isovas
8.8K posts

isovas
@isovas
Hit by the curse of being a blue archive fan(peak fiction btw)
the hellish place known as TR Katılım Haziran 2013
374 Takip Edilen94 Takipçiler

^😭💢😭😭 😭😭 💢😭💢 😭 💢 😭😭😭😭 😭😭 😭😭😭 💢💢💢 😭💢😭 💢💢 💢💢💢 😭💢😭 😭 💢😭💢😭 😭💢😭 😭 😭💢 💢 😭😭 😭😭😭💢 😭 😭😭💢💢😭😭
nan@angelflesh3
i hate when ppl use “😭” constantly pls be creative
ART
isovas retweetledi

So-called age verification for social media is spreading across the world, framed as an effort to create a safer internet for children. In reality, age verification lays the foundation for a fully controlled internet.
The age verification rush must be slowed down, and politicians need to recognize the consequences of different types of legislation and systems.
Age verification is the wrong approach to fix “the social media problem”
The big tech social media companies are bad. Their business model is bad; it is based on mass surveillance and manipulation, and they cooperate with governments in mapping entire populations. But age verification is fundamentally the wrong approach to preventing children from using big tech social media platforms. Introducing age verification is based on coercion; the state forces social media companies to verify their users’ identities. But the big tech social media platforms already know which of their users are children. Their business model depends on knowing this. They know how old users are, and they know exactly what type of person they are. As age verification is based on coercion, politicians could instead force platforms to stop doing the things politicians consider harmful to children, or force them to block children (again, they know who they are) from using their services. But instead, politicians seek to massively invade everyone’s privacy and undermine democratic rights on a global scale. In other words, the latter is the real objective – they do not want to protect children; they want to impose control.
Slippery slope of age verification
It is undeniable that age verification threatens freedom of expression, risks increasing mass surveillance, and is likely to lead to censorship. It will not only shrink the online world and reduce young people’s right to privacy (for example, if VPN services were to be restricted); but also risks becoming a significant step toward a controlled internet for everyone.
Most age verification is identity verification
Most countries are now considering introducing age verification systems, meaning that everyone would have to identify themselves either to the service/website they want to use or to a third party capable of linking them to their activity on that service or website. This is not age verification but identity verification, and the consequence is therefore that freedom of information is restricted (you can no longer visit regulated websites anonymously) and that you can no longer post anonymously on social media. This is a major problem in countries like the UK and Germany where the police conduct raids on people’s homes for posting content on social media that the authorities dislike. Or in the United States, where authorities are trying to pressure tech companies into revealing the identities behind accounts protesting ICE. Social media identity verification removes important tools for activists in countries where criticizing those in power is dangerous.
Restrictions on app store or operating system level
Some countries are looking to impose identity verification at the app store level or even within the operating system itself. This is an exciting experiment, since this is possible to circumvent using open-source operating systems. Some countries are already looking to include open-source systems. Since open-source systems cannot be controlled, politicians would ultimately need to ban devices that are not controlled by the state. The end point: telescreens like those in Orwell’s 1984, devices that both monitor you and broadcast only the information approved by the state.
The Zero-Knowledge Proof (ZKP) alternative and the EU
The EU has presented its own age verification app as “completely anonymous”. The idea is to use Zero-Knowledge Proof (ZKP) cryptography to break the link between the age credential issuer (EU governments) and the regulated services/sites. Currently, the EU app does not have ZKP functionality, contrasting Ursula von der Leyen’s claim that the app ”is technically ready to be used”. But more importantly, the app is currently designed to always function without ZKP technology; if ZKP is unavailable, the app falls back to a non-ZKP model. Even if fully developed ZKP technology could be implemented in the future, it would remain an optional extra feature that countries may choose to disable and that the EU could remove at any time.
Read more on our site.
mullvad.net/blog/age-verif…
English

@GachaAddict91 @IceColdSight She's going to burn her hands using that, i fannot allow her to hurt herself like that
English

@xhikmatx @BA_fterbirth Mari and chinatsu can remove debuffs as well, no?
English

@BA_fterbirth It's expected that there will be a new boss that will require debuff removal students , and toki is the only welfare student that has this ability in her kit. So chances are if you don't have the gacha alternatives you will have to use toki
English

@CryingEmojiman I love how D for the restrictions bosses are like stage 90 for some reason
English

@Rejuicinated @AltofMC Oh now I get what you mean, I just don't let the ticket count go to max so I didn't consider that
English

@AltofMC If you can't one phase D difficulty you have to wait an hour to do it a second time too yeah fuck that.
English

@The_Doddler I have everyone I need and it's barely not enough, just take the 1 ticket loss for geburah
English

@ajansmuhbir1923 Biraz da benden duy hain kemal, ne olduğun belliydi zaten artık herkes görüyor
Türkçe

@ijv__ @ProdigyOwl Blue dot is a must, borrow that instead(sazusa or ssaori). You'll be fine without bhoshi.
English

@isovas @ProdigyOwl I don't have ibuki built too much, and I only have lvl1 Kirino, and need to save resources for fes... I had to borrow BHoshi for 2nd cover 😔

English

@ijv__ @ProdigyOwl I used shizuko for my floor 99 clear, and mine is lvl80, she'll be fine. For chise, you only need the sub skill, she doesn't require much investment. Ibuki is good here, you can use her. For the second barricade, you can use anyone but if you have swimsuit kirino she's very good
English

@ProdigyOwl For FRR I'm just able to do F51 since I don't have BHoshi, SSaori, and my cover is lv77 Shizuko. Also Chise lvl~83 and not built too much.
Best I have for debuffs is Saiba twins.
I pretty much have nothing for blue content.
English

@subvitals_ @superflanke @CorneliusSensei @YuzuBlueArchive In normal raid content you (should) use one main dps, and the rest of the students should support that one dps, so multitarget buffing is not used on normal content. You either don't need survivability, or you need to use a healer.
English

@isovas @superflanke @CorneliusSensei @YuzuBlueArchive she buffs everyone in an AOE compared to c.hare who only buffs 1 character, buffing multiple students help everyone do damage
English

@subvitals_ @superflanke @CorneliusSensei @YuzuBlueArchive Uh, no? Ibuki has her uses but it's definitely not for normal raid content.
English

@superflanke @isovas @CorneliusSensei @YuzuBlueArchive for that i just use ibuki she has yellow armor and atk down on basic which is wayyyyy better that whatever c.hare offers
English

@subvitals_ @superflanke @CorneliusSensei @YuzuBlueArchive Hey now, i agree that she's replaceable but her buffs being dogshit is just false
English

@superflanke @CorneliusSensei @YuzuBlueArchive nah her buffs are dogshit and she’s very replaceable in every team
English

@Rasshigun I went ddmmyyyy, but I guess I should've guessed they went for the american way
English


























