billy

@Damonsta777 @MLJanson @otherfren @PaulieM80 The evidence I use is of modern times, not letters from 20+ years ago. Take this seriously.

@instanceGWD @MLJanson @otherfren @PaulieM80 You’re not quoting anybody at all. That’s quite a lot worse by a fair degree.

Moon landing deniers and Flat Earthers are the thickest people on the globe

@Damonsta777 @MLJanson @otherfren @PaulieM80 You quoted van allen (who died in 2006). That isn’t intellectually honest in 2026. Considering the magnitudes of more information we have gained in the last 20 years proving its lethality is nothing to be toyed with.

@instanceGWD @MLJanson @otherfren @PaulieM80 Can you quote the independent research for me? You’d ask me to do the same.

@NathanJarrell4 @DeWittTom @MarchandSurgery What does the space race have to do with spreading communism? Nothing, there’s no correlation.

@instanceGWD @DeWittTom @MarchandSurgery So the USSR wasn't trying to spread the influence of Communism around the world and assist allies after WW2? They weren't controlling other nations in the form of puppet states?

If anything were to happen to the Artemis II astronauts on this mission, it would be an amazingly strong argument that the original lunar landing was fake, exonerating all skeptics. If we can't circle the moon 57 years later, we probably didn't land on it and get back in 1969.

@Damonsta777 @otherfren @PaulieM80 Magnitudes more. A simple google search. And with that we also know they’re impossible to traverse through safely. Of course, nasa (the ones faking this), would disagree

@instanceGWD @otherfren @PaulieM80 It’s true that ‘we’ have more knowledge of them than he did, through probes and instrumentation sent up to directly measure them. They also prove that they’re fine to travel through. The Apollo astronauts got through fine, and the Artemis crew will too.

@MLJanson @Damonsta777 @otherfren @PaulieM80 Or we know now that it’s impossible to safely pass through, based off independent research. NASA (the one faking this) aren’t evidence.

@instanceGWD @Damonsta777 @otherfren @PaulieM80 True, we do know a lot more about radiation in outer space by now. Artemis 1 for example was a test run to see how it would affect a human crew and how to best shield them. nature.com/articles/s4158…

@NathanJarrell4 @DeWittTom @MarchandSurgery No leverage would’ve been gained. No leverage was gained. There was no race, no one died in the Cold War.

@instanceGWD @DeWittTom @MarchandSurgery Think about it: The Soviets dearly wanted to be the first ones to put a man on the moon. The political leverage that it would have generated for them would have been totally devastating to the US, by demonstrating the superiority of communism. Why would they lie about losing?

@MLJanson @Damonsta777 @otherfren @PaulieM80 He died in 2006. You and I know magnitudes more about the belts then he did, correct? Appealing to his authority hurts you actually.

@instanceGWD @Damonsta777 @otherfren @PaulieM80 So, you believe Van Allen that these radiation belts exists, but claim that he's wrong about their intensity?

@Damonsta777 @otherfren @PaulieM80 No, he died in 2006. I (and you) have much more knowledge about the belts then he did. Correct? You also appealed to his authority even though he’s been dead for 20 years.

@instanceGWD @otherfren @PaulieM80 You’ve been arguing with me about the ‘Van Allen belt’ It seems reasonable to refer to, well, Van Allen. Sometimes people know more than you. Like Van Allen. We should be comfortable with that knowledge.

@NathanJarrell4 @DeWittTom @MarchandSurgery So by your own admission no 3rd party evidence exists. Thanks

@instanceGWD @DeWittTom @MarchandSurgery That's because there WAS no 3rd party in the 60s. No country in the world had a space program other than the US and the USSR, and that was only because the two nations were fighting each other to get to be the first one to put a man on the moon.

@MLJanson @Damonsta777 @otherfren @PaulieM80 Yeah I trust him, totally. This totally isn’t an appeal to authority.

@instanceGWD @Damonsta777 @otherfren @PaulieM80 "Radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage - a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights." - James Van Allen

@Damonsta777 @otherfren @PaulieM80 Talk about an appeal to authority wow

@instanceGWD @otherfren @PaulieM80 James Van Allen agrees with me. Yes. THAT Van Allen. Otherwise known as the very source of the “science” you’re quoting in this instance.

@conspiracyslyr What satellites? This isn’t verifiable

@instanceGWD there are better images that can be verified by comparing them to satellite imagery

Nice curve

@xjoshryan Nope not yet

@instanceGWD Did you read through it??

@instanceGWD babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uiug… Feel free to read through the entire PDF document ‘Apollo Experience Report: Protection Against Radiation’ document is also available on nasa technical report server but can’t get the pdf to load so I linked a third party copy of it

@Altacnt21 @Wombatofwisdom @JonSedore @CuriosityonX It’s not predictable whatsoever, that’s why it’s highly dynamic. Randomness is therefore implied by this. “It implies change” expand on this misinterpretation more.

@instanceGWD @Wombatofwisdom @JonSedore @CuriosityonX Dynamic doesn’t imply randomness. It implies change. Basically it’s not uniform. But it’s predictable. You can average the exposure an astronaut will experience given their mission and change the mission to get them within acceptable conditions

Farthest ever landing. We landed on a moon of Saturn 1.4 billion km away and most people have no idea. This is actual footage from Titan's surface. The Huygens probe dropped through orange haze for 2.5 hours before touching down on an alien world.

@Damonsta777 @otherfren @PaulieM80 The liars and deceivers say they received 2 rads. The science shows the belts carry radiation magnitudes. Yes, magnitudes higher then any x ray machine on earth. With 1-2 hour travel time. And not factoring in cosmic rays. There’s no excuse.

@instanceGWD @otherfren @PaulieM80 The Apollo 11 astronauts received about 2 rads of radiation over the entire 6 day period they were in space. Van Allen himself has discounted these claims you people are making. There’s gaps. They pass through those gaps very quickly. It’s not a massive deal.

@IdkIdk410509 @CarnivorChris33 @HMBohemond The reality is we never went to the moon in the 60s when we can’t go today.

@instanceGWD @CarnivorChris33 @HMBohemond No, you just deny reality for no reason and its annoying seeing people deny reality so confidently.

Reminder there's people who also unironically believe airplanes are fake. We're going to be doing regular Mars trips in a decade or two and they still won't believe it. Actual subhumans. Not worthy of equal rights.

@Fireman14YT @Stephannisuarez Seeing nasa evidence isn’t believing either

@instanceGWD @Stephannisuarez I wasn’t arguing about space travel. Just saying that even seeing isn’t always believing for some people 😅

Los terraplanistas escondiéndose en una esquina de la tierra ahora mismo

@conspiracyslyr No land features evident, looks blatantly fake and unverifiable to me.

@instanceGWD the curve is clearly visible

I changed my mind about the Artemis mission. Sometimes we need something to unite humanity in celebration and awe. We can waste a little money for that

@YesterdayBriefs @FearedBuck No.

@FearedBuck Flat earth gang’s down BAD rn

Artemis II crew captured a view of Earth this morning from 41,000 miles away. The first time since 1972 that humans have seen a crescent Earth in full.