Josh

Flat earthers watching every conspiracy theory but their's come true...

Every time you see someone denying the Moon landing or any other spaceflight, remember that their ranks include people who don't understand how night and day work. It does largely stem from a fundamental ignorance of science and refusal to learn.

@KBone478 @FoxNews Entirely new technology btw

@FoxNews “Hey look kids!! We are doing far less than what NASA supposedly did over 50 years ago even though technology is far more advanced today.” It truly is pathetic.

ARTEMIS II CREW SPEAKS FROM SPACE: “We are definitely 100% on our way to the moon." "The lunar gravity will take over in a couple of days here and start pulling us around the far side." "At the end of our translunar injection here, about an hour and a half ago, we just really looked at each other — and I know the United States has done this 1968 through 1972 — but it's just, this is unbelievable, that we can put our minds to something and pull it off." "This is an unbelievable technical accomplishment.”

@GoldenWaterDrop @NASA_Johnson Nixon called NASA, not the astronauts on the moon 😂

@NASA_Johnson So where is the live 24-7 feed? If Nixon could call the moon, surely we can livestream on Youtube.

Because the astronauts are traveling so far, a series of Earth-based satellites known as the Deep Space Network help keep us connected to our Moon-bound crew. Did you know you can see those connections happening real-time? You can see which satellites are communicating with Orion by visiting: go.nasa.gov/4m6vnHP

@jessicarivera_4 @Canadian3Raging @ManaByte 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@Canadian3Raging @xjoshryan @ManaByte It's invisible.

Nixon called NASA and they patched the call through the radio. Newspapers ran stills from the TV broadcasts. How can moon landing deniers be this dumb?

@jessicarivera_4 @Canadian3Raging @ManaByte You claim a firmament exists, prove it.

@Canadian3Raging @xjoshryan @ManaByte Because there's a firmament separating the heavens from the earth.

@jessicarivera_4 @Canadian3Raging @ManaByte source: RocketLab

@xjoshryan @Canadian3Raging @ManaByte The other photos of other agencies who have taken actual pictures that are not CGI. Please and thank you.

@jessicarivera_4 @Canadian3Raging @ManaByte What specifically do you want to see?

@xjoshryan @Canadian3Raging @ManaByte Yeah yeah. Show me some. The burden of proof is on you.

@hansolar85 @EthanPh @Zebra12991210 @Keith02484670 Bless your little soul 😭😭😂😂

@xjoshryan @EthanPh @Zebra12991210 @Keith02484670 Listen up you little acne-faced bitch, go run along to your boyfriend.

We landed on the moon. The earth is round. Chemtrails aren't real. The wtc was hit by two passenger jets. Climate change is fake. My truths for today. Oh and the Artemis launch was underwhelming.

@jessicarivera_4 @Canadian3Raging @ManaByte do you think NASA are the only people capable of producing a photo from space? what about all the amateur astronomers, private space exploration companies, the list goes on. I suppose they’re in on it too? takes about 15 seconds of thinking to realise how ridiculous that sounds

@Canadian3Raging @xjoshryan @ManaByte I am a flat earther bc that's what we see everyday with our eyes and you can't show me the proof that it's round without NASA's CGI images so spare me big brain.

@jessicarivera_4 @Canadian3Raging @ManaByte you… you think radio waves can’t leave the atmosphere? why?

@Canadian3Raging @xjoshryan @ManaByte Outside the atmosphere? You must think you're really smart huh?

@jessicarivera_4 @ManaByte Well firstly much of the technology is ground based and secondly, you can literally see the satellite-based ones with a telescope, Jessica. Use your brain

@xjoshryan @ManaByte There aren't billions of dollars worth of communication outside of our Earth's atmosphere either.

@MJmcnult @Burki677 Their attention span and intelligence level is way too small for them to comprehend any of this

@Burki677 If you chat for 2 minutes with these guys, you find out they know very little about the Moon landing program, like its duration, number of missions and landings, the technology: rocketry, communication, Lunar descent/ascent, space, or even basic physics.

Oh boy….. flerfs really don’t know about geostationary satellites. I guess it makes sense as it destroys satellites on a flat earth.

@GreenTeebox @Burki677 do you know how small satellites are compared to the scale of the Earth and the empty space around it? it’s no one else’s fault that you lack the brain cells to comprehend scale

@Burki677 We can’t see it because it’s not happening. One more question, where are the 15,000 satellites orbiting your globe? On the other side?

For everyone saying fish eye... cope harder.

@GreenTeebox @Burki677 the 1,000 mph measurement is only accurate at the equator, but even then you’re only using that number because it sounds big; in reality it’s tiny when you consider the size of the globe. besides, we don’t measure linear rotation in mph we use RPM which in this case is 0.000964

@Burki677 So something that is moving cannot capture something else that’s moving? Besides the fact that these are just visualizations and that there are no satellites, you still haven’t explained why we can’t see your globe spinning 1,000 mph?

@jessicarivera_4 @ManaByte last time I checked there isn’t billions of dollars worth of satellite communication technology that’s designed for very long range in a Walmart stores

@ManaByte We're supposed to believe we can communicate with people outside of the atmosphere when we can't even get a cell signal inside of a Walmart? Yeah sure 🫡

@hansolar85 @EthanPh @Zebra12991210 @Keith02484670 this reads like it was written by either a 12 year old or a basement dweller

@xjoshryan @EthanPh @Zebra12991210 @Keith02484670 Is that why he blocked me and ran away to his mommy

@hansolar85 @EthanPh @Zebra12991210 @Keith02484670 Apache point observatory lunar laser-ranging operation, for one

@xjoshryan @EthanPh @Zebra12991210 @Keith02484670 Name the laser. Surely it has a name or model number so I can learn more about it.

@hansolar85 @EthanPh @Zebra12991210 @Keith02484670 typical fallback response when you know you’re out of bs to spew, absolutely zero intelligence in that brain of yours

@EthanPh @xjoshryan @Zebra12991210 @Keith02484670 Oh… you’re an Elon bot. That makes sense

@hansolar85 @EthanPh @Zebra12991210 @Keith02484670 your source also tells you you’re wrong

@xjoshryan @EthanPh @Zebra12991210 @Keith02484670 Google