jdx

552 posts

jdx banner
jdx

jdx

@jdxcode

I make dev tools. I love CLIs. https://t.co/VVNmJX4LVt

Dallas, TX Katılım Temmuz 2006
1.2K Takip Edilen2.9K Takipçiler
jdx
jdx@jdxcode·
@neogoose_btw I’m not sure I mind when my users do this. I think hearing what an agent has to say is often a lot more useful to me than an (understandably) clueless user
English
0
0
4
681
jdx
jdx@jdxcode·
@DanielLockyer Gemini seems particularly dumb about this
English
2
0
6
1.4K
Daniel Lockyer
Daniel Lockyer@DanielLockyer·
one of the most frustrating things about AI review bots: outdated knowledge
Daniel Lockyer tweet media
English
47
20
1.1K
59K
jdx
jdx@jdxcode·
@pepicrft Thanks for giving it a go!
English
0
0
0
86
jdx
jdx@jdxcode·
@nateberkopec this seems to be the consensus! I'm glad I asked because it's not what I expected
English
0
0
3
114
Nate Berkopec
Nate Berkopec@nateberkopec·
@jdxcode idk man especially these days where I can be like “hey Claude just mirror all my package json tasks in Mise” it’s not a huge bonus
English
1
0
0
762
jdx
jdx@jdxcode·
I've been tempted for a long time to make mise natively capable of running package.json tasks, e.g: `mise run test`. My hesitation is I don't want it to be capable of really any other task definition and users will expect that.
English
8
1
28
3.9K
Alexey Zhokhov
Alexey Zhokhov@donbeave·
@jdxcode Because just supports subdirectory tasks, unless I’m missing that feature in mise?
English
1
0
0
33
jdx
jdx@jdxcode·
@donbeave just is great, but I don't know why I would use just instead of mise tasks?
English
1
0
0
81
Alexey Zhokhov
Alexey Zhokhov@donbeave·
@jdxcode How about using just that? That’s what I’m currently using, but I’d be happy to switch it out for mise.
English
1
0
0
85
jdx
jdx@jdxcode·
@davidlormor Yeah, I think plugins may be the right answer here. mise can provide the task layer, while a Rails/Pitchfork plugin could auto-define the obvious project tasks instead of making every app hand-write the same glue.
English
0
0
0
99
David Lormor
David Lormor@davidlormor·
@jdxcode I’ve been pondering this lately - I’ve got a “monorepo” that’s a mix of TypeScript, Ruby, Terraform, etc. (it’s a Rails app…). Mise/Pitchfork would be great for a unified interface for dev environments, but I’m still tinkering with the best way to handle it…
English
1
0
1
145
jdx
jdx@jdxcode·
@rob_ferney Totally fair to prefer ecosystem task runners, but tasks have been a core feature in mise since 2023 and a lot of users really like them.
English
1
0
1
65
Robert Ferney
Robert Ferney@rob_ferney·
@jdxcode If anything, Making a second utility that mise can install to handle tasks could be a thing.. sous as a name comes to mind if you want to keep with the cooking theme 😀
English
1
0
0
74
jdx
jdx@jdxcode·
@rob_ferney this sounds more like you don't think mise should have tasks at all?
English
2
0
0
217
Robert Ferney
Robert Ferney@rob_ferney·
@jdxcode Clean separation of concerns. Mise does its job very well! Let the apps that mise manages do the tasks.
English
1
0
4
245
jdx
jdx@jdxcode·
@pepicrft @tuistdev yes aube is being too strict, will be patched in today's release
English
0
0
0
33
Pedro Piñera
Pedro Piñera@pepicrft·
@jdxcode @tuistdev We can add the field if that's the issue, but you might want to align with the conventional behavior (if there's any?)
Pedro Piñera tweet media
English
1
0
0
58
jdx
jdx@jdxcode·
@just_be_dev a bit of a cop-out, but yeah, that's the other option here
English
0
0
1
200
jdx
jdx@jdxcode·
@anthonysheww cheat away! I'm sure I took some turborepo ideas and made it part of mise tasks—this is how users get great products!
English
0
0
3
73
Anthony Shew
Anthony Shew@anthonysheww·
@jdxcode Just reading about aube now - very cool! Was looking to put this exact same behavior into Turborepo, so glad to have some notes to cheat off of. 😄
English
1
0
0
75
Anthony Shew
Anthony Shew@anthonysheww·
@jdxcode The pnpm guide is describing the default behavior. It’s explaining that behavior in the context of worktrees to be helpful for users who don’t immediately make the connection. 😄
English
1
0
0
257
Colin Armstrong
Colin Armstrong@colinarms·
I somehow ended up with 1TB worth of node_modules in my @conductor_build git worktree folders because every fresh worktree does a `yarn install` What's the solution here? Yarn hardlinks, yarn PnP, move to pnpm, etc?
Colin Armstrong tweet media
English
10
0
19
16.9K
jdx
jdx@jdxcode·
I think I need to get the world onto github.com/suzuki-shunsuk… Long-lived gh tokens with agentic workflows should be like running your services over http.
English
1
6
30
3.4K