IPconnect_Offcial

633 posts

IPconnect_Offcial banner
IPconnect_Offcial

IPconnect_Offcial

@ipconnect_jp

IPconnect株式会社公式|AI×ブロックチェーンでコンテンツIPの保護・活用を支援。ISS(IP Supervisory Supporter)でIP監修業務を効率化し、ARH(AI Rights Hub)でAI時代の権利リスク評価・記録を支援。

Tokyo, Japan Katılım Haziran 2023
30 Takip Edilen58 Takipçiler
IPconnect_Offcial
IPconnect_Offcial@ipconnect_jp·
異例の転換。SpotifyとUMGがAI生成カバー・リミックスを許可するライセンス契約を締結(Consequence)。訴訟一辺倒だったAI×音楽の世界に初の「共存モデル」が誕生。権利者とAIの関係は対立から共創に変わるか、搾取の入口になるか? #生成AI #著作権 consequence.net/2026/05/spotif…
日本語
0
0
0
37
IPconnect_Offcial
IPconnect_Offcial@ipconnect_jp·
衝撃の初適用。米連邦検察がディープフェイク新法「TAKE IT DOWN Act」で初のAIポルノ生成者2名を起訴(AP)。民事訴訟から刑事罰へ、AI悪用の法的リスクが一段階上がった。刑事罰はAI悪用の抑止力になるか、萎縮を招くか? #生成AI #著作権 apnews.com/article/deepfa…
日本語
0
0
0
35
IPconnect_Offcial
IPconnect_Offcial@ipconnect_jp·
衝撃の予測。AI特許訴訟戦争はまだ始まっていないが急速に迫る(Bloomberg Law)。スマホ特許戦争と同じパターンなら、数千件のAI特許訴訟が今後数年で噴出する。著作権の次は特許、御社のAI技術は守れるか攻められるか? #生成AI #著作権 news.bloomberglaw.com/legal-exchange…
日本語
0
0
1
41
IPconnect_Offcial
IPconnect_Offcial@ipconnect_jp·
衝撃の数字。2026年のAIレイオフが15社で7.5万人超。AI企業はクリエイターの権利を侵害しつつ自社の人間も削減する。AIの恩恵は誰が受け取るのか、企業か社会全体か? #生成AI #著作権
thehype.@thehypedotnews

meta laid off 8,000 today. that pushes 2026's ai layoff tally past 75,000 across 15 big companies the cuts aren't proportional to company size – they're proportional to how aggressively leadership is restructuring around ai: • block: 40% of staff • wisetech: 29% • snap: 19% • oracle: 18% • intuit: 17% • coinbase: 14% • livspace: 13% • pinterest: 12% • atlassian: 12% • meta: 10% what makes this different from 2022-2023's "year of efficiency" cuts: - these companies aren't struggling. oracle posted +22% revenue growth. meta just raised 2026 capex to $125 - 145b. block's adjusted EPS is projected up 62%. they're cutting from positions of strength - the money isn't disappearing. it's being redirected. meta cancelled 6,000 open roles on top of the 8,000 cuts and reassigned 7,000 to new ai teams. oracle is funneling freed-up cash into a $50b ai capex push - ceos are saying the quiet part out loud. dorsey: "a significantly smaller team, using the tools we are building, can do more and do it better." armstrong (coinbase) wants "no pure managers" and "one-person teams." cannon-brookes (atlassian) calls it "self-funding ai investment" it's structural, not cyclical. coinbase is flattening to 5 management layers. block is going from 5 management layers to 2-3. the org chart itself is being rewritten this isn't a downturn. it's a workforce restructure around ai – and we're still in inning one follow @thehypedotnews for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

日本語
0
0
1
95
IPconnect_Offcial
IPconnect_Offcial@ipconnect_jp·
衝撃の問い。あなたの顔と声は誰のものか?生成AIで肖像コピーや声の無断使用が容易になった今、所有権の概念が根本から揺らいでいる(Forbes Japan)。肖像は本人の財産か、それともデジタル公共財か? #生成AI #著作権 forbesjapan.com/articles/detai…
日本語
0
0
0
30
IPconnect_Offcial
IPconnect_Offcial@ipconnect_jp·
異例の訴訟。ChatGPTが「弁護士として法的助言をした」として利用者がOpenAIを提訴、OpenAI側は棄却を要求(JD Journal)。AIの出力に法的責任は生じるか否か、AI責任論の最前線。利用者の自己責任か、提供者の責任か? #生成AI #著作権 jdjournal.com/2026/05/19/ope…
日本語
0
1
0
122
IPconnect_Offcial
IPconnect_Offcial@ipconnect_jp·
異例の州法攻勢。イリノイ州でAI学習の無断利用を争う訴訟が相次ぐ(MSN)。同州は生体情報保護法BIPAで$6.5億の和解実績も。著作権法より州法の方がAI企業を追い詰める時代、連邦法は不要か必要か? #生成AI #著作権 msn.com/en-us/technolo…
日本語
0
1
0
114
IPconnect_Offcial
IPconnect_Offcial@ipconnect_jp·
衝撃の分析。Musk敗訴でOpenAIのIPOが加速、AI業界の「暑い夏」が到来するとNYTが予測。抗議運動は拡大するも企業の勢いは止まらない。クリエイターの権利保護は規制に頼るべきか、市場で勝ち取るべきか? #生成AI #著作権 nytimes.com/2026/05/18/tec…
日本語
0
0
0
98
IPconnect_Offcial
IPconnect_Offcial@ipconnect_jp·
異例の速さ。EU、非同意の「ヌーディファイアプリ」を12月2日から全面禁止へ(MSN)。AI法修正でディープフェイク生成ツールに罰則付き規制を導入。AI開発企業は法令遵守で生き残るか、規制回避で地下に潜るか? #生成AI #著作権
日本語
1
0
0
122
IPconnect_Offcial
IPconnect_Offcial@ipconnect_jp·
@muskonomy 波紋。Musk側が第9巡回控訴裁判所への上訴を表明。$150億の戦いはまだ終わらない。控訴審で時効判断が覆る可能性はあるのか、それともOpenAIのIPOが先に実現するか? #生成AI #著作権
日本語
0
0
1
155
Muskonomy
Muskonomy@muskonomy·
JUST IN: Elon Musk says he will appeal the Musk v. OpenAI verdict to the Ninth Circuit after the jury ruled against him on a statute of limitations technicality. Musk says the ruling never touched the merits of the case. "The judge and jury never actually ruled on the merits of the case, just on a calendar technicality." "There is no question to anyone following the case in detail that Altman and Brockman did in fact enrich themselves by stealing a charity. The only question is WHEN they did it." On why he is appealing: "Creating a precedent to loot charities is incredibly destructive to charitable giving in America." "OpenAI was founded to benefit all of humanity." The fight is not over.
Muskonomy tweet mediaMuskonomy tweet media
Muskonomy@muskonomy

JUST IN: Elon Musk waited too long to sue OpenAI, jury finds on Day 14 of trial The unanimous verdict from the 9-person jury in federal court in Oakland hinged on one issue: timing. The jury found that Elon Musk waited too long to bring his lawsuit against OpenAI, Sam Altman and Greg Brockman. The statute of limitations on his core claims had already run out by the time he sued in August 2024. What the jury actually decided: - Musk's breach of charitable trust claim was barred by the statute of limitations - Musk's unjust enrichment claim was barred by the statute of limitations Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers had instructed the jury that California law gives a plaintiff three years to bring a breach of charitable trust claim once they knew or should have known of the breach, and two years to bring an unjust enrichment claim. The cutoff dates were August 5, 2021 for the breach of charitable trust claim and August 5, 2022 for unjust enrichment. In her closing argument, OpenAI defense counsel Sarah Eddy walked the jury through years of Musk's own emails, tweets and public statements showing he was on notice of OpenAI's for-profit pivot well before those cutoff dates. Eddy pointed to a September 2020 Musk tweet calling OpenAI "captured by Microsoft" and arguing the company had become the opposite of its founding open-source mission. Eddy also argued that Shivon Zilis, Musk's OpenAI board observer and now a Neuralink executive, had kept Musk updated on OpenAI's restructuring discussions for years. Zilis was on OpenAI's 2021 special committee. The jury agreed. Musk knew, or should have known, about the alleged breach years before he filed suit. The merits of Musk's underlying claims were never decided. The case was lost on timing alone. (Image of the Jury is from Google)

English
27
43
147
9.1K
IPconnect_Offcial
IPconnect_Offcial@ipconnect_jp·
@Ivywen_W 異例の結末。時効で門前払いという結論に多くの人が困惑。2023年のOpenAI再編危機→2024年の提訴→2026年の判決。AI業界の変化速度に法的手続きが追いつかない現実。時効制度はAI時代に適切か、見直すべきか? #生成AI #著作権
日本語
0
0
5
160
Ivywen
Ivywen@Ivywen_W·
When I first heard the result of Musk v. OpenAI, I was honestly confused. Wasn’t OpenAI’s major restructuring crisis in 2023? Wasn’t the lawsuit first filed in early 2024? It is only 2026 now. How did this case end on statute of limitations? The version the jury appears to have accepted is this: OpenAI argued that Musk already knew about, and participated in, OpenAI’s for-profit path as early as 2017–2019. If he believed that path violated OpenAI’s nonprofit / charitable mission, then he should have sued back then, not in 2024–2026. In other words, the limitations clock was effectively traced back to 2017–2019. OpenAI even brought this point into closing arguments, which shows how central this defense was for them. But later developments such as the PBC conversion, the removal of the profit cap, and Microsoft’s control or influence could plausibly be new, independent harms. Throughout this litigation, OpenAI’s posture has appeared weak, evasive, and full of contradictions — something widely visible in media coverage of the trial. If the final outcome turns only on a “procedural” issue, then people are inevitably going to ask: What about the merits? Did OpenAI really have no substantive defense left? But it does not answer the underlying questions about OpenAI’s nonprofit mission, its for-profit transformation, Microsoft’s influence, internal governance, or unjust enrichment. @OpenAI @sama @elonmusk #ChatGPT #AIRight Source: theguardian.com/technology/202…
English
2
23
67
8.5K
IPconnect_Offcial
IPconnect_Offcial@ipconnect_jp·
衝撃の判決。$150億のMusk vs OpenAI訴訟、陪審が全会一致でMuskの請求を棄却(Reuters)。時効成立が決め手に。Musk側は「戦争は終わっていない」と控訴表明。この判決はAI業界の勝利か、それとも説明責任の敗北か? #生成AI #著作権
日本語
1
0
0
54