
One thing that teach me why #Monero $XMR is the future. Watch "The Godfather II" when Michael Corleone (Al Pacino) discusses Cuban Rebels "They Could Win"
The Sovereign Individual
37.3K posts

@inmueblesmx
#Monero $XMR 48Mxn8mRGvxYjVeKG7ehA18x4GNLL6gwd35SLPHw8gxAAZT62oQfKt4ZtXt5YXfoFQJxBsCY6RPSZjQucH8xAni64xeLGmb

One thing that teach me why #Monero $XMR is the future. Watch "The Godfather II" when Michael Corleone (Al Pacino) discusses Cuban Rebels "They Could Win"














jberman outlined a 4-phase audit plan for FCMP++ integration code, starting with crypto and progressing to consensus, with funds to be raised via CCS; discussions covered phasing, timelines (estimated 3 months), auditors (potentially @cypher_stack), and related upstream PRs. jberman: My current plan on the table is to have the fcmp++-stage in the seraphis-migration repo ready for auditing. I'd like to audit the integration code in 4 phases: 1) Crypto, 2) Crypto Integration, 3) Tree building / prove / verify, 4) Consensus integration Each subsequent phase essentially utilizes the building blocks of its preceding phase So right now, I have PR's prepped (and am working with jeffro to get those PR's merged), and then would like to get started with auditing on a specific commit of fcmp++-stage rbrunner: So with possible working-in of the results of one phase's audit results before going to the audit of the next phase? jberman: Of note, I've already opened a couple PR's upstream, which jeffro and vtnerd reviewed. I'm proposing we get that code + other related building block crypto audited as well rbrunner, Yes. I'm thinking about a distinct CCS like kayaba's where I raise funds for the audits in advance, to minimize downtime between each phase rbrunner: I see. Makes sense Will be interesting to see how long the whole process takes, over all 4 phases jberman: Here are the specific sections I want to get audited: paste.debian.net/hidden/82c00500 Audit 1 Crypto - rct::zeroCommitVartime - fe_batch_invert - ed25519 -> wei conversion - point_to_ed_derivatives - ed_derivatives_to_wei_x_y - fe_ed_derivatives_to_wei_x_y - torsion clearing - clear_torsion - get_valid_torsion_cleared_point - rct::verPointsForTorsion - unbiased key image generator - unbiased_hash_to_ec - Review that this achieves the stated goal of eliminating bias. Hash to point safety. Review: safety, constant timedness Out of scope (slated for future optional audit): - torsion check - torsion_check_vartime - get_valid_torsion_cleared_point_fast - fe_reduce - fe_dbl ______________________ Audit 2 Integrated Crypto - output_to_tuple - output_to_pre_leaf_tuple - selene_scalar_from_bytes - set_valid_leaves - hash_grow - hash_init_point - point_to_cycle_scalar - from_bytes / to_bytes ______________________ Audit 3 Curve Tree building - get_tree_extension - get_leaf_layer_grow_instructions - hash_children_chunks - set_next_layer_extension - get_grow_layer_instructions - get_next_layer_extension ______________________ Audit 4 Consensus Integration advance_tree grow_tree trim_block trim_tree get_last_path handle_fcmp_tree batch_verify_fcmp_pp_txs - batchVerifyFcmpPpProofs // Make sure the block uses the correct FCMP++ tree root and n tree layers jberman: rbrunner, I think 3 months is a reasonable expectation. First 2 audit phases ~1 month, and the latter 2 ~two months rbrunner: Sounds like a good sprint :) Hopefully without burnout at the end ... rucknium: Do you have specific firm(s) in mind? jberman: Will probably start with CS if they have availability between the other work rucknium: Code auditing plan sounds good to me. I am no code auditing expert of course :) #c656005" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">libera.monerologs.net/monero-researc…






I'm sitting on 1,000 ounces of silver bars bought physical, did what everyone says to do "Real assets" "Outside the system" "When everything collapses you'll be glad you have it" tried to sell some last week, trying to sell it today refineries won't touch it dealers lowballing 30% under spot banks look at me like I'm selling contraband turns out "owning" something and being able to "exit" something are two very different skills this is the same trap I see in trading people hold positions they can't exit stocks with no volume options with no buyers sitting on "value" that only exists on paper supply & demand lesson learned




