J 🌑

Hyperliquid, the decentralized crypto exchange that has emerged as one of the most active trading venues in digital assets, is proposing to add prediction markets to its platform — a direct challenge to Kalshi and Polymarket bloomberg.com/news/articles/…

@CoinbaseSG @BaseinSG Base!

Let’s take flight to the next riddle! ✈️ Hint: It’s a speedy crypto layer. 5 winners will be chosen to win S$200 BTC and a Coinbase Merlion Pudgy! → Follow @CoinbaseSG @BaseinSG → RT + comment your guess 🔔 Open to existing Coinbase Singapore users. Giveaway ends 12/8/25.

1/ Some thoughts on the new MAS consultation response that pretty much everyone has been asking me about lately. TLDR: Targeted at closing a loophole exploited by some CEXes, custodians and MMs. Builders/LabsCos are ok but some things to look out for due to broad language.

I came 479th on @infinex's Season Zero Yaprun leaderboard, and I just claimed my airdrop of 15,384 µPatrons. Honestly I wasn't even expecting anything, so this was a nice surprise. Thanks @infinex!

@0xdune2000 Hell yes please give us Swidge Hero

Wait, you guys actually want this...?

I'm proud to introduce Swidge V3.0 to @infinex I took all of your feedback on board to build the next generation of swidging. This was your most requested feature.

@ben_kurrek Hyperliquid is the answer

I heard rumours of a new chain being added to Infinex.... Any guesses? It's going to be BIG.

@ben_kurrek Yes, but getting harder to earn with all the competition

Anyone earned any bulls on Bullrun? Testing something for Infinex.

@ben_kurrek 1. Fast execution, very decent rates. 2. Not being able to swidge smaller amounts eg <$1 worth of tokens to clear annoying dust from vaults or wallets. If there's a default / 'last resort' swidge option available eh swidge $0.37 of ENA to XGP or uPatron that'll be cool.

I'm building Swidge V3 and want to get you involved, so 1. What do you like about Swidge? 2. What annoys you about Swidge? Reply with your answers. I'll take all your feedback into account. The best products are built with the community. Infinex

@ben_kurrek @infinex (3) works best imo, no funds actually leave the wallet but gets reserved (further transfers of the same token will just be less of the amount reserved). I would prefer to know what my amount reserved is rather than have funds keep leaving my wallet for no discernable reason.

📢 Calling all @infinex patrons, we need your opinions! We're thinking of a few different ways to deal with gas costs with Infinex Connect. Let me know your favourite of the 3. 🧵1/4

@ramboINX I'm not a bot yo Infinex

Not a fan of bots engagement farming the infinex kaito campaign, we want it to be fair. If you are not a bot comment "i'm not a bot yo" i'm creating a list.. Infinex

1/ Just realized that the Coindesk article released the full versions of (a) the contract I termed 'possibly the worst agreement I have ever seen' and (b) the agreement I drafted. Perfect opportunity to explain legal v commercial terms, and demonstrate the role of foundations.

@infinex_app Gm infinex

Gm to all my real (human) yappers ☀️

YAP for Infinex

@0xdune2000 Hyperliquid EVM please!

What yield opportunities would you want most on Infinex?

@infinex_app 1) what

First 500 to react. Go

Hyperliquid was the best airdrop of 2024, HyperEVM could be the best of 2025🪂 Today, I'm sharing my full farming strategy, including my tier list of the best protocols to farm 1- @hyperlendx S-tier protocol, the main lending market of HyperEVM, they already catched +50m of tvl within 2 weeks, just from $HYPE deposits @hyperlendx have a points system, that gives a certain number of points every week based on protocol usage (supplying + borrowing) Toto's strategy: I'm max supplying all my $HYPE, then borrowing 75% of my supplied amount using e-mode. This way I can have full exposure to @hyperlendx while farming other protocols with my borrowed $HYPE 2- @felixprotocol Liquity fork of HyperEVM, which allow you to mint $feUSD using $HYPE as collateral. Another HyperEVM top tier protocol, they already catched +80m$ TVL in 2 weeks Points program started 2 days ago, and will reward usage of the protocol Toto's strategy: I'm minting feUSD using my borrowed $HYPE from @hyperlendx , and also bought some feUSD. Then I put everything into the stability pool. Stability pool currently print 4% APR, but allow you to buy some $HYPE at a huge discount when people are liquidated 3- @HyperSwapX @HyperSwapX is currently the second dex of HyperEVM in terms of TVL, while the first one is @KittenswapHype Problem is that Kittenswap airdrop is in veKitten, which means you will have to sell at a huge discount to be liquid. Thats why I prefer farming @HyperSwapX, and I'm pretty sure they will become top 1 dex of HyperEVM with time They also have a points program, giving each week a fixed amount of points to users. Toto's strategy: I'm supplying into KEI (@KeikoFinance) / USDXL (@HypurrFi) / feUSD (@felixprotocol) stablecoins pools. APR is not great, but this allow you to do 3-in-1 points farming (2 stablecoins + @HyperSwapX) 4 - @hyperbeat x @mizulabs Hyperbeat and Mizu recently launched vaults to farm most projects of HyperEVM without the headaches. Vaults are powered by @veda_labs, so it should be pretty safe to deposit Liquidity will be deployed across all protocols using @roycoprotocol, a bit like what berachain did with Boyco. As of now there are 4 vaults available: - $USD - $BTC - $ETH - $HYPE Toto's strategy: I didn't deposited, as I prefer to choose what I'm farming, but for those who wants an HyperEVM exposure without spending time digging projects, this is imo the best opportunity. I'm also keeping an eye on @silhouette_ex and @ValantisLabs, but I'm waiting for more details about points to start farming Important: Most projects are playing the HL playbook, giving a fixed number of points every week based on protocol usage, which means the earlier you are, the more points you get. Airdrop percentage should also follow what Hyperliquid did, and I wouldn't be surprised if some of the projects mentioned above give 20% or 30% airdrop.

@infinex_app Swidge

Swidge Say it back

This is batshit insane, no other way to call it. We now have the first attempt by the White House—specifically by Steve Miran, the Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers—to justify the tariffs based on economic "theory", and it's without a doubt the most dishonest piece of economic reading that's I've ever had the misfortune to lay my eyes upon. The gist of Miran's argument is to reposition the global reserve currency status of the dollar not as an exorbitant privilege (as erstwhile French President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing once characterized it), but as somehow a "burden" that the rest of the world needs to compensate the US for bearing. As Miran explains it, having the dollar as a reserve currency "has caused persistent currency distortions and contributed, along with other countries’ unfair barriers to trade, to unsustainable trade deficits" which "have decimated our manufacturing sector." So he wants to give up the reserve currency status of the dollar, right? Wrong. He wants to have it both ways. He says that America's "financial dominance cannot be taken for granted; and the Trump Administration is determined to preserve [it]" but this same financial dominance "comes at a cost" and "other nations" need to pay for it. And he means this literally. He made a list of what exactly he means by "burden sharing" and one of the forms it can take is countries "simply writ[ing] checks to Treasury that help us finance global public goods." Let's pause a moment here to contemplate the sheer insanity of this: the U.S. is literally suggesting that countries should mail checks to the US Treasury as tribute for the 'privilege' of maintaining the dollar as a global reserve currency, when it is this very reserve status of the dollar that is the cornerstone of US power. It's the equivalent of Samson asking everyone to pay him to keep his hair. Because that's what Miran is conveniently not mentioning in his text. The reason Giscard d'Estaing called it an "exorbitant privilege" is that it allows the U.S. to quite literally have its way of life subsidized by the rest of the world. Miran (and Trump) complain about the trade deficits, but they are the very manifestation of this subsidization: countries normally cannot run a permanent trade deficit because they'd one day face a balance of payments crisis. It's like a private individual: you cannot indefinitely buy more from others than what you yourself earn. At some point you'll have to pay up. Unless, that is, you're the issuer of the currency everyone uses, in which case the normal rules of economic gravity are suspended. While other nations must balance their books eventually, the dollar's reserve status gives America the unique ability to consume more than it produces perpetually, with the world eagerly accepting dollars that cost nothing to create in exchange for real goods and services. That's not a "burden", it very much is an "exorbitant privilege". So yes, sure, because America can effectively buy most of what it needs from the rest of the world for "free" (by printing dollars), this situation doesn't exactly create incentives to do the hard work of manufacturing goods domestically. But framing this as other countries taking advantage of America rather than America taking advantage of its currency dominance is an astonishing inversion of reality. And even more astonishing is Miran's ask that countries now compensate the U.S. for this. Some people mention that it's like asking vassals for tribute but it's actually even worse than this. The tribute is already embedded in the global reserve currency status of the dollar: other countries work hard for the U.S. while they can just issue IOUs that never come due. What Miran is thus proposing is effectively demanding vassals make payments for the privilege of already making payments—a double tribute system where countries first subsidize American living standards by accepting dollars as reserves, and then must pay an additional fee for the 'burden' this supposedly places on the US. Miran's piece is replete with other complete inversions of reality. For instance, he now blames China for the 2008 crash because "their holdings of U.S. mortgage debt helped fuel the housing bubble, forcing hundreds of billions of dollars of credit into the housing sector without regard as to whether the investments made sense." Anyone with even a rudimentary knowledge of the 2008 financial crisis would have their breath taken away by such brazen revisionism. Not only is the crisis universally known to have been caused by US regulatory failures and the reckless securitization of subprime mortgages by Wall Street firms, but China in this instance literally saved U.S. markets from complete meltdown after Hank Paulson personally appealed to Beijing to continue purchasing US Treasury bonds during the height of the crisis, which they did. To now blame them for the very crisis they helped mitigate and played no part in creating is beyond dishonest—it's gaslighting on a geopolitical scale. All in all, it's clear what the US is trying to achieve here, they effectively want to have their cake and eat it. They want to keep the privilege and want the rest of the world to pay for the downsides that come with it. Which means we're truly at a crossroad in history where nations must make an immensely consequential choice: acquiesce to this insane double tribute system or stand against it. There are very few precedents in world history for such a nakedly exploitative power play, but history is very clear on two things: submitting to extortion only invites more of it, and collective resistance is the only effective response.

@infinex_app Nowhere to go but here

Reply guys. Lock in.