McFly22

@dubsndoo Come to Alberta my guy

I’m trying to decide whether there will be an election to turf David Eby before they give away my property to FNs. I could sell now and move to Alberta, or I can wait till after the CP leadership vote. It’s a dilemma.

@KirkLubimov This is all so dumb

Future proofing our oil&gas industry with carbon tax? Apparently, Danielle Smith & Mark Carney agree. Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Tim Hodgson: "The Premier said it is important to have a carbon price so that we can help future-proof the industry in Alberta." What!

@david_parker What organizations count as third party advertisers?

The spending limit for Third Party Advertisers for the Referendum is just over $600,000. One organization will not win this Referendum. We need dozens of organizations. Not only one. The desire for a single organization to do everything will kill the movement.

@MasatoToys @Martyupnorth Virtue signaling probably

@imsomcfly22 @Martyupnorth I don't know what it's for but it's fuckin weird lol I see it more and more on political stuff. The more important the more likely. EVERY SINGLE TIME they are making these crazy hand signs at like 1/100th the speed of the person talking they are supposedly translating. ???

Carefull Danielle, you're going to make Naheed's head explode.

@MasatoToys @Martyupnorth Yeah seems like a waste of money

@Martyupnorth There is zero chance that sign language interpreter is keeping up. They never do. It's super weird. Watch for it, it's becoming more common for political stuff. Yet EVERY TIME, there is zero chance they are keeping up. ???

‼️MAJOR BREAKING 2 Canadian judges have ACCUSED government prosecutors of putting immigrant criminals ahead of victims Antonio Skarica and Antoine Piché have BOTH blown the whistle on light sentences for BRUTAL, VIOLENT, criminals to avoid deportation. -National Post WOW!!

@dubsndoo Only so such you can do with a 170$ carbon tax

I think if the NDP falls here in B.C., Mark Carney will go into full panic mode about his net zero agenda. Alberta and B.C. could work together to make both provinces energy superpowers to supply the world with reliable energy, and in the process, strip Carney of his NDP ally.

@DavidSacks Oufffffff

Good luck California it was nice knowing you

@nateglubish This looks great 👍

Follow the money. That's the mandate behind TRACE — our AI-powered review of Alberta's contracts and expenditures. In one test, AI traced circular funding through 80,000+ charities across 3.2 septillion possible paths. In under 90 minutes. On April 29, we're taking this to Ottawa. Every province should benefit from what Alberta has built. READ MORE: nateglubish.substack.com/p/were-taking-…

@Altairus1664 @david_parker why

@david_parker Include an easy path to residency and citizenship for Canadians

The new nation of Alberta cannot have a small group of people determining what its Constitution looks like. There must be a democratically elected Constitutional Convention with at least one representative sent from every riding to debate what that constitution will look like.

@cspotweet not at 170$ carbon tax

Mark Carney asked about how Iran situation has changed the federal-Alberta MOU. Says it's reinforced the issue of energy security here and unlocking markets abroad, and reinforces overall energy transition. Will set up for major investment in Alberta and nationwide.

@Prominent_Bryan What do they need to change?

Look it isn't rocket science. The CPC can either act like this election winning machine it's supposed to be and realize they currently have a bad offering Or they can continue being a mini cult and lose the next election

@adamscochran He’s Mr net zero bud

So many Conservatives have crossed the aisle that the a special election tipped the Canadian Liberal party into a majority. US Dems could learn a lot from Carney. Very 90s style Democrat. Pro business & economy. Is not performative about his values, but if you come after those rights, he will fuck you up. And he is able to build coalitions on sensible policy because he doesn’t stick to hardline populist talking points that are “all or nothing” he is willing to always set the expectation of achieving a middle ground that moves things forward, rather than getting nothing by pursuing absolutism.

After 4 hours this video was dead in the water. it had 30 RTS and was not getting more, I did a simple hail mary RT, one RT that's it. It's about to crack 1300 rts and 600 bookmarks. A simple retweet can go miles.

@BillboardChris Why are you even taking about this. Insane to me people want to leave the country you constantly protest and your like nahhh you can’t

Grok says the chance of Alberta becoming independent is near 0%. I think they’d be better off independent, but leaving isn’t a simple matter of a yes vote in a referendum. From Grok: Current public support for Alberta independence is a minority position (typically 25–30% in recent polls), though it has reached a 5-year high amid ongoing frustrations with federal policies. A clear majority of Albertans (around 60–70%) consistently say they would vote to stay in Canada. Recent polling examples (as of early-to-mid 2026): • Pollara Strategic Insights (March 16–25, 2026, released early April): 27% of decided voters would vote to separate (a record high, up 7 points since December 2025). Another 15% of those planning to vote “remain” say they might switch to “yes” as a protest message to Ottawa, potentially pushing support as high as 42% in a referendum scenario. Among United Conservative Party (UCP) voters, it’s roughly split (55% separate vs. 45% remain). • Abacus Data (February 2026): 26% support independence; 64% oppose. • Angus Reid Institute (February 2026): 29% would vote to leave (only 8% definite; 21% leaning); 65% would vote to stay (57% definite). • Other polls (Ipsos, Research Co., Leger, Mainstream Research in Jan–March 2026) show similar ranges: 17–31% open to independence, with “committed” support dropping to ~15–16% once real-world economic and social costs are factored in. Support is higher among younger voters and UCP/federal Conservative supporters, but it remains far short of the clear majority needed for any realistic path forward. A citizen-led petition to force an independence referendum question has reportedly gathered enough signatures, but its path forward is now legally uncertain. Stay Free Alberta claims it surpassed the required ~177,732–178,000 valid signatures by late March 2026 (well before the May 2 deadline). If verified by Elections Alberta, Premier Danielle Smith has pledged to include the question on the provincial referendum ballot scheduled for October 19, 2026. However, First Nations groups have launched court challenges arguing the petition violates treaty rights and lacked consultation. A judge has paused signature verification pending review. If blocked, separatists may ask the provincial government to proceed anyway. Smith herself opposes full separation. She describes her position as favoring a “strong and sovereign Alberta within a united Canada” and is using the 2026 referendum mainly for other questions on immigration, constitutional changes, and provincial autonomy—not as a direct push for independence. Even if a referendum happens and a “yes” side somehow wins (which current polling makes unlikely), actual independence as a sovereign country is extremely improbable in the near term (realistically near 0% chance without a dramatic, sustained shift in sentiment and politics). Reasons include: • Legal hurdles: The 1998 Supreme Court of Canada Secession Reference and the federal Clarity Act require a “clear question” and “clear majority,” followed by good-faith negotiations with the federal government and other provinces. Unilateral secession is not possible, and constitutional amendments would be needed. • National opposition: Roughly 79% of all Canadians (including majorities outside Alberta) say they would block Alberta from leaving if given a vote. • Historical precedent: Quebec’s two referendums (1980 and 1995) failed despite higher support levels at the time, and even a narrow “yes” would trigger prolonged, uncertain negotiations. In short, the movement reflects real grievances (resource policy, carbon taxes, federal overreach), and it has energized separatist activism and a possible symbolic vote in October 2026. But polling, legal barriers, and political reality point to very low odds of Alberta becoming an independent country anytime soon. Most Albertans and Canadians prefer reform within Confederation over breakup.

Pro tip for Alberta independence supporters: Search my profile. I’ve been posting about Alberta Independence every day for over a year. You’ll find arguments and answers on just about every topic. Basically, it’s Wikipedia for Alberta independence.

Although it is now day 5 of fuel protests now here in Ireland, my message is the same. Super proud of all the hardworking men and women in this country who have stood their ground! This video got me demonetised on Meta, so 🖕 you suckerberg 🤣

@wealthmoose Yikes

🚨 A Fox News segment just went viral… A professor of “Queer Studies in Education” from Canada gets roasted on U.S. national TV. This is how the world now sees Canadian academia. We used to export excellence. Now we export… this. 🇨🇦 #Cdnpoli #Canada

Fraser institute President Niels Veldhuis debunks the Liberals claim that it’s Trumps tariffs that are causing Canada’s decline.

@BillboardChris We have no choice. Independence or we’re going down with the rest of Canada

For everyone who thinks Alberta can simply vote to leave Canada and take the oil with them, it doesn’t work like that. A referendum does not automatically achieve independence. Under Canadian constitutional law, informed by the Supreme Court of Canada’s 1998 Reference re Secession of Quebec and the federal Clarity Act (2000): • Unilateral secession is illegal. Alberta cannot simply declare independence. • A “clear question” (the proposed wording aims to meet this) and a “clear majority” (not precisely defined, but the House of Commons would assess factors like the size of the yes vote, turnout, and overall circumstances) would create a reciprocal obligation for the federal government, other provinces, and relevant parties (including Indigenous nations) to negotiate in good faith on potential constitutional changes to allow secession. • Negotiations would cover complex issues: division of national debt, borders, currency, trade agreements, military/NORAD/NATO membership, pensions (CPP/OAS), equalization, Indigenous treaty rights (Treaties 6, 7, 8 cover much of Alberta), environmental obligations, and more. These would require a constitutional amendment approved under Canada’s amending formula (typically involving Parliament and at least seven provinces representing 50% of the population). • First Nations groups have launched court challenges arguing that the petition and referendum process violates treaty rights and the duty to consult, potentially delaying or blocking certification of signatures. In short, even a strong yes vote would start a long, uncertain, multilateral negotiation process—not an immediate exit. Failure to reach agreement could leave the status quo or lead to prolonged uncertainty.