Persephone: Empress of Bombastic Caucasity

The Jack youtu.be/kq_GSIw0X0w?si… via @YouTube

@GuntherEagleman @SenateGOP The government is by the people and for the people. From now on we're going to make demands from the bottom-up. It's our civic duty to come up with a list of demands or they're out regardless of party. I could demolish their excuses, poor logic, and egotistical lack of wisdom.

ATTENTION RINOS: If you think it's hard to sell busting the filibuster to your constituency now, imagine what you'll have to do to sell the NG and ICE flooding your polling stations. I'm all for BOTH. @SenateGOP, if I were you, I would nuke the filibuster before it's too late.

@karolszafranski @MJPiazza2 There needs to be expertise and someone with knowledge of prioritizing Rodale's Organic farming methods up to the least hazardous chemicals. And an AI app. A cost of the illegal immigration of unqualified but honest, hardworking immigrants. Damages the environment at our expense.

@MJPiazza2 Fun fact: it is not possible to tell most apiaceae from each other by a pic like this. It could be one of literally hundreds of different species.

Fun fact! Those flowers are actually poison hemlock, the most poisonous plant in North America. They didn't want your flowers because you were trying to kill them.

@captive_dreamer There's evidence all over the place. For fuck's sake, they posted it themselves smugly.

We're now watching - in real time - leftist posters on here say that they never tried to get people fired for not respecting "pronouns," that they didn't redefine what it meant to be a "woman" and that COVID lockdowns "never happened." They're feeling pressed. They know its bad for them. This sort of stuff is becoming profoundly unpopular and they're hoping they can convince you that they weren't yelling at random people having dinner in restaurants during the Floyd riots or that nothing actually happened, nobody died, they didn't burn down city centers. Keep pushing them. Make them despair. And most importantly, do not let them control the narrative.

@LinkedInLunat1c He's a retard. The kid could have been a programming whiz or a seasoned veteran turbo user. Dude should go on his own and make a local social media app for his area or some other project. The internet used to link people with special interests and expertise with a high barrier.

A startup founder fires an engineer due to AI and gloats about it on LinkedIn.

@DisaffectedPod They don't know what's worth arguing for, the meaning of the West and its canon, good citizenship, morals, good humor, how to live, or the importance of any goddamn thing, really. Read-only internet should be a button here to obliterate people auditioning for The X Gong Show.

It's so possible, so easily possible, to converse with people online. You can even disagree with them without using provocative, insulting tactics. You can entirely disagree with someone else's opinion without being a narcissistic dick. You can disagree without using insinuation, provocation, ridicule, and personal invective unprovoked. People think I'm "mean" on here and "too harsh." No. It's that I don't tolerate deliberate provocation, and I won't pretend it's not deliberately insulting provocation. I block the very first time someone does it. Let me give an example: Say I write that Land O'Lakes butter is the best national brand for taste. Obviously, some people are going to disagree. Compare these two ways someone might open with a disagreement: 1. "Do you think? I've always preferred Kate's butter, and it's won blind taste tests." 2. "Lol/lmao. Actually, Kate's is objectively proven to be better but I guess it's easier to just go off king lol/lmao" Number 1 will get a conversational, pleasant response from me. Number 2 gets a "fuck off" and an immediate block. None of this is weird or difficult. No one doesn't understand this. -J

@gman5180 Ask him to name one law and he will crumble.

Do some people just wake up and say "what imaginary problem can I be enraged about today?" My second question... So, what laws ONLY apply to him specifically? 🤔

@NewswirePatriot Time to confiscate their knives, disarm the illegitimate police, send the navy with a robot army, and dump them in the ocean. Or they could run like hell...

This Muslim man DEMANDS that the reporter "cover up" and wear a hijab. He says America and Europe MUST follow Sharia Law. "I WANT TO SEE EVERY WOMAN COVERED FROM HEAD TO TOE!" 👉 What would you tell him?

@AntiWokeMemes Can't make an analogy to save their lives.

You have to be kidding me 😂

@DavidJHarrisJr Send in the robot army to liberate him from his illegitimate position.

Keir Starmer: “I’m not going to walk away I’m not going to plunge the country into chaos.” Thoughts?

@Pixie1z It's citizen's responsibility to vote, not a right or an obligation. It would make more sense if voting was a law like other countries. If you were representing real voters and had any fucking sense, you'd cut the red tape since you're in the government. Weapons-grade-stupid.

What would you say to her?

@MatrixMysteries Government lawyers should sue endowments for defrauding government financial aid. The youth were robbed of a Classical Western Education, civics, imagination, a backbone, the ability to defend ideas and their opposite, and know how to get along by traitors with illegitimate power

“Can someone explain how I have a BACHELOR’S degree and can’t get hired at Target?” 4 years of college. Thousands in tuition. Endless applications. Rejected from a cashier job. She didn’t fail the system — the system sold her a scam.

@CynicalPublius We need a place to collaborate, get ideas, and inspire people again.

@CynicalPublius With AI, young programmers, and people interested in the truth, we can eliminate middlemen and illegitimate authority. Parallel Polis. We have Jordon Peterson Academy, University of Austin, and Ralston College. We do this from the bottom up with legitimate interest and authority.

When a scientist or an engineer earns a Ph.D., it is usually based on reproducible, verifiable outcomes drawn from the laws of the natural world. When a social "scientist" earns a Ph.D. in a "social science," it is based on collating the written opinions of other "social scientists" into a heavily footnoted thesis, and those people who were footnoted earned THEIR Ph.D. based on collating the written opinions of other "social scientists" into a heavily footnoted thesis, and those people who were footnoted earned THEIR Ph.D. based on collating the written opinions of other "social scientists" into a heavily footnoted thesis, and so on, and so on. A Ph.D. in science or engineering is based on the laws of the natural world. A Ph.D. in any "social science" is based on regurgitating the writings of other people who never had to prove anything. A "social science" Ph.D. is an intellectual Ponzi scheme--one based largely on restating the (often mistaken) opinions of those who came before you as if their opinions were fact, but arranging those opinions in such a way as to create your own novel and equally untrustworthy opinion. We are at a point in society where anyone with a Ph.D. in a non-scientific or non-engineering field is more untrustworthy than random people on the street.

@DisaffectedPod And maybe a robot army. Perhaps life is a fractured fairy tale and we need to laugh our asses of so hard we cry with mockery contests and pay people who win? Pay to play doesn't work here. We need wicked humor contests. We're here to blow off steam and laugh.

@DisaffectedPod We need John Cleese to help us come up with the best english insult. Or have a contest. Mockery is an art form. I love words and etymology. These people need to be mercillessly mocked out of power by the best.

Good question. A question that would occur to any sane, normal, moral adult if not for the feminist indoctrination. Why DO adult women concerned about trans hate the teen boys being abused, and call them the villains?

@GuntherEagleman Not only does he have the morals of a socipath but he's weapons-grade stupid. I hate chronic liars.

BOOM! KASH WITH THE KNOCKOUT! VAN HOLLEN: Do you know it's a crime to lie to Congress? PATEL: Maybe the next time you run up a $7,000 bar tab we can talk about it VAN HOLLEN: See. You're lying again. I'm glad you agreed to take the test regarding whether you have alcohol problems. You are a disgrace. AFTER THE HEARING PATEL DROPS THE RECEIPTS 🫳🏼🎤