Nasser Ega-Musa

Trump & the Somalis: Donald Trump’s 3 December outburst — calling Somalis “garbage” — is one of the most openly racist statements by a US president in a century. For the complete article follow this link…& pls subscribe whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb… #Trump #Somalis #Minnesota

'You should be disqualified for retweeting something stupid but not for giving a prestigious diplomatic post to a friend of the worst paeodphile of our age?' @lewis_goodall questions Labour's criticism of Zack Polanksi's response to the Golders Green attack.

@Bro_Code_x Send list of secret codes please

Secret codes for Chatgpt

Arnab Goswami becoming an overnight hero in Iran 🇮🇷 for his Trump bashing wasn’t something i ever expected to witness. Crazy times, this video is viral across Iran

"I regard myself as the greatest failure that ever walked the planet earth"

𝗪𝗛𝗬 𝗜 𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗚𝗘𝗗 𝗠𝗬 𝗡𝗔𝗥𝗥𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗩𝗘 𝗢𝗡 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗖𝗔𝗨𝗦𝗘𝗦 𝗢𝗙 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗚𝗢 𝗪𝗔𝗥. Many people have wondered why I made a shift on my previous perception of Paul Kagame causing the crisis in Congo. I explained this issue clearly on a podcast in 2024; listen without emotions and learn: 1. I began to read and listen to the historical context of the causes of the Congo conflict from Julius Nyerere, Thabo Mbeki, Nelson Mandela, and AU mediation reports. And all exposed clearly that the blame lies with fully on Mobutu Seseseko and successive Congolese governments for trying to displace Banyamulenge-speaking people from their ancestral land in Eastern Congo to Rwanda where their ancestors came from before Leopold carved large chunks out of Rwanda, Burundi and Uganda to form Zaire or Congo. 2. I also went to Congo and Rwanda and learned the facts for myself by listening to both the Congolese people and the Rwandans alike, instead of only listening to the Congolese side as I had done before. With that, I realized that my previous narrative was driven by Belgian colonial propaganda designed to keep the brothers and sisters in that region divided by promoting tribalism and self-hate for the colonizer to benefit from their minerals while they fight each other. x.com/ellen_kampire_…

Wow. So what he is saying is that Iran almost has more effective separation of powers than the U.S. 🤔

Three weeks ago, Louise Lyngsholm Lave barely knew who Pete Hegseth was. Now, after co-creating their third music video for Bruce Kluger’s savage satire album “MAGA Country,” it would appear she knows way too much. And the scariest part? Real life is catching up to the absurdity faster than the video could predict. Welcome to Macho Pete territory. 🎥🔥

🇮🇷 NEW Lego Style Music Video from Iran via PersiaBoi Studios They are SO FAST and the Music is Good Titled: Taco Tuesday Backpedal TACO stands for Trump Always Chickens Out.

🇮🇷 NEW Lego Style Music Video from Iran via PersiaBoi Studios Titled: Uranium Heist in the Dead of Night FAILED OPERATION $600 MILLION WASTED This one is a WHOLE PRODUCTION hinting at the Uranium Heist theory many think led to the weekend chaos in Iran for the U.S.

There just aren't enough Iranian embassies for me to follow. 🤣

In 2019, MIT professor Patrick Winston gave a legendary 1-hour lecture called “How to Speak.” It has 18M+ views for a reason. His frameworks: • Your ideas are like your children • The 5-minute rule for job talks • Why jokes fail at the start 15 lessons on communication:

@IRMilitaryMedia Irans big beautiful gift to Iran 🇮🇷

Who decided that one human’s pain outweighs another’s? This video made my entire body tingle.

He is 59 years old. Born in Richmond, Virginia, but chose Iran. That alone tells you everything about the kind of man he is. He has the rare ability to dissect Western narratives in real time, be it live on CNN, BBC, Al Jazeera, Sky News, and dismantle them calmly, in perfect English, often better than the hosts themselves. Recently, he appeared on live TV and left a host completely speechless after naming the “Epstein class” as the elite pulling strings over governments and media. Just days later, a verified account on X posted a $1 million bounty on his head, demanding he be captured alive. His response? He kept talking. Kept showing up. Didn’t miss a single interview. His PhD thesis was a direct intellectual challenge to Edward Said’s work on Orientalism. Written at the University of Birmingham. Pure scholarship. He volunteered to fight in the Iran-Iraq war as a young man. Survived two chemical weapons attacks. Then went back to university and became a professor. He is one of the founders of the Institute for North American and European Studies at the University of Tehran. Built academic bridges while the West was burning them. He has appeared on nearly every major global news network as a voice that inserts truth into the entire conversation. He has done so much for those of us tired of one-sided Western narratives dominating the airwaves. In the art of truth-telling and intellectual courage, Professor Marandi is a role model to our generation. 💯​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Video credit: Unmute Humanity @s_m_marandi

⁦@s_m_marandi⁩ My conversation with ChatGPT on how you keep besting western journalists and how they keep coming back for more…they never learn chatgpt.com/s/t_69bc85b93e…

A reported dialogue between Ali Larijani and Ayatollah Ali Khamenei before his martyrdom: Ali Larijani, Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, came to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei carrying a cold report — but his heart was not cold. After a long silence he said: “My leader… this time the threat is not just a passing message of pressure. A decision has been made. The enemy wants to kill you, even if the sky burns with missiles. We have prepared a fortified location, a place carefully secured and hidden from all eyes — a place bombs cannot easily reach and aircraft cannot strike. It is not hiding, my leader… but a temporary disappearance until the storm passes.” The Leader remained silent for a moment, then slowly stood up — as if history itself had risen with him. He approached and asked calmly: “And when you came to me… what answer did you expect?” Larijani replied after hesitation: “I expected you would refuse. But my leader, the nation needs you, and the battle needs its commander.” The Leader smiled — a smile carrying both sadness and wisdom. “You are right in the calculations of states and the books of security. But let us speak for a moment in a language older than politics. How can I ask a soldier to face death if his commander disappears? How can I tell the people to stand firm… if I am the first to leave the field of danger?” He paused, as if a door to Karbala had opened within his chest. “We are the sons of a man named Hussein ibn Ali — the Imam who knew his fate and still walked toward it as one walks toward God’s promise. He did not disappear because his army was small — for he had a greater army in the heavens.” Larijani replied: “But my leader, history is not one page. We also have a Hidden Imam whose absence taught us that disappearance is sometimes wisdom, not fear.” The Leader sighed and answered: “The difference, Mr. Larijani, is that when the Imam disappeared, he had no army and no nation capable of defending the truth. But we… how can I disappear when I have a nation fighting? How can I vanish while my soldiers stand under fire? When a leader disappears while he is alone, it may be wisdom. But when a whole nation stands behind him, his disappearance may become a heavy question in the conscience of history.” Larijani fell silent, unable to respond. The Leader shook his hand, thanking him for his concern. After Larijani left, he gathered his family and told them about the proposal — a safe place they could go until the war ended. They looked at him as children look at the meaning of dignity and simply said: “We are wherever you are.” And so the man remained where he was — not because he did not know the danger, but because he knew something deeper: Some leaders, when they disappear from death, may also disappear from the memory of their nation.

I will never not remember this.

@gothburz Now do one as a Trump White House Aide…puuuleeeze 🙏🏾

@inaxusein Appreciate that. Though the last time I submitted something to an academic institution, I got a B+ and a margin note that still haunts me.

I am an intern in the Office of Legislative Affairs at the Department of State. My job is binders. When the Secretary briefs members of Congress, I prepare the classified briefing packets. I print the cover sheets. I tab the sections with a ruler because my supervisor once told me that a misaligned tab conveys a lack of respect for the classification, and a lack of respect for the classification means you should not be in the building. The ruler is six inches. The tabs are perfect. On March 2, 2026, I prepared eight binders. Not five hundred and thirty-five. Eight. The Gang of Eight. The Speaker, the House Minority Leader, the Senate Majority Leader, the Senate Minority Leader, and the chairs and ranking members of the intelligence committees. Eight people. I printed eight cover sheets. I placed eight binders on eight chairs in a SCIF in the Capitol. The room seats twelve. I removed four chairs and set them in the hallway. They would not be needed. The Constitution says Congress declares war. All of Congress. All five hundred and thirty-five members. I printed materials for eight. My job is counting to eight. Before the classified briefing, the Secretary spoke to reporters on the Capitol steps. I was inside, standing by the door to the room, which was not yet occupied because the eight people had not yet arrived. I could hear him through the hallway. This is what he said, in the order he said it, because the order is the point: "We knew that there was going to be an Israeli action." "We knew that that would precipitate an attack against American forces." "And we knew that if we didn't preemptively go after them before they launched those attacks, we would suffer higher casualties." A reporter asked if the United States was forced to strike because of an impending Israeli action. The Secretary said: "No." Then: "Obviously, we were aware of Israeli intentions and understood what that would mean for us, and we had to be prepared to act as a result of it." The answer is no. The next sentence is yes. They are in the same breath. I heard both from the hallway. The Secretary then defined the imminent threat. He said: "The imminent threat was that we knew that if Iran was attacked — and we believed they would be attacked — that they would immediately come after us." Israel attacks Iran. Iran attacks us. We attack Iran first so that when Israel attacks Iran and Iran attacks us, we have already attacked Iran. I stood by the door with a ruler in my pocket and tried to diagram this sentence. It is a circle. The circle is the justification. I have a political science degree from Georgetown. I took Constitutional Law. I took a seminar on the July Crisis of 1914. Austria-Hungary was going to attack Serbia. Russia would mobilize. Germany knew that meant a two-front war, so Germany struck France first. Every country entered because of what another country was about to do. The professor called it an alliance cascade. The cascade killed twenty million people and created the conditions for fascism. He did not tell us what the next one creates. That was a lecture hall. This is a hallway in the Capitol. The binders are new. I wrote my ConLaw final paper arguing that the War Powers Resolution was "effectively unenforceable." My professor wrote in the margin: "Correct, but that's a description, not an argument." I think about that margin note a lot. I thought about it again when the Secretary said, on the steps of the building that wrote the law: "No presidential administration has ever accepted the War Powers Act as constitutional — not Republican presidents, not Democratic presidents." He said: "We can't notify 535 people. That's not possible." It is possible. It is called a vote. It is the first power listed in Article I, Section 8. I was inside the building. I had the eight binders. The five hundred and twenty-seven other members would learn what happened the same way you did. A reporter asked about a school in Minab. One hundred and seventy students. Ages seven to twelve. Saturday is a school day in Iran. The Secretary said: "I've seen those reports." He said: "If that was our strike." He said: "It'd be very tragic." Two blocks away, the same morning, the First Lady was chairing a UN Security Council meeting titled "Children, Technology, and Education in Conflict." She said: "The U.S. stands with all of the children throughout the world." She did not mention Minab. The Secretary did not mention Minab. One building said "very tragic." The other building said "imagine the loss of potential." Neither building said the name of the school. The Secretary was asked about regime change. He said: "Not regime change." Then: "We hope that the Iranian people can overthrow this government." On my ConLaw final, the distance between "not the objective" and "we hope it happens" was worth four points. I got them right. In practice the distance is zero and it is not on the exam. The Secretary walked past me. I held the door. He did not look at me. He sat down. Eight people were in the room. The door closed. I stood in the hallway with the four extra chairs. Senator Warner came out forty minutes later. He said: "There was no imminent threat to the United States of America by the Iranians. There was a threat to Israel." He said: "If we equate a threat to Israel as the equivalent of an imminent threat to the United States, then we are in uncharted territory." Senator Schumer said the answers were "totally insufficient." He said they "raised many more questions than it answered." I collected the binders afterward. One had a coffee ring on the cover sheet. One had a margin note I am not permitted to describe. One was untouched. Someone attended a classified briefing on the third day of a war launched without their authorization and did not open the binder. I tabbed that binder with a ruler. I am standing in the hallway. The four chairs are against the wall. The war is in its third day. The Speaker says they have the votes to block the war powers resolution. The vote is this week. The binders are filed. The Secretary said, to the last reporter who shouted a question as he walked away: "The hardest hits are yet to come." I got a B+ on that paper. My professor was right. It was a description, not an argument. It's still a description.