and then the others, who seemed like they should be there, have disappeared: Rublev, Tsitsipas, Medvedev."

English
0
1
0
228
Jim
Jim@Jimbo1604·
@pavyg Yeah he’s right. Mr Nadal should also have mentioned Andy Murray as well
English
4
0
11
733
ilyza1002
ilyza1002@ilyza1002·
@JoyRichard25860 This has nothing to do with bias; the conversation naturally revolved around Alcaraz and a little bit around Zverev, because he played against him in the semi-finals and he trained with Toni Nadal.
English
3
0
20
4.6K
ilyza1002
ilyza1002@ilyza1002·
Toni Nadal said in an interview during the Australian Open that he thinks Zverev is the only one who can challenge Alcaraz and Sinner, if he changes certain things. Nada: "So, Alcaraz can go wherever he wants. First, he has special physical conditions, he has very good technical skills and, on top of that, he is lucky: he has lower-level rivals. And I'm not saying this because I'm Rafael Nadal's uncle — not at all. I try to be impartial. But it's clear, you said it before: before, Rafael or Djokovic played against Del Potro, and if Del Potro had a great day, he could beat you. Before, Rafael and Federer faced Wawrinka or Murray, and you knew you were going to suffer and that the match was going to be complicated." Today they win 80% of the time? Nadal: "Yes. The only one I think could challenge them a little is Zverev, as long as he's willing to change some habits in both his game and his character. If he's willing to fight... because Zverev has great ball control and a very good serve. I said this to Zverev when he came to train. I said,"‘Look, you have that serve, how many breaks are they going to get on you in a match? Two? Then play much more aggressively." Because you're not like Rafael, who had to fight for every point. You know that in a long match the'll get two breaks on you, so take a lot more risks." After the final of the Australian Open, Toni Nadal gave another interview and said the following: Nadal: "For me, he (Alcaraz) has a big advantage in that I don't see any rival, or almost any rival, who can bother him or unsettle him much... No, Sinner obviously can." And Zverev on Thursday when we saw him close in and force the fifth set? Nadal: "Zverev, yes, I said it, I don't know if you remember... I said, ‘Well, if Zverev plays well...’ But Zverev has a mental problem. He has an obsession with winning. Zverev had the match, he had the chance to win the second set, and when he served to win, he got broken. And his best shot is his serve. He comes back to win the match in the fifth, when he serves to close out the match and again... fails at that moment. So he's a dangerous rival and, for me, he's clearly better than Djokovic is today, but he lacks... the... if he, if Zverev had won that match today, he probably would have won the final too. It would change him because it gives you extra confidence and takes away the pressure he has to win a Grand Slam. Today, I don't see a Fonseca or a Mensik who can compete with Carlos in a year or two. I don't know if one will appear soon, but at the moment I don't know of any young players aged 18, 19 or 17 who are already showing signs of being a number one. Of course, in the end, Carlos is competing against Sinner, who is very good; Zverev, let's see how today's result affects him; and then the others, who seemed like they should be there, have disappeared: Rublev, Tsitsipas, Medvedev."
Radioestadio Noche@RadioestadioN

Toni Nadal "El único que puede competir con Alcaraz y Sinner creo que es Zverev, si cambia ciertas cosas"

English
11
17
246
159K
ilyza1002
ilyza1002@ilyza1002·
@kevinmcginty @bulldog_seviche Definitely, Zverev would have liked to keep him longer and still raves about him today, but he (understandably) decided to spend more time with his family.
English
0
0
2
264
ilyza1002
ilyza1002@ilyza1002·
During this year's Australian Open, David Ferrer spoke in an interview about his time as Alexander Zverev's coach: How long did you train him? A year with Zverev? Ferrer: "I was there for a year, yes." And how was it with him? Ferrer: "Very good, very good. I have a very good relationship with Alexander, yes. Yes, it was really good, I went to Monte Carlo, I travelled with him and what happened was that I had just quit tennis a year prior and well, then I decided -we had agreed to do it for a year- and then I decided to stop because I needed time to be at home with my family and, look, that's how I've stayed for five more years. But the experience was very good, he was a hard worker, I enjoyed working with him very much." Are players generally sponges? Are you sponges when faced with a coach who was usually a tennis player before? Ferrer: "Well good players have that ability to easily do what you tell them to do, right? They pick it up right away. And Alexander Zverev was one of them. He was intelligent, very intelligent tennis-wise, and he also really liked to talk about tennis. He was a player who, in that respect, even when training, I had to stop him. I didn't want him to train so many hours because he wore himself out a lot physically."
Tennis TV@TennisTV

It's been confirmed that @DavidFerrer87 is coaching @AlexZverev on a trial basis! Zverev was the opponent in Ferrer's last-ever match, last year in Madrid... What do you make of this new partnership?

English
4
16
164
62.6K
ilyza1002
ilyza1002@ilyza1002·
Yes, I understand what you mean and I agree with you. If you take the whole quote, he was referring more to a mental block because he is obsessed with winning a Grand Slam tournament. But of course, the media only pick up on the first part. That's why I posted the whole quote. That's the only thing we can do. Unfortunately.
English
1
0
2
109
UcoNH
UcoNH@mariamnoori2·
@ilyza1002 Look for example if he said straight forward that Sascha’s problem is his obsession with winning , they wouldn’t get the headlines they want .. you know it’s just changing few words , it’s not difficult .. just like Ferrer who was choosing his words wisely and smartly..
English
1
0
1
59
ilyza1002
ilyza1002@ilyza1002·
@mariamnoori2 I completely get your frustration, but that's just how the media works. And when it's a longer interview (as was the case with this one on the radio), they only take a few sentences out of context. There's no way to prevent that.
English
1
0
0
74
UcoNH
UcoNH@mariamnoori2·
@ilyza1002 Look , what frustrates me is that they all know how the media is but they keep saying the things the media wants ..
English
1
0
0
53
ilyza1002
ilyza1002@ilyza1002·
@kevinmcginty It was a good call, but unfortunately that time is over.
English
1
0
1
1.8K
ilyza1002
ilyza1002@ilyza1002·
@Sporting_TC True, but "You can not be serious" will stay forever and will be heard many more times on tennis courts around the world.😅
English
0
0
2
392
ilyza1002
ilyza1002@ilyza1002·
I am a "veteran" tennis fan and have been watching tennis for more than 40 years (since Boris Becker won Wimbledon in 1985 at the age of 17) I have watched thousands of matches, stayed up many nights and even took holidays off work to watch matches. I have seen countless dramatic matches, unfair umpire decisions, players trying to win by dirty means, but never in all that time have I had the feeling that has increasingly gripped me in recent months: that the rules of the sport I love so much are no longer the same for all players and that some players are given preferential treatment in order to achieve a desired result. The decisions that were made at the Australian Open this year have unfortunately increased this feeling and taken away a lot of my enjoyment of tennis.
Wimbledon@Wimbledon

The inimitable @TheBorisBecker, a champion at 17... #17daystogo #WimbledonAwaits

English
100
65
893
224.3K
ilyza1002
ilyza1002@ilyza1002·
I'm not complaining, I just expressed my feelings and also said that I'm not basing this on that one incident. Most commentators, most former players (and even the AO mentioned it in their YouTube video) talked about cramps. And the fact is that there should be no MTO for that. It's clear and clever that Alcaraz presented it differently to the physio. But again, that doesn't mean I have to think it's fair and sporting. I remember McEnroe very well and also know exactly what Becker has to say about that time.
English
2
1
4
397
Charles Arthur
Charles Arthur@charlesarthur·
@ilyza1002 But it means that the rules weren't bent for Carlos. And that's what you were complaining was happening. You don't remember the days when McEnroe got let off all sort of bad behaviour. That really was bending the rules.
English
1
0
5
418
ilyza1002
ilyza1002@ilyza1002·
We can disagree on this, that's perfectly fine, but it's my personal feeling (and it's not just about yesterday's incident). True, but Andy Roddick (whose opinion I generally value as a former player) also said that he would bet a dollar that it was cramps and that if he were Zverev, he would be pissed too. And just because he would have done the same thing as Carlos doesn't mean that I or many, many others have to think it's right.
English
2
0
20
3.2K
Charles Arthur
Charles Arthur@charlesarthur·
@ilyza1002 I've been watching and playing longer than you, and I think you're wrong. The rules are clearer than they ever were, and they hold the players in check better than they ever did. Andy Roddick, who knows more than both of us, said he'd have done the same as Carlos. Let it go.
English
6
0
22
4.3K
ilyza1002
ilyza1002@ilyza1002·
@Spunkjensen My idol? Well, that really made me laugh. My teenage years are long behind me. And it's not about the loss, it's about my general feeling that not all players are treated equally.
English
2
0
24
1.9K
Morten Munk
Morten Munk@Spunkjensen·
@ilyza1002 Sounds like you are just disappointed because your idol lost. Get over it.
English
2
0
8
2.2K
ilyza1002
ilyza1002@ilyza1002·
I know the rule, but that's no explanation or justification for the MTO in my opinion. If it had been heat illness, his vital functions would have been checked first (as we've seen with several MTOs for other players). There was no treatment for heat illness or anything else, just a massage of the thighs. And Alcaraz did not refer to this in his press conference either.
English
4
1
34
6.2K
Pedro A. Taboada
Pedro A. Taboada@Pedro_A_Taboada·
Respect to you as a veteran fan—watching since Becker’s epic ’85 Wimbledon win at 17 is impressive! On the AO decisions: the Grand Slam Rulebook is clear—no MTO for ‘pure’ cramps (only brief treatment during side changes or set breaks). But Alcaraz vomited twice into his towel earlier in the third set (at around 3-2), which triggered the heat illness provisions. The medical team (physio and doctor) evaluated it as a compatible medical condition: vomiting + localized cramping (right adductor) counted as symptoms of heat illness, not just conditioning/fatigue loss. Their call alone—legal, within the rules, even if debatable or frustrating. There was only one full MTO (3 minutes at 5-4 in the third after he held serve). No multiple stops or extra breaks beyond standard changeovers. Zverev then won the next two sets (third and fourth in tiebreaks) and built huge momentum. He even had the match on his racquet at 5-4 in the fifth on his own serve—but couldn’t close it. That’s where Grand Slams are decided: on court, in the clutch moments, enduring and delivering under pressure. Gentlemen’s tennis—the kind of Federer, Nadal, Edberg, or Ashe—shines in competing fiercely to the limit and accepting the outcome with class: full respect to rivals, no public excuses or complaints. Epic battle from both (nearly 5h30m thriller), but Alcaraz held on through the suffering and won. Let’s celebrate the sport’s integrity and the drama it delivered!
English
7
2
56
7.5K
ilyza1002
ilyza1002@ilyza1002·
I'm pretty sure most journalists were already rubbing their hands, expecting plenty of material and a minute-long rant from Alexander Zverev when they asked him about Alcaraz's MTO at the press conference. But Zverev gave them nothing and came up with a very mature and classy response, showing great sportsmanship: "But to be honest, I don't want to talk about this right now, because I think this is one of the best battles there ever was in Australia. And it doesn't deserve to be the topic now." 📽️abc_sport IG
English
24
35
726
49K