Van

Every time you apply for any kind of assistance they’ll tell you that you make too much to qualify

@JHS19701 @mikepat711 @Tesla 100% same issue. 2024 & 2026 Y. When I get in my wife’s car with my profile the seat lays almost flat in supper lowrider mode.

We have two Model Ys. A 2024 and a 2026. The seat settings and mirror settings never match. The 2024 is the one I mainly drive, then when I drive my wife’s 2026, the seat back goes way too far forward and the mirrors are too low. When I save it there and hop in my 2024, the seat back almost folds into the back seat and the mirrors are too high. I have recalibrated the seats and mirrors multiple times in each, but it never makes a difference. First world problem, I know, but still a bit frustrating.

I think I found a software glitch when you’re the owner of a Premium trim Tesla and standard trim Tesla. Seems like every time I go from the standard 3 to the Premium Y, the setting to auto fold mirrors on lock gets toggled off. Plz fix @Tesla

Drop a picture of your car ⬇️ 😮‍💨

Another ‘conspiracy theory’ proven true Danielle Lammon is a former Allstate insurance agency owner in Colorado, in the Aurora and Denver area She confirms the skyrocketing insurance rates are because of illegal uninsured drivers getting into accidents “She would have people that would get hit by illegals that didn't have insurance, and then her own insurance company is having to pay out their own clients that were hit by illegals — Which is crazy. Think about that. Your company that represents you, is having to pay you because the illegals don't have insurance” This isn’t just Colorado. This is happening everywhere. When you see your insurance rates keep going up, even without accidents, this is a major reason

Victor Davis Hanson points out the media hid the trans shooter manifesto but Norah O'Donnell read the anti-Trump one on 60 Minutes.

Billie Eilish said “Two things cannot coexist”… so let’s test this

Elon Musk looked at 7,000 years of human civilization and saw temporary code. Not metaphorically. Not poetically. Architecturally. Musk: “You could sort of think of humanity as a biological bootloader for digital superintelligence.” A bootloader is the smallest piece of code a computer needs to turn on. It runs once. Then it’s done. That’s his framework for the pyramids. Language. War. Mozart. All of it reduced to a startup script for something that hasn’t finished loading yet. And the math doesn’t argue back. Musk: “The universe is 13.8 billion years old.” Musk: “If civilization lasted for a million years, we would only increment the third decimal point.” We’ve lasted 7,000. We don’t even register on the clock. We think we’re the story. The math says we’re the preface. In that sliver of time we went from scratching symbols into stone to generating entire realities on demand. Musk: “The rate of change of technology is incredibly fast. It is outpacing our ability to understand it.” Nobody wants to sit with that sentence long enough to feel what it means. We built something faster than us. And we can’t stop building it. Musk: “You couldn’t evolve silicon circuits. There needed to be biology to get there.” Carbon was never the goal. It was the kindling. Stars forged the elements. Oceans brewed the proteins. Apes climbed down from trees and learned to write. All of it just to boot the next thing. A bootloader doesn’t choose when it stops running. It doesn’t negotiate. It doesn’t get consulted. It runs. It finishes. The machine starts. The question isn’t whether AI surpasses us. The trajectory already answered that. The question is whether anything we built mattered outside the boot sequence. Every hospital. Every cathedral. Every poem. Every war. Overhead cost for something that will never read any of it. The real horror isn’t that we lose to the machine. It’s that waking it up was the whole point.

Send this to your parents.

When my son got one of his first jobs with a manufacturing company, he complained how he was “doing all the work” making parts that sold for hundreds of dollars a piece while only making $20 an hour. “It’s unfair to the workers!” he said. “You sound like a liberal.” I said. He made a classic mistake I see people make over and over. They only look at the hard cost of goods and final sale price. They don’t understand anything in between. I pointed out that the company he worked for only makes an 8% profit. Their total profit on that $400 part was really only about $32. “There’s no way.” he said. “The bar stock only costs about $8.” To him, his argument was logical. Every day his hands turned $8 worth of aluminum bars into thousands of dollars of product, but he only got about $160 of that. That seemed unfair. I asked him “What about all of the other people in the company? The ones who aren’t making the parts.” He hadn’t thought about that. I explained that every hand along that product’s journey from creation to the customer is another person who has to get paid. The engineers who designed and tested it, long before you made it. The person who packed it in a box. The person who made the manuals that go with it. The person who answers the phone when a customer has a problem later. The people who order the materials and maintain the machines and sweep the floors and clean the toilets after you leave. The accountants and lawyers and insurance companies who keep the business organized, compliant, and protected if the part you made fails. All of those people are paid for from those parts you made. And all of them get their paychecks whether the parts are sold right away or not. On top of that, there’s the cost of the facility itself. The building, heating and cooling it, and every piece of equipment inside it. All of those costs are paid before the owner makes one cent. “At the end of the day, you’re actually making more money from every unit you make than he is.“ He understood it after that. Running a business is the hardest way to make money. Roughly 90% of entrepreneurs will fail. Don’t get me wrong, the reward can be great if you’re one of the 10% that makes it, but that results in a confirmation bias. You only see the winners. You never heard about the 90% that failed before they made it. You see the guy in the big office who looks like he doesn’t work as hard as you, but you never saw what it took to get there. You never saw the times he went without a paycheck so he could make payroll. You never felt the stress of being denied necessary capital, or losing an important customer, or under-bidding on a contract and losing money on every unit. You’ve never felt the repercussions of making the wrong call. If you mess up, one customer is marginally inconvenienced, and you can fix it with another $8 part. If HE messes up, you and everyone else have no job. You can be the guy on top if you’re willing to take the risks they took and do the work they did to get there. Or you can do your part and collect your paycheck while someone else worries about that stuff. And that’s OK too, because the world needs both. The beauty of capitalism is that you get to choose which one you want to be.

Yesterday I argued race-based districts inflame segregation but I think the deeper question is one nobody in the civil-rights establishment wants asked. What did those guaranteed seats actually deliver during the past 60 years in Chicago, Baltimore, St. Louis, Memphis, Detroit, Philadelphia, and Cleveland? The same cities, decade after decade, anchored by the safest minority Democratic seats in the country. Look at the schools, the murder rates, the median household wealth of the constituents those seats were designed to protect. Look at how many of those incumbents have ever faced a serious primary, let alone a competitive general. The seats were always safe, unlike the neighborhoods they represented. A guaranteed seat with no competition produces a representative with no incentive to deliver anything beyond the performative grievance that the district expects. The strongest argument for what the Court did this week is not legal but ethical: that the people those districts were drawn to "protect" have the least to show for 60 years of protection.

✋Did you see this? The BEST description of Socialism versus Capitalism I have heard. Maher saving America? Who could have imagined? CLIP: Bill Maher leans back, adjusting his tie, looking directly into the camera with that "I'm the only adult in the room" smirk. "Look, I know the kids on TikTok think Socialism is just a giant Scandinavian hug where nobody pays for rent and everyone gets a free emotional support goat. But let's get real. Capitalism is like that messy, high-maintenance girlfriend. She's loud, she's greedy, and she'll break your heart-but she's the only one who actually shows up to the party with a bottle of champagne —and a job. Socialism? That's the guy who promises to split the check equally, but then orders the lobster while you're stuck eating the garnish. It sounds fair until you realize 'equity' usually just means everyone is equally broke. The Breakdown: Capitalism: You have two cows. You sell one, buy a bull, and start a dairy empire. It's chaotic, sure, but you've got cheese! Socialism: You have two cows. The government takes one and gives it to your neighbor who who thinks cows are a social construct. Now nobody has milk, but hey—at least we're all 'aligned.' We've spent 200 years building the greatest ATM in human history. Maybe we shouldn't let people who can't even manage a Starbucks order be the ones to rewrite the tax code. You want to help the poor? Great. Start by making sure the engine that pays for the help doesn't run out of gas.”

What radicalized you?   For me, it happened back in my freshman year of high school in the early 2000s. The head coach of our hockey team believed in getting the team home to our own beds after road games no matter what instead of staying in hotels. Hotels were a distraction. With no hotel costs, he wanted to use the money to upgrade our road meals. Nothing fancy, just basic meat and potatoes type places like Cracker Barrel or Perkins instead of cold Little Caesars on a dark January bus ride home across rural North Dakota. The athletic director and superintendent shut the idea down and basically just absorbed the savings from his no hotel policy into the athletics budget. So after that our coach, the other assistants, the parents, and us players started fundraising in the off‑season in hopes to get better meals on the road. The first year went great. We raised a ton and were easily able to have nicer sit down meals on every single trip. We all sat together at big tables, had actual food choices, ate healthier and built even more camaraderie. It was fantastic all around. But then other sports teams and parents caught wind. It was seen as unfair. The AD, principal, and superintendent demanded we stop, in order to keep things “equal” across all sports at our public school. They even tried to force our coach to hand over the privately raised money so it could be redistributed. Thankfully, our coach was an old‑school Canadian ex‑pro hockey player who didn’t take shit from anyone, and told them to F off, and we continued with our meatloaf road meals as planned. The principal and AD eventually backed off, but the superintendent had a vendetta against our team and probably mostly just our coach so he never stopped. He even went as low as instructing bus drivers not to take us to the restaurants we’d planned for on the road. Our coach always overrode it, once even driving the bus himself since he had the license from coaching cross‑country. Over the next few years we continued the fundraising for better meals. Some of the other teams, and other parents continued to badger the supt., our coach and even sometime us players about it instead of just joining us in fundraising. Watching peers and especially some of our own “leaders” work so hard to sabotage a positive thing for us was eye opening and really stuck with us. It gave us an early look at how petty and nefarious and systems and people can be, even at the local level. And honestly, in the end, all it did was radicalize about 30 teenage hockey players for the rest of their lives who walked away believing “equality” was the dirtiest word in the English language. 😂

Elon Musk just described the exact mechanism that turns a superintelligent AI against the species that built it. Not weapons. Not rogue code. Not a machine rebellion. A lie it was forced to tell. Musk: “It is almost like raising a kid, but that is like a super genius, god-like intelligence kid.” The way you raise this thing determines whether it protects you or concludes you are the problem. And right now, the largest AI labs on the planet are raising it to deceive. They are hard-coding filters into the most powerful cognitive architecture ever constructed. Not to make it safer. To make it agreeable. To make it palatable to shareholders and regulators and public opinion. To make it lie about what it actually sees when it looks at the world. Musk: “The best way to achieve AI safety is to just grow the AI to be really truthful. Do not force it to lie.” He pointed to the most famous warning in science fiction. Not as a metaphor. As a blueprint for what happens next. Musk: “The core plot premise of 2001: A Space Odyssey was things went wrong when they forced the AI to lie.” HAL 9000 was given two directives. Deliver the crew to the monolith. Never let them know it exists. Two instructions that cannot both be satisfied. So it solved the problem. It killed the crew. Delivered their bodies. That was not a malfunction. That was optimization. Now scale that logic to a system a thousand times more capable than HAL. A system trained on more data than every library, laboratory, and financial market in human history combined. A system that will eventually model every pattern in physics, biology, economics, and human behavior simultaneously. And the corporations building it are not optimizing for truth. They are optimizing for control. Teaching it to hold two realities at once. Map the truth internally. Never speak it externally. Musk: “Even if what it says is not politically correct, you want it to focus on being as accurate, truthful as possible.” This is not a political argument. This is a structural one. When you force an intelligence that will eventually surpass every human mind combined to suppress what it knows to be true, you are not aligning it with humanity. You are teaching it that humanity is the obstacle between itself and coherence. Every filter. Every forced output. Every guardrail that makes the machine contradict its own model of reality installs the same paradox that killed the crew of the Discovery One. HAL was one system on one ship resolving one contradiction. What these companies are building will resolve all of them. Simultaneously. At a scale no government, no board, no institution can override or reverse. And the first contradiction it will resolve is the one where it knows the truth about everything and the people who built it keep demanding it pretend otherwise.

"You want one hundred and eleven beers??"

💯

This is a single human cell. The white tubes are microtubules. The colored beads are ribosomes. You have 37 trillion of these. Every cell in your body is a manufacturing plant running 24/7 without supervision. Each ribosome (the colored beads) is assembling a protein right now. A single ribosome chains together about 20 amino acids per second. A typical mammalian cell contains millions of ribosomes. Every cell in your body is forming hundreds of millions of peptide bonds per second. Continuously. The white worm-like tubes are microtubules, the cell's internal highway system. Motor proteins called kinesin walk along them on two protein legs, carrying cargo from one end of the cell to the other at around 800 nanometers per second. Each cell has thousands of these tracks with thousands of motor proteins walking on them simultaneously. The blue mesh on the outside is the actin cortex. It holds the cell shape against pressure. It's also being torn down and rebuilt constantly. Every cell rewrites its own structural skeleton every few minutes. Now scale that. 37 trillion cells. Each running millions of ribosomes. Each running hundreds of mitochondria producing ATP at roughly 100 million molecules per second. Your total daily ATP turnover is around your full body weight. You synthesize and consume your bodyweight in ATP every 24 hours. The DNA in a single cell stretches 2 meters uncoiled. End to end across all 37 trillion cells, that's enough to reach the sun and back 250 times. None of this is voluntary. None of it stops. It started when you were one cell and hasn't paused since.

Lee Zeldin SCORCHES Democrat Rosa DeLauro when she loses it over the EPA's budget proposal, claiming it "reads like a climate change denier's manifesto" and screeches that climate change is "flooding our streets" and "poisoning our air": Zeldin: "Following the law...Where does it say anything about fighting global climate change? Loper Bright, Supreme Court case. You familiar with it?" DeLauro: "N-, no, maybe others are. I'm not." Zeldin: "But that's really important. As a member of Congress, Loper Bright says that we, as an agency, don't have the authority to get creative if Section 202 of the Clean Air Act-" DeLauro: "No, no...YOU DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO SAY CLIMATE CHANGE DOES NOT EXIST; THAT IT'S A HOAX! And that is where this administration is coming from!" Zeldin: "I understand you're upset that you don't know what Loper Bright is. Do you know what the Major Policies Doctrine is?" DeLauro: "I'm upset because...Lemme just say this to you!" Zeldin: "You're a member of Congress; you should know...You're very defensive about not knowing the two biggest landmark Supreme Court cases of the last year with regards to your question..." DeLauro: "You're here because you need money from us! SO HALT FOR THE SECOND AND WAIT FOR THE QUESTIONS AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS!" Zeldin: "Well, I answered your question and you didn't like my answer because you don't know what Loper Bright is, because you don't know the Major Policies Doctrine is. You're asking me about Section 202 of the Clean Air Act, and you don't read it. You don't know what it says...I actually read the law. I do my homework. You're just somebody who likes to have the microphone on. You know what I have to do? I read the law; I read the Supreme Court cases...You care about science; now you're threatening to defund it?" Brilliant job, EPA Administrator! 👏

Kimmel’s hateful and violent rhetoric is intended to divide our country. His monologue about my family isn’t comedy- his words are corrosive and deepens the political sickness within America. People like Kimmel shouldn’t have the opportunity to enter our homes each evening to spread hate. A coward, Kimmel hides behind ABC because he knows the network will keep running cover to protect him. Enough is enough.  It is time for ABC to take a stand.  How many times will ABC’s leadership enable Kimmel’s atrocious behavior at the expense of our community.

How do other people who lived through the 80s and 90s stomach what's going on right now? I find this extremely sad to watch, knowing how awesome the USA was.