Josh

111 posts

Josh banner
Josh

Josh

@xjoshryan

Katılım Aralık 2018
89 Takip Edilen19 Takipçiler
Josh retweetledi
Szabadság1956🇺🇸 Слава Україні!🇺🇦 Tisza2026🇭🇺
Every time you see someone denying the Moon landing or any other spaceflight, remember that their ranks include people who don't understand how night and day work. It does largely stem from a fundamental ignorance of science and refusal to learn.
Szabadság1956🇺🇸 Слава Україні!🇺🇦 Tisza2026🇭🇺 tweet media
English
6
8
170
2.3K
KBone
KBone@KBone478·
@FoxNews “Hey look kids!! We are doing far less than what NASA supposedly did over 50 years ago even though technology is far more advanced today.” It truly is pathetic.
English
1
0
0
1.1K
Fox News
Fox News@FoxNews·
ARTEMIS II CREW SPEAKS FROM SPACE: “We are definitely 100% on our way to the moon." "The lunar gravity will take over in a couple of days here and start pulling us around the far side." "At the end of our translunar injection here, about an hour and a half ago, we just really looked at each other — and I know the United States has done this 1968 through 1972 — but it's just, this is unbelievable, that we can put our minds to something and pull it off." "This is an unbelievable technical accomplishment.”
English
535
890
7.8K
510.5K
HiddenInPlainSight
HiddenInPlainSight@GoldenWaterDrop·
@NASA_Johnson So where is the live 24-7 feed? If Nixon could call the moon, surely we can livestream on Youtube.
English
1
0
1
1.1K
NASA's Johnson Space Center
NASA's Johnson Space Center@NASA_Johnson·
Because the astronauts are traveling so far, a series of Earth-based satellites known as the Deep Space Network help keep us connected to our Moon-bound crew. Did you know you can see those connections happening real-time? You can see which satellites are communicating with Orion by visiting: go.nasa.gov/4m6vnHP
NASA's Johnson Space Center tweet media
English
95
847
4.7K
238.1K
Jeremy
Jeremy@ManaByte·
Nixon called NASA and they patched the call through the radio. Newspapers ran stills from the TV broadcasts. How can moon landing deniers be this dumb?
3AMGrind@3AM_Grind

@ManaByte It’s FAKE. What number did Nixon call?? How did they get pictures in the paper the very next day?!?

English
33
32
909
17.8K
Josh
Josh@xjoshryan·
@jessicarivera_4 @Canadian3Raging @ManaByte do you think NASA are the only people capable of producing a photo from space? what about all the amateur astronomers, private space exploration companies, the list goes on. I suppose they’re in on it too? takes about 15 seconds of thinking to realise how ridiculous that sounds
English
1
0
2
34
Jessica Rivera
Jessica Rivera@jessicarivera_4·
@Canadian3Raging @xjoshryan @ManaByte I am a flat earther bc that's what we see everyday with our eyes and you can't show me the proof that it's round without NASA's CGI images so spare me big brain.
English
2
0
0
35
Josh
Josh@xjoshryan·
@jessicarivera_4 @ManaByte Well firstly much of the technology is ground based and secondly, you can literally see the satellite-based ones with a telescope, Jessica. Use your brain
English
1
0
1
32
Jessica Rivera
Jessica Rivera@jessicarivera_4·
@xjoshryan @ManaByte There aren't billions of dollars worth of communication outside of our Earth's atmosphere either.
English
2
0
0
283
Josh
Josh@xjoshryan·
@MJmcnult @Burki677 Their attention span and intelligence level is way too small for them to comprehend any of this
English
0
0
2
21
Super Dad - Home Chef
Super Dad - Home Chef@MJmcnult·
@Burki677 If you chat for 2 minutes with these guys, you find out they know very little about the Moon landing program, like its duration, number of missions and landings, the technology: rocketry, communication, Lunar descent/ascent, space, or even basic physics.
English
2
0
6
120
Burki
Burki@Burki677·
Oh boy….. flerfs really don’t know about geostationary satellites. I guess it makes sense as it destroys satellites on a flat earth.
Burki tweet media
English
7
7
88
2.2K
Josh
Josh@xjoshryan·
@GreenTeebox @Burki677 do you know how small satellites are compared to the scale of the Earth and the empty space around it? it’s no one else’s fault that you lack the brain cells to comprehend scale
English
0
0
1
9
DynaMike
DynaMike@GreenTeebox·
@Burki677 We can’t see it because it’s not happening. One more question, where are the 15,000 satellites orbiting your globe? On the other side?
English
2
0
0
50
Josh
Josh@xjoshryan·
@GreenTeebox @Burki677 the 1,000 mph measurement is only accurate at the equator, but even then you’re only using that number because it sounds big; in reality it’s tiny when you consider the size of the globe. besides, we don’t measure linear rotation in mph we use RPM which in this case is 0.000964
English
0
0
0
3
DynaMike
DynaMike@GreenTeebox·
@Burki677 So something that is moving cannot capture something else that’s moving? Besides the fact that these are just visualizations and that there are no satellites, you still haven’t explained why we can’t see your globe spinning 1,000 mph?
English
2
0
0
55
Josh
Josh@xjoshryan·
@jessicarivera_4 @ManaByte last time I checked there isn’t billions of dollars worth of satellite communication technology that’s designed for very long range in a Walmart stores
English
1
0
1
58
Jessica Rivera
Jessica Rivera@jessicarivera_4·
@ManaByte We're supposed to believe we can communicate with people outside of the atmosphere when we can't even get a cell signal inside of a Walmart? Yeah sure 🫡
English
5
0
0
1.3K