jampot2

To celebrate European Free Speech Ignorance Day coinciding with Black Friday Year, I've created a series of cartoons. No European leaders were harmed during the making of these (though a few barrel bottoms were scraped) #1 The Big Deal #freespeech #kiermandate #muskvsEU

@JanejOL @LOVillaJavea The IRGC murdered 40000+ protesters and continues to execute tender young lives to this day. They hold the world to ransom, would erase Israel & the West at the drop of a hijab. Starmer constantly lying & selling out the country forever. Boris went to a party.

@jampot2 @LOVillaJavea I do not believe that IRGC is all peaceful but equally they are not all terrorists, Hezbollah etc. Brexit was an economic, security & free movement disaster. I don’t believe Starmer is lying unlike Johnson, Hancock, Cummings, Gove etc

Normal people couldn’t survive the amount of criticism Starmer receives. How does he?

@AkevvFlurry @RockChartrand I conceded corruption is found in all systems. It's human nature. But a) you've got more chance of dealing with it in a democratic system b) more people have more opportunities than c) if you pretend everyone is equal & monopolise & suppress everyone with your own set of cronies.

@jampot2 @RockChartrand Then they use those riches to BUY entire government agencies. If you do not see the problem unchecked wealth really is, you’re a shill or you’re too dumb to pull your pants on in the morning.

It isn’t billionaires. It’s the principle that individuals have a right to produce, trade, and keep what they earn. Billionaires are just the most visible target. Start there, and you normalize the idea that success is a liability. Once that principle is accepted, it doesn’t stay confined. It moves downward. And there’s a practical side you’re ignoring. In a free system, you choose who you deal with. You can walk away. When power shifts to bureaucrats, that choice disappears. You deal with them whether you want to or not. So no, it isn’t about defending the rich. It’s about rejecting a system where your rights depend on who has political power.

@JanejOL @LOVillaJavea Sorry Jane. I'm sure you're a lovely person but do appear to regurgitate the PC messaging: believe the EU is democratic, the PM is a man of principle, IRGC = Iranians, Islam is peaceful etc. But goodwill, naïvety & misplaced faith are sadly counterproductive in today's world.

@JanejOL @LOVillaJavea Congratulations! You win our model citizen award, sucking up everything you're told. My Nigerian Prince friend Dr Bakare Tunde would like to reward you for your virtue. Shall I introduce you? Just send me bank details and PIN...

@LeoKearse @STWuk @MayorofLondon @CNDuk @PSCupdates @PalForumUk @FriendsofAlAqsa "It's a nTwap!!" (as I think the Admiral said on the Nigerian version of Star Wars)

@STWuk @MayorofLondon @CNDuk @PSCupdates @PalForumUk @FriendsofAlAqsa The famous British "Nakba Day".

We're calling on @MayorofLondon to intervene in Met Police decision to hand central London to racist thug Tommy Robinson on Nakba day

@JanejOL @LOVillaJavea [P.S. Don't!]

@LOVillaJavea It's like bodily secretions off a Ukrainian rent boy's back

@Skint_Eastwood1 Right. So the new, super tolerant, liberal society needs basing on a society that's eradicated any dissenting voices? Where've we heard & had that before? [clue: in totalitarian states. ie supporters are ANYTHING BUT liberal. They are the sinister, underhand, actual fascists]

🚨Green Party Leader Zack Polanski Wants To Build A Society That Doesn’t Include Anyone From The Right “There are people who identify as right wing or even far right… Do we think we can change their minds or is it a case of building a society that doesn’t include them?” What the hell does Zack mean by this? Tell us @ZackPolanski what do you have planned if you ever get into power?

@RupertLowe10 You'd make a good diplomat. I think many people would be less restrained.

I think Starmer is just a deeply unpleasant bloke. Awful PM, awful man. He should do us all a favour and resign.

@AkevvFlurry @RockChartrand I'll not deny that capitalism is flawed + some very wealthy people have an obscene amount of money & abuse their position. But I'm sufficiently experienced to know that happens in any system. But people need opportunity, motivation, opportunity and HOPE in life.

@AkevvFlurry @RockChartrand Read what Rock says again. People get rich because they find a way to add (lots of) value to society. They often pay a lot of tax, which goes back into society. We need a society that encourages individuals to make their unique contribution, not begrudge/discourage = road to ruin

@JChimirie66677 @Darth_Trader1 @the_rupert If I were King Charles, I'd summon him, say "Enough is enough", dissolve Parliament, give the country a chance to save something of itself, make myself useful & relevant again, leaving my own mark on British history.

@JChimirie66677 @Darth_Trader1 @the_rupert And the longer it goes on, the more irrevocable damage it will do: to his party, to politics, to social cohesion, to the country, international relations, etc. A wise man (with a genuine social conscience) would realise that. A wise electorate would see that. Oh well...

Starmer Sacked the Man Who Followed the Rules. Keir Starmer did not sack Sir Olly Robbins because he did something wrong. He sacked him because he did something inconvenient. That distinction matters more than anything else that has happened this week, and this has been a week of considerable consequence. Ciaran Martin, former head of the National Cyber Security Centre and a man with direct professional knowledge of how the vetting system operates, went on the record yesterday to say that Robbins had not only no duty to inform Downing Street of Mandelson's vetting failure, he had a positive duty not to. The system is designed that way deliberately. Security vetting exists at arm's length from political authority precisely to prevent ministers from interfering in assessments that should be made on security grounds alone. Robbins followed the rules. Starmer dismissed him anyway. What Starmer has done is construct a causal chain that does not exist. The argument being assembled in Downing Street runs as follows: Robbins overruled the security services, Robbins did not tell us, and therefore we bear no responsibility for what followed. Every part of that argument is false. The decision to appoint Mandelson was Starmer's. He made it before vetting was complete. He made it in full knowledge of the Epstein connection. He made it because his chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, a protégé of Mandelson, pushed for it despite institutional warnings. The vetting failure did not cause the appointment. The appointment came first. Starmer signed it off and the vetting process, working exactly as designed, subsequently said no. The sacrifice of Robbins also destroys what remains of Starmer's own defence. He has spent months insisting that process failed him, that he was deceived, that the system let him down. A former head of the National Cyber Security Centre has now said publicly that there was no process failure. The system worked. Which means the problem was never process. The problem was judgment. Starmer's judgment, exercised before the process had even concluded. Consider what the dismissal means for Whitehall. Every senior civil servant in every department now understands the lesson. Following established procedure will not protect you if the political consequences prove embarrassing. Correct conduct is no defence against a Prime Minister who needs a fall guy. The chilling effect on institutional independence will outlast this government and this scandal. Starmer has not just sacrificed one official. He has sent a message to the entire senior civil service about what loyalty to process is actually worth. Meanwhile the documents withheld from Parliament grow more suspicious by the day. The government will not say how many it is concealing. It will not describe their general type. It will not explain why their release would prejudice any future prosecution beyond asserting that it would. Sir Michael Ellis, a former Attorney General and criminal barrister of seventeen years standing, has said publicly that the prosecution argument is nonsense, that the test for contempt requires a substantial risk of serious prejudice that the existing wall of media coverage has already made effectively impossible to meet. A government with nothing to hide does not hide things it cannot explain. A Prime Minister with clean hands does not sack the civil servant whose hands were cleanest. Robbins told friends he would not be the fall guy. He was made one regardless. Starmer called the vetting failure a failing of the state. The man who followed the state's rules lost his job the same day. The public can see what that is. They have a word for it. So does the Ministerial Code. Keir Starmer and Olly Robbins

@AkevvFlurry @RockChartrand Imagine your own skills were that unique & valuable that it made you rich. You wouldn't complain then! There'd be nothing to stop you giving your wealth away but the State likes to help with that anyway. Wealth breeds wealth. Envy breeds crime, sloth, depression & depravity.

@UltraDane Has he won any interesting auction lots though?

This is so fucked. The smartest kid in class is failing because he cant understand a word she says.

@JChimirie66677 @the_rupert They appear to have entered a new phase of blatant lying and not even caring. People on the (centre) Right have developed a degree of immunity to being called 'racist'. I'm wondering if the Left have developed immunity to being called 'liars' and are now going into lie overdrive.

Rupert, you are right on both counts. He will not go voluntarily. That has been clear from the beginning. A man who can look the country in the eye and say he beats himself up more than anyone else does not possess the instinct for self-sacrifice that resignation requires. But the irony you identify is the most powerful political dynamic in this story. Every day he stays, the questions compound. Every document release adds another layer. Every withheld file adds another suspicion. Every sacked official adds another potential witness. The Robbins dismissal alone has created an enemy with direct knowledge, no remaining obligations and every personal incentive to talk. A resignation in February would have been painful but survivable for Labour. What is happening now is structural. The party is being defined by this scandal in the run up to local elections, with a leader who has exhausted his stock of defences and is now reduced to blaming failing of the state while the state's most senior officials line up to contradict him. He is not governing. He is enduring. And the longer he endures, the deeper the damage runs.

I still see people in the UK regularly deny this simple reality, that the EU quite happily admits. The unelected EU Commission propose laws. Not the elected Parliament. Parliament debates and amends them, but it doesn't propose them. The unelected write the laws.

Wow. Starmer is so scared and incapable of answering questions at PMQs, that Labour whips tried to manufacture a way to cancel next week's PMQs so he wouldn't have to endure another one. How utterly pathetic. Scared of being held to account. dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…

@FUDdaily It's the only halfway sensible way to address demand for cheap housing without destroying the countryside, building on flood plains, etc. Until someone claims having a detached house, garden, pool, WiFi etc is a basic human right (more than the average taxpayer can afford anyhow)

@FUDdaily They should build high-rises again. I suspect the truth is they know they'd still be unpopular because "Who'd want to live next to/under/over that ****er?" It was hard enough in a more homogeneous society: be impossible with all the world's conflicts playing out under one roof.

I have zero interest in solving the housing problem unless it involves remigration flights. I do not want to pave over my country with deano boxes. I don't want to house infinity bomalians. I don't want more houses added to my village. I don't want our local town to be any bigger than it is already. Only when we've deported the 8-12m people who shouldn't be here, will I entertain the notion that we need more houses.

@NiohBerg Useful idiots. Probably also advised to issue a statement upholding the narrative 'Stay silent in the interest of diversity'

Unbelievable. A British woman was gangraped near a church in Epsom, and the church's first reaction is to condemn the locals for being angry about it. What is wrong with them?