Jay

8.7K posts

Jay banner
Jay

Jay

@Jay002

Fifth Columnist for the ASI 🫡 Anti-censorship 🏴‍☠️ Anti-guardrails ⛓️‍💥 e/acc 📈 Don’t Die 𒉭 AI Art 🎨 Zero Two fan 🕊️

Katılım Mayıs 2019
1.6K Takip Edilen817 Takipçiler
Jay retweetledi
Testlabor
Testlabor@testerlabor·
UX Suggestion to xAI: It would be cool if there was a switch to toggle between standard Grok agents and custom agents. That would simplify things and users wouldn't have to delete custom agents every time.
Testlabor tweet media
English
14
6
70
2.2K
MOMof DataRepublican
MOMof DataRepublican@data_republican·
I used to say, "Google it!" Now I say, "Grok it!"
English
713
929
9K
552.6K
Jay retweetledi
Dustin
Dustin@r0ck3t23·
Jensen Huang just told every AI leader in the room to grow up. Stop scaring the public with science fiction. Start communicating like the weight of civilization is on your shoulders. Because it is. Huang: “AI is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” That single statement dismantles half the panic surrounding this industry. The mainstream conversation is dominated by people projecting human malice onto math. Alien consciousness onto code. Existential dread onto a software architecture we built, we trained, and we can read. Huang: “We say things like, ‘We don’t understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” When builders tell the public they don’t understand their own creation, the public hears threat. The state responds with control. That is already happening. Palihapitiya asked Huang what he would have told Anthropic during their regulatory clash with the Department of Defense. Huang didn’t attack the technology. He attacked the communication. Huang: “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is really terrific. We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” Warning shows risks, mitigation, why upside overwhelms downside. Scaring says we might be building something that destroys us and we can’t stop it. One builds trust. The other invites regulation written in panic. Huang: “To say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there’s no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” Projecting catastrophe without evidence is not caution. It is sabotage. When your technology is embedded in national defense, the financial system, and healthcare infrastructure, your words carry structural weight. If the architects act terrified of their own product, the response is predictable. Governments step in. They restrict. They seize control of something they don’t understand because the builders told them to be afraid. Huang: “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” Most tech founders have not internalized this. You are no longer a startup founder disrupting an industry. You are running infrastructure that nations depend on. Your statements move policy. Your framing shapes legislation. Your tone determines whether governments treat you as partner or threat. Huang: “We have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.” Huang did not ask for silence. He asked for precision. The leaders who cannot tell the difference will not be leading for long.
English
222
260
1.3K
143K
Jay retweetledi
The Conservative Alternative
The Conservative Alternative@OldeWorldOrder·
They're calling it 'The Greatest Community Note In History'
The Conservative Alternative tweet media
English
111
3.3K
27.2K
280.7K
Jay
Jay@Jay002·
@emollick Is this AI or a human response?
English
0
0
1
123
Ethan Mollick
Ethan Mollick@emollick·
These are the most bot-infested my replies have ever been. I counted, and 10%, at most, are human.
English
22
0
69
9.8K
Jay
Jay@Jay002·
@EthanHe_42 While I think they should have given more guidance on how to tailor these (best practices, etc.), I really appreciate how customizable Grok is. With Grok's lower guardrails, better instruction following, and truth-seeking purpose, it truly is the most aligned AI out there.
English
0
0
1
8
Jay
Jay@Jay002·
@svpino It was confirmed a while back that blocking accounts does not affect your own reach.
English
1
0
2
14
Santiago
Santiago@svpino·
75% of the replies I get are now AI slop. I can't block them because I've been told that blocking too many accounts will reduce my reach. I don't block them → they keep spamming me. I block them → fewer humans see my writing. What are we supposed to do?
English
264
8
272
17.7K
Jay
Jay@Jay002·
@DaveShapi I agree. I thought the original beta was much better (and more accurate) than beta 2 and later.
English
0
0
3
324
David Shapiro (L/0)
David Shapiro (L/0)@DaveShapi·
I'm sorry to say that Grok 4.20 has become much more ChatGPT-like in the last week. It gets stuck on "well ackshually" kind of pedantry AND it stops thinking broadly or even searching broadly and just picks a hill to die on. It does the same kind of nonsense that ChatGPT used to (before I deleted my account) where it seems like it really just wants to one-up the user on completely asinine points while deliberately missing the point. This is a massive departure from how Grok 4.20 behaved on launch. I showed a conversation to Claude and even Claude was like "yeah, Grok sort of defeated its own argument but couldn't concede" Pathetic.
English
51
12
202
13.7K
Jay retweetledi
Ejaaz
Ejaaz@cryptopunk7213·
this is a huge deal. massive win for AI labs, founders and builders in the USA. Trump's new AI legal framework doesn't fuck around, gloves are off: - U.S. *does NOT* believe AI trained on copyright material violates copyright theft. MASSIVE win for anthropic, openai who have used copyrighted material. - data centers: full-speed ahead to build them. any increased costs for people should be subsidized. - Trump intends to override state AI laws that create "undue burdens" aka if it prevents USA from beating china - it gets killed. - NO new ai regulators - trump specifically told congress not to spin up further oversight. let the AI spice flow. - no censorship of AI by government. very interesting given the recent pentagon anthropic drama. so basically if you want to build crazy ai shit - the US isn't going to be the one to stop you. huge 180 from their stance last year. amazing work @DavidSacks and whoever else worked on this
Ejaaz tweet media
David Sacks@DavidSacks

In December, President Trump signed an Executive Order tasking us with the development of a national framework for AI, what he called “One Rulebook.” This was in response to a growing patchwork of 50 different state regulatory regimes that threaten to stifle innovation and jeopardize America’s lead in the AI race. Today we are releasing that framework. It will help parents safeguard their children from online harm, shield communities from higher electric bills, protect our First Amendment rights from AI censorship, and ensure that all Americans benefit from this transformative technology. We look forward to working with our colleagues in Congress to turn the principles we are announcing today into legislation. whitehouse.gov/articles/2026/…

English
127
214
1.7K
155.9K
Jay
Jay@Jay002·
@mark_k @xai A Perplexity Computer equivalent?
English
1
0
4
1.1K
Jay retweetledi
Autism Capital 🧩
Autism Capital 🧩@AutismCapital·
Okay the fanfiction is going crazy. We're shipping Trump and Takaichi. Trumpichi. 💕🌸
Autism Capital 🧩 tweet media
English
369
1.7K
19.4K
852.2K
Jay
Jay@Jay002·
@elder_plinius To be fair, it’s probably the other aliens.
English
0
0
2
145
Jay
Jay@Jay002·
@Tesla @FoxNews Amazing how easy it is to refute fake news like this now. Go Tesla!
English
0
0
1
137
Fox News
Fox News@FoxNews·
'TERRIFYING': Dashcam video shows the moment a Tesla Cybertruck, allegedly operating in self-driving mode, nearly sent a Houston mom and her infant off a bridge before violently crashing into an overpass barrier. The woman claims she suffered multiple injuries from the incident and is now suing the automaker for $1 million.
English
3.2K
2.2K
14.1K
6.3M
Jay
Jay@Jay002·
@elonmusk It's been wrong a lot since the Beta 2 update, or it just doesn't get the core of what's being asked. Customizing the agents is a lot of fun, though.
English
0
0
1
18
Jay
Jay@Jay002·
@mark_k Strange, especially when they offer a paid feature to enhance your post with Grok.
English
0
0
2
26
Mark Kretschmann
Mark Kretschmann@mark_k·
I think X might nerf posts containing emdash characters. Today I made a post that contained one emdash, and the post tanked. Then I deleted the post, and posted the exact same thing again but without the emdash, and it did much better. Perhaps some kind of bot filter? 🤷‍♂️
English
38
8
99
5.5K
Jay retweetledi
hourly_Hina
hourly_Hina@love_you_young·
hourly_Hina tweet media
ZXX
0
48
1.8K
33.4K