Janguv

Have some respect. That's some of the world's leading demographers there.

@GoodwinMJ The Amazon customers are still buying Fluffy Chick ahead of your pile of wank, MattGPT.

They’re attacking this book because it says what millions of people already feel. The usual suspects hate it. But the people have taken it to Number 2 on Amazon. This isn’t just a book anymore - it’s a statement. Join us & get your copy. shorturl.at/MOOz1

@I_amMukhtar @andytwelves Funny that when he is asked which "top demographers" reviewed it he gave a guilty silent grin. But THEN later he (rightly) points out academic peer-review is anonymous. Sure – well, it would be, if the publisher had an anonymous peer-review process. He didn't use a publisher lol.

Whoever is advising Matt GPT hates him. They made him humiliate himself on his favourite channel and get fact-checked on air. He asked AI to check whether his book was written by AI, and he could not name a single person who peer-reviewed it. He's relying on the gullibles.

@StarmertheFraud @CeilNoyle @LabourTogether Oh well of course it was Kuenssberg giving Simons the opportunity to launder his reputation hahaha.

PAUL HOLDEN STATEMENT IN RESPONSE TO INTERVIEW WITH JOSH SIMONS ON BBC NEWSCAST Yesterday, BBC Newscast published a lengthy, forty-minute interview with former Cabinet Minister Josh Simons MP. The interview addressed how Simons, as a director of @LabourTogether, had appointed a firm called APCO Worldwide to investigate me and my colleagues. I was not told by the BBC ahead of the broadcast that the episode was being recorded or aired. I was not approached to respond to the lengthy comments made about me or the small anti-corruption organisation, @ShadowWorldInv1 , that I run with my colleague @andrewfeinstein. Andrew, who is also repeatedly mentioned, was also not approached for comment. I only found out last night, when a friend texted me, that the person who hired a major multinational reputation management firm that produced a despicable and defamatory report on me and my colleagues, and who reported me on the basis of these false and defamatory reports to the UK’s security services, was being given forty minutes to give his version of events on a major podcast published by our national broadcaster. To be clear, the BBC has NEVER - not once - approached me to comment on a story that is, ultimately, about me, my investigations, my family and my colleagues. They did not approach me when the story first broke, and they did not approach me for this episode. If the BBC had done so, I would have raised several issues with the way in which matters related to me were discussed. For example, Simons repeatedly stated in the interview that he instructed APCO to investigate whether my reporting or sourcing derived from a ‘hack’ of the Electoral Commission. The word ‘hack’ is used eight times in the interview. At no time was it acknowledged in this discussion that this allegation – that I might have received hacked materials – is entirely false, and I have repeatedly proven it to be false. Following the broadcast, I contacted the BBC to complain and to raise serious issues with the broadcast. I was contacted by the Newscast editor, Sam Bonham, to say the BBC would update the Newscast episode and further reporting to reflect some of my concerns. This has not yet happened with regards to the podcast, although I note some online reporting finally reflects a very small and limited sampling of my comments. I will wait to see if amendments and updates will follow. If they do not, I will be escalating this matter to OFCOM. In the interim, I have decided to share the full statement I provided to the BBC, which is produced below: I would like to put certain things on the record. First, my reporting on Labour Together and Morgan McSweeney was entirely factually accurate and based on impeccable, legal sourcing. My sourcing has been reviewed by multiple media outlets, who confirmed the authenticity and legal provenance of my sources. Revelations based on my book, The Fraud, has subsequently been covered widely across the mainstream media, including in multiple front-page scoops, in outlets such as The Times, Daily Mail, The Guardian, The National and ITV. The stories I produced in 2023 and 2024, and which prompted Labour Together's investigation into me, were subject to extensive editorial and legal checks. They were, I believe, entirely accurate reporting on matters of profound public interest, which included raising concerns about the character of powerful individuals like Morgan McSweeney. Considering the recent Mandelson affair, I believe I have been entirely vindicated in attempting to alert the public about McSweeney's past, including how McSweeney made use of £700,000 in funding that he unlawfully failed to declare to the Electoral Commission to procure power and influence for himself and Sir Keir Starmer. Second, Josh Simons states that he never intended for APCO Worldwide to investigate me or my journalistic colleagues. However, a copy of the contract between APCO Worldwide and Labour Together, addressed to Simons, has now been published. The contract sets out a scope of work written in plain English. It states that APCO will 'investigate the sourcing, funding, origins of a Sunday Times article as well as upcoming works by authors Paul Holden and Matt Taibbi.' The contract then states that the aim of the APCO investigation will be to 'provide a body of evidence that could be packaged up in the media in order to create narratives that would proactively undermine any future attacks on Labour Together.' The contract then sets out a range of potentially invasive investigative methods that will be used to generate this 'package', including 'financial investigations' and 'human intelligence investigations.' I provide the full text of this contract below. This contract is clear. APCO were hired to investigate me to produce materials that would 'proactively undermine' my factually accurate, public interest reporting. They would use a range of investigative techniques to do so. APCO then did exactly as was suggested in the contract, using these investigative methods to "investigate" me. This investigation has caused me and my family significant anxiety and distress. Third, Josh Simons was provided with a report called Operation Cannon. It is the result of a lengthy investigation into me and my colleagues by APCO Worldwide. I have seen a copy of this report. It makes a series of extremely defamatory and utterly false allegations against me. It identifies my home address and sets out private information about my family. I cannot express how profoundly shocking, outrageous and defamatory this report truly is. Simons may claim he never intended for APCO to investigate me, but on receipt of this despicable report, he then chose to use it. He submitted sections of the report to the National Cyber Security Centre to convince them to investigate me. The Guardian has published the email correspondence in which Simons repeated some of the substance of the allegations in the APCO reports. Fourth, multiple media freedom advocacy organisations, including the NUJ, have strongly criticised the APCO investigation and these related matters. They have all, to my mind correctly, strongly criticised Labour Together and APCO for investigating journalists producing factually accurate reporting in the public interest. Finally, I am still reviewing the Newscast interview. I will be responding in due course and I hope that the BBC will, this time, give me the platform to set out what really happened and why. Text of Contract Between Labour Together and APCO Worldwide, addressed to Josh Simons Dear Mr Simons We are pleased that you have selected APCO Worldwide Limited (“APCO”) to provide the following scope of work (“services”) during Term: APCO will devise a concise strategy to aid Labour Together. APCO will investigate the sourcing, funding and origins of a Sunday Times article about Labour Together, as well as upcoming works by authors Paul Holden and Matt Taibbi – to establish who and what are behind the coordinated attacks on Labour Together. The approach should provide a body of evidence that could be packaged up for use in the media in order to create narratives that would proactively undermine any future attacks on Labour Together. The material can also inform any future legal strategy that Labour Together might wish to pursue against any of these parties. The work will include: • Open Source Investigations (OSINT): Recovery and Preservation of Evidence • Human Intelligence Investigation (HUMINT): Recovery and Preservation of Evidence • Financial Investigation: Forensic Accounting Focus • Digital Forensics Investigation: Recovery and Preservation of Evidence • Stakeholder Outreach • Media Packaging and Dissemination

Crucial for how this stuff lands is how deferential the Green leadership will be to critics. The Corbyn movement was effectively brought down by its own deference, though it was institutionally so much more vulnerable due to the Labour party factionalism and media outriders.

I really don't think the smear strategy will be anywhere near as politically effective this time round. That said, some people don't help themselves (or the movement) and will always provide low-hanging fruit. Like the guy in the first screenshot.

@iainoverton @Telegraph The anti-Zionist left will not collapse into some impotent and underhand liberal Zionism merely by finding descriptors like "group of Jews" distasteful and unhelpful in the circumstances.

@iainoverton @Telegraph x.com/doctor_rahmeh/… Like, this is the tweet they linked to. The salient fact about the identity of those berating Al-Jazeera journos is not that simply that they are Jewish, but also that (one expects) they express an ideology (a kind of Zionism) which treats AJ so hostile.

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: Green Party activists have described Jewish people as “an abomination to this planet” in a string of anti-Semitic WhatsApp messages, The Telegraph can reveal 🔗: telegraph.co.uk/politics/2026/…

@WhiteHouse Yearning for a safe and legal migration pathway for most Americans to go and stay on the moon.

The goal is not just to reach the Moon, but to stay. 🌘

‘I sat next to an elderly Jewish lady at a recent meeting. We chatted briefly and then I began to read excerpts from my new book in my infamous droidesque monotone drawl… and anyway for some reason she now wants to leave the country’ Matt Goodwin Is a more likely scenario

@RandalHendrick9 @weiss_hadas I have read so many "this paper fills that gap" sentences in my academic life. Going forward, I now want to see "that changes now!" instead. The drama of that remark really underscores how (almost always) inconsequential some apparent research gap is lol.

@weiss_hadas Abstract: “While there a million ‘not your grandma’s librarian pieces,’ none has begun from AI images of sexy horny librarians. That changes now.”

i'm surprised this gap was even formed

Double doon.

@AdamJoseph No wonder he works for/with the Forest fan Brent Di Cesare, then.

If everyone Bruno Fernandes could do what he does, if anyone could do it, they would. Nobody can. Why might that be? Ricky's a bit of a magician himself, it turns out. In 2013 he & his son scammed fans out of more than £600,000, were convicted as touts & didn't end up in prison.

@SevyDC @RuhamaFernandez The psychopathic stare of a man dead behind the eyes.

@RuhamaFernandez Ruhama, don’t be appalled. You’re talking about a woman whose daughter might also be her niece.

As a Cuban refugee and former political prisoner, I am appalled that you and your daughter are supporting the regime that has oppressed us for 67 years. The aid does not reach ordinary Cubans—it is sold in dollar stores—while you help whitewash a dictatorship. Shame on you, and shame on your daughter.