Jack O'Keefe

163 posts

Jack O'Keefe banner
Jack O'Keefe

Jack O'Keefe

@jackmokeefe1

Software Engineer at GitHub Copilot

Katılım Şubat 2022
676 Takip Edilen81 Takipçiler
Jack O'Keefe
Jack O'Keefe@jackmokeefe1·
@Birdyword I have been reading that the Chinese elites no longer think the US is a declining power, especially after the Maduro spectacle
English
0
0
0
117
Mike Bird
Mike Bird@Birdyword·
I have no particular defence and intelligence insight here, I just always wonder: if you were a risk-averse Chinese policymaker who believed that the US was currently a decaying power, flailing both at home and abroad, would you lean towards rolling the dice, or waiting?
The Wall Street Journal@WSJ

China isn’t planning to invade Taiwan in 2027 and would prefer to take control of the island without resorting to force., the U.S. concludes on.wsj.com/4lAedlA

English
69
26
525
60.9K
Jack O'Keefe
Jack O'Keefe@jackmokeefe1·
@maxxyung11 I think this is absolutely insane and there is close to zero chance of this happening, but if you are right, you are goated
English
0
0
1
189
Maxx Yung
Maxx Yung@maxxyung11·
just want to put it here right now that i think openai will acquire ginkgo within 8 months
English
15
0
99
12.7K
Jack O'Keefe
Jack O'Keefe@jackmokeefe1·
@TheDavidHasbun @Altacnt21 @t_NYC Depleted Uranium is probably more harmful to the soldiers actually handling it. It is used to make tank rounds. I don't think the people receiving the tank round are going to fare well either way. It is also essentially has its radioactivity stripped
Jack O'Keefe tweet media
English
0
0
0
14
DavidHasbun
DavidHasbun@TheDavidHasbun·
Ok then eplain to me the differences between radioactive Thorium and radioactive Uranium. Thorium is still radioactive. Thorium still depletes. Depleted Thorium is still radioactive and causes all the same problems as depleted uranium. Depleted Thorium still needs to be stored for at least 300 years and that's if we don't use it to make depleted Thorium bombs which we absolutely will. It is literally the exact same thing as far as the dangers and environmental impacts go and as far as causing cancer and developmental problems when the material is released into the environment. So we switch to Thorium. Great. Do you really think we won't be dropping depleted Thorium bombs as soon as it gets depleted? We are talking about nuclear waste here. Both depleted Uranium and depleted Thorium are nuclear waste. You are falling for a rebrand. It is still radioactive and just as dangerous to the environment.
English
2
0
0
22
thomas 🛠 gazafunds.com/all
The fact that young people talk about nuclear power and never, ever, EVER mention the nuclear waste that is buried all over USA in storage sites that will remain radioactive basically forever and aren’t secured or really “safe”
vivian@vivian39_

nuclear energy is sitting right there. just sitting there. producing massive amounts of clean reliable power with a safety record better than literally every other energy source per kwh. and we're out here arguing about whether to put a solar panel on a parking garage. okay

English
259
208
1.7K
227.9K
Jack O'Keefe
Jack O'Keefe@jackmokeefe1·
@ellipsus_writes They deleted ChatGPT because they moved to Claude. The market overall is still growing rapidly
English
0
0
0
29
Ellipsus
Ellipsus@ellipsus_writes·
This month, 1.5 million people deleted ChatGPT. AI overreach is now a mobilizing issue across the political spectrum.
English
3
13
154
2.3K
Ellipsus
Ellipsus@ellipsus_writes·
If you’ve taken the time to explain why AI is bad (for the arts, for democracy, for education, for everything) by posting online, or just explaining these issues to someone in your life—thank you. The pushback is working. You have quite literally made a difference.
English
22
950
4.4K
33K
Jack O'Keefe
Jack O'Keefe@jackmokeefe1·
@geoffreywoo @pmarca But the people remember the thinkers. Can you name the most prominent businessmen of the 1700s? Almost certainly not. Can you name the most prominent thinkers? Probably.
English
0
0
0
56
GEOFF WOO
GEOFF WOO@geoffreywoo·
what @pmarca is saying is actually so obviously true: think less, do more. if you possess some passable level of IQ, you’re already thinking enough and that’s sufficient world is run by doers, not thinkers. do more stuff.
English
51
18
313
11.7K
Jack O'Keefe
Jack O'Keefe@jackmokeefe1·
@aliceyting Hi Professor Ting, I am interested, but I am not sure if your DMs are open. Thanks
English
0
0
0
2.7K
Alice Ting
Alice Ting@aliceyting·
We are recruiting! If you are passionate about technology development, protein engineering, computational design, directed evolution, chemical biology - please reach out! (The setting is pretty nice too…)
Alice Ting tweet media
English
21
62
480
52.9K
Jack O'Keefe
Jack O'Keefe@jackmokeefe1·
"By capturing emergent group behaviors sparked by individual interactions, it transcends the limits of traditional prediction" from the MiroFish page. Another indication that Gestalt is a real phenomenon
English
0
0
0
181
Jack O'Keefe retweetledi
Jess 🌱
Jess 🌱@thattallguy·
I think folks on this app are greatly underestimating how much the general public hates AI. Like, haaaaaaates it.
English
622
432
7.2K
186.8K
Jack O'Keefe
Jack O'Keefe@jackmokeefe1·
@eptwts You get to talk in short bursts that don't work virtually. Also, just having a physical human next to you is nice. If you work remote, it makes a huge difference
English
0
0
0
180
Jack O'Keefe retweetledi
spor
spor@sporadica·
this is probably the dumbest thing i’ve ever heard
David Senra@davidsenra

Great men of history had little to no introspection. The personality that builds empires is not the same personality that sits around quietly questioning itself. @pmarca and I discuss what we both noticed but no one talks about: David: You don't have any levels of introspection? Marc: Yes, zero. As little as possible. David: Why? Marc: Move forward. Go! I found people who dwell in the past get stuck in the past. It's a real problem and it's a problem at work and it's a problem at home. David: So I've read 400 biographies of history’s greatest entrepreneurs and someone asked me what the most surprising thing I’ve learned from this was [and I answered] they have little or zero introspection. Sam Walton didn't wake up thinking about his internal self. He just woke up and was like: I like building Walmart. I'm going to keep building Walmart. I'm going to make more Walmarts. And he just kept doing it over and over again. Marc: If you go back 400 years ago it never would've occurred to anybody to be introspective. All of the modern conceptions around introspection and therapy, and all the things that kind of result from that are, a kind of a manufacture of the 1910s, 1920s. Great men of history didn't sit around doing this stuff. The individual runs and does all these things and builds things and builds empires and builds companies and builds technology. And then this kind of this kind of guilt based whammy kind of showed up from Europe. A lot of it from Vienna in 1910, 1920s, Freud and all that entire movement. And kind of turned all that inward and basically said, okay, now we need to basically second guess the individual. We need to criticize the individual. The individual needs to self criticize. The individual needs to feel guilt, needs to look backwards, needs to dwell in the past. It never resonated with me.

English
139
66
2.2K
123.8K
sucks
sucks@powerbottomdad1·
@jackmokeefe1 incredible you have copilot right there on your bio
English
1
0
8
14.3K
sucks
sucks@powerbottomdad1·
S - ny, sf A - san diego B - chicago, boston, dc, detroit, austin C - seattle, miami, pittsburgh, denver, vegas, atl D - houston, dallas, s.a, kansas city, portland, louisville, nashvile, LA, minneapolis, charlotte E - philly, phoenix, ohio, indianapolis, stl, jacksonville, tampa
English
185
35
1.7K
292.8K
Jack O'Keefe retweetledi
abel
abel@Abel_summation·
"I'm not very hopeful. It would almost take a miracle to make that work," says Igor Torreira on the plausibility of an international AI ban. Igor Torreira is a Senior Fellow at Georgetown University's Center for Security and Emerging Technology and a former senior researcher at the RAND Corporation, where he led research on military cyber operations and the effects of cyber weapons. He also worked as a Special Assistant in the Office of the Secretary of Defense at the U.S. Department of Defense. Listen to my conversation with him below, where we discuss: 2:48 What people most commonly misunderstand about technological competition between the US and China 4:35 Why large government and military institutions struggle to adopt new technologies 6:27 How autonomous systems could change the future of warfare 10:06 Whether humans will continue to remain directly involved in warfare 11:53 The cybersecurity risks created by autonomous and AI-enabled systems 13:10 How AI could shift the offense-defense balance in cyber conflict 15:15 The relevance of traditional metrics like GDP in light of AI 20:44 The role of think tanks and independent research organizations in shaping policy 22:56 Whether international agreements or bans on AI development are realistically possible 24:48 Advice for students interested in technology policy and security
English
1
2
14
2.8K
Jack O'Keefe
Jack O'Keefe@jackmokeefe1·
@0xkyle__ Chinese TikTok has insane amounts of brain rot and they add sound effects literally every 0.5 seconds which makes it insanely annoying. They aren’t realistic sound effects either, they are absurd so it’s more catching
English
0
0
2
593
Kyle
Kyle@0xkyle__·
Chinese firewall one of the least talked about but genius moves bc they basically saw early on that the Internet would reshape culture ffw 20 years and thats why China tiktok isnt actually brainrot Pretty sure the internet will become a walled garden in the future
English
92
195
2.4K
93.8K
Jack O'Keefe
Jack O'Keefe@jackmokeefe1·
@apralky It is because they are Nietzschean last men. They are playing around with semantic games because they are bored
English
0
0
0
163
yung macro 宏观年少传奇
It is kind of interesting: the East Coast magazine types are seemingly intelligent people, seemingly selected through very tight funnels -- great universities, great SAT scores, they can often think critically, follow long and established traditions of thought, etc. but here we are moving at breakneck pace through this unprecedented technological revolution which by any reasonable consensus has decent odds of literally ending biological life as we know it in all sorts of horrible ways, and all they can think about is that... prose is getting kinda worse on the way? That some writing sounds a little sloppier now? That they are not fans of the style? This is somehow their elephant in the room? What? Is this just what happens when you compound bad epistemic habits for decades? Functional paralysis in otherwise sane minds?
English
78
44
1.1K
173.1K
Jack O'Keefe
Jack O'Keefe@jackmokeefe1·
Here is a summary of my essay on what it would be like to give an LLM drugs. I think the discourse surrounding consciousness in LLMs is ridiculous.
Jack O'Keefe tweet media
English
1
1
1
212