
flopipop
3.6K posts


@kdotcrypto @bulktrade @junbug_sol Yeah it doesn't really matter for the testnet.
Just thinking about mainnet, and the fact that this has happened with other apps so don't want it to be the case with Bulk as well...
English

@ipopflop @bulktrade @junbug_sol will speak with devs
just curious, why do you want to use your ledger for a testnet? just singup with an email or hotwallet
English


@kdotcrypto @bulktrade @junbug_sol It isn't. Just tried yesterday and it didn't work... There's a button that allows you to state you're using l*dg3r, but when you click it and try to sign it doesn't work...
English

The owner of the S&P 500 index is licensing the world’s most tracked stock index for the launch of a derivative contract that trades around the clock on the crypto exchange Hyperliquid on.wsj.com/4bezxK0
English

There’s also going to be a lot of hate, seethe, cope that enters the zeitgeist as more of CT is forced to pay attention to Bittensor
You logged into this world everyday and the golden ticket was staring you in the face for years and you still couldn’t muster up the agency to figure it out
sun runner@0xSunRun
Most of CT is going to fuck up the Bittensor trade by not taking the time to stake into subnets and then selling too soon.
English

I'm not. I'm questioning Bittensor specifically. Why?
Because Bittensor is currently incentivizing miners in the order of $1-$5M per year to compete in a certain game in areas where other centralized competitors have raised hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars (and could do something similar). How can this be competitive?
English

@Old_Samster This can happen in a centralized setting as well. You build a competitive game and allow anyone to participate. This already happens with HackerOne or Immunefi...
English


@ipopflop Latency doesn’t matter
The point is that on chain liquidity is not subject to 400ms ticks
English

@magicdhz @MattTheFinGuy @KyleSamani So what's the current "shred time"? Are there different guarantees between inclusion on a shred vs. block?
English

@MattTheFinGuy @KyleSamani @ipopflop depends on the scheduler, but most validators run schedulers that include and shred txs in increments that are smaller than the standard slot time
so prop AMMs update quotes multiple times a slot
English

@markjeffrey It isn't even a better product. But even if it were it's an unbelievably tough uphill battle.
English

Agree.
It is not enough to make a better product.
You must then MARKET and SELL it better.
Compu-history is replete with lesser products winning through sales, marketing and distribution cough Windows 98.
rich.τ@richdotca
@markjeffrey Ridges hasn't yet faced its most difficult challenge and that is to steal customers who have already gotten used to and don't mind paying for the existing products. Cost alone won't do it as existing products can simply create tiers and offer cheaper options.
English

Congrats @tplr_ai — progress in decentralized AI training!
A 72B parameter AI model was trained here on a decentralized network, by using aggressive communication compression between nodes (SparseLoCo).
In this setup, nodes are still quite powerful GPU stacks (8 Blackwells) but you can connect the dots on where this is going.
Very soon all kinds of GPUs will be training models in swarms.
templar@tplr_ai
We just completed the largest decentralised LLM pre-training run in history: Covenant-72B. Permissionless, on Bittensor subnet 3. 72B parameters. ~1.1T tokens. Commodity internet. No centralized cluster. No whitelist. Anyone with GPUs could join or leave freely. 1/n
English

We have been cooking a lot at Exponent behind the scenes over the past months, with many new products tailored for what’s next in the industry.
Very excited to finally start sharing more in the coming weeks, starting with a new look for Exponent
Time to build a generational company
Exponent@ExponentFinance
English

2026 is going to be an insane year for Exponent
So much cooking over the next month
And it starts with a brand refresh that captures what we're all about
Exciting times!
Exponent@ExponentFinance
English

@markjeffrey What's the case for Targon. It has no competitive advantage against any hyperscaler which offers essentially the same product (in hardware terms) with better assurances (and certifications) for their users...
English

No user will ever care, but building fully on-chain perps on Solana is really technically challenging.
I respect all the teams who have attempted this Herculean task in the past: Drift, Zeta, Mango, Jupiter to name a few. Many of these teams have found success with real users, but I think it’s fair to say that all of them had to make product tradeoffs as a direct result of Solana’s programming model.
We achieved:
- Price time priority on user limit orders with built-in margin
- Synchronous matching (no crank)
- Lazily accumulating funding payments
- Low compute quote updates for makers
- Platform-wide cross and isolated margin
This required innovation on the core system architecture.
I usually don’t like talking about this because, in my eyes, these properties are table stakes for being competitive with any centralized exchange. Our users won’t care about the sick tech, but they will care about how good the product feels.
We moved mountains to build @PhoenixTrade.
No on-chain vault + off-chain matching.
No compromises on microstructure.
No vapor.
All of the program code will be made source-available at general launch.
English

