isnatious

🇹🇭 temple views 🇹🇭 Medical cannabis with a spiritual View @isnatious farm 🌱🪴💨🛕

@Bounce_BackLoan Click baiting 🤡 hes talking about the tradition of taking an mp hostage, get a real job

In his own cryptic but beautiful way, and to stick two fingers up at Keir Starmer, King Charles, whilst addressing Congress, aligns himself firmly with right leaning political parties, expressing his annoyance at illegal immigrants who don't want to leave the UK.

This is more accurate from grok than what I was saying, east India company had a major hand in the game, the British Navy and Empire spread it globally inadvertently through labour and colonisation Medicinal introduction to the West: EIC employees were key transmitters. In the 1670s, merchants like Thomas Bowrey and Robert Knox described bhang's effects in India and brought samples/knowledge to England (e.g., shared with Royal Society's Robert Hooke). In the 1830s–1840s, EIC surgeon W.B. O’Shaughnessy studied Indian cannabis, popularized its tinctures/extracts for medicine (e.g., for pain, anxiety), and helped integrate it into Western pharmacopeia, spreading awareness across the British Empire. publicdomainreview.org The 1894–95 Indian Hemp Drugs Commission (under British Indian government) produced a detailed report concluding moderate use was largely harmless, reflecting colonial ambivalence—revenue from taxes versus moral concerns. en.wikipedia.org The EIC focused far more on opium (monopoly production in Bengal, smuggling to China leading to the Opium Wars), but cannabis taxation provided steady Indian revenue.Broader Spread via Empire NetworksImperial trade, migration, and labor indirectly dispersed psychoactive cannabis:Africa and elsewhere: Cannabis reached East Africa centuries earlier (via Indian/Arab traders), but British colonial eras saw further mixing through trade routes, Swahili networks, and later indentured labor. British policies sometimes regulated or noted its use in colonies. en.wikipedia.org Caribbean and Americas: Indian indentured laborers (post-slavery, under British arrangements) brought ganja traditions to places like Jamaica/Trinidad in the 19th century, blending with local cultures and contributing to modern traditions (e.g., influencing Rastafarian use later). Sailors, merchants, and trade further spread it. fromtheearth.com Global trade networks under British dominance (EIC ships, ports, and later Crown rule) facilitated seeds, knowledge, and use patterns, even if not a centralized "campaign." In summary, the British Navy drove industrial hemp demand and colonial cultivation for strategic self-sufficiency, while the EIC regulated/taxed psychoactive cannabis in India, extracted revenue, and—via employees—introduced it scientifically to the West and empire. This was secondary to opium but still contributed to cannabis's wider presence through empire-building, not as a primary profit engine like narcotics cartels. Cannabis's global spread was ancient and multi-source, with British imperialism accelerating certain channels via logistics, science, and migration. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov For deeper reading, the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission Report and histories of naval hemp provide primary insights.

@isnatious Let me check I actually already posted on this once. let me tag you, and we can build on this research

This is a vintage “herb box” for cannabis (flowering tops) from Parke, Davis & Co., a major U.S. pharmaceutical company based in Detroit, Michigan. The label indicates: • Cannabis, U.S.P. (United States Pharmacopeia standard) — Cannabis sativa Linnaeus. • No. 144 — This likely refers to their internal product/catalog number for the crude botanical drug/herb (pressed flowering tops), not a fluid extract. Similar Parke-Davis herb boxes existed for other botanicals, and cannabis was sold in small ounce-sized cardboard containers like this. • POISON and PHYSIOLOGICALLY TESTED — Standard warnings and quality assurances for potent drugs of the era. Parke-Davis pioneered physiological (bioassay) standardization for cannabis potency since chemical assays weren’t reliable then (often using animal tests, e.g., on dogs). • Manufactured/sold by Parke, Davis & Co., Detroit, Mich., U.S.A. Historical Context In the late 19th and early 20th centuries (roughly 1890s–1930s), cannabis was a legitimate medicine in the U.S. and Europe. It was used as a sedative, analgesic, narcotic, and for conditions like pain, insomnia, spasms, and more. Parke-Davis (and partners like Eli Lilly) cultivated “Cannabis Americana” in U.S. botanical gardens/farms to ensure consistent quality and potency, as imported Indian cannabis (Cannabis indica) varied widely. They marketed it as comparable or superior to imports. These were used by for pharmacists or physicians to prepare tinctures, extracts, pills, etc. Fluid extracts were more common for dispensing, but raw herb boxes like this were also produced. Cannabis remained in the U.S. Pharmacopeia until the 1940s but faced increasing restrictions, with full federal prohibition coming via the 1937 Marihuana Tax Act. Collectible Value and Rarity These Parke-Davis cannabis herb boxes are scarce collectibles in the antique pharmaceutical/ephemera market. Similar sealed or well-preserved examples have appeared in auctions (e.g., McMurray Auctions). Value depends heavily on condition, completeness, and whether contents remain—often in the range of tens to hundreds of dollars for good specimens, as they’re popular with medical history collectors. Yours shows typical age wear but has a clear, intact label, which is desirable. Parke-Davis was eventually acquired by Pfizer and was a pioneering company in many areas of medicine. Artifacts like this highlight a time when cannabis was treated as a standard pharmaceutical rather than a prohibited substance. I wonder what landrace varieties they used to craft this No. 144? Their legendary “Cannabis Americana” — seeds sourced from the ancient Indian, Nepalese, and Turkestan landraces, then grown and selected right here in U.S. botanical gardens and fields for peak resin and medicinal power? Or potent Mexican sativas pressed into those classic 1-oz herb boxes? It’s a profound wonder we once had real standards for cannabis — U.S.P. grade, physiologically tested for consistent potency and reliability, treated as legitimate medicine. Then prohibition rolled in, and we didn’t just lose access… we lost the entire framework of knowledge, cultivation practices, genetic integrity, and quality control that honored this sacred plant’s true heritage. These old artifacts are time capsules reminding us what was possible when landrace diversity was the foundation, not marketing hype. The plant remembers those lineages. Now it’s on us — the landrace hunters and preservers — to reclaim and protect what remains before it’s gone forever. What landraces do you think powered these old pharma preparations? Drop any historical insights or theories below 👇 #landracebureau #SacredPlants #CannabisHistory #PreservingTheLegacy #LandraceCannabis #ReclaimThePlant

@LandraceBureau @papagell @grok British banter mate

@papagell @isnatious @grok find any info you can on this claim

@LandraceBureau Thats possible ill be in the uk next month 🤔

@isnatious One of us needs to go to the physical archives in London

In 1533, King 👑 Henry VIII enacted a law requiring landowners and farmers to set aside a portion of their arable land specifically for growing hemp (or flax, as the two fibers served similar purposes). The standard requirement was: • (approximately 1/4 acre) of hemp or flax for every 60 acres of land under tillage (cultivated or plowed). This applied to farmers and landholders with sufficient acreage, and failure to comply resulted in fines. Purpose? ⚓️Naval cordage. But English-grown hemp was short-stemmed, weak, prone to rot. Ship captains refused it. This is where we learn about the Baltic Hemp supply line. Primary refinement happened in northern Russia—Volga, Dnieper basins. Serfs under Ivan IV weren’t breeding for yield like we think. They selected against brittleness. The policy reflected hemp's economic and strategic importance: ships of the era required massive amounts of hemp rigging and sails (often 50-100 tons per large vessel), replaced frequently due to wear. Evidence? Pollen cores from Tver Oblast show consistent Cannabis sativa dominance from the 1400’s. They kept the tallest dioecious males, culled the rest. Females stood till seed drop—ensuring next year’s field stayed stable. Over two centuries, that gave Russia the longest fibres in Europe: up to fifteen feet, tensile strength triple English hemp. Trade records confirm it. Hanseatic League logs—housed now in Hamburg Staatsarchiv and Bremen—list shipments: “Riga clean” meant Russian fibre, hand-scutched, water-retted, zero seed. Each bundle marked by inspector; inferior Polish or Livonian lots got downgraded. English importers? Steelyard merchants, based at Thames edge. They paid customs duty per stone—about fourteen pounds—logged in London Port Books from fifteen sixty-five. Figures don’t lie: seventy percent of all hemp imported came via Riga between fifteen eighty and sixteen twenty. These were northern landraces—low cannabinoid, high cellulose, cold-adapted. THC? Trace levels; not bred out, just never there. Today’s gene banks like Vavilov Institute hold samples traced back to those exact zones. DNA mapping shows minimal divergence since sixteen hundred. We are hunted TNA E one-ninety series, Sound Toll ledgers, Bremen archives. So if you’re near: • The National Archives, Kew—order E one-ninety volumes (London, fifteen sixty-five onward). Ask for hemp/Riga imports. • Hamburg Staatsarchiv—Hanseatic logs from Lübeck, Danzig. • Bremen Übersee-Archiv—merchant tallies. 📸 Snap photos, tag us, drop links. We’re pioneering this one—turning footnotes into footage. Here’s the twist: nobody’s posted the actual scans. Who’s in? 📖 1588 London port book entry (trading ship logs). 🛳️ ✍️

@LandraceBureau Thats great stuff! With receipts! Let's do it ✌️

@isnatious let’s collaborate on some research I think i bring up some good points

@LandraceBureau Quite possibly, I was off here for a long time so probably missed it, appreciate that 👌✌️

@BeanGeniePNW @noveltygiftseed @RemoNutrients Looking very nice.. he does some good stuff he does

Pineapple Runtz X 🍓 Gorilla from @noveltygiftseed currently outgrowing all the other plants, checking lots of boxes. ✅0 problems This is my first run of this strain, and using @RemoNutrients this round. Grow your own!

@skunkcityseeds @new_grower @ledobrands Nice

@isnatious @new_grower @ledobrands I use these really small pots to keep mini mother plants under a really low wattage light (25/35w) on 24/0, excellent space saver when storing mother plants and once they are root bound, chop the root ball down and replant into the same pot with fresh soil and they’ll grow again

I know a guy that can get you those genetics. He would be @ledobrands. I have some pure sativas from him that I am scared to run in a tent. Yall check him out.

@HowToQuotePro 💯

@isnatious Few acres near a mountain for me, bye bye baby lol

2 out in 1 year 1 out in 1.5... Well worth the risk for a million imo 👇

Black Opal (Frumpz x Black Bubblegum Horchata) has long been a powerhouse standout in our line. BBH is a phenotype of our Black Bubblegum which is (Spritzer x Horchata) Spritzer is a pheno of Grumpz (Grape Pie x Mac) x Runtz), and Frumpz is (Freshwater Taffy x Grumpz) So Frumpz is actually a cousin to the Spritzer, making our Black Opal very similar genetically to original Black Bubblegum. However, as she is a more indirect form of inbreeding than an S1, F2, or Bx1 she retains FAR more hybrid vigor while maintaining the desired genotype. For people asking for original Black Bubblegum I always point to Black Opal, she has the flavor, yields, color, and bag appeal just like her momma.

@HowToQuotePro Definitely! Id be straight to bkk after the 1st crop that's for sure, I wouldn't be around for a second run 🤣

@isnatious If they've stashed the dough, million percent. That's "fuck you" money in a lot of countries!

@skunkcityseeds @new_grower @ledobrands I do similar, especially when doing perpetual and have not got the space and im usually waiting to re use the media from the plants in flower, so have many small pots in veg waiting.. The thai got left in 1 of those pots 🤣✌️

@isnatious @new_grower @ledobrands You’re right a small pot will control it’s size, it’s what I do if I’m running a small space, run 1/2 or 1 gallon pots so the plants don’t grow too big, I could run 1 plant in one big pot but that’s not as fun lol

@skunkcityseeds @new_grower @ledobrands Thats good to know thanks, I had fun with the pure thai, vegged it 18 6 first, And was surprised how fast it flowered and how short it was, maybe due to small pot🤔

@isnatious @new_grower @ledobrands Those 14-16+ week Sativa’s love 14/10 after 8-10 weeks of 12/12 🤫 they also prefer a much more balanced NPK compared to Hybrids or Short flowering Indica which is interesting 👊😎

@skunkcityseeds @new_grower @ledobrands If its thai, laos or Cambodian id say start 12 12 from seed as that's the natural light cycle year round out here ✌️

@new_grower @ledobrands Probably worth starting seedlings off on 12/12 just to be safe 😂 DWC(hydro) is plants on steroids lol. If you use cuts keep them real small and go straight to 12/12 💯

Since everyone showing off some sativa buds. How bout some classic Thai from this last run. Shes an F3 from 2 pks of old Dutch Flowers Choco Thai. She carries those short fat Thai leaves with a nice sativa structure. Fruity incense/patchouli funk. Thai atw bay-bay;) haha

@Josbkk Tah Mai mee meetur mai dong pai kap

😂😂

@mmfactory36 Koh samet?

島の端から端まで行ってきた

@nova2cotton Got a point there to be fair 🤔

Tin foil hat conspiracy of the day O_O YouTube isn’t demonetizing creators because of “inauthenticity” or TOS violations… they’re doing it so they can quietly steal the ad revenue your videos generate. Think about it. Your content suddenly isn’t “eligible” for monetization… yet they’re still running full ads on it and pocketing every cent. If you’re not allowed to earn from it, why are they?