Jane

13.6K posts

Jane banner
Jane

Jane

@janehetts

🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 Reform UK

Devon Katılım Ağustos 2018
1.1K Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Jane
Jane@janehetts·
This is fascinating and so relevant to the situation in the UK
Jane tweet media
English
0
0
1
480
Madelaine Hanson
Madelaine Hanson@MadelaineLucyH·
I’d feel safer walking through Tower Hamlets alone in a mini skirt than walking through a Reform rally and most women right wing or not know that’s the truth 💀🤷‍♀️
English
2.1K
219
2.4K
147.8K
That 1
That 1@that_1·
Meghan wasn't there for 122 minutes after all. 😂☠️
English
104
103
971
49K
Jane retweetledi
Bev Turner
Bev Turner@beverleyturner·
I'm sorry WHHHAATTT??? THIS IS THE GUY WHO STARMER JUST FIRED because he wasn't told that Mandelson had failed vetting. Someone. Is. Lying. Who? And why?? Oh dear.....
Aphra Brandreth@AphraBrandreth

At a @CommonsForeign session in November 2025, I directly asked Sir Oliver Robbins whether the FCDO had a different view of who should be recommended for the posting of US Ambassador. His response? "It was clear that the Prime Minister wanted to make this appointment himself."

English
132
1.2K
3.6K
79.6K
Jane retweetledi
Skint Eastwood
Skint Eastwood@Skint_Eastwood1·
🚨 Starmer Announces Bold Mission to Reopen Strait of Hormuz… After Iran and Trump Just Declared It Open Starmer's masterplan: “We will lead a multinational mission to open the Strait of Hormuz.” Iran & Trump just announced it's already fully open today 😂 Brilliant timing, Keir. The ships are sailing while you're still scheduling the planning meeting. 🤡
English
7.8K
12.6K
52.3K
1.5M
Stephanie Sidley
Stephanie Sidley@StephanieSidley·
Meghan Markle only spent 122 minutes at the “girls retreat” in Australia and then left!!!! Anyone who paid for this scam weekend is an idiot!!!!
Stephanie Sidley tweet media
English
234
226
2.3K
57.1K
Tom Watson
Tom Watson@tom_watson·
He is many things but Keir Starmer is not a liar.
English
13.1K
955
4.7K
906.6K
Jane
Jane@janehetts·
@that_1 How uncomfortable is she in this situation?
English
0
0
6
169
That 1
That 1@that_1·
Meghan's most difficult acting part so far
English
361
80
1.1K
37.7K
Jane
Jane@janehetts·
@lady_doi Pre order. Does this mean no refunds if unhappy with product? Seen it done by other influencers…..
English
0
0
1
250
Lady Doi
Lady Doi@lady_doi·
"Meghan’s visit causing ‘considerable concern’ behind palace gates" 🗞️ A longform article in The Telegraph about Meghan's grifting and merching in Australia under the guise of 'charity' "Prince Harry and Meghan’s tour of Australia has raised alarm in royal circles after it emerged that Meghan is earning money from a shopping platform built around the outfits she wears on charitable engagements. The Duchess of Sussex has invested in OneOff, a 'style-driven fashion discovery platform', which includes purchasing links to a host of celebrities’ clothes. She is understood to be receiving a share of sales. Meghan’s OneOff page includes seven outfits she has worn since the couple arrived in Australia on Tuesday for what has been described as a “quasi-royal tour”. One of the “looks” featured is the black Karen Gee “Priscilla Dress” worn by the 44-year-old mother-of-two on a visit to the Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne on Tuesday. Visitors who click on the link can press a “buy now” button straight to the website where the $1250 dress is available for pre-order. There are also links to the Real Fine Studio Puffy Hearts earrings worn by Meghan, along with her Christian Dior iridescent black leather high heels, although they appear to have already sold out. According to Vogue, the current revenue split on a sale is 10 to 25 per cent from the retailer to OneOff, which is split with the creator. The London Telegraph understands that the commercialisation of Meghan’s wardrobe has “caused considerable concern” behind palace gates. A royal source said: “Everybody just rolls their eyes now as they know the routine – push the envelope, get criticised, reverse tack and say you made a donation. By making money while doing ‘philanthropic’ work, they very much appear to be having their cake and eating it.” Another insider said: “Grifting is one thing, but carrying out a faux royal visit to a children’s hospital while flogging your outfits online appears to have crossed a line.” It follows increased discomfort over the monetisation of the tour, where tickets to a high-end “girls’ weekend” retreat in Sydney have been on sale for up to $3199 for VIP access to Meghan. Also featured on her OneOff page is the khaki suede St Agni bomber jacket ($1000) and skirt ($890) she wore on a visit to the Australian National Veterans Art Museum in Melbourne on Tuesday. Meghan once complained about having to wear tights as a working royal. While promoting the second series of her Netflix show With Love, Meghan, she said: “It was different several years ago, when I couldn’t be as vocal and I had to wear nude pantyhose all the time. “Let’s be honest, that was not very myself. I hadn’t seen pantyhose since movies in the ’80s! That felt a little bit inauthentic.” There is even a link to her Cartier Tank Française 18-carat gold watch. Diana, Princess of Wales, had the same watch, and it has never been officially confirmed whether the watch Meghan wears belonged to her late mother-in-law. When the couple stepped down as working royals in 2020, they released a statement titled Spring Transition 2020 on their now-defunct Sussex Royal website, which read: “The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will become privately funded members of the Royal family with permission to earn their own income and the ability to pursue their own private charitable interests.” The original statement was not agreed upon, with the late Queen Elizabeth leading negotiations over what the Sussexes’ future would look like in a meeting that has become known as the Sandringham Summit. Buckingham Palace made it clear that a “half-in, half-out” model was not acceptable, confirming that the couple would step back from all active royal duties, including official military appointments. They were banned from using the name Sussex Royal for their activities, over fears their money-making plans would look as though they were endorsed by the royal family. Since then, the couple has made commercial deals with Spotify, Netflix and others, and Meghan has launched her own business, As Ever. Palace aides have welcomed the Sussexes’ commercial success, believing they are better placed earning a living than having to rely on royal scandals to make headlines as they did in the era of their Oprah Winfrey interview and Harry’s autobiography, Spare. Since then, the royal family has enjoyed being able to concentrate on their official duties while the public interest drifts from the so-called “Sussex soap opera”. But the visit to Australia, where King Charles is head of state, is more complicated, with crowds turning out to see the couple because of their former royal status. The tour has also prompted confusion over whether it is a commercial or charitable endeavour. It has once again led to criticism of The Firm – as the royal family is sometimes called – with Meghan complaining about having been trolled and Harry complaining about not wanting to be royal. References have also been made in news coverage to previous visits by Princess Diana, who was careful never to cash in on her royal status, despite being a global fashion icon." ✍️ Camilla Tominey, The Telegraph, London
Lady Doi tweet media
English
64
57
642
48.8K
Jane retweetledi
Julia Hartley-Brewer
Here's the thing: They know they're lying. We know they're lying. We know they know they're lying. They know we know they know they're lying. And they still think they'll get away with it. But we know better. bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
English
215
1.1K
5.2K
38.4K
Jane retweetledi
Dr David Bull
Dr David Bull@drdavidbull·
The establishment likes to lie to you about Reform UK. Here’s the reality: Reform UK-led councils have delivered the lowest council tax rises of any party. 👇
English
464
469
1.6K
23.5K
Summer Belle
Summer Belle@SummerRhapsody·
#MeghanMarkle wearing a mum t shirt while she dumps Archie & Betty at every opportunity.
Summer Belle tweet media
English
124
61
1.3K
10.7K
Jane retweetledi
Chris Rose
Chris Rose@ArchRose90·
Now it turns out that Keir Starmer hired Peter Mandelson to be his US Ambassador after he FAILED his security vetting. The Foreign Office had to use a rare power to the overrule security officials due to Keir Starmer announcing his role beforehand. Outrageous. He must resign.
Chris Rose tweet media
English
262
2.8K
9.1K
60.5K
Jane retweetledi
Nigel Farage MP
Nigel Farage MP@Nigel_Farage·
Keir Starmer said in February that the security services had given Mandelson “clearance for the role”. Now we discover that he has blatantly lied, the Prime Minister should resign. Vote Reform on May 7th to make it happen.
English
555
2.6K
14.4K
171.5K
That 1
That 1@that_1·
and here comes the victim card 🤦🏻‍♂️
English
754
114
2K
67K
Nancy Sidley
Nancy Sidley@nancytsidley·
This is so desperate. 🤦🏻‍♀️
Nancy Sidley tweet mediaNancy Sidley tweet mediaNancy Sidley tweet mediaNancy Sidley tweet media
English
221
27
936
45.8K
That 1
That 1@that_1·
i will just leave it here 🤫
That 1 tweet media
English
580
159
2K
97.1K
Lin Mei
Lin Mei@linmeitalks·
Conservatives under @KemiBadenoch looking more attractive than Reform 🤷🏽‍♀️
English
126
35
419
12.7K